Conceptio › Archive › Europe PMC
Europe PMC open access CC BY 4.0

Academic Publishing as a Complex System

Varga T et al. · europe_pmc
Europe PMC · Papers · License: CC BY 4.0
Open Source ↗
biomedicallife-science
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

Academic Publishing as a Complex System | Research Square Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Academic Publishing as a Complex System Tibor Varga, Jeroen Uleman, Stéphane Tuffier, Morten Hulvej Rod, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8948694/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Academic publishing is facing growing concerns related to reproducibility, peer review, and accessibility, yet proposed reforms have produced limited systemic change. We examined academic publishing as a complex adaptive system by conducting a thematic analysis of stakeholder interviews, developing a Causal Loop Diagram, and using the Action Scales Model to identify potential leverage points. From 13 stakeholder interviews, we synthesized nine interrelated challenges and mapped structural drivers and feedback loops shaping the system. Reinforcing dynamics linking prestige, evaluation metrics, and commercial incentives appear to sustain high publication volumes and constrain individual agency, even when dysfunction is widely recognized. Event-level actions were largely limited to transparency measures, whereas greater leverage emerged at the levels of system structures, goals, and beliefs. Applying this framework to the reproducibility, peer review, and accessibility crises illustrates how tensions are maintained. These findings highlight the value of complex systems approaches for understanding institutional behaviour and guiding coordinated change. Humanities/Complex networks Scientific community and society/Scientific community/Publishing Scientific community and society/Scientific community/Careers Social science/Complex networks Scientific community and society/Scientific community/Funding Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files SupplementalMaterial.pdf Supplemental Material Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Related documents

Record · ID 4958 · SHA-256 e245472c36d260ae
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive