ConceptioArchiveCode of Federal Regulations (eCFR)
Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)public full text

42 CFR Part 8 — Medications for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

Office of the Federal Register (NARA) · Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR, Office of the Federal Register)
Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) · Legal · License: Public Domain
Open Source ↗
departmentofhealthandhumanservicesgeneralprovisionshealthpart8public
united states, us regulation, us federal regulation, code of federal regulations, cfr, federal regulation, 42, 8, part 8, 42 cfr 8, 42 cfr part 8, public, health, public health service, department of health and human services, general provisions

PART 8—MEDICATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID USE DISORDER Authority: 21 U.S.C. 823; 42 U.S.C. 257a, 290aa(d), 290dd-2, 300x-23, 300x-27(a), 300y-11. Source: 89 FR 7549, Feb. 2, 2024, unless otherwise noted. Subpart A—General Provisions § 8.1 Scope. (a) Scope. (b) Severability. §thnsp;8.2 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this part: Accreditation Body “the Body” Accreditation Body application Accreditation elements Accreditation survey Accredited OTP Behavioral health services e.g., Care plan Certification Certification application Certified opioid treatment program Comprehensive treatment Conditional certification Continuous medication treatment Dispense Diversion control plan Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards For-cause inspection Harm reduction Individualized dose Interim treatment Long-term care facilities Medical director Medication for Opioid Use Disorder MOUD Medication unit Nationally recognized evidence-based guidelines Opioid Treatment Program OTP Opioid Treatment Program certification Opioid Use Disorder Opioid Use Disorder treatment Patient, Physical and behavioral health services e.g., Practitioner, Program sponsor Recovery support services (1) Recovery (2) Recovery support services Split dosing State Opioid Treatment Authority (SOTA) Telehealth telemedicine, for purposes of this part, Withdrawal management Subpart B—Accreditation of Opioid Treatment Programs § 8.3 Application for approval as an Accreditation Body. (a) Eligibility. (b) Application for initial approval. https://dpt2.samhsa.gov/sma163/. (c) Application for renewal of approval. (1) At least 9 months before the date of expiration of an Accreditation Body's term of approval, the Body shall inform the Secretary in writing of its intent to seek renewal. (2) The Secretary will notify the applicant of the relevant information, materials, and supporting documentation required under paragraph (b) of this section that the applicant shall submit as part of the renewal procedure. (3) At least 3 months before the date of expiration of the Accreditation Body's term of approval, the applicant shall send to the Secretary electronically a renewal application containing the information, materials, and supporting documentation requested by the Secretary under paragraph (c)(2) of this section. (4) An Accreditation Body that does not intend to renew its approval shall so notify the Secretary at least 9 months before the expiration of the Body's term of approval. (d) Rulings on applications for initial approval or renewal of approval. (2) If the Secretary determines that the applicant does not substantially meet the requirements set forth in this subpart, the Secretary will notify the applicant of the deficiencies in the application and request that the applicant resolve such deficiencies within 90 days of receipt of the notice. If the deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of the Secretary within the 90-day time period, the Body will be approved as an Accreditation Body. If the deficiencies have not been resolved to the satisfaction of the Secretary within the 90-day time period, the application for approval as an Accreditation Body will be denied. (3) If the Secretary does not reach a final decision on a renewal application before the expiration of an Accreditation Body's term of approval, the approval will be deemed extended until the Secretary reaches a final decision, unless an Accreditation Body does not rectify deficiencies in the application within the specified time period, as required in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (e) Relinquishment of approval. (f) Notification. (1) Transfer copies of records and other related information as required by the Secretary to a location, including another Accreditation Body, and according to a schedule approved by the Secretary; and (2) Notify, in a manner and time period approved by the Secretary, all OTPs accredited or seeking accreditation by the Body that the Body will no longer have approval to provide accreditation services. (g) Term of approval. (h) State, territorial, or Indian Tribe Accreditation Bodies. [89 FR 7549, Feb. 2, 2024, as amended at 91 FR 8382, Feb. 23, 2026] § 8.4 Accreditation Body responsibilities. (a) Accreditation surveys and for cause inspections. (2) Accreditation Bodies must agree to conduct for-cause inspections upon the request of the Secretary. (3) Accreditation decisions shall be fully consistent with the policies and procedures submitted as part of the approved Accreditation Body application. (b) Response to noncompliant programs. (i) Provide written notice to the OTP that identifies each area of non-compliance, categorizes each non-compliant condition as either “minor” or “significant” as determined by the Accrediting Body, and requires the OTP to take corrective action to address the area(s) of non-compliance within a schedule, not to exceed 180 days, that the Accrediting Body deems appropriate based on the severity of the non-compliant conditions; and (ii) Provide the Secretary with a copy of the written notice required under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section. (2) Once an Accreditation Body provides an OTP with the notice described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, it shall verify the implementation of the corrective measures by the OTP within the specified schedule. Within 30 days following the last day of the specified schedule, the Accreditation Body shall provide written notice to the Secretary regarding whether the OTP has implemented the corrective measures. (3) OTPs that are meeting the requirements of § 8.12, but are only required to correct minor non-compliant conditions shall be granted a three-year accreditation, beginning from the end date of the current and expiring accreditation period. Minor non-compliant conditions, found at the time of the survey that are not resolved, as determined by the Accreditation Body, within the OTP's three-year accreditation period and that remain areas of non-compliance during the OTP's subsequent three-year accreditation renewal survey, shall automatically be categorized as “significant” non-compliant conditions for purposes of the renewal survey and must be corrected in accordance with paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section. (4) OTPs that are required to correct significant non-compliant conditions shall be granted a one-year accreditation, beginning from the end date of the current and expiring accreditation period. An OTP's accreditation must be revoked if it fails to correct significant non-compliant conditions within the schedule provided under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section. If an Accrediting Body verifies that an OTP has corrected the significant non-compliant conditions identified within the specified schedule, it shall extend the OTP's accreditation period by an additional two years. (5) In cases of severe non-compliance with the requirements of § 8.12 that pose immediate risks to patient health and safety, the Accreditation Body shall inform the OTP and Secretary within 48 hours and provide a detailed written report of the non-compliance within 5 business days. The Accreditation Body shall give the OTP 30 days from the date of the non-compliance report to correct the non-compliance issue(s). A follow-up survey shall be conducted by the Accreditation Body within 30 days of the expected correction date to ensure successful remediation. Should the OTP not rectify the non-compliance within the 30-day period, the Accreditation Body shall revoke the OTP's accreditation. The Secretary will then make a decision regarding the OTP's certification in accordance with the procedures under § 8.13. (c) Recordkeeping. (2) Accreditation Bodies shall establish procedures to protect confidential information collected or received in their role as Accreditation Bodies that are consistent with, and that are designed to ensure compliance with, all Federal and State laws, including 42 CFR part 2. (i) Information collected or received for the purpose of carrying out Accreditation Body responsibilities shall not be used for any other purpose or disclosed, other than to the Secretary or its duly designated representatives, unless otherwise required by law or with the consent of the OTP. (ii) Nonpublic information that the Secretary shares with the Accreditation Body concerning an OTP shall not be further disclosed except with the written permission of the Secretary. (d) Reporting. (2) Accreditation Bodies shall submit a summary of the results of each accreditation survey to the Secretary within 90 days following the survey visit. Such summaries shall contain sufficient detail to justify the accreditation action taken. (3) Accreditation Bodies shall provide the Secretary a list of each OTP surveyed, and the identity of all individuals involved in the conducting and reporting of survey results. (4) Accreditation Bodies shall submit to the Secretary the name of each OTP for which the Accreditation Body accredits conditionally, denies, suspends, or revokes accreditation, and the basis for the action, within 48 hours of the action. (5) Notwithstanding any reports made to the Secretary under paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this section, each Accreditation Body shall submit to the Secretary semiannually, on January 15 and July 15 of each calendar year, a report consisting of a summary of the results of each accreditation survey conducted in the past year. The summary shall contain sufficient detail to justify each accreditation action taken. (6) All reporting requirements listed in this section shall be provided to the Secretary at the address specified in § 8.3(b). (e) Complaint response. (f) Modifications of accreditation elements. i.e., (g) Conflicts of interest. (h) Accreditation teams. (i) The dispensing and administration of medications subject to control under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (ii) Medical issues relating to the dosing and administration of MOUD for the treatment of OUD; (iii) Psychosocial counseling of individuals receiving OUD treatment; and (iv) Organizational and administrative issues associated with OTPs. (2) Members of the accreditation team must be able to recuse themselves at any time from any survey in which either they or the OTP believes there is an actual conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. Conflict or perceived conflict of interest must be documented by the Accreditation Body and made available to the Secretary. (i) Accreditation fees. (1) The Accreditation Body shall make public its fee structure, including those factors, if any, contributing to variations in fees for different OTPs. (2) At the Secretary's request, Accreditation Bodies shall provide to the Secretary financial records or other materials, in a manner specified by the Secretary, to assist in assessing the reasonableness of Accreditation Body fees. § 8.5 Periodic evaluation of Accreditation Bodies. The Secretary will periodically evaluate the performance of Accreditation Bodies primarily by inspecting a selected sample of the OTPs accredited by the Accrediting Body, and by evaluating the Accreditation Body's reports of surveys conducted, to determine whether the OTPs surveyed and accredited by the Accreditation Body are in compliance with applicable standards under this part. The evaluation will include a determination of whether there are major deficiencies in the Accreditation Body's performance that, if not corrected, would warrant withdrawal of the approval of the Accreditation Body under § 8.6. § 8.6 Withdrawal of approval of Accreditation Bodies. If the Secretary determines that an Accreditation Body is not in substantial compliance with this subpart, the Secretary shall take appropriate action as follows: (a) Major deficiencies. (1) In the event of a major deficiency, the Secretary shall notify the Accreditation Body of the agency's action and the grounds on which the approval was withdrawn. (2) An Accreditation Body that has lost its approval shall notify each OTP that has been accredited or is seeking accreditation that the Accreditation Body's approval has been withdrawn. Such notification shall be made within a time period and in a manner approved by the Secretary. (b) Minor deficiencies. (1) If the Secretary places an Accreditation Body on probationary status, the Body shall notify all OTPs that have been accredited, or that are seeking accreditation, of the Accreditation Body's probationary status within a time period and in a manner approved by the Secretary. (2) Probationary status will remain in effect until such time as the Body can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary that it has successfully implemented or is implementing the corrective action plan within the established schedule, and the corrective actions taken have substantially eliminated all identified problems. (3) If the Secretary determines that an Accreditation Body that has been placed on probationary status is not implementing corrective actions satisfactorily or within the established schedule, the Secretary may withdraw approval of the Accreditation Body. The Accreditation Body shall notify all OTPs that have been accredited, or are seeking accreditation, of the Accreditation Body's loss of the Secretary's approval within a time period and in a manner approved by the Secretary. (c) Reapplication. (2) If the Secretary determines that the new application demonstrates that the Body satisfactorily has addressed the causes of its previous unacceptable performance, the Secretary may reinstate approval of the Accreditation Body. (3) The Secretary may request additional information or establish additional conditions that must be met before the Secretary approves the reapplication. (4) The Secretary may refuse to accept an application from a former Accreditation Body whose approval was withdrawn because of fraud, material false statement, or willful disregard of public health. (d) Hearings. Subpart C—Certification and Treatment Standards for Opioid Treatment Programs § 8.11 Opioid Treatment Program certification. (a) General. (2) To obtain certification from the Secretary, an OTP must meet the Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards in § 8.12, must be the subject of a current, valid accreditation by an Accreditation Body or other entity designated by the Secretary and must comply with any other conditions for certification established by the Secretary. (3) OTPs are expected to maintain certification with the Secretary and to comply with any other conditions for certification established by the Secretary. Certification shall be granted for a term not to exceed 3 years, except that certification may be renewed during the final certification year if the OTP applies for certification renewal in accordance with the steps outlined in paragraph (a)(4) of this section. (4) OTPs which satisfy the criteria for certification under this section may apply for renewal of their certification. OTPs are expected to apply for certification renewal during the final year of the OTP's certification period. OTPs should take steps to ensure that administrative tasks associated with renewal are completed before the OTP's certification expires. OTPs may apply for certification renewal in accordance with the procedures as outlined in paragraph (b) of this section. If an OTP anticipates any delays in routine certification renewal, an extension may be requested by submitting to the Secretary a statement justifying the extension in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. (5) OTPs that are certified and are seeking certification renewal, and who have been granted accreditation for 1 year by an Accreditation Body as provided under § 8.4(b), may receive a conditional certification for one year unless the Secretary determines that such conditional certification would adversely affect patient health. An OTP must obtain a standard 3-year certification, as described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, within the 1-year conditional certification period. If standard accreditation is not obtained by the OTP within the 1-year conditional certification period, the OTP's conditional certification will lapse, and the Attorney General will be notified that the OTP's registration should be revoked. (6) OTPs whose certification has expired, and who seek re-certification, will be considered “new” programs and will be required to apply for provisional certification in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. (b) Application for initial or renewal certifications and re-certification. (1) A description of the current accreditation status of the OTP; (2) A description of the organizational structure of the OTP; (3) The names of the persons responsible for the OTP; (4) The addresses of the OTP and of each medication unit or other facility under the of the OTP; (5) The sources of funding for the OTP and the name and address of each governmental entity that provides such funding; (6) A statement that the OTP will comply with the conditions of certification set forth in paragraph (g) of this section; and (7) The application shall be signed by the program sponsor who shall certify that the information submitted in the application is truthful and accurate. (8) Applications for re-certification shall include an explanation of why the OTP's most recent certification expired and information regarding the schedule for an accreditation survey. (c) Action on application. (2) The Secretary may deny the application if the Secretary determines that: (i) The application for certification is deficient in any respect; (ii) The OTP will not be operated in accordance with the Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards established under § 8.12; (iii) The OTP will not permit an inspection or a survey to proceed, or will not permit in a timely manner access to relevant records or information; or (iv) The OTP has made misrepresentations in obtaining accreditation or in applying for certification. (3) Within 5 days after it reaches a final determination that an OTP meets the requirements for certification in this section; the Secretary will notify the Drug Enforcement Administration that the OTP has been determined to be qualified to provide OUD treatment under section 303(h) of the Controlled Substances Act. (d) Provisional certification. (e) Requirements for certification. (2) OTPs shall allow, in accordance with Federal controlled substances laws and Federal confidentiality laws, inspections and surveys by duly authorized employees of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), by Accreditation Bodies, by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and by authorized employees of any other Federal governmental entity with legal authority to conduct inspections or surveys on an OTP's premises. (3) Disclosure of patient records maintained by an OTP is governed by the provisions of 42 CFR part 2 and 45 CFR parts 160 and 164, and every program must comply with these regulations, as applicable. Records on the receipt, storage, and distribution of MOUD are also subject to inspection under Federal controlled substances laws and under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321 et seq. (4) An OTP or medication unit or any part thereof, including any facility or any individual, shall permit a duly authorized employee of the Department of Health and Human Services or SAMHSA to have access to and to copy all records on the use of MOUD in accordance with the provisions of 42 CFR part 2 and 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. (5) OTPs shall notify the Secretary in writing within 3 weeks of any replacement or other change in the status of the program sponsor or medical director. (6) OTPs shall comply with all regulations enforced by the DEA under 21 CFR chapter II and must be registered by the DEA before administering or dispensing MOUD. (7) OTPs must operate in accordance with Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards and approved accreditation elements. (f) Conditions for interim treatment program approval. (2) Before the Secretary may grant such approval, the OTP must provide the Secretary with documentation from the SOTA of the State in which the OTP operates demonstrating that: (i) Such officer does not object to the providing of interim treatment in the State; (ii) The OTP seeking to provide such treatment is unable to provide access for patients in a comprehensive treatment program within a reasonable geographic area within 14 days of the time patients seek treatment for OUD; (iii) The authorization of the OTP to provide interim treatment will not otherwise reduce the capacity of comprehensive treatment programs in the State to admit individuals (relative to the date on which such officer so certifies); and (iv) OTPs providing interim treatment will arrange for each individual's transfer to a comprehensive treatment program no later than 180 days from the date on which each individual first requested treatment. Individuals enrolled in interim treatment shall not be discharged without the approval of an OTP practitioner, who shall consider on-going and patient-centered treatment needs, which are to be documented in the patient record, while awaiting transfer to a comprehensive treatment program. (3) The Secretary will provide notice to the OTP denying or approving the request to provide interim treatment. The OTP shall not provide such treatment until it has received such notice from the Secretary. (g) Exemptions. (h) Medication units, long-term care facilities and hospitals. (2) Specifically, any services that are provided in an OTP may be provided in the medication unit, assuming compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local law, and the use of units that provide appropriate privacy and have adequate space. (3) Certification as an OTP under this part is not required for the initiation or continuity of medication treatment or withdrawal management of a patient who is admitted to a hospital, long-term care facility, or correctional facility, that is registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration as a hospital/clinic, for the treatment of medical conditions other than OUD, and who requires treatment of OUD with methadone during their stay, when such treatment is permitted under applicable Federal law. (i) The term “long-term care facility” is defined in § 8.2. Nothing in this section is intended to relieve hospitals, or long-term care facilities and correctional facilities that are registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration as a hospital/clinic, from their obligations to obtain appropriate registration from the Attorney General, under section 303(g) of the Controlled Substances Act. Treatment provided under this section should always comply with applicable Federal laws. (ii) [Reserved] [89 FR 7549, Feb. 2, 2024, as amended at 91 FR 8382, Feb. 23, 2026] § 8.12 Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards. (a) General. (b) Administrative and organizational structure. (2) The medical director shall assume responsibility for all medical and behavioral health services performed by the OTP. In addition, the medical director shall be responsible for ensuring that the OTP is in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. (c) Continuous quality improvement. (2) An OTP must maintain a current “Diversion Control Plan” or “DCP” as part of its quality assurance program that contains specific measures to reduce the possibility of diversion of dispensed MOUD, and that assigns specific responsibility to the OTP providers and administrative staff for carrying out the diversion control measures and functions described in the DCP. (d) Staff credentials. (e) Patient admission criteria Comprehensive treatment. (2) Comprehensive treatment for persons under age 18. (3) Withdrawal management. (f) Required services General. (2) Initial medical examination. (A) A screening examination to ensure that the patient meets criteria for admission and that there are no contraindications to treatment with MOUD; and (B) A full history and examination, to determine the patient's broader health status, with lab testing as determined to be required by an appropriately licensed practitioner. A patient's refusal to undergo lab testing for co-occurring physical health conditions should not preclude them from access to treatment, provided such refusal does not have potential to negatively impact treatment with medications. (ii) Assuming no contraindications, a patient may commence treatment with MOUD after the screening examination has been completed. Both the screening examination and full examination must be completed by an appropriately licensed practitioner. If the licensed practitioner is not an OTP practitioner, the screening examination must be completed no more than seven days prior to OTP admission. Where the examination is performed outside of the OTP, the written results and narrative of the examination, as well as available lab testing results, must be transmitted, consistent with applicable privacy laws, to the OTP, and verified by an OTP practitioner. (iii) A full in-person physical examination, including the results of serology and other tests that are considered to be clinically appropriate, must be completed within 14 calendar days following a patient's admission to the OTP. The full exam can be completed by a non-OTP practitioner, if the exam is verified by a licensed OTP practitioner as being true and accurate and transmitted in accordance with applicable privacy laws. (iv) Serology testing and other testing as deemed medically appropriate by the licensed OTP practitioner based on the screening or full history and examination, drawn not more than 30 days prior to admission to the OTP, may form part of the full history and examination. (v) The screening and full examination may be completed via telehealth for those patients being admitted for treatment at the OTP with either buprenorphine or methadone, if a practitioner or primary care provider, determines that an adequate evaluation of the patient can be accomplished via telehealth. When using telehealth, the following caveats apply: (A) In evaluating patients for treatment with schedule II medications (such as Methadone), audio-visual telehealth platforms must be used, except when not available to the patient. When not available, it is acceptable to use audio-only devices, but only when the patient is in the presence of a licensed practitioner who is registered to prescribe (including dispense) controlled medications. The OTP practitioner shall review the examination results and order treatment medications as indicated. (B) In evaluating patients for treatment with schedule III medications (such as Buprenorphine) or medications not classified as a controlled medication (such as Naltrexone), audio-visual or audio only platforms may be used. The OTP practitioner shall review the examination results and order treatment medications as indicated. (3) Special services for pregnant patients. (4) Initial and periodic physical and behavioral health assessment services. (ii) The periodic physical examination should occur not less than one time each year and be conducted by an OTP practitioner. The periodic physical examination should include review of MOUD dosing, treatment response, other substance use disorder treatment needs, responses and patient-identified goals, and other relevant physical and psychiatric treatment needs and goals. The periodic physical examination should be documented in the patient's clinical record. (5) Counseling and psychoeducational services. (ii) OTPs must provide counseling on preventing exposure to, and the transmission of, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and either directly provide services and treatments or actively link to treatment each patient admitted or readmitted to treatment who has received positive test results for these conditions from initial and/or periodic medical examinations. (iii) OTPs must provide directly, or through referral to adequate and reasonably accessible community resources, vocational training, education, and employment services for patients who request such services or for whom these needs have been identified and mutually agreed-upon as beneficial by the patient and program staff. (6) Drug testing services. (g) Recordkeeping and patient confidentiality. (2) OTPs shall include, as an essential part of the recordkeeping system, documentation in each patient's record that the OTP made a good faith effort to determine whether the patient is enrolled in any other OTP. A patient enrolled in an OTP shall not be permitted to obtain treatment in any other OTP except in circumstances involving an inability to access care at the patient's OTP of record. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, travel for work or family events, temporary relocation, or an OTP's temporary closure. If the medical director or program practitioner of the OTP in which the patient is enrolled determines that such circumstances exist, the patient may seek treatment at another OTP, provided the justification for the particular circumstances are noted in the patient's record both at the OTP in which the patient is enrolled and at the OTP that will provide the MOUD. (h) Medication administration, dispensing, and use. (2) OTPs shall use only those MOUD that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) for use in the treatment of OUD. In addition, OTPs who are fully compliant with the protocol of an investigational use of a drug and other conditions set forth in the application may administer a drug that has been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration under an investigational new drug application under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for investigational use in the treatment of OUD. Currently the following MOUD will be considered to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the treatment of OUD: (i) Methadone; (ii) Buprenorphine and buprenorphine combination products that have been approved for use in the treatment of OUD; and (iii) Naltrexone. (3) OTPs shall maintain current procedures that are adequate to ensure that the following dosage form and initial dosing requirements are met: (i) Methadone shall be administered or dispensed only in oral form and shall be formulated in such a way as to reduce its potential for parenteral misuse. (ii) For each new patient enrolled in an OTP, the initial dose of methadone shall be individually determined and shall include consideration of the type(s) of opioid(s) involved in the patient's opioid use disorder, other medications or substances being taken, medical history, and severity of opioid withdrawal. The total dose for the first day should not exceed 50 milligrams unless the OTP practitioner, licensed under the appropriate State law and registered under the appropriate State and Federal laws to administer or dispense MOUD, finds sufficient medical rationale, including but not limited to if the patient is transferring from another OTP on a higher dose that has been verified, and documents in the patient's record that a higher dose was clinically indicated. (4) OTPs shall maintain current procedures adequate to ensure that each MOUD used by the program is administered and dispensed in accordance with its FDA approved product labeling. The program must ensure that any significant deviations from the approved labeling, including deviations with regard to dose, frequency, or the conditions of use described in the approved labeling, are specifically documented in the patient's record. (i) Unsupervised or “take-home” medication doses. (1) Any patient in comprehensive treatment may receive their individualized take-home doses as ordered for days that the clinic is closed for business, including one weekend day ( e.g., (2) OTP decisions on dispensing MOUD to patients for unsupervised use beyond that set forth in paragraph (i)(1) of this section shall be determined by an appropriately licensed OTP medical practitioner or the medical director. In determining which patients may receive unsupervised medication doses, the medical director or program medical practitioner shall consider, among other pertinent factors that indicate that the therapeutic benefits of unsupervised doses outweigh the risks, the following criteria: (i) Absence of active substance use disorders, other physical or behavioral health conditions that increase the risk of patient harm as it relates to the potential for overdose, or the ability to function safely; (ii) Regularity of attendance for supervised medication administration; (iii) Absence of serious behavioral problems that endanger the patient, the public or others; (iv) Absence of known recent diversion activity; (v) Whether take-home medication can be safely transported and stored; and (vi) Any other criteria that the medical director or medical practitioner considers relevant to the patient's safety and the public's health. (3) Such determinations and the basis for such determinations consistent with the criteria outlined in paragraph (i)(2) of this section shall be documented in the patient's medical record. If it is determined that a patient is safely able to manage unsupervised doses of MOUD, the dispensing restrictions set forth in paragraphs (i)(3)(i) through (iii) of this section apply. The dispensing restrictions set forth in paragraphs (i)(3)(i) through (iii) of this section do not apply to buprenorphine and buprenorphine products listed under paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section. (i) During the first 14 days of treatment, the take-home supply (beyond that of paragraph (i)(1) of this section) is limited to 7 days. It remains within the OTP practitioner's discretion to determine the number of take-home doses up to 7 days, but decisions must be based on the criteria listed in paragraph (i)(2) of this section. The rationale underlying the decision to provide unsupervised doses of methadone must be documented in the patient's clinical record, consistent with paragraph (g)(2) of this section. (ii) From 15 days of treatment, the take-home supply (beyond that of paragraph (i)(1) of this section) is limited to 14 days. It remains within the OTP practitioner's discretion to determine the number of take-home doses up to 14 days, but this determination must be based on the criteria listed in paragraph (i)(2) of this section. The rationale underlying the decision to provide unsupervised doses of methadone must be documented in the patient's clinical record, consistent with paragraph (g)(2) of this section. (iii) From 31 days of treatment, the take-home supply (beyond that of paragraph (i)(1) of this section) provided to a patient is not to exceed 28 days. It remains within the OTP practitioner's discretion to determine the number of take-home doses up to 28 days, but this determination must be based on the criteria listed in paragraph (i)(2) of this section. The rationale underlying the decision to provide unsupervised doses of methadone must be documented in the patient's clinical record, consistent with paragraph (g)(2) of this section. (4) OTPs must maintain current procedures adequate to identify the theft or diversion of take-home medications, including labeling containers with the OTP's name, address, and telephone number. Programs also must ensure that each individual take-home dose is packaged in a manner that is designed to reduce the risk of accidental ingestion, including child-proof containers (see Poison Prevention Packaging Act, Pub. L. 91-601 (15 U.S.C. 1471 et seq. (j) Interim treatment. (2) The program shall notify the SOTA when a patient begins interim treatment, when a patient leaves interim treatment, and before the date of transfer to comprehensive services, and shall document such notifications. (3) The Secretary may revoke the interim authorization for programs that fail to comply with the provisions of this paragraph (j). Likewise, the Secretary will consider revoking the interim authorization of a program if the State in which the program operates is not in compliance with the provisions of § 8.11(h). (4) All requirements for comprehensive treatment apply to interim treatment with the following exceptions: (i) A primary counselor is not required to be assigned to the patient, but crisis services, including shelter support, should be available; (ii) Interim treatment cannot be provided for longer than 180 days in any 12-month period; (iii) By day 120, a plan for continuing treatment beyond 180 days must be created, and documented in the patient's clinical record; and (iv) Formal counseling, vocational training, employment, economic, legal, educational, and other recovery support services described in paragraphs (f)(4) and (f)(5)(i) and (iii) of this section are not required to be offered to the patient. However, information pertaining to locally available, community-based resources for ancillary services should be made available to individual patients in interim treatment. § 8.13 Revocation of accreditation and Accreditation Body approval. (a) The Secretary's action following revocation of accreditation. (b) Accreditation Body approval. (2) Within 1 year from the date of withdrawal of approval of an Accreditation Body, or within any shorter period of time established by the Secretary, OTPs currently accredited by the Accreditation Body must obtain accreditation from another Accreditation Body. The Secretary may extend the time period for obtaining reaccreditation on a case-by-case basis. § 8.14 Suspension or revocation of certification. (a) Revocation. (1) Has been found to have engaged in misrepresentation in obtaining the certification; (2) Has failed to comply with the Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards in any respect; (3) Has failed to comply with reasonable requests from the Secretary or from an Accreditation Body for records, information, reports, or materials that are necessary to determine the continued eligibility of the OTP for certification or continued compliance with the Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards; or (4) Has refused a reasonable request of a duly designated inspector, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Inspector, State Inspector, or Accreditation Body representative for permission to inspect the program or the program's operations or its records. (b) Suspension. (1) The failure to comply with the Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards presents an imminent danger to the public health or safety; (2) The refusal to permit inspection makes immediate suspension necessary; or (3) There is reason to believe that the failure to comply with the Federal Opioid Use Disorder treatment standards was intentional or was associated with fraud. (c) Written notification. (d) Procedure. (i) The Secretary will immediately notify DEA that the OTP's registration should be suspended under 21 U.S.C. 824(d); and (ii) the Secretary will provide an opportunity for a hearing under this subpart. (2) Suspension of certification under paragraph (b) of this section shall remain in effect until the agency determines that: (i) The basis for the suspension cannot be substantiated; (ii) Violations of required standards have been corrected to the agency's satisfaction; or (iii) The OTP's certification shall be revoked. § 8.15 Forms. (a) SMA-162—Application for Certification to Use Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. (b) SMA-163—Application for Becoming an Accreditation Body under § 8.3. Subpart D—Procedures for Informal Review of Suspension or Proposed Revocation of OTP Certification, and of Adverse Action Regarding Withdrawal of Approval of an Accreditation Body § 8.21 Applicability. The procedures in this subpart apply when: (a) The Secretary has notified an OTP in writing that its certification under the regulations in subpart B of this part has been suspended or that the Secretary proposes to revoke the certification; and (b) The OTP has, within 30 days of the date of the notification or within 3 days of the date of the notification when seeking an expedited review of a suspension, requested in writing to the reviewing official, an opportunity for an informal review of the suspension or proposed revocation. (c) The Secretary has notified an Accreditation Body of an adverse action taken regarding withdrawal of approval of the Accreditation Body under the regulations in subpart A of this part; and (d) The Accreditation Body has, within 30 days of the date of the notification, requested in writing an opportunity for a review of the adverse action. § 8.22 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this subpart: Appellant (1) The OTP which has been notified of its suspension or proposed revocation of its certification under the regulations of this part and has requested a review of the suspension or proposed revocation; or (2) The Accreditation Body which has been notified of adverse action regarding withdrawal of approval under the regulations of this subpart and has requested a review of the adverse action. Respondent Reviewing official § 8.23 Limitation on issues subject to review. The scope of this informal review shall be limited to the facts relevant to any suspension, or proposed revocation, or adverse action, the necessary interpretations of the facts, the regulations in this subpart, and other relevant law. § 8.24 Specifying who represents the parties. The appellant's request for an informal review shall specify the name, address, and phone number of the appellant's representative. In its first written submission to the reviewing official, the respondent shall specify the name, address, and phone number of the respondent's representative. § 8.25 Informal review and the reviewing official's response. (a) Request for review. (b) Acknowledgment. § 8.26 Preparation of the review file and written arguments. The appellant and the respondent each participate in developing the file for the reviewing official and in submitting written arguments. The procedures for development of the review file and submission of written argument are: (a) Appellant's documents and brief. (1) A review file containing the documents supporting appellant's argument, tabbed and organized chronologically, and accompanied by an index identifying each document. Only essential documents should be submitted to the reviewing official. (2) A written statement, not to exceed 20 double-spaced pages, explaining why respondent's decision to suspend or propose revocation of appellant's certification or to take adverse action regarding withdrawal of approval of the Accreditation Body is incorrect (appellant's brief). (b) Respondent's documents and brief. (1) A review file containing documents supporting respondent's decision to suspend or revoke appellant's certification, or approval as an Accreditation Body, tabbed and organized chronologically, and accompanied by an index identifying each document. Only essential documents should be submitted to the reviewing official. (2) A written statement, not exceeding 20 double-spaced pages in length, explaining the basis for suspension, proposed revocation, or adverse action (respondent's brief). (c) Reply briefs. (d) Cooperative efforts. (e) Excessive documentation. (f) Discovery. § 8.27 Opportunity for oral presentation. (a) Electing oral presentation. (b) Presiding official. (c) Preliminary conference. (d) Time and place of oral presentation. (e) Conduct of the oral presentation General. (2) Burden of proof/standard of proof. (3) Admission of evidence. (4) Motions. (5) Transcripts. (f) Obstruction of justice or making of false statements. (g) Post-hearing procedures. § 8.28 Expedited procedures for review of immediate suspension. (a) Applicability. (b) Reviewing official's response. (c) Review file and briefs. (1) A review file containing essential documents relevant to the review, tabbed, indexed, and organized chronologically; and (2) A written statement, not to exceed 20 double-spaced pages, explaining the party's position concerning the suspension and any proposed revocation. No reply brief is permitted. (d) Oral presentation. (e) Written decision. (f) Transmission of written communications. § 8.29 Ex parte communications. For the purposes of maintaining the equity of informal review proceedings, except for routine administrative and procedural matters or as described in §§ 8.22(2) and 8.27(e), a party shall not communicate with the reviewing or presiding official without notice to the other party. § 8.30 Transmission of written communications by reviewing official and calculation of deadlines. (a) Timely review. (b) Due date. § 8.31 Authority and responsibilities of the reviewing official. In addition to any other authority specified in this subpart, the reviewing official and the presiding official, with respect to those authorities involving the oral presentation, shall have the authority to issue orders; examine witnesses; take all steps necessary for the conduct of an orderly hearing; rule on requests and motions; grant extensions of time for good reasons; dismiss for failure to meet deadlines or other requirements; order the parties to submit relevant information or witnesses; remand a case for further action by the respondent; waive or modify the procedures in this subpart in a specific case, usually with notice to the parties; reconsider a decision of the reviewing official where a party promptly alleges a clear error of fact or law; and to take any other action necessary to resolve disputes in accordance with the objectives of the procedures in this subpart. § 8.32 Administrative record. The administrative record of review consists of the review file; other submissions by the parties; transcripts or other records of any meetings, conference calls, or oral presentation; evidence submitted at the oral presentation; and orders and other documents issued by the reviewing and presiding officials. § 8.33 Written decision. (a) Issuance of decision. (b) Date of decision. (c) Public notice and communications to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Federal Register. (2) If the suspension and proposed revocation of OTP certification are denied, the revocation will not take effect and the suspension will be lifted immediately. Public notice will be given by publication in the Federal Register. § 8.34 Court review of final administrative action; exhaustion of administrative remedies. Before any legal action is filed in court challenging the suspension, proposed revocation, or adverse action, respondent shall exhaust administrative remedies provided under this subpart, unless otherwise provided by Federal law. The reviewing official's decision, under § 8.28(e) or § 8.33(a), constitutes final agency action as of the date of the decision. Subpart E [Reserved]

Related documents

Record · ID 509878 · SHA-256 345ea48910d692f4
Retrieved via Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.