ConceptioArchiveCode of Federal Regulations (eCFR)
Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)public full text

12 CFR Part 302 — Regulations Governing Bank Supervision

Office of the Federal Register (NARA) · Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR, Office of the Federal Register)
Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) · Legal · License: Public Domain
Open Source ↗
united states, us regulation, us federal regulation, code of federal regulations, cfr, federal regulation, 12, 302, part 302, 12 cfr 302, 12 cfr part 302, banks, and, banking, federal deposit insurance corporation, procedure and rules of practice

PART 302—REGULATIONS GOVERNING BANK SUPERVISION Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 12 U.S.C. 1818, 1819(a) (Seventh and Tenth), 1831p-1. Source: 86 FR 12085, Mar. 2, 2021, unless otherwise noted. Subpart A—Use of Supervisory Guidance § 302.1 Purpose. The FDIC issues regulations and guidance as part of its supervisory function. This subpart reiterates the distinctions between regulations and guidance, as stated in the Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance (appendix A to this part) (Statement). § 302.2 Implementation of the Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance. The Statement describes the official policy of the FDIC with respect to the use of supervisory guidance in the supervisory process. The Statement is binding on the FDIC. § 302.3 Rule of construction. This subpart does not alter the legal status of guidelines authorized by statute, including but not limited to, 12 U.S.C. 1831p-1, to create binding legal obligations. Subpart B—Prohibition on Use of Reputation Risk by Regulators Source: 91 FR 18293, Apr. 10, 2026, unless otherwise noted. § 302.100 Prohibitions. (a) The FDIC will not criticize, formally or informally, or take adverse action against an institution on the basis of reputation risk. (b) The FDIC will not require, instruct, or encourage an institution, or any employee of an institution, to: (1) Refrain from contracting or doing business with a third party, including an institution-affiliated party, on the basis of reputation risk; (2) Terminate a contract or discontinue doing business with a third party, including an institution-affiliated party, on the basis of reputation risk; (3) Sign a contract or initiate doing business with a third-party, including an institution-affiliated party, on the basis of reputation risk; or (4) Modify the terms or conditions under which it contracts or does business with a third party, including an institution-affiliated party, on the basis of reputation risk. (c) The FDIC will not require, instruct, or encourage an institution, or any employee of an institution, to terminate a contract with, discontinue doing business with, sign a contract with, initiate doing business with, modify the terms under which it will do business with a person or entity, or take any action or refrain from taking any action on the basis of the person's or entity's political, social, cultural, or religious views or beliefs, constitutionally protected speech, or solely on the basis of the person's or entity's involvement in politically disfavored but lawful business activities perceived to present reputation risk. (d) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section only apply to actions taken on the bases described in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, and the prohibition in paragraph (c) of this section shall not apply with respect to persons, entities, or jurisdictions sanctioned by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. (e) Nothing in this section shall restrict the FDIC's authority to implement, administer, and enforce the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code. (f) The FDIC will not take any supervisory action or other adverse action against an institution, a group of institutions, or the institution-affiliated parties of any institution that is designed to punish or discourage an individual or group from engaging in any lawful political, social, cultural, or religious activities, constitutionally protected speech, or, for political reasons, lawful business activities that the FDIC or any of its personnel disagrees with or disfavors. (g) Definitions. Adverse action (i) Any negative feedback delivered by or on behalf of the FDIC to the supervised institution, including in a report of examination or a formal or informal enforcement action; (ii) A downgrade, or contribution to a downgrade, of any supervisory rating, including, but not limited to: (A) Any rating under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or any comparable rating system); (B) Any rating under the Uniform Interagency Consumer Compliance Rating System; (C) Any rating under the Uniform Rating System for Information Technology; (D) Any rating under any other rating system; (iii) A denial of a filing pursuant to Part 303 of the FDIC's regulations; (iv) Inclusion of a condition on a deposit insurance application or other approval; (v) Imposition of additional approval requirements; (vi) Any other heightened requirements on an activity or change; (vii) Any adjustment of the institution's capital requirement; and (viii) Any action that negatively impacts the institution, or an institution-affiliated party, or treats the institution differently than similarly situated peers. Doing business with (i) The bank providing any product or service, including account services; (ii) The bank contracting with a third party for the third party to provide a product or service; (iii) The bank providing discounted or free products or services to customers or third parties, including charitable activities; (iv) The bank entering into, maintaining, modifying, or terminating an employment relationship; or (v) Any other similar business activity that involves a bank client or a third party. Institution Institution-affiliated party Reputation risk Appendix A to Part 302—Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance The FDIC is issuing this statement to explain the role of supervisory guidance and to describe the FDIC's approach to supervisory guidance. Difference Between Supervisory Guidance and Laws or Regulations The FDIC issues various types of supervisory guidance, including interagency statements, advisories, policy statements, questions and answers, and frequently asked questions, to its supervised institutions. A law or regulation has the force and effect of law. 1 1 Ongoing Efforts To Clarify the Role of Supervisory Guidance The FDIC is clarifying the following policies and practices related to supervisory guidance: • The FDIC intends to limit the use of numerical thresholds or other “bright-lines” in describing expectations in supervisory guidance. Where numerical thresholds are used, the FDIC intends to clarify that the thresholds are exemplary only and not suggestive of requirements. The FDIC will continue to use numerical thresholds to tailor, and otherwise make clear, the applicability of supervisory guidance or programs to supervised institutions, and as required by statute. • Examiners will not criticize through supervisory recommendations (including matters requiring board attention) a supervised financial institution for, and the FDIC will not issue an enforcement action on the basis of, a “violation” of or “non-compliance” with supervisory guidance. In some situations, examiners may reference (including in writing) supervisory guidance to provide examples of safe and sound conduct, appropriate consumer protection and risk management practices, and other actions for addressing compliance with laws or regulations. • Supervisory criticisms should continue to be specific as to practices, operations, financial conditions, or other matters that could have a negative effect on the safety and soundness of the financial institution, could cause consumer harm, or could cause violations of laws, regulations, final agency orders, or other legally enforceable conditions. • The FDIC also has at times sought, and may continue to seek, public comment on supervisory guidance. Seeking public comment on supervisory guidance does not mean that the guidance is intended to be a regulation or have the force and effect of law. The comment process helps the FDIC to improve its understanding of an issue, to gather information on institutions' risk management practices, or to seek ways to achieve a supervisory objective most effectively and with the least burden on institutions. • The FDIC will aim to reduce the issuance of multiple supervisory guidance documents on the same topic and will generally limit such multiple issuances going forward. The FDIC will continue efforts to make the role of supervisory guidance clear in communications to examiners and to supervised financial institutions and encourage supervised institutions with questions about this statement or any applicable supervisory guidance to discuss the questions with their appropriate agency contact.

Related documents

Record · ID 505360 · SHA-256 5d271f37a38c6c69
Retrieved via Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.