50 U.S.C. § 2787 — Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts

(a) Briefings on requests for proposals Not later than 7 days after issuing a request for proposals for a contract to manage and operate a facility of the Administration , the Administrator shall brief the congressional defense committees on the preliminary assessment of the Administrator of the costs and benefits of the competition for the contract, including a preliminary assessment of the matters described in subsection (c) with respect to the contract. (b) Reports after transition to new contracts If the Administrator awards a new contract to manage and operate a facility of the Administration , the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the matters described in subsection (c) with respect to the contract by not later than 30 days after the completion of the period required to transition to the contract. (c) Matters described The matters described in this subsection, with respect to a contract, are the following: (1) A clear and complete description of the cost savings the Administrator expects to result from the competition for the contract over the life of the contract, including associated analyses, assumptions, and information sources used to determine such expected cost savings. (2) A description of any key limitations or uncertainties that could affect such costs savings, including costs savings that are anticipated but not fully known. (3) The costs of the competition for the contract, including the immediate costs of conducting the competition, the costs of the transition to the contract from the previous contract, and any increased costs over the life of the contract. (4) A description of any disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract. (5) A clear and complete description of the benefits expected by the Administrator with respect to mission performance or operations resulting from the competition. (6) How the competition for the contract complied with the Federal Acquisition Regulation regarding federally funded research and development centers, if applicable. (7) The factors considered and processes used by the Administrator to determine— (A) whether to compete or extend the previous contract; and (B) which activities at the facility should be covered under the contract rather than under a different contract. (8) With respect to the matters included under paragraphs (1) through (7), a detailed description of the analyses conducted by the Administrator to reach the conclusions presented in the report, including any assumptions, limitations, and uncertainties relating to such conclusions. (9) Any other matters the Administrator considers appropriate. (d) Information quality Each briefing required by subsection (a) and report required by subsection (b) shall be prepared in accordance with— (1) the information quality guidelines of the Department of Energy that are relevant to the clear and complete presentation of the matters described in subsection (c); and (2) best practices of the Government Accountability Office and relevant industries for cost estimating, if appropriate. (e) Review of reports by Comptroller General of the United States (1) Determination The Comptroller General of the United States shall determine, in consultation with the congressional defense committees , whether to conduct an initial review, a comprehensive review, or both, of a report required by subsection (b). (2) Initial review The Comptroller General shall provide any initial review of a report required by subsection (b) as a briefing to the congressional defense committees not later than 180 days after that report is submitted to the congressional defense committees . (3) Comprehensive review (A) Submission The Comptroller General shall submit any comprehensive review of a report required by subsection (b) to the congressional defense committees not later than 3 years after that report is submitted to the congressional defense committees . (B) Elements A comprehensive review of a report required by subsection (b) shall include an assessment, based on the most current information available, of the following: (i) The actual cost savings achieved compared to cost savings estimated under subsection (c)(1), and any increased costs incurred under the contract that were unexpected or uncertain at the time the contract was awarded. (ii) Any disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract compared to the disruptions and delays estimated under subsection (c)(4). (iii) Whether expected benefits of the competition with respect to mission performance or operations have been achieved. (iv) Such other matters as the Comptroller General considers appropriate. (f) Applicability (1) In general The requirements for briefings under subsection (a) and reports under subsection (b) shall apply with respect to requests for proposals issued or contracts awarded, as applicable, by the Administrator during fiscal years 2019 through 2032. (2) Naval reactors The requirements for briefings under subsection (a) and reports under subsection (b) shall not apply with respect to a management and operations contract for a Naval Reactor facility. ( Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVIII, § 4807 , as added Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXI, § 3131(a) , Aug. 13, 2018 , 132 Stat. 2298 ; amended Pub. L. 118–31, div. C, title XXXI, § 3119 , Dec. 22, 2023 , 137 Stat. 791 ; Pub. L. 118–159, div. C, title XXXI, § 3122 , Dec. 23, 2024 , 138 Stat. 2300 .) Editorial Notes Amendments 2024—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 118–159 amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (e) related to review of reports by Comptroller General of the United States. 2023—Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted “2032” for “2022”.

Related documents

• Gate Design and Stage-Dependent Incentives in Retail Proprietary-Trading Evaluations: Why Passing Is Not Standalone Evidence of Skill, and Why the Product Fails to Pay Under Measured Trading Constraints#1084773
• THE UPSIDE AND DOWNSIDE: PROTECTIONS, INCENTIVES, DISINCENTIVES, AND RISKS#2098
• Prevention and promotion approaches to contracting: Implications for negotiator focus and contract frames on exchange performance and relationships in the digital age#675918
• The Implementation Cost of Fairness in Service Policy Selection#1050258
• EFFECTS OF MARKET RESEARCH QUALITY IN THE SERVICES CONTRACT LIFE CYCLE#657657