18 U.S.C. § 17 — Insanity defense
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
(a) Affirmative Defense.— It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under any Federal statute that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense. (b) Burden of Proof.— The defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence. (Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 402(a) , Oct. 12, 1984 , 98 Stat. 2057 , § 20; renumbered § 17, Pub. L. 99–646, § 34(a) , Nov. 10, 1986 , 100 Stat. 3599 .)
Related documents
- 18 U.S.C. § 4242 — Determination of the existence of insanity at the time of the offense#573170
- 18 U.S.C. § 3531 — Return; several defendants; conviction of less offense; poll of jury—(Rule)#573295
- 18 U.S.C. § 3581 — Sentence of imprisonment#573297
- 15 U.S.C. § 5723 — Enforcement#565797
- 18 U.S.C. § 2426 — Repeat offenders#573612
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive