ConceptioArchiveGoogle Patents
Google Patentsopen access

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery — Orexo Ab (US12357573B2)

Orexo Ab · Google Patents
Google Patents · Patents · License: Open Access
Open Source ↗
patent, google patents, intellectual property, US12357573B2, Orexo Ab, Jonas Sävmarker, en, 2025

ABSTRACT

Abstract

According to the invention, there is provided a pharmaceutically-acceptable composition which is preferably in the form of a spray-dried powder comprising a mixture of:

(a) a pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of at least one pharmaceutically-active compound; and (b) a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier material, which carrier material comprises a combination of a disaccharide and a polymeric material.

Compositions are suitable for, for example, transmucosal drug delivery, including sublingual and nasal delivery. In the case of nasal delivery, said compositions may be loaded into single- or multiple-use nasal applicators. Preferred pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers in this regard include lactose or trehalose and dextrins (e.g. cyclodextrins or maltodextrins), which may be spray-dried together in combination. Compositions may further comprise one or more alkyl saccharides. Preferred alkyl saccharides include sucrose esters, such as sucrose monolaurate.

Description

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/540,929, filed Dec. 2, 2021, which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/GB2021/051191, filed May 18, 2021, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and which claims the priority benefit of GB 2018901.5, filed Dec. 1, 2020, GB 2009905.7, filed Jun. 29, 2020, and GB 2007306.0, filed May 18, 2020.

This invention relates to new pharmaceutical compositions that are useful in a variety of medical conditions. The invention also relates to methods of manufacturing such compositions and formulating them into dosage forms.

PRIOR ART AND BACKGROUND

The listing or discussion of an apparently prior-published document in this specification should not necessarily be taken as an acknowledgement that the document is part of the state of the art or common general knowledge.

Among the various well-known routes of the drug delivery, peroral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract is the most common. It is generally regarded as being the most favoured by the patients and practitioners.

However, peroral drug administration is known to have specific drawbacks, including the fact that active ingredients are necessarily subject to hepatic first-pass metabolism and also enzymatic degradation within (and outside) the gastrointestinal tract. This may affect the efficacy of certain drugs and, in some cases, may even disqualify it as an administration route altogether.

Peroral administration to the gastrointestinal tract has the additional disadvantage that it requires absorption of active ingredients through the intestines as part of the digestive process, which takes time. In the treatment of certain conditions, such as acute disorders, a more rapid onset of pharmacological effect is often highly desirable.

In such cases, administration principles in which drugs are immediately absorbed into systemic circulation is more likely to lead to a rapid onset of action. Although this can be done via parenteral administration (such as subcutaneous or intravenous injection), such delivery means are inconvenient, and are sometimes very difficult and/or impossible for patients to do, requiring time-consuming intervention by physicians to ensure compliance and avoid effects that are either unwanted or detrimental.

Transmucosal administration of active ingredients is a viable alternative to parenteral administration. It gives rise to the possibility of delivering drug molecules directly into systemic circulation through mucosal membranes (e.g. rectally, sublingually, buccally, pulmonarily and intranasally), and may lead to advantages, such as increased patient compliance, improved drug bioavailability, a more rapid onset of action and reduced side effects.

However, transmucosal administration of drugs presents its own, quite distinct problems. Unlike the gastrointestinal tract, which is a large organ that contains a relatively large amount of biological fluids, spaces such as the oral and nasal cavities are relatively small and contain much lower amounts of bodily fluids, such as saliva and/or mucous. This inevitably provides a considerable limitation on the amount of active ingredient that can be administered in a single dose.

Furthermore, although it is a dynamic system, the gastrointestinal tract is, in the main part, something of a ‘closed’ system. Conversely, the rapid clearance mechanisms that take place in both the oral and nasal cavities means that the time that is often available for absorption across a mucosal surface, for an already more limited amount of drug, is also limited.

Numerous formulation principles have been put forward to solve this problem, including, for example, bioadhesive formulation principles, such as buccal patches for oromucosal drug delivery (see, for example, Shojaei, J. Pharm. Pharmaceutical Sci., 15, 19 (1998) and Gandhi, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 43, 67 (1994)), as well as in situ gelling compositions for intranasal drug delivery (see, for example, Bertan et al, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 27, 62 (2006)).

Transmucosal drug delivery systems that are in the solid state may present a significant advantage in allowing for higher drug loadings in the formulation. However, although solid drug delivery compositions are far more common when administering to rectal, buccal, sublingual and pulmonary mucosae, it remains the case that the vast majority of intranasal drug delivery systems are presented in the form of liquid sprays, typically aqueous solutions, wherein drug solubility plays yet another limiting factor in the amount of drug that is available for absorption.

That liquid sprays for intranasal delivery are almost ubiquitous is because formulating solid pharmaceutical formulations in form of a nasal powder is not easy. Unlike powders that are frequently employed for inhalation of active ingredients into the lungs, there are very few commercially-available intranasal powder formulations.

When formulated as dry powders, pulmonary drug delivery compositions typically take the form of ‘aggregate’ mixtures that include micronized particles of API on larger carrier particles. These aggregates are intended to dissociate/break up upon inhalation or actuation of a device, depositing only the fine particles of active ingredients in the lung.

However, such drug delivery systems are understood not to work effectively in the case of intranasal drug delivery. This is because the presence of such fine particles leads to a significant risk of lung exposure, which is not the intended site of administration. If drug particle sizes were increased to avoid this problem, it would likely lead to difficulties in ensuring appropriate interactions in the heterogeneous ‘interactive’ mixture, which depends on substantial differences in sizes of the two components to ensure interaction, leading to potential manufacturing issues, such as segregation during filling. Attempting to compensate for this by correspondingly increasing carrier particle size would not necessarily solve the problem, but would necessarily increase the mass of inactive excipients in an already finitely limited total mass of dosage form, potentially resulting in a reduction in the dose of active ingredient.

The difficulties of formulating dry powders for intranasal delivery are dealt with in US Patent Application US 2005/001411 A1. In this document, it is stated that powders for nasal administration need to be fine enough so that they can be efficiently conveyed by a flow of gas and efficiently deposited in the nose, yet also coarse enough to facilitate the introduction of the powder into an appropriate powder device, which is always needed for intranasal administration. US 2005/001411 A1 apparently solves this problem by making loosely formed secondary particles (aggregates) of primary particles comprising active ingredients. The aggregates have dimensions that are a few hundreds of microns, and this is said to enable more efficient loading into an appropriate intranasal administration (an applicator, dispenser or insufflator) device. Upon actuation of such a device, and administration of the composition, the aggregates apparently quickly break up into the primary particles of active ingredients. These primary particles are of a size that is just a few microns, which is stated to facilitate their dissolution and, thereafter, intranasal absorption of active ingredient.

As stated above, transmucosal (e.g. intranasal) delivery of drugs intended for systemic absorption avoids the first pass metabolism that is inevitably a component of peroral administration. Drug metabolism occurs through chemical reactions with enzymes that are capable of altering an active ingredient's chemical structure.

Because most drugs are organic molecules that contain functional groups that are capable of undergoing such chemical reactions, they are often susceptible to some form of chemical decomposition when they come into contact with substances that are capable of interacting with those functional groups outside of the body.

Such chemical transformation is typically classified as chemical ‘degradation’ in the pharmaceutical field, because it can often lead to a loss of efficacy or, in extreme situations, toxic by-products, either or both of which may lead to a drug being ineffective and/or harmful to patients.

How rapidly such degradation can occur depends upon how inherently chemically-unstable the drug compound is in the first place, the way that it is formulated and the conditions of its storage. Often high temperatures and humidities can lead to accelerated degradation.

Such a loss of chemical integrity is measurable, and is why all pharmaceutical products have shelf-lives printed on their label and/or embossed on their packaging. It is also why certain prescribed medicines contain specific printed information in packaging inserts regarding appropriate storage conditions.

As is summarised by Kou and Zhou in Chapter 16 of the textbook Amorphous Solid Dispersions , Shah et al (Eds.), Springer (2014), if a drug is formulated in an amorphous, as opposed to a crystalline, physical state, it is typically presented in a higher energy state, and is thus likely to be more chemically and physically unstable, presenting challenges to pharmaceutical formulators.

Chemical stability is thus often improved by presenting a drug in a crystalline state, often through salt formation. The primary objective of salt formation is usually to increase hydrophilicity of active ingredients in order to address poor aqueous solubility and dissolution rate issues. However, in making a salt, other physicochemical and biological concerns, such as chemical stability, can often be simultaneously addressed. For example, basic drugs (e.g. drugs containing at least one amine group) are often presented in the form of an acid addition salt, which salts are typically more stable chemically than the corresponding ‘free’ amine bases.

However, whilst potentially providing active ingredient in a form in which it can be more easily stored without chemical degradation, and more efficient in terms of its rate and/or extent of dissolution after administration, crystalline salts generally have slower dissolution rates and are less efficiently absorbed across mucosal membranes, than if corresponding active ingredients are presented in an amorphous, and/or unionized form, respectively.

In summary, active pharmaceutical ingredients formulated as amorphous solid dispersions generally have the advantage of higher bioavailability, but typically present challenges in the form of reduced physical and chemical stability, whereas drugs formulated in a crystalline and/or salt form, whilst generally being more stable tend to be less bioavailable.

The latter problem can be particularly disadvantageous in the case of transmucosal, such as intranasal or sublingual, drug delivery, where, as stated above, residence times of drugs in the relevant cavity, within which absorption into systemic circulation needs to occur, is limited. This, coupled with poor permeability across mucous membranes at physiological pHs may lead to unacceptably low and/or slow transmucosal absorption to provide for an adequate therapeutic effect.

Many elaborate formulation principles have been devised over the years to address the balancing act between solubility and permeability in transmucosal drug delivery systems. Such formulation principles include the addition of pH modifying substances that convert an ionized salt form of active ingredient into a more permeable unionized state.

However, in view of all of the aforementioned potential advantages that it offers, there remains a need for improved solid (e.g. powder-based) transmucosal and especially intranasal drug delivery systems.

In particular, there remains a significant unmet clinical need in the field of transmucosal delivery, for a powdered drug delivery composition that:

(i) is both physically and chemically stable; and (ii) provides active ingredient:

at a sufficient dose; and in a form in which it is permeable enough to provide a required therapeutic effect (such as speed of onset) at the (relatively speaking) low doses that are possible, and short residence times that are available, in the transmucosal context, such as within the nasal cavity.

In addition to the above, in the more specific field of intranasal drug delivery, there remains a significant unmet clinical need for such a drug delivery composition that comprises particles of an appropriate size to enable both the efficient:

filling of a drug delivery device; and deposition within the relevant (e.g. nasal) cavity.

Intranasal dry powder formulations are known from inter alia international patent applications WO 2010/142696 and WO 2019/038756, U.S. Pat. No. 10,653,690 B1 and US patent application US 2018/0092839A.

Russo et al ( J. Pharm. Sci., 95, 2253 (2006)) discloses spray-drying the opioid analgesic compound, morphine, with numerous excipients. Spray-dried formulations are also disclosed in Vengerovich et al., Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 163, 737 (2017), where it was attempted to microencapsulate an active ingredient (naloxone) in various substances, including 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, with a view to developing sustained-release preparations based on polymeric carriers for emergency care.

We have now found that it is possible to formulate certain active ingredients in the form of amorphous dry powder compositions by way of a process that, for example, spray-dries those active ingredients along with a specific combination of carrier materials, as disclosed hereinafter. Such compositions may provide for surprising and substantial improvements in stability of those active ingredients before administration. Such compositions may in addition provide for improved bioavailability and/or speed of absorption of those active ingredients following administration.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 to 7 represent drawings of actuator devices that may be used to dispense compositions of the invention.

FIGS. 8 to 11 show plasma concentration-time curves from a pharmacokinetic study carried out in dogs, in which intranasally-administered compositions of the invention comprising different active ingredients are compared with plasma concentration-time curves for the same active ingredients delivered via different administration means.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a pharmaceutically-acceptable composition in the form of an amorphous, mono-particulate powder comprising a mixture of:

(a) a pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of at least one pharmaceutically-active compound; and (b) a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier material, which carrier material comprises a combination of a disaccharide and a polymeric material, which pharmaceutically-acceptable compositions are referred to here

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/540,929, filed Dec. 2, 2021, which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/GB2021/051191, filed May 18, 2021, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and which claims the priority benefit of GB 2018901.5, filed Dec. 1, 2020, GB 2009905.7, filed Jun. 29, 2020, and GB 2007306.0, filed May 18, 2020.

This invention relates to new pharmaceutical compositions that are useful in a variety of medical conditions. The invention also relates to methods of manufacturing such compositions and formulating them into dosage forms.

PRIOR ART AND BACKGROUND

The listing or discussion of an apparently prior-published document in this specification should not necessarily be taken as an acknowledgement that the document is part of the state of the art or common general knowledge.

Among the various well-known routes of the drug delivery, peroral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract is the most common. It is generally regarded as being the most favoured by the patients and practitioners.

However, peroral drug administration is known to have specific drawbacks, including the fact that active ingredients are necessarily subject to hepatic first-pass metabolism and also enzymatic degradation within (and outside) the gastrointestinal tract. This may affect the efficacy of certain drugs and, in some cases, may even disqualify it as an administration route altogether.

Peroral administration to the gastrointestinal tract has the additional disadvantage that it requires absorption of active ingredients through the intestines as part of the digestive process, which takes time. In the treatment of certain conditions, such as acute disorders, a more rapid onset of pharmacological effect is often highly desirable.

In such cases, administration principles in which drugs are immediately absorbed into systemic circulation is more likely to lead to a rapid onset of action. Although this can be done via parenteral administration (such as subcutaneous or intravenous injection), such delivery means are inconvenient, and are sometimes very difficult and/or impossible for patients to do, requiring time-consuming intervention by physicians to ensure compliance and avoid effects that are either unwanted or detrimental.

Transmucosal administration of active ingredients is a viable alternative to parenteral administration. It gives rise to the possibility of delivering drug molecules directly into systemic circulation through mucosal membranes (e.g. rectally, sublingually, buccally, pulmonarily and intranasally), and may lead to advantages, such as increased patient compliance, improved drug bioavailability, a more rapid onset of action and reduced side effects.

However, transmucosal administration of drugs presents its own, quite distinct problems. Unlike the gastrointestinal tract, which is a large organ that contains a relatively large amount of biological fluids, spaces such as the oral and nasal cavities are relatively small and contain much lower amounts of bodily fluids, such as saliva and/or mucous. This inevitably provides a considerable limitation on the amount of active ingredient that can be administered in a single dose.

Furthermore, although it is a dynamic system, the gastrointestinal tract is, in the main part, something of a ‘closed’ system. Conversely, the rapid clearance mechanisms that take place in both the oral and nasal cavities means that the time that is often available for absorption across a mucosal surface, for an already more limited amount of drug, is also limited.

Numerous formulation principles have been put forward to solve this problem, including, for example, bioadhesive formulation principles, such as buccal patches for oromucosal drug delivery (see, for example, Shojaei, J. Pharm. Pharmaceutical Sci., 15, 19 (1998) and Gandhi, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 43, 67 (1994)), as well as in situ gelling compositions for intranasal drug delivery (see, for example, Bertan et al, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 27, 62 (2006)).

Transmucosal drug delivery systems that are in the solid state may present a significant advantage in allowing for higher drug loadings in the formulation. However, although solid drug delivery compositions are far more common when administering to rectal, buccal, sublingual and pulmonary mucosae, it remains the case that the vast majority of intranasal drug delivery systems are presented in the form of liquid sprays, typically aqueous solutions, wherein drug solubility plays yet another limiting factor in the amount of drug that is available for absorption.

That liquid sprays for intranasal delivery are almost ubiquitous is because formulating solid pharmaceutical formulations in form of a nasal powder is not easy. Unlike powders that are frequently employed for inhalation of active ingredients into the lungs, there are very few commercially-available intranasal powder formulations.

When formulated as dry powders, pulmonary drug delivery compositions typically take the form of ‘aggregate’ mixtures that include micronized particles of API on larger carrier particles. These aggregates are intended to dissociate/break up upon inhalation or actuation of a device, depositing only the fine particles of active ingredients in the lung.

However, such drug delivery systems are understood not to work effectively in the case of intranasal drug delivery. This is because the presence of such fine particles leads to a significant risk of lung exposure, which is not the intended site of administration. If drug particle sizes were increased to avoid this problem, it would likely lead to difficulties in ensuring appropriate interactions in the heterogeneous ‘interactive’ mixture, which depends on substantial differences in sizes of the two components to ensure interaction, leading to potential manufacturing issues, such as segregation during filling. Attempting to compensate for this by correspondingly increasing carrier particle size would not necessarily solve the problem, but would necessarily increase the mass of inactive excipients in an already finitely limited total mass of dosage form, potentially resulting in a reduction in the dose of active ingredient.

The difficulties of formulating dry powders for intranasal delivery are dealt with in US Patent Application US 2005/001411 A1. In this document, it is stated that powders for nasal administration need to be fine enough so that they can be efficiently conveyed by a flow of gas and efficiently deposited in the nose, yet also coarse enough to facilitate the introduction of the powder into an appropriate powder device, which is always needed for intranasal administration. US 2005/001411 A1 apparently solves this problem by making loosely formed secondary particles (aggregates) of primary particles comprising active ingredients. The aggregates have dimensions that are a few hundreds of microns, and this is said to enable more efficient loading into an appropriate intranasal administration (an applicator, dispenser or insufflator) device. Upon actuation of such a device, and administration of the composition, the aggregates apparently quickly break up into the primary particles of active ingredients. These primary particles are of a size that is just a few microns, which is stated to facilitate their dissolution and, thereafter, intranasal absorption of active ingredient.

As stated above, transmucosal (e.g. intranasal) delivery of drugs intended for systemic absorption avoids the first pass metabolism that is inevitably a component of peroral administration. Drug metabolism occurs through chemical reactions with enzymes that are capable of altering an active ingredient's chemical structure.

Because most drugs are organic molecules that contain functional groups that are capable of undergoing such chemical reactions, they are often susceptible to some form of chemical decomposition when they come into contact with substances that are capable of interacting with those functional groups outside of the body.

Such chemical transformation is typically classified as chemical ‘degradation’ in the pharmaceutical field, because it can often lead to a loss of efficacy or, in extreme situations, toxic by-products, either or both of which may lead to a drug being ineffective and/or harmful to patients.

How rapidly such degradation can occur depends upon how inherently chemically-unstable the drug compound is in the first place, the way that it is formulated and the conditions of its storage. Often high temperatures and humidities can lead to accelerated degradation.

Such a loss of chemical integrity is measurable, and is why all pharmaceutical products have shelf-lives printed on their label and/or embossed on their packaging. It is also why certain prescribed medicines contain specific printed information in packaging inserts regarding appropriate storage conditions.

As is summarised by Kou and Zhou in Chapter 16 of the textbook Amorphous Solid Dispersions , Shah et al (Eds.), Springer (2014), if a drug is formulated in an amorphous, as opposed to a crystalline, physical state, it is typically presented in a higher energy state, and is thus likely to be more chemically and physically unstable, presenting challenges to pharmaceutical formulators.

Chemical stability is thus often improved by presenting a drug in a crystalline state, often through salt formation. The primary objective of salt formation is usually to increase hydrophilicity of active ingredients in order to address poor aqueous solubility and dissolution rate issues. However, in making a salt, other physicochemical and biological concerns, such as chemical stability, can often be simultaneously addressed. For example, basic drugs (e.g. drugs containing at least one amine group) are often presented in the form of an acid addition salt, which salts are typically more stable chemically than the corresponding ‘free’ amine bases.

However, whilst potentially providing active ingredient in a form in which it can be more easily stored without chemical degradation, and more efficient in terms of its rate and/or extent of dissolution after administration, crystalline salts generally have slower dissolution rates and are less efficiently absorbed across mucosal membranes, than if corresponding active ingredients are presented in an amorphous, and/or unionized form, respectively.

In summary, active pharmaceutical ingredients formulated as amorphous solid dispersions generally have the advantage of higher bioavailability, but typically present challenges in the form of reduced physical and chemical stability, whereas drugs formulated in a crystalline and/or salt form, whilst generally being more stable tend to be less bioavailable.

The latter problem can be particularly disadvantageous in the case of transmucosal, such as intranasal or sublingual, drug delivery, where, as stated above, residence times of drugs in the relevant cavity, within which absorption into systemic circulation needs to occur, is limited. This, coupled with poor permeability across mucous membranes at physiological pHs may lead to unacceptably low and/or slow transmucosal absorption to provide for an adequate therapeutic effect.

Many elaborate formulation principles have been devised over the years to address the balancing act between solubility and permeability in transmucosal drug delivery systems. Such formulation principles include the addition of pH modifying substances that convert an ionized salt form of active ingredient into a more permeable unionized state.

However, in view of all of the aforementioned potential advantages that it offers, there remains a need for improved solid (e.g. powder-based) transmucosal and especially intranasal drug delivery systems.

In particular, there remains a significant unmet clinical need in the field of transmucosal delivery, for a powdered drug delivery composition that:

(i) is both physically and chemically stable; and (ii) provides active ingredient:

at a sufficient dose; and in a form in which it is permeable enough to provide a required therapeutic effect (such as speed of onset) at the (relatively speaking) low doses that are possible, and short residence times that are available, in the transmucosal context, such as within the nasal cavity.

In addition to the above, in the more specific field of intranasal drug delivery, there remains a significant unmet clinical need for such a drug delivery composition that comprises particles of an appropriate size to enable both the efficient:

filling of a drug delivery device; and deposition within the relevant (e.g. nasal) cavity.

Intranasal dry powder formulations are known from inter alia international patent applications WO 2010/142696 and WO 2019/038756, U.S. Pat. No. 10,653,690 B1 and US patent application US 2018/0092839A.

Russo et al ( J. Pharm. Sci., 95, 2253 (2006)) discloses spray-drying the opioid analgesic compound, morphine, with numerous excipients. Spray-dried formulations are also disclosed in Vengerovich et al., Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 163, 737 (2017), where it was attempted to microencapsulate an active ingredient (naloxone) in various substances, including 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, with a view to developing sustained-release preparations based on polymeric carriers for emergency care.

We have now found that it is possible to formulate certain active ingredients in the form of amorphous dry powder compositions by way of a process that, for example, spray-dries those active ingredients along with a specific combination of carrier materials, as disclosed hereinafter. Such compositions may provide for surprising and substantial improvements in stability of those active ingredients before administration. Such compositions may in addition provide for improved bioavailability and/or speed of absorption of those active ingredients following administration.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 to 7 represent drawings of actuator devices that may be used to dispense compositions of the invention.

FIGS. 8 to 11 show plasma concentration-time curves from a pharmacokinetic study carried out in dogs, in which intranasally-administered compositions of the invention comprising different active ingredients are compared with plasma concentration-time curves for the same active ingredients delivered via different administration means.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a pharmaceutically-acceptable composition in the form of an amorphous, mono-particulate powder comprising a mixture of:

(a) a pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of at least one pharmaceutically-active compound; and (b) a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier material, which carrier material comprises a combination of a disaccharide and a polymeric material, which pharmaceutically-acceptable compositions are referred to hereinafter together as ‘the compositions of the invention’.

Compositions of the invention are in the form of an amorphous, mono-particulate powder. By ‘mono-particulate’, we mean that the plurality of particles that form the powdered compositions of the invention comprise a homogeneous or a heterogeneous mixture, in which pharmaceutically-active ingredients are encapsulated in an amorphous state within the carrier materials as defined above, optionally in the presence other ingredients. The particles of the powdered compositions of the invention are thus presented as an amorphous composite of active ingredient, the aforementioned carrier materials and, optionally, other ingredients.

By being amorphous in their nature, compositions of the invention may be wholly amorphous and/or predominantly amorphous (for example more than about 50% by weight, such as more than about 75% by weight, including more than about 80% by weight, such as more than about 90% by weight, or 95% by weight, including more than about 99% by weight amorphous).

As described hereinafter, despite being in an amorphous physical state, compositions of the invention exhibit remarkable and unexpected physical and chemical stability, and may thus be provided in the form of pharmaceutical products that show excellent shelf-life when stored under normal storage conditions.

Compositions of the invention are produced in the form of solid powders by an appropriate technique. In general, appropriate techniques fall into ‘solvent-based’ methods, which include spray-drying, fluidized bed techniques, co-precipitation, supercritical fluid techniques, spray granulation, cryogenic techniques (including freeze-drying), electrospinning and rotating jet techniques, or ‘fusion-based’ methods, which include melt granulation, melt extrusion, high-shear mixing (e.g. KinetiSol®), milling and molten material on carrier techniques (e.g. Meltdose®). Preferred methods include freeze-drying and, more preferably, compositions of the invention are made by a process of spray drying.

Such powders may be suitable for delivery via any pharmaceutically-acceptable administration route directly to patients, or may be presented as an intermediate composition that may subsequently be formulated into a pharmaceutically-acceptable dosage form which is to be administered to one or more patients.

In this respect, there is provided a pharmaceutical formulation and/or a pharmaceutically-acceptable dosage form which formulation and/or dosage form is to be administered to a patient, and comprises one or more compositions of the invention.

Suitable pharmaceutical dosage forms may thus comprise liquid formulations, such as solutions, which may be prepared by dissolving a composition of the invention in a pharmaceutically-acceptable solvent (such as water), for delivery to such patients for example by injection or by infusion.

Alternative pharmaceutical dosage forms may comprise liquid or semi-solid formulations, such as liquid suspensions and/or gel compositions which may comprise (e.g. particles of) a composition of the invention that is/are suspended or dissolved in an appropriate liquid or semi-solid carrier which may be loaded into an appropriate dosage form or delivered by, for example, injection or infusion, or may be formed after injection (e.g. subcutaneously or intramuscularly) to form an implant or a depot formulation.

Compositions of the invention may in the alternative be presented as part of an essentially solid pharmaceutical dosage form. The term ‘solid’ will be well understood by those skilled in the art to include any form of matter that retains its shape and density when not confined, and/or in which molecules are generally compressed as tightly as the repulsive forces among them will allow. An essentially solid formulation is thus one that is at least about 80%, such as at least about 90%, including at least about 95% (or at least about 99%) in such a form.

In this respect, compositions of the invention may be provided in a multi-particulate form (e.g. as powders, granules, pellets and/or beads), comprising a plurality of particles that may individually and/or may collectively consist essentially of, and/or comprise, one or more compositions of the invention.

Compositions of the invention may thus be presented following their preparation (e.g. by spray-drying) in the form of simple powder mixtures, powder microspheres, coated powder microspheres, a lyophilised liposomal dispersion, or a combination thereof.

If a pharmaceutically-acceptable dosage form of the invention ‘consists essentially of’ the particles of one or more compositions of the invention, this will be understood to mean that that dosage form comprises only one or more compositions of the invention, along with other features that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the dosage form. Alternatively, in situations where the dosage forms of the invention ‘consist essentially of’ one or more compositions of the invention, this may be understood to mean that that dosage form comprises at least about 90%, such as at least about 95%, including at least about 97% (e.g. about 99%) by weight of those one or more compositions of the invention in total.

Pharmaceutical dosage forms may in the alternative comprise one or more compositions of the invention, which may be provided in the form of a single unit dosage form, such as a pessary, a suppository or another form of insert, a pill, a capsule, a cake, a patch (e.g. a buccal patch), a film (e.g. an intraoral film) or a tablet (e.g. a sublingual tablet).

Capsules may be prepared by loading a composition of the invention as a spray-dried powder directly into a pharmaceutically-acceptable capsule made from an appropriate material designed for either sublingual or, preferably, peroral delivery, or by mixing a composition along with excipients prior to loading into such a capsule, which may involve a granulation step as described hereinafter, prior to loading into a capsule for such delivery.

Compositions of the invention may in this respect be granulated into a pellet or a pill, but they may also be formulated (that is, provided for administration) in the form of a dry, free-flowing powder. By ‘dry’ we include essentially free of water and other liquid solvents, which includes that there is less than about 10%, such as less than about 5%, more preferably about 3%, such as less than about 2%, e.g. less than about 1% of the formulation is a liquid, such as water.

Appropriate techniques for making dosage forms comprising dry powders or granulates include simple dry mixing, granulation (including dry granulation, wet granulation, melt granulation, thermoplastic pelletising, spray granulation), extrusion/spheronisation or freeze-drying.

Dry granulation techniques are also well known to those skilled in the art and include any technique in which primary powder particles are aggregated under high pressure, including slugging and roller compaction, for example as described hereinafter.

Wet granulation techniques are well known to those skilled in the art and include any technique involving the massing of a mix of dry primary powder particles using a granulating fluid, which fluid comprises a volatile, inert solvent, such as water, ethanol or isopropanol, either alone or in combination, and optionally in the presence of a binder or binding agent. The technique may involve forcing a wet mass through a sieve to produce wet granules which are then dried, preferably to a loss on drying of less than about 3% by weight.

Melt granulation will be known by those skilled in the art to include any technique in which granules are obtained through the addition of a molten binder, or a solid binder which melts during the process (which binder materials may comprise the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier materials of the composition of the invention). After granulation, the binder solidifies at room temperature. Thermoplastic pelletising will be known to be similar to melt granulation, but in which plastic properties of the binder are employed. In both processes, the agglomerates (granules) obtained comprise a matrix structure.

Extrusion/spheronisation will be well known to those skilled in the art to include any process involving the dry mixing of ingredients, wet massing along with a binder, extruding, spheronising the extrudate into spheroids of uniform size, and drying.

Spray granulation will be known by those skilled in the art to include any technique involving the drying of liquids (solutions, suspensions, melts) while simultaneously building up granulates in a fluid bed. The term thus includes processes in which foreign seeds (germs) are provided upon which granules are built up, as well as those in which inherent seeds (germs) form in the fluid bed due to abrasion and/or fracture, in addition to any spray coating granulation technique generally. The sprayed liquid coats the germs and assists further agglomeration of particles. It is then dried to form granules in the form of a matrix.

The term ‘freeze drying’ includes lyophilisation or cryodesiccation, and any low temperature desolvatization (e.g. dehydration) process, in which product is frozen, pressure is lowered, and the frozen solvent (e.g. water) is removed by sublimation.

Compositions of the invention may in the alternative be provided in the form of a tablet for peroral, buccal and/or sublingual use. Such tablets may be formed for example by direct compression/compaction of a composition of the invention, optionally following mixing it together with one or more appropriate excipients, such as a diluent, a disintegrant, a glidant and/or a lubricant, and may be achieved using techniques such as those described in, for example, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets. Volume 1, 3 rd Edition, Augsburger et al (eds.), CRC Press (2008) and the documents cited therein. Suitable compacting equipment includes standard tabletting machines, such as the Kilian SP300 or the Korsch EKO, XP1, XL 100, and XL 200.

Suitable disintegrants (as defined in, for example, Rowe et al, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 6 th ed. (2009)) that may be employed in tablets include cellulose derivatives such as hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), low substituted HPC, methyl cellulose, ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose calcium, carboxymethyl cellulose sodium, microcrystalline cellulose, modified cellulose gum; starch derivatives such as moderately cross-linked starch, modified starch, hydroxylpropyl starch and pregelatinized starch; and other disintegrants such as calcium alginate, sodium alginate, alginic acid, chitosan, colloidal silicon dioxide, docusate sodium, guar gum, magnesium aluminium silicate, polacrilin potassium and polyvinylpyrrolidone. Combinations of two or more disintegrants may be used.

Preferred disintegrants include so-called superdisintergrants' (as defined in, for example, Mohanachandran et al, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 6, 105 (2011)), such as cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone, sodium starch glycolate and croscarmellose sodium. Combinations of two or more superdisintegrants may be used.

When disintegrants and/or superdisintegrants are employed tablets in an (e.g. total) amount of between 0.5 and 15% by weight based upon the total weight of a composition. A preferred range is from 1 to 8%, such as from about 2 to about 7% (e.g. about 5%, such as about 4%) by weight.

If present, binder is preferably employed in an amount of between 0.5 and 20% by weight based upon the total weight of the tablet formulation. A preferred range is from 1 to 15%, such as from about 2.0 to about 12% (e.g. about 10%) by weight. Suitable binders include cellulose gum and microcrystalline cellulose.

Whether in the form of a powder or otherwise, dosage forms comprising compositions of the invention may otherwise be prepared by standard techniques, and using standard equipment, known to the skilled person. In this respect, the compositions of the invention may be combined with conventional pharmaceutical additives and/or excipients used in the art for relevant preparations, and incorporated into various kinds of pharmaceutical preparations using standard techniques in order to make dosage forms of the invention (see, for example, Lachman et al, The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy , Lea & Febiger, 3 rd edition (1986); ‘ Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy ’, Troy (ed.), University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 21 st edition (2006); and/or ‘ Aulton's Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines ’, Aulton and Taylor (eds.), Elsevier, 4 th edition, 2013).

It is preferred that compositions of the invention are suitable for, and/or are formulated for, transmucosal delivery of the active ingredient into systemic circulation.

The term ‘transmucosal’ will be understood by those skilled in the art to mean that, however it is administered to a patient, a composition is presented at a relevant mucosal surface in such a form that the active ingredient(s) may be absorbed across that mucosal surface following its dissolution. Relevant mucosal surfaces thus include the oral, nasal, ocular, vaginal, cervical, pulmonary and/or anorectal mucosae, more particularly the oral mucosa (including buccal and sublingual mucosae) and the nasal mucosa.

Thus, dosage forms comprising a composition of the invention may be directly administered to a mucosal surface (including rectally, vaginally, buccally, sublingually or intranasally) of a patient for transmucosal delivery of active ingredients.

If administered to the sublingual mucosa, compositions of the invention may be in the form of e.g. sublingual tablets as described above, which may comprise disintegrantsor disintegrating agents (which may be defined as any material that is capable of accelerating to a measurable degree the disintegration/dispersion of such composition of the invention), which may be achieved, for example, by the material being capable of swelling and/or expanding when placed in contact with aqueous media, as described hereinafter.

Alternatively compositions of the invention may be administered sublingually in the form of a powder as described herein, which may be emptied into the mouth and under the tongue from an appropriate receptacle, such as a capsule or a sachet.

If compositions of the invention are suitable for, and/or are formulated for sublingual or, more notably, intranasal administration, then they are preferably administered in the form of a powder composition in which the dosage amount of the active ingredient(s) is no more than about 100 mg. Such sublingual and/or nasal powder compositions may comprise a composition of the invention admixed with other excipients, or may consist essentially of a composition of the invention as hereinbefore defined.

Compositions of the invention that are suitable for, and/or are formulated for, intranasal administration are preferably provided by way of a dosing means that is suitable for nasal delivery. Such a dosing means may contain one spray-dried powder composition of the invention, or it may contain two or more such compositions. In the latter instance, the dosing means contains two or more dosing amounts of said composition of the invention, which dosing amounts will each contain a pharmacologically-effective dose of the pharmacologically-active compound(s) (also referred to herein interchangeably as ‘drug(s)’, ‘pharmaceutically-active ingredient(s) and/or ‘active ingredient(s)’).

Two or more compositions of the invention may be administered intranasally, either by repeated actuation of a device that either comprises, or is in communication with, that dosing means. Compositions of the invention may therefore be presented within an appropriate device (e.g. a nasal applicator or dispenser (insufflator), for example as described hereinafter), and/or may be presented within a container or a reservoir that is part of, is adjunct to, and/or is suitable for being placed adjunct to, such an applicator. Such a container or reservoir may contain the one or more compositions of the invention, each containing a pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of said active ingredients.

In this way, appropriate dosing means and/or nasal applicators may be actuated only once to deliver a single composition of the invention comprising an appropriate dose of an active ingredient following that actuation (i.e. a single-use dosing unit), may be actuated more than once to deliver two or more compositions of the invention, each comprising an appropriate dose of active ingredient, upon each such actuation (i.e. a multiple-use dosing unit), and/or may be re-filled with a replacement source of composition(s) of the invention (e.g. a container or reservoir), comprising one or more such compositions, to provide for single and/or multiple doses and/or dosing regimens.

Compositions of the invention may thus be administered in the form of a plurality of particles, which particles may individually and/or collectively consist of, and/or comprise, compositions of the invention.

Compositions of the invention are thus prepared (initially) in the form of solid, dry, free-flowing, multi-particulate powders. By ‘dry’ we include essentially free of water and other liquid solvents, which includes that there is less than about 10%, such as less than about 5%, more preferably about 3%, such as less than about 2%, e.g. less than about 1% of the formulation is a liquid, such as water.

As stated above, compositions of the invention are provided in the form of amorphous, mono-particulate powders. They are not composed of physical associations of two or more discrete, separate sets of particles of different ingredients in the form of a mixture, such as an ordered, or interactive, mixture of smaller particles of active ingredients associated with larger, but separate and chemically distinct, particles of carrier substances. That said, compositions of the invention may be provided as small particles which may subsequently be adhered to separate, larger carrier particles in an interactive mixture, and such a presentation may be useful if the dosage form that is intended for inhalation, for example to the lung, (see e.g. J. Drug Delivery , Art. ID 5635010, 1-19 (2018)).

As mentioned hereinbefore, the process of making compositions of the invention enables the formation of pharmaceutical products that show excellent shelf-life, in terms of both physical and chemical stability, when stored under normal storage conditions, as defined herein.

Compositions of the invention are preferably prepared by a process of spray-drying. The process of ‘spray-drying’ will be understood by the skilled person to include any method of producing a dry powder from a liquid, including a solution or a suspension (including a slurry) that involves rapid drying using hot gas to convert a stream of liquid into vaporized solvent and particles of solid, which solid particles comprise the solute that was previously dissolved in a solution, and/or particles that were previously suspended in the evaporated liquid.

Appropriate spray-drying equipment includes some form of atomization means, such as a spray nozzle, which disperses the liquid into a spray with a relatively uniform droplet size. Such means may include any means that is capable of producing a dry, free-flowing powder, and may include high pressure swirl nozzles, rotary disks and/or atomizer wheels, high pressure single fluid nozzles, two-fluid nozzles and/or ultrasonic nozzles.

The spray-dryer may be a single effect or a multiple effect spray-dryer, and may comprise an integrated and/or an external vibrating fluidized bed, a particle separator, and/or a collection means which may be a drum or a cyclone.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for the manufacturing of a composition of the invention, wherein said process comprises the steps of:

i) mixing together the one or more active ingredients and pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier materials, in an appropriate volatile solvent, ii) spray-drying the mixture from step i).

Preferred volatile solvents include water, or organic solvents, such as lower alkyl alcohols (e.g. ethanol), hydrocarbons (e.g. C 5-10 alkanes), haloalkanes, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, ethyl acetate, acetone, etc., or mixtures thereof.

We prefer that mixing together the one or more active ingredients, pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier materials, and other optional ingredients as described herein (for example alkyl saccharides as described hereinafter), with the solvent results in a solution that can be spray-dried.

Appropriate pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier materials that may be employed in compositions of the invention include relevant materials that, in the appropriate combination, are suitable (and/or approved) for pharmaceutical use and/or for transmucosal (e.g. sublingual or, notably, intranasal) delivery, and are capable of maintaining their physical and/or chemical integrity, and/or do not affect the physical and/or chemical integrity of any active ingredients and/or any other ingredients that are or may be present in the composition (such as alkyl saccharide), in the solid state, under normal storage conditions.

It is well known that significant difficulties may be experienced in attempting to obtain both chemically- and physically-stable solid compositions, such as powders. If the physical form of a composition changes under normal storage conditions (e.g. from a free flowing powder to an agglomerated mass that is difficult to discharge), it will likely lead to non-reproducibility of dose of active ingredient. This is particularly so when dispensing a composition from, or via, a nasal applicator as described herein, where such agglomeration may result in the complete inability to dispense the active ingredient.

Similarly, for multiple dose units containing two or more doses of a composition, such stability is critical to ensure reproducibility of the dose of active ingredient over time. Either of these problems may have a detrimental effect on a subject's health, and/or put a subject's well-being at significant risk.

For certain compositions of the invention, exposure to atmospheric water may result in powder compositions that are less solid-state stable. For example, exposure to certain (e.g. higher) relative humidities may affect the physical form of the composition, for example by deliquescence, and/or by lowering glass transition temperatures of compositions, and/or individual components of the compositions, such as carrier materials, or in another way.

Accordingly, compositions of the invention, and pharmaceutical formulations and dosing means (such as nasal applicators) including them, are preferably packaged within containers that substantially prevent the ingress of atmospheric water under the storage conditions defined herein. Such containers may include packaging materials, such as blister packs for tablets and capsules and heat-sealed aluminium pouches and/or thermoformed plastics.

The phrase ‘maintaining physical and chemical integrity’ essentially means chemical stability and solid state stability.

By ‘chemical stability’, we include that any composition of the invention may be stored in isolated solid form, when formulated into a pharmaceutical formulation or dosage form, and/or when loaded into a pharmaceutical dosing means, such as a nasal applicator or a reservoir therefor (with or without appropriate pharmaceutical packaging), under normal storage conditions, with an insignificant degree of chemical degradation or decomposition of either the composition per se or the active ingredient included therein.

By ‘solid state stability’, we include that any composition of the invention may be stored in an isolated solid form, when formulated into a pharmaceutical formulation or dosage form, and/or when loaded into a pharmaceutical dosing means, such as a nasal applicator or a reservoir therefor (with or without appropriate pharmaceutical packaging), under normal storage conditions, with an insignificant degree of solid state transformation (e.g. crystallisation, recrystallisation, loss of crystallinity, solid state phase transition (e.g. between a glassy or a rubbery state, or to an agglomerated form)), hydration, dehydration, solvatisation or desolvatisation of either the composition per se or the active ingredient included therein.

Examples of ‘normal storage conditions’ for compositions of the invention, whether in the form of a pharmaceutical formulation or dosage form, and/or when loaded into a pharmaceutical dosing means loaded into applicators, devices, drug reservoirs (such as canisters or containers) or otherwise, include temperatures of between about −50° C. and about +80° C. (preferably between about −25° C. and about +75° C., such as about 50° C.), and/or pressures of between about 0.1 and about 2 bars (preferably atmospheric pressure), and/or exposure to about 460 lux of UV/visible light, and/or relative humidities of between about 5 and about 95% (preferably about 10 to about 40%), for prolonged periods (i.e. greater than or equal to about twelve, such as about six months).

Under such conditions, compositions of the invention (and/or active ingredients contained therein) may be found to be less than about 15%, more preferably less than about 10%, and especially less than about 5%, chemically degraded/decomposed, and/or solid-state transformed, as appropriate. The skilled person will appreciate that the above-mentioned upper and lower limits for temperature and pressure represent extremes of normal storage conditions, and that certain combinations of these extremes will not be experienced during normal storage (e.g. a temperature of 50° C. and a pressure of 0.1 bar).

Such chemical and, particularly, physical stability is of importance in a solid state composition, such as a powder, to ensure that the appropriate dose is delivered to the patient. This is particularly so when the composition is to be delivered intranasally.

Particularly preferred pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier materials that may be employed to produce compositions of the invention, and which possess the desirable characteristics mentioned herein, include, for the disaccharide component, maltitol, trehalose, sucralose, sucrose, isomalt, maltose and, particularly, lactose (including β-D-lactose and α-D-lactose, especially α-D-lactose monohydrate)

For the polymeric material component, preferred pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier materials that may be employed to produce compositions of the invention, and which possess the desirable characteristics mentioned herein, include cellulose and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (hypromellose, HPMC), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), methyl cellulose (MC), ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), modified cellulose gum, microcrystalline cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose; starches, such as rice starch, tapioca starch, wheat starch and, more particularly, corn starch and potato starch; starch derivatives, such as pregelatinized starch, carboxymethyl starch, as well as moderately cross-linked starch, modified starch and sodium starch glycolate; polysaccharides, including dextrins, such as dextrin, cyclodextrins and linear or branched dextrins, such as maltodextrins; powdered tragacanth; waxy excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; polyols, such as solid polyethylene glycols; acrylic polymers, such as carbomer and its derivatives; polyvinylpyrrolidone (povidone, PVP); crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone; polyethylene oxide (PEO); chitosan (poly-(D-glucosamine)); natural polymers, such as gelatin, sodium alginate, pectin; scleroglucan; xanthan gum; guar gum; poly co-(methylvinyl ether/maleic anhydride); and croscarmellose (e.g. croscarmellose sodium). Hypromellose acetate succinate (HPMCAS), copovidone and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, or PVOH) may also be mentioned.

More preferred polymeric materials include sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium starch glycolate, polyvinylpyrrolidone and, particularly, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (such as hypromellose 2906, preferably hypromellose 2910 (i.e. ‘E’-types), and more preferably USP/NF hypromellose 2208 (i.e. ‘K’-types)), and the like, or, particularly, polysaccharides, such as dextrins, including cyclodextrins (e.g. α-, β- and γ-cyclodextrins and derivatives thereof, such as, 2-hydroxypropyl-γ-cyclodextrin, sulfobutylether β-cyclodextrin sodium salt, randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin, branched β-cyclodextrin and the like and, particularly, 2-hydroxypropyl-8-cyclodextrin); and linear or branched dextrins, such as maltodextrins, which are classified by DE (dextrose equivalent), which can be between 3 and 20 (the higher the DE value, the shorter the average length of the glucose chains), especially maltodextrin with a DE of between 6 and such as 8 and 12.

In any event, suitable polymers for use in compositions of the invention should have a molecular weight that is high enough such that, when it is employed in any given amount in combination with a disaccharide, it is capable of forming a suitable carrier material for the active ingredient.

For any given polymer, polymer chain length (and therefore molecular weight) is directly proportional to its viscosity. Put another way, the viscosity of a solution of that polymer is proportional to the molecular weight or chain length of the specific polymer.

In this respect, it may be preferred that the polymer has a relative viscosity value at 20° C. of no more than about 1000 (more preferably no more than about 120, such as no more than about 60, and particularly no more than about 10) mPa*s, as measured, for any given and essentially:

(a) water-soluble polymer, as a 2 wt % solution of the polymer in water by the standard USP methods for viscosity, i.e. <911> Method I, and/or <912> Method I; and (b) water-insoluble polymer, as a 5 wt % solution of the polymer in a suitable organic solvent, such as acetone, methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, dichloromethane, toluene and mixtures thereof, which solvent system may be dry or partly aqueous, by the USP method <911> Method I.

The skilled person will understand which test is more suitable for the polymer tested.

Mixtures from any of the foregoing lists of disaccharides and/or polymeric materials may be employed.

Amounts of carrier materials that may be employed in compositions of the invention are typically in the range of about 5% to about 99.9%, including up to about 99% (e.g. up to about 95% or about 90%), such as about 10% (e.g. about 25%, including about 35%) to about 85%, including about 50% to about 75%, by weight, based upon the total weight of the composition (whether one dose of said composition is included in the dosing means or otherwise).

It is preferred that the combination of carrier materials is capable of giving rise to a composition of the invention that possesses a glass transition temperature (Tg) that:

(a) enables its production as a hard and/or brittle, ‘glassy’, amorphous, powdered physical form, that can be easily formulated into a pharmaceutical formulation or dosage form, and/or loaded into a suitable dosing means, such as a nasal applicator, or a drug reservoir and/or container within, or adjunct to, such an applicator, as described herein; and (b) is high enough that, after such a pharmaceutical formulation, dosage form or dosing means, such as an applicator or reservoir, is packaged as described herein, and thereafter subjected to a high external temperature (e.g. up to between about 50° C. and about 80° C.), it remains in that glassy state, rather than being transformed into a more viscous or rubbery state, and/or a crystalline state.

Such extreme external temperatures are often experienced inside vehicles in warm and/or sunny climates, which vehicles will frequently be parked for extended periods of time in full sun, where the resultant heat gain can be enormous. If the Tg of a composition of the invention is low, the composition may transform after exposure to such high temperatures to such a viscous/rubbery state, this will give rise to inefficient dosing of the composition of the invention, for example inefficient discharging of the composition from a dosing means, applicator or reservoir (and so too the dose(s) of active ingredient) once the dosing means or applicator is actuated. Furthermore, a too low Tg may affect the disintegration and/or dissolution of compositions of the invention in the form of tablets for sublingual or peroral use.

In this respect, we prefer that the lowest measurable Tg of a composition of the invention is at least about 40° C., such as at least about 50° C., such as at least about including at least about 60° C., when measured at a relative humidity of up to about 35%, such as up to about 30%, including up to about 25% (e.g. up to about 20%, such as less than about 15%, e.g. less than about 10%). By ‘lowest measurable Tg’, we include that the composition of the invention may comprise particles that are heterogenous in their nature. In particular, particles may comprise discrete regions of the carrier materials, or composite mixtures thereof, and so may possess individual and separate Tg values. It will be clear to the skilled person that the value of the lowest measurable Tg has a strong impact on the physical stability of the composition.

We have found that compositions of the invention comprising a combination of a disaccharide and a polymer (e.g. HPMC as defined herein) and/or, particularly, a dextrin is capable of giving rise to an appropriate level of physical and chemical stability of compositions and active ingredients when compared to other carrier materials, when employed alone or in isolation.

A particularly preferred combination of carrier materials thus includes trehalose or, more preferably, a lactose, such as α-D-lactose monohydrate, and a dextrin, and especially a cyclodextrin, such as 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, or a maltodextrin, such as maltodextrin 12DE. We have found that such a combination of carrier materials can be spray-dried together along with an active ingredient and also, if present, an alkyl saccharide in appropriate proportions to produce a composition of the invention that possesses both the desired physical and chemical stability under normal storage conditions, as defined herein.

We have found that relative amounts of the disaccharide and the polymer ingredients in the carrier material (and particularly so when the polymer is a dextrin) can be tailored to ensure the required level of physical and/or chemical stability of active ingredient whilst, at the same time, not lowering the Tg of the composition of the invention in such a manner that it affects its physical stability.

We have found that a ratio of between about 50:1 to about 1:50 of disaccharide:polymer (e.g. dextrin) by weight, based on the total weight of the composition, may work depending on the active ingredient that is employed. Preferred ratios are in the range of about 10:1 to about 1:40 (including up to about 1:30 or up to about 1:20), for example between about 2:1 and about 1:10, more preferably about 1:1 to about 1:8 of disaccharide:polymer (e.g. dextrin) by weight, based on the total weight of the composition.

Whatever their proportions in the final mixture, compositions of the invention

CLAIMS

Claims ( 54 )

The invention claimed is:

1. A nasal applicator device for intranasal delivery of a composition to nasal mucosa, wherein the device comprises a reservoir that is within, or adjunct or attached to, said device, which reservoir contains a composition in the form of an amorphous powder, which amorphous powder comprises particles, is free of liquid propellant, and is essentially free of water,

wherein said amorphous powder comprises:

(a) a pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of epinephrine or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof as sole active ingredient; and

(b) a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier material, which carrier material comprises a combination of a disaccharide and a polymeric material comprising a dextrin and/or hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose;

wherein the particles of the amorphous powder comprise an amorphous composite of epinephrine or salt thereof and the carrier material; and

wherein the nasal applicator device is configured and the particles are of a size whereby said device, upon actuation, is capable of depositing an effective dose of epinephrine, or salt thereof, to the nasal mucosa.

2. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the amorphous powder comprises less than about 5% of water.

3. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the amorphous powder comprises less than about 3% or water.

4. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the amorphous powder comprises less than about 2% of water.

5. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the amorphous powder comprises less than about 1% of water.

6. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the disaccharide is selected from the group consisting of maltitol, trehalose, sucralose, sucrose, isomalt, maltose and lactose.

7. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the disaccharide comprises lactose or trehalose.

8. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the dextrin comprises a cyclodextrin or a maltodextrin.

9. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carrier material comprises a combination of:

(i) lactose or trehalose; and

(ii) a maltodextrin.

10. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the ratio of disaccharide:polymeric material by weight is in the range of about 2:1 and about 1:8.

11. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the ratio of disaccharide:polymeric material by weight is about 2:1.

12. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the lowest measurable glass transition temperature of the composition is at least about 40° C. when measured at a relative humidity of up to about 35%.

13. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the composition further comprises a sucrose ester.

14. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the sucrose ester comprises sucrose monolaurate.

15. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of epinephrine is between about 0.1 mg and about 5 mg (calculated as the free base compound).

16. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the nasal applicator device is a single-use device and the reservoir contains a single dose of said amorphous powder.

17. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the powder has a particle size distribution that includes a D10 that is above about 3 μm.

18. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 17 , wherein the particle size distribution includes a D10 above about 10 μm.

19. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 18 , wherein the particle size distribution includes a D90 below about 500 μm.

20. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 18 , wherein the particle size distribution includes a D90 below about 100 μm.

21. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the powder has a particle size distribution that includes a volume-based mean diameter within the range of about 10 μm and about 100 μm.

22. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carrier material comprises a combination of:

(i) lactose or trehalose, and

(ii) a maltodextrin; and

wherein the amorphous powder composition further comprises sucrose monolaurate.

23. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carrier material comprises a combination of:

(i) lactose or trehalose, and

(ii) a maltodextrin; and

wherein the amorphous powder composition further comprises sucrose monolaurate, and the powder has a particle size distribution that includes a D10 above about 10 μm.

24. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , which is packaged within a container that substantially prevents the ingress of atmospheric water.

25. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 24 , wherein the container comprises a material selected from the group of heat-sealed aluminium pouches and thermoformed plastics.

26. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 22 , which is packaged within a container that substantially prevents the ingress of atmospheric water.

27. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 26 , wherein the container comprises a material selected from the group of heat-sealed aluminium pouches and thermoformed plastics.

28. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 23 , which is packaged within a container that substantially prevents the ingress of atmospheric water.

29. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 28 , wherein the container comprises a material selected from the group of heat-sealed aluminium pouches and thermoformed plastics.

30. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the disaccharide is selected from the group consisting of maltitol, trehalose, sucralose, sucrose, isomalt, maltose and lactose.

31. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 30 , wherein the disaccharide comprises lactose or trehalose.

32. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the dextrin comprises a cyclodextrin or a maltodextrin.

33. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the carrier material comprises a combination of:

(i) lactose or trehalose; and

(ii) a maltodextrin.

34. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the ratio of disaccharide:polymeric material by weight is in the range of about 2:1 and about 1:8.

35. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 34 , wherein the ratio of disaccharide:polymeric material by weight is about 2:1.

36. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the lowest measurable glass transition temperature of the composition is at least about 40° C. when measured at a relative humidity of up to about 35%.

37. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the composition further comprises a sucrose ester.

38. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 37 , wherein the sucrose ester comprises sucrose monolaurate.

39. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the pharmacologically-effective dosage amount of epinephrine is between about 0.1 mg and about 5 mg (calculated as the free base compound).

40. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the nasal applicator device is a single-use device and the reservoir contains a single dose of said amorphous powder.

41. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the powder has a particle size distribution that includes a D10 that is above about 3 μm.

42. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 41 , wherein the particle size distribution includes a D10 above about 10 μm.

43. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 42 , wherein the particle size distribution includes a D90 below about 500 μm.

44. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 42 , wherein the particle size distribution includes a D90 below about 100 μm.

45. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the powder has a particle size distribution that includes a volume-based mean diameter within the range of about 10 μm and about 100 μm.

46. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the carrier material comprises a combination of:

(i) lactose or trehalose, and

(ii) a maltodextrin; and

wherein the amorphous powder composition further comprises sucrose monolaurate.

47. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the carrier material comprises a combination of:

(i) lactose or trehalose, and

(ii) a maltodextrin; and

wherein the amorphous powder composition further comprises sucrose monolaurate, and the powder has a particle size distribution that includes a D10 above about 10 μm.

48. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 2 , which is packaged within a container that substantially prevents the ingress of atmospheric water.

49. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 48 , wherein the container comprises a material selected from the group of heat-sealed aluminium pouches and thermoformed plastics.

50. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 46 , which is packaged within a container that substantially prevents the ingress of atmospheric water.

51. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 50 , wherein the container comprises a material selected from the group of heat-sealed aluminium pouches and thermoformed plastics.

52. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 47 , which is packaged within a container that substantially prevents the ingress of atmospheric water.

53. The nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 52 , wherein the container comprises a material selected from the group of heat-sealed aluminium pouches and thermoformed plastics.

54. A process for the manufacturing of the nasal applicator device as claimed in claim 1 , which comprises loading said amorphous powder into the reservoir of said applicator device.

US18/345,770

2020-05-18

2023-06-30

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Active

US12357573B2

( en )

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number

Priority Date

Filing Date

Title

US18/345,770

US12357573B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2023-06-30

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

US19/234,579

US20260124143A1

( en )

2020-05-18

2025-06-11

New pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Applications Claiming Priority (12)

Application Number

Priority Date

Filing Date

Title

GB2007306

2020-05-18

GBGB2007306.0A

GB202007306D0

( en )

2020-05-18

2020-05-18

New pharmaceutical composition

GB2007306.0

2020-05-18

GB2009905.7

2020-06-29

GB2009905

2020-06-29

GBGB2009905.7A

GB202009905D0

( en )

2020-06-29

2020-06-29

New pharmaceutical composition

GB2018901.5

2020-12-01

GBGB2018901.5A

GB202018901D0

( en )

2020-12-01

2020-12-01

New pharmaceutical composition

GB2018901

2020-12-01

PCT/GB2021/051191

WO2021234366A1

( en )

2020-05-18

2021-05-18

New pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

US17/540,929

US11737980B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2021-12-02

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

US18/345,770

US12357573B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2023-06-30

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number

Title

Priority Date

Filing Date

US17/540,929

Continuation

US11737980B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2021-12-02

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number

Title

Priority Date

Filing Date

US19/234,579

Continuation

US20260124143A1

( en )

2020-05-18

2025-06-11

New pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Publications (2)

Publication Number

Publication Date

US20240024244A1

US20240024244A1 ( en )

2024-01-25

US12357573B2

true

US12357573B2 ( en )

2025-07-15

Family

ID=76138084

Family Applications (3)

Application Number

Title

Priority Date

Filing Date

US17/540,929

Active

US11737980B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2021-12-02

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

US18/345,770

Active

US12357573B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2023-06-30

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

US19/234,579

Pending

US20260124143A1

( en )

2020-05-18

2025-06-11

New pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number

Title

Priority Date

Filing Date

US17/540,929

Active

US11737980B2

( en )

2020-05-18

2021-12-02

Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number

Title

Priority Date

Filing Date

US19/234,579

Pending

US20260124143A1

( en )

2020-05-18

2025-06-11

New pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Country Status (25)

Country

Link

US

( 3 )

US11737980B2

( en )

EP

( 2 )

EP3962455B1

( en )

JP

( 1 )

JP2023526098A

( en )

KR

( 1 )

KR20230012502A

( en )

CN

( 2 )

CN121265577A

( en )

AU

( 1 )

AU2021276611A1

( en )

BR

( 1 )

BR112022023307A2

( en )

CA

( 1 )

CA3178769A1

( en )

CL

( 1 )

CL2022002979A1

( en )

CO

( 1 )

CO2022015183A2

( en )

DK

( 1 )

DK3962455T3

( en )

ES

( 1 )

ES2929818T3

( en )

HR

( 1 )

HRP20221361T1

( en )

HU

( 1 )

HUE060573T2

( en )

IL

( 1 )

IL297658A

( en )

LT

( 1 )

LT3962455T

( en )

MD

( 1 )

MD3962455T2

( en )

MX

( 1 )

MX2022014216A

( en )

PE

( 1 )

PE20230382A1

( en )

PL

( 1 )

PL3962455T3

( en )

PT

( 1 )

PT3962455T

( en )

RS

( 1 )

RS63725B1

( en )

SI

( 1 )

SI3962455T1

( en )

SM

( 1 )

SMT202200411T1

( en )

WO

( 1 )

WO2021234366A1

( en )

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party

Publication number

Priority date

Publication date

Assignee

Title

US8580801B2

( en )

2008-07-23

2013-11-12

Robert I. Henkin

Phosphodiesterase inhibitor treatment

US10598672B2

( en )

2014-02-18

2020-03-24

Cyrano Therapeutics, Inc.

Methods and compositions for diagnosing and treating loss and/or distortion of taste or smell

WO2021194893A1

( en )

2020-03-24

2021-09-30

Cyrano Therapeutics, Inc.

Treatment of chemosensory dysfunction from a coronavirus infection

SMT202200411T1

( en )

2020-05-18

2022-11-18

Orexo Ab

New pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

US12414916B2

( en )

2021-06-10

2025-09-16

Belhaven BioPharma Inc.

Dry powder formulations of epinephrine and associated methods

GB202117016D0

( en )

2021-11-25

2022-01-12

Orexo Ab

New pharmaceutical device

AU2022395920A1

( en )

2021-11-25

2024-05-30

Orexo Ab

Pharmaceutical composition comprising adrenaline

AU2022398370A1

( en )

*

2021-11-25

2024-05-30

Orexo Ab

Pharmaceutical composition comprising biopharmaceutical drug compounds

CN119278026A

( en )

2022-03-31

2025-01-07

好利安科技有限公司

Inhalation composite and carrier-based formulation combinations

AU2023262714B2

( en )

*

2022-04-29

2024-08-22

Pentide Therapeutics Limited

Pharmaceutical compositions of semaglutide and the methods of use thereof

US12029709B2

( en )

2022-08-11

2024-07-09

De Motu Cordis Pty Ltd

Inhalable epinephrine formulation

KR20250048076A

( en )

*

2022-08-11

2025-04-07

드 모투 코르디스 피티와이 엘티디

Inhaled epinephrine formulation

GB202301322D0

( en )

*

2023-01-30

2023-03-15

Therakind Ltd

Antiemetic pharmaceutical compositions for nasal delivery

KR20260005949A

( en )

*

2023-04-24

2026-01-12

시라노 테라퓨틱스, 아이엔씨.

Treatment of memory loss using phosphodiesterase inhibitors

EP4719348A1

( en )

*

2023-05-31

2026-04-08

Orexo AB

Spray-dried compositions comprising adrenergic receptor modulators

GB202308123D0

( en )

*

2023-05-31

2023-07-12

Orexo Ab

New copmosition

EP4727536A1

( en )

*

2023-06-14

2026-04-22

Genus Lifesciences Inc.

Pharmaceutical oral solid dosage forms including phenobarbital and methods of making and using the same

US20260108686A1

( en )

*

2024-10-21

2026-04-23

Belhaven BioPharma Inc.

Compositions, devices, and methods for intranasal delivery of dry powder epinephrine

Citations (121)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party

Publication number

Priority date

Publication date

Assignee

Title

GB1287475A

( en )

1969-11-28

1972-08-31

Aspro Nicholas Ltd

Aspirin formulations

WO1991009592A1

( en )

1989-12-21

1991-07-11

Kabi Pharmacia Ab

Transdermal system

US5082669A

( en )

1989-07-20

1992-01-21

Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Rapid-releasing oral particle pharmaceutical preparation with unpleasant taste masked

EP0657176A2

( en )

1993-12-06

1995-06-14

Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.

Composition containing a water-insoluble or slightly water-soluble compound with enhanced water-solubility

EP0736299A1

( en )

1995-04-03

1996-10-09

Cerbios-Pharma S.A.

Process for preparing a liposomal, water-dispersable, solid, dry, therapeutic formulation for oral administration

US5702362A

( en )

1995-05-26

1997-12-30

Bayer Aktiengesellschaft

Nasal applicator

JP2000178184A

( en )

1998-12-17

2000-06-27

Lion Corp

Granular composition, tablet and method for producing granular composition

WO2000062757A1

( en )

1999-04-19

2000-10-26

Britannia Pharmaceuticals Limited

Composition containing opioid antagonists and spray dispenser

EP1093818A1

( en )

1998-07-08

2001-04-25

Kirin-Amgen Inc.

Powdery preparation for mucosal administration containing polymeric medicine

WO2001030288A1

( en )

1999-10-27

2001-05-03

Anesta Corporation

Oral transmucosal drug dosage using solid solution

WO2001060338A1

( en )

2000-02-17

2001-08-23

Alpharma Aps

Drug carrier pellet production process

WO2001087264A2

( en )

2000-05-18

2001-11-22

Elan Pharma International Ltd.

Rapidly disintegrating solid oral dosage form

WO2001089485A1

( en )

2000-05-26

2001-11-29

Hanmi Pharm. Co., Ltd.

Rapidly disintegrating tablet and process for the manufacture thereof

US6398074B1

( en )

1998-03-10

2002-06-04

Valois S.A.

Reservoir, reservoir filling method and device for dispensing fluid contained in the reservoir

WO2002047607A2

( en )

2000-12-15

2002-06-20

Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited

Process for the preparation of a fast dissolving dosage form

WO2003061632A1

( en )

2002-01-22

2003-07-31

Ml Laboratories Plc

Method of treatment of a patient requiring analgesia

WO2004054511A2

( en )

2002-12-13

2004-07-01

The Regents Of The University Of California

Analgesic combination comprising nalbuphine

WO2004075877A1

( en )

2003-02-24

2004-09-10

Pharmaceutical Productions, Inc.

Transmucosal drug delivery system

EP1349598B1

( en )

2001-01-12

2004-11-03

Becton, Dickinson and Company

Medicament respiratory delivery device

WO2004100857A2

( en )

2003-05-07

2004-11-25

Akina, Inc.

Highly plastic granules for making fast melting tablets

WO2004112702A2

( en )

2003-06-13

2004-12-29

Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.

Low dose pharmaceutical powders for inhalation

CN1565451A

( en )

2003-06-25

2005-01-19

中国人民解放军军事医学科学院毒物药物研究所

Naloxone Hydrochloride nose powder preparation

US20050019411A1

( en )

2001-10-18

2005-01-27

Paolo Colombo

Powder for nasal administration of drugs

US20050042178A1

( en )

2003-08-18

2005-02-24

Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh

Microparticles containing the CGRP-antagonist 1-[N2-[3,5-dibrom-N-[[4-(3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-oxoquinazoline-3-yl)-1-piperidinyl]carbonyl]-D-tyrosyl]-L-lysyl]-4-(4-pyridinyl)-piperazine, process for preparing and the use thereof as inhalation powder

CN1615867A

( en )

2004-10-22

2005-05-18

北京阳光润禾科技有限公司

Naloxone hydrchloride freeze-dried powder preparation for injection

WO2005044186A2

( en )

2003-10-28

2005-05-19

Glaxo Group Limited

Inhalable pharmaceutical formulations employing desiccating agents and methods of administering the same

US20050118272A1

( en )

2001-12-27

2005-06-02

Jerome Besse

Micronized pharmaceutical or nutraceutical powder with immediate release

CN1640402A

( en )

2004-01-02

2005-07-20

广东奇方药业有限公司

Stable naloxone powder for injection

WO2005065652A1

( en )

2004-01-06

2005-07-21

Doron Friedman

Non-aqueous composition for oral delivery of insoluble bioactive agents

WO2005079777A1

( en )

2004-02-23

2005-09-01

Hormos Medical Ltd.

Solid formulations of ospemifene

US6938798B2

( en )

2000-12-08

2005-09-06

Tebro S.A.

Fluid or powdery product dispensing device

CN1781479A

( en )

2004-12-02

2006-06-07

和记黄埔医药企业有限公司

Chinese small iris seed agent dispersion system and its preparing method

CN1813739A

( en )

2005-11-25

2006-08-09

王颖

Nalmefene hydro chloride lyophilized powder formulation for injection

WO2006085101A2

( en )

2005-02-10

2006-08-17

Orexo Ab

Pharmaceutical compositions useful in the transmucosal administration of drugs

WO2006101536A1

( en )

2004-11-04

2006-09-28

Akina, Inc.

Fast-melting tablets having taste-masking and sustained release properties

AU2006207868A1

( en )

2002-03-20

2006-09-28

Alkermes, Inc.

Method and apparatus for producing dry particles

WO2007024123A1

( en )

2005-08-26

2007-03-01

Sk Chemicals Co., Ltd.

Pharmaceutical composition of pranlukast solid-dispersion with improved initial dissolution rate and the method of preparing the same

CN1939358A

( en )

2005-09-30

2007-04-04

江西本草天工科技有限责任公司

Sarcandra glaber dispersant tablets

WO2007086039A1

( en )

2006-01-27

2007-08-02

The Provost, Fellows And Scholars Of The College Of The Holy And Undivided Trinity Of Queen Elizabeth, Near Dublin

A method of producing porous microparticles

WO2007096906A2

( en )

2006-02-27

2007-08-30

Panacea Biotec Ltd.

Novel buccoadhesive compositions and process of preparation thereof

US20070202163A1

( en )

2005-09-09

2007-08-30

Mutasem Rawas-Qalaji

Fast-disintegrating epinephrine tablets for buccal or sublingual administration

WO2007108010A2

( en )

2006-03-21

2007-09-27

Jubilant Organosys Limited

Taste masked pharmaceutical composition for oral solid dosage form and process for preparing the same using magnesium aluminium silicate

WO2007113856A2

( en )

2006-03-31

2007-10-11

Rubicon Research Private Limited

Directly compressible composite for orally disintegrating tablets

WO2008033023A2

( en )

2006-09-15

2008-03-20

Echo Pharmaceuticals B.V.

Granulate containing a pharmaceutically active substance and anemulsifier and method for its manufacture

WO2008127746A1

( en )

2007-01-10

2008-10-23

Board Of Regents The University Of Texas System

Enhanced delivery of immunosuppressive drug compositions for pulmonary delivery

US20080269347A1

( en )

2006-09-28

2008-10-30

Azopharma, Inc.

Epinephrine formulations

WO2009040595A1

( en )

2007-09-28

2009-04-02

Wockhardt Research Centre

Multi-dose pharmaceutical composition of analgesic for nasal administration

WO2009120735A1

( en )

2008-03-27

2009-10-01

Us Worldmeds Llc

Composition and method for transmucosal delivery of lofexidine

US20090264530A1

( en )

2008-04-16

2009-10-22

Nickell Robert P

Combined nsaid and acetaminophen formulation and method

US7722566B2

( en )

2003-10-09

2010-05-25

Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd.

Device to deliver a powdery medicine into nasal cavity

EP2251038A1

( en )

2008-03-11

2010-11-17

ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Solid dispersion, pharmaceutical compositions containing the same, and processes for the production of both

WO2010135495A2

( en )

2009-05-20

2010-11-25

Aeras Global Tb Vaccine Foundation

Stable, spray dried, immunogenic, viral compositions

WO2010142696A1

( en )

2009-06-11

2010-12-16

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Use of opioid receptor antagonists for acute treatment of paraphilic arousal states

WO2010144865A2

( en )

2009-06-12

2010-12-16

Meritage Pharma, Inc.

Methods for treating gastrointestinal disorders

US20110045088A1

( en )

2009-07-31

2011-02-24

Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd.

Intranasal granisetron and nasal applicator

WO2011036521A2

( en )

2009-09-25

2011-03-31

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited

Formulations comprising triptan compounds

US7947742B2

( en )

2002-06-28

2011-05-24

Civitas Therapeutics, Inc.

Inhalable epinephrine

WO2012027731A2

( en )

2010-08-27

2012-03-01

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Pharmaceutical composition and administrations thereof

WO2012042224A2

( en )

2010-10-01

2012-04-05

Cipla Limited

Pharmaceutical composition

WO2012075455A2

( en )

2010-12-02

2012-06-07

Aptalis Pharmatech, Inc.

Rapidly dispersing granules, orally disintegrating tablets and methods

WO2012109694A1

( en )

2011-02-18

2012-08-23

Sai Ying Ko

Process for preparing products comprising stabilised actives and compositions comprising same

US20130213398A1

( en )

2010-08-23

2013-08-22

Michael M. Lipp

Dry powder formulations and methods for treating pulmonary diseases

WO2013168437A1

( en )

2012-05-11

2013-11-14

株式会社アクティバスフã

Related documents

Record · ID 607361
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.