Figshare
open access
CC BY 4.0
Table 1_Debating for persuasion versus debating for deliberation: the effect of differing communicative goals on disciplinary knowledge construction.docx
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Meta‐regresses and the limits of persuasive argumentation#17561
- How Different Discussion Formats Shape Political Disagreement Between Citizens: Comparing Low and High Cue Interactions#16214
- Multi-Granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts#679224
- Large Language Models in Resolving Contextual Knowledge Conflicts#925511
- Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation#761322
Record · ID 464148
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive