42 U.S.C. § 1320a-10 — Effect of failure to carry out State plan
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
In an action brought to enforce a provision of this chapter, such provision is not to be deemed unenforceable because of its inclusion in a section of this chapter requiring a State plan or specifying the required contents of a State plan. This section is not intended to limit or expand the grounds for determining the availability of private actions to enforce State plan requirements other than by overturning any such grounds applied in Suter v. Artist M., 112 S. Ct. 1360 (1992), but not applied in prior Supreme Court decisions respecting such enforceability: Provided, however, That this section is not intended to alter the holding in Suter v. Artist M. that section 671(a)(15) of this title is not enforceable in a private right of action. (Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, § 1130A, as added Pub. L. 103–432, title II, § 211(a) , Oct. 31, 1994 , 108 Stat. 4460 .) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date Pub. L. 103–432, title II, § 211(b) , Oct. 31, 1994 , 108 Stat. 4460 , provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] shall apply to actions pending on the date of the enactment of this Act [ Oct. 31, 1994 ] and to actions brought on or after such date of enactment.”
Related documents
- 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-2 — Effect of failure to carry out State plan#594272
- 19 U.S.C. § 4534 — Drawback#574591
- 42 U.S.C. § 602 — Eligible States; State plan#594451
- 42 U.S.C. § 7425 — Measures to prevent economic disruption or unemployment#590997
- 42 U.S.C. § 7901 — Congressional findings and purposes#590827
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive