ABSTRACT
Abstract
Separation systems and processes using osmotically driven membrane systems are disclosed and generally involve the extraction of solvent from a first solution to concentrate solute by using a second concentrated solution to draw the solvent from the first solution across a semi-permeable membrane. These systems and processes involve the integration of the osmotically driven membrane systems, such as forward osmosis, with renewable energy sources, such as solar thermal power plants or geothermal installations for the recovery of draw solutes.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/764,339, filed Feb. 13, 2013; and 61/785,116, filed Mar. 14, 2013; the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
FIELD OF THE TECHNOLOGY
One or more aspects relate generally to osmotic separation. More particularly, one or more aspects involve the integration of osmotically driven membrane processes (ODMP), such as forward osmosis, with renewable energy sources, such as solar thermal power plants or geothermal installations.
BACKGROUND
Large amounts of fresh water are required for power generation. Specifically, water is consumed in the cooling process of a Rankine power cycle. Among different power generation technologies, Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants with wet cooling have the highest annual water consumption. To further exacerbate this problem, CSPs are located in areas of high solar irradiance, such as deserts, which have limited surface water. Some CSP plants have adopted dry cooling methods that greatly reduce water intake, but lead to increased capital costs and large efficiency losses on hot days.
Existing sea-water desalination processes utilized to provide fresh water for both municipal and industrial sources are low recovery processes. Sea Water Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) plants typically have a recovery of Ë45% âso more than half the sea water that enters the plant is returned to the sea as a concentrate. Multiple Effect Distillation (MED) and Multi-Stage Flash (MSF) plants operate at much lower recoveries, typically in the 15 to 35% range. Therefore, these plants expend energy and pre-treatment costs on bringing a great deal of water to the plant that is subsequently returned to the sea as a waste. Concentrate management is a significant issue with inland brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO) plants. These plants can produce fresh water from brackish aquifers and surface waters, but are plagued with the problem of what to do with the concentrate that is produced. Returning the concentrate to a saline body, such as a sea or ocean, is not practical.
Low enthalpy geothermal resources provide geothermal fluids at temperatures of 150° C. and below; however, this is a generalization, as industry definitions are not consistent. These resources are less than ideal for electrical power generation, because the low temperature of the available heat results in a low thermodynamic efficiency and relatively high capital cost, and such systems would likely use an Organic Rankine Cycle. However, they are available in relatively shallow wells in many regions where higher enthalpy resources are not available.
Electrical power usage is dependent on region. But in many arid regions a significant amount of power is consumed either directly for desalination or indirectly as a reduction in power plant output due to the addition of back pressure on the steam turbine or extraction of higher pressure steam from a steam turbine, for example in an Integrated Power and Water Plant utilizing MSF or MED or a SWRO.
It is, therefore, attractive to use low enthalpy geothermal resources to desalinate water directly and avoid the significant electrical power generation inefficiencies and transmission losses, thus both reducing generation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and displacing fossil fuel consumption. In the case of fossil fuel producers, this displaced consumption represents potential export revenue. In the context of renewable sources of energy for FO desalination, geothermal sources are very desirable in that they are not subject to diurnal or weather variations, which may negate the need for storage of heat and allow for steady operation of the desalination.
The use of geothermal resources for the desalination of water has been proposed before. Bechtel proposed a combined water and power plant in the 60's. The US Bureau of Reclamation built a plant in Holtville in 1972. This was likely with a higher enthalpy resource. Two small plants have been installed in France and Tunisia using polypropylene evaporators and condensers with operation temperature ranges of 60 to 90° C. A 2 stage Alpha Laval MED plant operating at 61° C. was piloted in the Greek Island of Kimolos with a production capacity of 80 m3/day. There does not seem to be any examples of low enthalpy geothermal desalination of a scale larger than pilot plant or installations with a high efficiency (with a significant number of effects). In general, MED is an obvious technology of choice for coupling to low enthalpy geothermal resources. In general, MSF requires too high of a thermal input temperature in order to obtain a sufficient number of stages to have an effective performance ratio, due to the adverse thermodynamics compared to MED.
It is also worth noting that at the temperatures available in low enthalpy system techniques, such as thermal vapor compression (TVC), which improve system efficiency, are not possible without an external heat pump, which would be a significant consumer of prime electrical power or a high quality heat source. Similarly, mechanical vapor compression (MVC) would use a significant amount of electricity, which may negate the benefits in the use of the geothermal resource to desalinate.
The need for, and occurrence of, sea-water desalination is highest in regions with high solar irradiance. Similarly, many in-land solar plants are located in regions of high solar irradiance that are often arid regions where access to water is limited, which hinders the solar plant operation and creates an opportunity to alleviate the local water scarcity.
SUMMARY
Aspects of the invention relate generally to osmotically driven membrane systems and processes, including forward osmosis separation (FO), direct osmotic concentration (DOC), pressure-assisted forward osmosis (PAFO), and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). More particularly, the invention relates to systems and methods that integrate renewable energy sources with the osmotically-driven membrane systems and processes (generally, ODMP).
Generally, the systems described herein are thermally driven brine concentrators or other types of ODMP that can recover significant amounts of water saline concentrates. The systems can produce fresh water from the waste concentrate of SWRO, MED and MSF (or directly from other water sources) and dramatically reduce the volume of the water required for, for example, a CSP plant. This water has already been treated for feed to the upstream desalination operation, and plant capacity can be increased with the existing intake and out-take structures, without increasing the pre-treatment cost, by turning a waste into a valuable product. Because the ODMP is a thermally driven process, it integrates well with solar thermal plants. Certain sources of heat can be captured from CSP plants with a very small marginal investment. Furthermore, since the ODMP can be driven by low grade (low temperature) heat, solar steam generators and solar water heaters provide a low cost approach to powering brine concentration when the brine concentration is not co-located with a CSP plant.
Described below are the estimated minimal CAPEX requirements to provide thermal power to disclosed systems for brine concentration by utilizing dumped energy and cold Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF) as sources of thermal power, as discussed in greater detail below. For a 50 MWe CSP plant, a 1300 m3/day (0.34 MGD) average capacity brine concentrating system can be virtually no OPEX utilizing dumped energy. Additional thermal power can be captured from cold HTF for only Ë$340/m3/day CAPEX investment in the solar field. These thermal power sources have no fuel costs and can be obtained with effectively zero marginal OPEX. The various systems themselves cost approximately $2,500 per m3/day capacity to install in the 3000 m3/day capacity range; however, these costs may vary depending on the application and overall size and configuration of the system. OPEX is minimal. With 25 year depreciation of capital this results in a cost of water in the $0.75 to $1 range.
Unlike all other brine concentration technologies, the present invention has the inherent capability to store desalination capacity. The basic forward osmosis process is described in the various patents and patent applications incorporated hereinbelow, but central to the production of fresh water from brines is the use of a draw solution that osmotically separates water from brines. As the draw solution is recycled in a closed loop cycle, it can be accumulated in the concentrated form during periods where thermal power input is higher and depleted during periods of lower thermal power input. Therefore, the process is inherently suited to couple with intermittent and variable thermal inputs, such as those found with renewable energy sources.
Typical CSP plants utilize a conventional steam Rankine cycle. Steam is condensed after exiting the turbine in order to improve turbine efficiency. The lower the temperature at which the heat rejected increases the efficiency of the Rankine cycleâleading to increased electrical production per unit of heat input at a given feed steam temperature. It is desirable to use cooling towers, as these can provide lower temperatures than dry cooling. But many CSP plants are, or will be, located in arid regions, where access to water resources is extremely limited. Dry cooling with air is an alternative to cooling with water consuming cooling towers. But dry cooling can reduce electricity production by 7% and increase the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 10%.
Brine concentration with the disclosed osmotic systems and processes is ideally suited for reducing water consumption of cooling towers by recapturing fresh water for cooling tower make-up from saline cooling tower blown-down. Additionally, where CSP plants are located in proximity to oil and gas production or mining operations, the osmotic systems and processes can be utilized to provide fresh water to the CSP plant cooling system by desalinating saline produced waters, fracturing fluid flow back or mining wastes. In these cases, implementation of the present invention to provide the opportunity for wet cooling could reduce LCOE by as much as 10%. Water consumption for cooling may be significant: 710-950 USG/MWh. CSP plants are often located in arid regions, so on site and integrated desalination may be very beneficial by providing a source of water suitable for a cooling tower and by reusing cooling tower blow down.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a system (and its corresponding method steps) for the osmotic extraction of a solvent from a first solution. The first solution can include any of the water sources disclosed herein, including the solvent recovered from any of those sources for reuse within the system/process. The system includes a forward osmosis unit including a first chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of the first solution, a second chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of a concentrated draw solution, and a semi-permeable membrane system separating the first chamber from the second chamber and configured for osmotically separating the solvent from the first solution, thereby forming a second solution in the first chamber and a dilute draw solution in the second chamber. The system also includes a source of thermal energy from a renewable energy source and a separation system in fluid communication with the forward osmosis unit and the source of thermal energy and configured to separate the dilute draw solution into the concentrated draw solution and a solvent stream. The separation system includes a first inlet fluidly coupled to an outlet of the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for receiving the dilute draw solution therefrom, a second inlet for receiving the source of thermal energy, a first outlet fluidly coupled to the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for introducing the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis unit, and a second outlet for outputting the solvent.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspect, the forward osmosis unit includes a plurality of semi-permeable membrane systems. The renewable energy source can include a concentrated solar energy plant or a geothermal system. The source of thermal energy can include at least one of waste heat, stored heat, or a steam source. The waste heat source can include heat rejected by a concentrated solar power plant, for example, during periods of high solar irradiance. The stored heat can include at least one of a hot heat transfer fluid, a cold heat transfer fluid, and/or a source of hot water from a concentrated solar power plant or other geothermal source. The steam source can include at least one of a portion of the steam output from a steam generator, a solar superheater, and/or a steam condenser, such as might be available between stages of a steam turbine. In some embodiments, the separation system includes a distillation module, such as a distillation column and/or a membrane distillation module; however, other types of separation systems as disclosed in the incorporated applications are contemplated and considered within the scope of the invention.
In one or more embodiments, the steam source is directly coupled to the distillation module via, for example, any necessary plumbing, valves, pumps, etc. In some embodiments, the other sources of thermal energy are used to generate steam for the separation system or otherwise provide heat for alternative draw solution recovery methods. In additional embodiments, the systems can include pre- and/or post-treatment systems in fluid communication with the source of thermal energy. In one embodiment, the system includes a pretreatment system for conditioning the first solution. In another embodiment, the system includes a post-treatment system for conditioning at least one of the second solution, the concentrated draw solution, and/or the solvent. In addition, the system can include an osmotic storage system for storing the concentrated draw solution and the solvent exiting the separation system in fluidic isolation for later reintroduction to the forward osmosis unit as the first solution and the concentrated raw solution. The system can be operated to store desalination capacity during off-peak hours (e.g., a period of low water and/or energy demand) and produce water during hours of peak water and/or energy demand.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of osmotically extracting a solvent from a first solution. The method includes the steps of providing a forward osmosis unit, fluidly coupling a separation system with the forward osmosis unit, and introducing a source of thermal energy from a renewable energy source to the separation system. The forward osmosis unit includes a first chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of the first solution, a second chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of a concentrated draw solution, and a semi-permeable membrane system separating the first chamber from the second chamber and configured for osmotically separating the solvent from the first solution, thereby forming a second solution in the first chamber and a dilute draw solution in the second chamber. The separation system is configured to separate the dilute draw solution into the concentrated draw solution and a solvent stream and includes an inlet fluidly coupled to an outlet of the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for receiving the dilute draw solution therefrom, a first outlet fluidly coupled to the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for introducing the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis unit, and a second outlet for outputting the solvent.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspect, the step of introducing a source of thermal energy includes directing at least one of waste heat, stored heat, or a steam source from a concentrated solar power plant to the separation system. Generally, the stored heat includes at least one of a hot heat transfer fluid, a cold heat transfer fluid, and/or a source of hot water from a concentrated solar power plant. In some embodiments, the separation system includes at least one distillation module (e.g., a distillation column or a membrane distillation module) and the step of introducing a source of thermal
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/764,339, filed Feb. 13, 2013; and 61/785,116, filed Mar. 14, 2013; the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
FIELD OF THE TECHNOLOGY
One or more aspects relate generally to osmotic separation. More particularly, one or more aspects involve the integration of osmotically driven membrane processes (ODMP), such as forward osmosis, with renewable energy sources, such as solar thermal power plants or geothermal installations.
BACKGROUND
Large amounts of fresh water are required for power generation. Specifically, water is consumed in the cooling process of a Rankine power cycle. Among different power generation technologies, Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants with wet cooling have the highest annual water consumption. To further exacerbate this problem, CSPs are located in areas of high solar irradiance, such as deserts, which have limited surface water. Some CSP plants have adopted dry cooling methods that greatly reduce water intake, but lead to increased capital costs and large efficiency losses on hot days.
Existing sea-water desalination processes utilized to provide fresh water for both municipal and industrial sources are low recovery processes. Sea Water Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) plants typically have a recovery of Ë45% âso more than half the sea water that enters the plant is returned to the sea as a concentrate. Multiple Effect Distillation (MED) and Multi-Stage Flash (MSF) plants operate at much lower recoveries, typically in the 15 to 35% range. Therefore, these plants expend energy and pre-treatment costs on bringing a great deal of water to the plant that is subsequently returned to the sea as a waste. Concentrate management is a significant issue with inland brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO) plants. These plants can produce fresh water from brackish aquifers and surface waters, but are plagued with the problem of what to do with the concentrate that is produced. Returning the concentrate to a saline body, such as a sea or ocean, is not practical.
Low enthalpy geothermal resources provide geothermal fluids at temperatures of 150° C. and below; however, this is a generalization, as industry definitions are not consistent. These resources are less than ideal for electrical power generation, because the low temperature of the available heat results in a low thermodynamic efficiency and relatively high capital cost, and such systems would likely use an Organic Rankine Cycle. However, they are available in relatively shallow wells in many regions where higher enthalpy resources are not available.
Electrical power usage is dependent on region. But in many arid regions a significant amount of power is consumed either directly for desalination or indirectly as a reduction in power plant output due to the addition of back pressure on the steam turbine or extraction of higher pressure steam from a steam turbine, for example in an Integrated Power and Water Plant utilizing MSF or MED or a SWRO.
It is, therefore, attractive to use low enthalpy geothermal resources to desalinate water directly and avoid the significant electrical power generation inefficiencies and transmission losses, thus both reducing generation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and displacing fossil fuel consumption. In the case of fossil fuel producers, this displaced consumption represents potential export revenue. In the context of renewable sources of energy for FO desalination, geothermal sources are very desirable in that they are not subject to diurnal or weather variations, which may negate the need for storage of heat and allow for steady operation of the desalination.
The use of geothermal resources for the desalination of water has been proposed before. Bechtel proposed a combined water and power plant in the 60's. The US Bureau of Reclamation built a plant in Holtville in 1972. This was likely with a higher enthalpy resource. Two small plants have been installed in France and Tunisia using polypropylene evaporators and condensers with operation temperature ranges of 60 to 90° C. A 2 stage Alpha Laval MED plant operating at 61° C. was piloted in the Greek Island of Kimolos with a production capacity of 80 m3/day. There does not seem to be any examples of low enthalpy geothermal desalination of a scale larger than pilot plant or installations with a high efficiency (with a significant number of effects). In general, MED is an obvious technology of choice for coupling to low enthalpy geothermal resources. In general, MSF requires too high of a thermal input temperature in order to obtain a sufficient number of stages to have an effective performance ratio, due to the adverse thermodynamics compared to MED.
It is also worth noting that at the temperatures available in low enthalpy system techniques, such as thermal vapor compression (TVC), which improve system efficiency, are not possible without an external heat pump, which would be a significant consumer of prime electrical power or a high quality heat source. Similarly, mechanical vapor compression (MVC) would use a significant amount of electricity, which may negate the benefits in the use of the geothermal resource to desalinate.
The need for, and occurrence of, sea-water desalination is highest in regions with high solar irradiance. Similarly, many in-land solar plants are located in regions of high solar irradiance that are often arid regions where access to water is limited, which hinders the solar plant operation and creates an opportunity to alleviate the local water scarcity.
SUMMARY
Aspects of the invention relate generally to osmotically driven membrane systems and processes, including forward osmosis separation (FO), direct osmotic concentration (DOC), pressure-assisted forward osmosis (PAFO), and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). More particularly, the invention relates to systems and methods that integrate renewable energy sources with the osmotically-driven membrane systems and processes (generally, ODMP).
Generally, the systems described herein are thermally driven brine concentrators or other types of ODMP that can recover significant amounts of water saline concentrates. The systems can produce fresh water from the waste concentrate of SWRO, MED and MSF (or directly from other water sources) and dramatically reduce the volume of the water required for, for example, a CSP plant. This water has already been treated for feed to the upstream desalination operation, and plant capacity can be increased with the existing intake and out-take structures, without increasing the pre-treatment cost, by turning a waste into a valuable product. Because the ODMP is a thermally driven process, it integrates well with solar thermal plants. Certain sources of heat can be captured from CSP plants with a very small marginal investment. Furthermore, since the ODMP can be driven by low grade (low temperature) heat, solar steam generators and solar water heaters provide a low cost approach to powering brine concentration when the brine concentration is not co-located with a CSP plant.
Described below are the estimated minimal CAPEX requirements to provide thermal power to disclosed systems for brine concentration by utilizing dumped energy and cold Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF) as sources of thermal power, as discussed in greater detail below. For a 50 MWe CSP plant, a 1300 m3/day (0.34 MGD) average capacity brine concentrating system can be virtually no OPEX utilizing dumped energy. Additional thermal power can be captured from cold HTF for only Ë$340/m3/day CAPEX investment in the solar field. These thermal power sources have no fuel costs and can be obtained with effectively zero marginal OPEX. The various systems themselves cost approximately $2,500 per m3/day capacity to install in the 3000 m3/day capacity range; however, these costs may vary depending on the application and overall size and configuration of the system. OPEX is minimal. With 25 year depreciation of capital this results in a cost of water in the $0.75 to $1 range.
Unlike all other brine concentration technologies, the present invention has the inherent capability to store desalination capacity. The basic forward osmosis process is described in the various patents and patent applications incorporated hereinbelow, but central to the production of fresh water from brines is the use of a draw solution that osmotically separates water from brines. As the draw solution is recycled in a closed loop cycle, it can be accumulated in the concentrated form during periods where thermal power input is higher and depleted during periods of lower thermal power input. Therefore, the process is inherently suited to couple with intermittent and variable thermal inputs, such as those found with renewable energy sources.
Typical CSP plants utilize a conventional steam Rankine cycle. Steam is condensed after exiting the turbine in order to improve turbine efficiency. The lower the temperature at which the heat rejected increases the efficiency of the Rankine cycleâleading to increased electrical production per unit of heat input at a given feed steam temperature. It is desirable to use cooling towers, as these can provide lower temperatures than dry cooling. But many CSP plants are, or will be, located in arid regions, where access to water resources is extremely limited. Dry cooling with air is an alternative to cooling with water consuming cooling towers. But dry cooling can reduce electricity production by 7% and increase the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 10%.
Brine concentration with the disclosed osmotic systems and processes is ideally suited for reducing water consumption of cooling towers by recapturing fresh water for cooling tower make-up from saline cooling tower blown-down. Additionally, where CSP plants are located in proximity to oil and gas production or mining operations, the osmotic systems and processes can be utilized to provide fresh water to the CSP plant cooling system by desalinating saline produced waters, fracturing fluid flow back or mining wastes. In these cases, implementation of the present invention to provide the opportunity for wet cooling could reduce LCOE by as much as 10%. Water consumption for cooling may be significant: 710-950 USG/MWh. CSP plants are often located in arid regions, so on site and integrated desalination may be very beneficial by providing a source of water suitable for a cooling tower and by reusing cooling tower blow down.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a system (and its corresponding method steps) for the osmotic extraction of a solvent from a first solution. The first solution can include any of the water sources disclosed herein, including the solvent recovered from any of those sources for reuse within the system/process. The system includes a forward osmosis unit including a first chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of the first solution, a second chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of a concentrated draw solution, and a semi-permeable membrane system separating the first chamber from the second chamber and configured for osmotically separating the solvent from the first solution, thereby forming a second solution in the first chamber and a dilute draw solution in the second chamber. The system also includes a source of thermal energy from a renewable energy source and a separation system in fluid communication with the forward osmosis unit and the source of thermal energy and configured to separate the dilute draw solution into the concentrated draw solution and a solvent stream. The separation system includes a first inlet fluidly coupled to an outlet of the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for receiving the dilute draw solution therefrom, a second inlet for receiving the source of thermal energy, a first outlet fluidly coupled to the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for introducing the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis unit, and a second outlet for outputting the solvent.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspect, the forward osmosis unit includes a plurality of semi-permeable membrane systems. The renewable energy source can include a concentrated solar energy plant or a geothermal system. The source of thermal energy can include at least one of waste heat, stored heat, or a steam source. The waste heat source can include heat rejected by a concentrated solar power plant, for example, during periods of high solar irradiance. The stored heat can include at least one of a hot heat transfer fluid, a cold heat transfer fluid, and/or a source of hot water from a concentrated solar power plant or other geothermal source. The steam source can include at least one of a portion of the steam output from a steam generator, a solar superheater, and/or a steam condenser, such as might be available between stages of a steam turbine. In some embodiments, the separation system includes a distillation module, such as a distillation column and/or a membrane distillation module; however, other types of separation systems as disclosed in the incorporated applications are contemplated and considered within the scope of the invention.
In one or more embodiments, the steam source is directly coupled to the distillation module via, for example, any necessary plumbing, valves, pumps, etc. In some embodiments, the other sources of thermal energy are used to generate steam for the separation system or otherwise provide heat for alternative draw solution recovery methods. In additional embodiments, the systems can include pre- and/or post-treatment systems in fluid communication with the source of thermal energy. In one embodiment, the system includes a pretreatment system for conditioning the first solution. In another embodiment, the system includes a post-treatment system for conditioning at least one of the second solution, the concentrated draw solution, and/or the solvent. In addition, the system can include an osmotic storage system for storing the concentrated draw solution and the solvent exiting the separation system in fluidic isolation for later reintroduction to the forward osmosis unit as the first solution and the concentrated raw solution. The system can be operated to store desalination capacity during off-peak hours (e.g., a period of low water and/or energy demand) and produce water during hours of peak water and/or energy demand.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of osmotically extracting a solvent from a first solution. The method includes the steps of providing a forward osmosis unit, fluidly coupling a separation system with the forward osmosis unit, and introducing a source of thermal energy from a renewable energy source to the separation system. The forward osmosis unit includes a first chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of the first solution, a second chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of a concentrated draw solution, and a semi-permeable membrane system separating the first chamber from the second chamber and configured for osmotically separating the solvent from the first solution, thereby forming a second solution in the first chamber and a dilute draw solution in the second chamber. The separation system is configured to separate the dilute draw solution into the concentrated draw solution and a solvent stream and includes an inlet fluidly coupled to an outlet of the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for receiving the dilute draw solution therefrom, a first outlet fluidly coupled to the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for introducing the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis unit, and a second outlet for outputting the solvent.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspect, the step of introducing a source of thermal energy includes directing at least one of waste heat, stored heat, or a steam source from a concentrated solar power plant to the separation system. Generally, the stored heat includes at least one of a hot heat transfer fluid, a cold heat transfer fluid, and/or a source of hot water from a concentrated solar power plant. In some embodiments, the separation system includes at least one distillation module (e.g., a distillation column or a membrane distillation module) and the step of introducing a source of thermal energy includes directing a steam source to the distillation module. The steam source can include at least one of a portion of the steam output from a steam generator, a solar super heater, and/or a steam condenser. In additional embodiments, the step of introducing a source of thermal energy includes directing the source of thermal energy to a steam generator or other heat exchanger to provide steam to the separation system. Furthermore, the method can include introducing a portion of the source of thermal energy to at least one of a pretreatment and/or post-treatment process for conditioning at least one of the first solution, the second solution, and/or the solvent. In some embodiments, the method includes the steps of storing the solvent and the concentrated draw solution generated by the separation system in fluidic isolation for later reintroduction to the forward osmosis unit as the first solution and the concentrated draw solution for additional desalination, for example, during a peak demand for water and/or energy.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspects, the concentrated draw solution includes ammonia and carbon dioxide in a desired molar ratio of at least one to one. However, other draw solutions are contemplated and considered within the scope of the invention, including, for example, NaCl or any of the various alternative draw solutions disclosed in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US13/69895 (the '895 application), filed Nov. 13, 2013, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In addition, other systems and methods for separating and recovering draw solutes and the solvent, such as those disclosed in the '895 application, are contemplated and considered within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, various pretreatment and post-treatment systems can be incorporated in the forgoing aspects of the invention. The pretreatment systems can include at least one of a heat source for preheating the first solution, means for adjusting the pH of the first solution, means for disinfection (e.g., chemical or UV), separation and clarification, a filter or other means for filtering the first solution (e.g., carbon or sand filtration or reverse osmosis), means for polymer addition, ion exchange, or means for softening (e.g., lime softening) the first solution. The post-treatment systems can include at least one of a reverse osmosis system, an ion exchange system, a second forward osmosis system, a distillation system, a pervaporator, a mechanical vapor recompression system, a heat exchange system, or a filtration system.
Still other aspects, embodiments, and advantages of these exemplary aspects and embodiments, are discussed in detail below. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing information and the following detailed description are merely illustrative examples of various aspects and embodiments, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the claimed aspects and embodiments. Accordingly, these and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention herein disclosed, will become apparent through reference to the following description and the accompanying drawings. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and can exist in various combinations and permutations.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a basic system for osmotic extraction of a solvent in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of one application of the system of FIG. 1 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a pictorial representation of a typical parabolic CSP plant configuration with a fossil-fuel-fired back-up system;
FIG. 4 is a pictorial representation of a typical parabolic CSP plant configuration with thermal storage;
FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of waste heat dumped during peak operating hours;
FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of an example of CSP plant performance;
FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of dumped energy for an exemplary plant;
FIGS. 8A-8D are block diagrams illustrating possible configurations for integrating osmotically driven membrane processes with renewable energy sources; and
FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of the system of FIG. 1 incorporated with various heat sources for the recovery and recycling of draw solutes in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In accordance with one or more embodiments, a basic osmotic method for extracting water from an aqueous solution may generally involve exposing the aqueous solution to a first surface of a forward osmosis membrane. A second solution, or draw solution, with an increased concentration relative to that of the aqueous solution may be exposed to a second opposed surface of the forward osmosis membrane. Water may then be drawn from the aqueous solution through the forward osmosis membrane and into the second solution, generating a water-enriched solution via forward osmosis, which utilizes fluid transfer properties involving movement from a less concentrated solution to a more concentrated solution. The water-enriched solution, also referred to as a dilute draw solution, may be collected at a first outlet and undergo a further separation process to produce purified water. A second product stream, i.e., a depleted or concentrated aqueous process solution, may be collected at a second outlet for discharge or further treatment. Alternatively, the various systems and methods described herein can be carried out with non-aqueous solutions.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, a forward osmosis membrane module may include one or more forward osmosis membranes. The forward osmosis membranes may generally be semi-permeable, for example, allowing the passage of water, but excluding dissolved solutes therein, such as sodium chloride, ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, and ammonium carbamate. Many types of semi-permeable membranes are suitable for this purpose provided that they are capable of allowing the passage of water (i.e., the solvent) while blocking the passage of the solutes and not reacting with the solutes in the solution.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, at least one forward osmosis membrane may be positioned within a housing or casing. The housing may generally be sized and shaped to accommodate the membranes positioned therein. For example, the housing may be substantially cylindrical if housing spirally wound forward osmosis membranes. The housing of the module may contain inlets to provide feed and draw solutions to the module as well as outlets for t withdrawal of product streams from the module. In some embodiments, the housing may provide at least one reservoir or chamber for holding or storing a fluid to be introduced to or withdrawn from the module. In at least one embodiment, the housing may be insulated. In yet other embodiments, the membrane(s) may be housed within a plate and frame type module. In addition, the membrane(s) or membrane module(s) may be submerged within a reservoir holding either the first solution or the second solution.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, draw solutes may be recovered for reuse. Examples of draw solute recovery processes are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0067819 (the '819 publication), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety or the '895 application. A separation system may strip solutes from the dilute draw solution to produce product water substantially free of the solutes. The separation system may include a distillation column or other thermal or mechanical recovery mechanism. Draw solutes may then be returned, such as by a recycling system, back to the concentrated draw solution. For example, gaseous solutes may be condensed or absorbed to form a concentrated draw solution. An absorber may use dilute draw solution as an absorbent. In other embodiments, product water may be used as an absorbent, for all or a portion of the absorbing of the gas streams from a solute recycling system. In addition, gas and/or heat produced as part of a waste water treatment process may be used in the draw solute recovery process.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, the first solution may be any aqueous solution or solvent containing one or more solutes for which separation, purification or other treatment is desired. In some embodiments, the first solution may be non-potable water, such as seawater, salt water, brackish water, gray water, or some industrial water. A process stream to be treated may include salts and other ionic species such as chloride, sulfate, bromide, silicate, iodide, phosphate, sodium, magnesium, calcium, potassium, nitrate, arsenic, lithium, boron, strontium, molybdenum, manganese, aluminum, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc. In some examples, the first solution may be brine, such as salt water, seawater, wastewater or other contaminated water. The first solution may be delivered to a forward osmosis membrane treatment system from an upstream unit operation, such as an industrial facility or power generation plant, or any other source such as the ocean. The second solution may be a draw solution containing a higher concentration of solute relative to the first solution. A wide variety of draw solutions may be used. For example, the draw solution may comprise a thermolytic salt solution. In some embodiments, an ammonia and carbon dioxide draw solution may be used, such as those disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0145568, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In one embodiment, the second solution may be a concentrated solution of ammonia and carbon dioxide. In at least one embodiment, the draw solution may comprise ammonia and carbon dioxide in a molar ratio of greater than 1 to 1.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, a forward osmosis separation process may comprise introducing a first solution on a first side of a semi-permeable membrane, detecting at least one characteristic of the first solution, selecting a molar ratio for a concentrated draw solution comprising two or more solute species (e.g., ammonia and carbon dioxide and their associated species) based on the at least one detected characteristic, introducing the concentrated draw solution at the selected molar ratio on a second side of the semi-permeable membrane to maintain a desired osmotic concentration gradient across the semi-permeable membrane, promoting flow of at least a portion of the first solution across the semi-permeable membrane to form a second solution on the first side of the semi-permeable membrane and a dilute draw solution on the second side of the semi-permeable membrane, introducing at least a portion of the dilute draw solution to a separation operation to recover draw solutes and a solvent stream, reintroducing the draw solutes to the second side of the semi-permeable membrane to maintain the selected concentrations and molar ratio of solute species in the concentrated draw solution, and collecting the solvent stream.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, various osmotically driven membrane systems and methods may be integrated with larger systems. In some embodiments, systems and methods may be integrated with various heat sources and water systems. In at least one embodiment, a draw solution may be fed on the inside of tubes associated with a condenser. In some embodiments, hot water from below-ground may be used in a reboiler. In other embodiments, geothermal heat, waste heat from industrial sources, solar collectors, molten salt, or residual heat in a thermal storage system may be used. In still other embodiments, diesel generators may be implemented.
The osmotically driven membrane systems discussed herein can be integrated with various renewable energy sources, such as low (and higher) grade geothermal resources, low cost solar water heaters, low cost solar steam generators, industrial waste heat such as flue gases, condensers etc., and can be used for the following applications: produced water treatment (waters co-produced with oil and gas production); mining waste waters, water production from concentrates of SWRO, MED, MSF and other sea water desalination plants; concentrate management from in-land (and others) brackish water plant, in particular BWRO; treatment of industrial wastewaters, including, but not limited to, cooling tower blow-down, boiler blow-down, process wastewater; reuse of industrial wastewaters; brine recovery in general; distributed small scale municipal drinking water production; drinking water production in general; production of water for agricultural and/or aquaculture uses; treatment of cooling tower blow-down or condensate blow-down specifically related to power production in a CSP plant; and provision of cooling water, wash-water, steam make-up or other utility water for a solar heating, solar steam generating or solar power plant.
Generally, the integration can take the form of direct use of heat for draw solution recovery, efficiency improvements with mechanical vapor compression recovery, and efficiency improvements with multiple-effects or staging of draw solution recovery. In some cases, pretreatment is required, in which case, the pretreatment process can be made more efficient by rejecting heat from the draw solute recovery process into the raw, or partially pre-treated water, to improve softening by shifting from cold softening to warm softening with improved softening kinetics and improved rate and quality of separation. One alternative to conventional solids contacting and high rate clarification softening is to use a cross flow micro-filtration softening operation. This provides a very high quality pre-treated water and can reduce chemical demand for silica reduction. Elimination of much of pre-treatment is possible with use of submerged planar or hollow fiber membranes or alternative configurations that allow seeded slurry approach of allowing precipitation onto seed crystals in solution in contact with the FO membranes. Examples of the seeded slurry approach can be found in U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2012/0273417 and 2012/0267307, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Many of these resources produce heat or power that is variable with respect to time, for example, with short-term variations in solar intensity, diurnal variations and seasonal variations. This can adversely impact the thermal separation operation. Possible solutions to this issue include: the intermittent operation of the desalination processâresulting in a larger capital cost as the capacity needs to be increased to compensate for time the plant is off line; integration into the thermal storage (if available) system of the thermal plant (e.g., molten salt or thermocline storage in a CSP plant); addition of thermal storage specifically for the desalination operation, by use of molten salts, thermocline storage, or sensible heating of ceramics or other solids; and decoupling of the thermal and desalination operations by storing desalinating separation capacity by storing osmotic separation capacity by storing concentrated and diluted draw solutions, for example, continuous desalination by replenishing and depleting a store of concentrated draw solution and intermittent draw solute recovery as heat is available.
The present invention provides for low enthalpy geothermal desalination with various osmotically driven membrane processes. Generally, the use of low enthalpy geothermal desalination offers a very attractive approach to displacing the use of fossil fuels to generate thermal and electrical power to desalinate. It removes the inefficiency of power generation and transmission and allows export of the displaced fossil fuel and reduces greenhouse gas emission. In practice, there are only a few small scale (pilot plant) implementations of low enthalpy geothermal desalination. The technology used has been MED with a few effects and a low efficiency (performance ratio). MED is the obvious conventional technology selection to couple with a low enthalpy geothermal resource. However, it is unclear how efficient this process will be when coupled with the unique characteristics of geothermal fluids at the temperatures of interest and it will require significant redesign from current commercial scale technologies. The osmotically driven membrane systems disclosed herein can use direct exchange with the geothermal circuit obviating need for the capital expense, electrical demands and inefficiency of a secondary circuit. These systems may require more pre-treatment than thermal technologies, but this is offset by much higher water recoveries and reduction in capital expense for intake/outfall structures and pumping requirements. With the current status of development, the system's performance ratio compares favorably with MED, especially given efficiency ratio reduction due to MED's need for a secondary circuit and possible need for steam generation. Future improvements in the technology offer the possibility of even greater performance.
Due to the low temperature of low enthalpy geothermal resources and the boiling point rise of geothermal brines compared to water, it is not practical to effectively flash the geothermal fluid to produce steam without the use of a vacuum condenser, which is likely impractical and inefficient as it would incur an energy penalty in the form of a vacuum pump. Thermal power is obtained by sensible heat removal from the geothermal fluid; i.e., by reducing the temperature of the geothermal fluid before it is pumped into a return well. Given the capital cost of drilling geothermal and return wells, it is economical to size a titanium primary heat exchanger to a 2° C. approach temperature. Titanium would be chosen as a material of construction due to the high salinity of the geothermal brine. That means that the fluid on the other side of the heat exchanger to the geothermal fluid will exit this exchanger at 2° C. less than the exit temperature of the geothermal fluid.
Since thermal energy is removed from the geothermal fluid by reducing its temperature, it is necessary to make a significant reduction in temperature to effectively use the resource. For example, 14% more thermal power can be obtained by cooling a 100° C. geothermal fluid to 65° C. as opposed to 70° C. Thus, the lower the temperature of the heat that can be used the more thermal energy that can be extracted from a given well. Note that in these cases the temperature of the heat flow entering the system would be 63° C. or 68° C.
In some applications it may be necessary to use a secondary circuit to transfer heat to the end use of the heat (for example electrical power generation or a desalination system). This circuit may be recirculating oil, water or other heat transfer fluid. Such a secondary system has the advantage of offering the ability to store thermal energy, although thermal storage at the temperatures of interest would be capital intensive. This secondary circuit also requires the use of prime electrical energy due to the need for a recirculation pump. There is a balance between this power demand and the temperature of the heat available to the end use of the heat. Since this secondary heat transfer fluid transfers sensible heat, its temperature will decrease. Increasing the recirculation rate can reduce this temperature decrease, but with the cost of increased pumping power due to a higher flow rate and friction losses and prime power consumption. Additionally, since a secondary circuit must transfer heat into the end use system, it requires a difference in temperature between the return temperature of the secondary fluid and the heat used in the system. This temperature can be reduced with increased capital spent on this heat exchanger, and in practice will be 2° C. or greater.
The efficiency of any thermodynamic heat engine process is limited by the temperature difference between the heat input temperature and the heat rejection temperature. In the Middle East region, the heat sink temperature (sea water) can reach 32° C. in the summer. Thus a 5° C. or greater temperature loss in a secondary circuit below the geothermal fluid return temperature can have significant impact on the efficiency of any end user of the thermal power. Thus, it is desirable to use the geothermal heat directly, rather than using a secondary circuit.
Significant improvements in thermal desalination can be made with the use of some form of heat pump, for example TVC, MVC, or absorption heat pump (ABS). However, with the temperature of heat available with low enthalpy geothermal power, TVC is not possible without an additional external heat pump. Any such heat pump would use a significant amount of prime electrical energy, as would MVC or ABS, thus negating the benefit of using low enthalpy geothermal energy.
The Gained Output Ratio (GOR) is a measure of the ratio of the mass of product water produced divided by the mass of the steam input. Since the steam input to different systems can be at different temperatures and therefore enthalpy a performance ratio is often used for comparison purposes. The Performance Ratio (PR) is often defined as the number of kilograms of water produced per 2326 kJ of heat consumed.
Thermal desalination systems are very sensitive to the Top Brine Temperature (TBT) and heat transfer area in a thermal desalination system is very significant. Any reduction in heat transfer coefficient due to scaling will have a very adverse impact of system efficiency and capacity. Sulfate is present in sea water in significant amounts and calcium sulfate exhibits retrograde solubility: it will precipitate and cause scaling if sea water is heated. MSF (a flash process) separates the sea water from the heat transfer process, but MED is very sensitive to TBT as the evaporation occurs on a heat transfer surface (usually the outside of heat transfer tubes). Thus, MED operates at much lower TBTs than MSF and often is designed to operate in parallel mode, where sea water is fed in parallel to each effect, resulting in a very low ratio of product water to sea water feed.
As discussed previously, MED plants will likely run in parallel feed mode and therefore their recovery (the percentage of product water divided by feed water) will be low. Even in backward feed mode, recovery is limited. Although recoveries as high as 30% are possible in some configurations, it is likely that recovery will be in the 10-20% range. This results in the need for large intake and outfall structures (Ë10-15% of plant capex) and prime energy consumption to pull in the feed and cooling water and return the concentrate. Furthermore, the heat transfer requirements of MED necessitate the use of evaporator tubes of expensive materials such as titanium, Al-Brass and cupro-nickel alloys. Aluminum is used rarely and only with very rigorous control of scaling and corrosion. The large volumes required for low pressure drop vapor flow in vacuum conditions and the use of horizontal designs result in a significant plant footprint. Capital costs for MED plants will be project specific and are in general significant. Ranges of $1000-$2000 m3/day of capacity are published for large scale plants.
Auxiliary energy inputs include pumping and the control system. Published numbers for MED plants range from 2-5 kWh/m3. These requirements do not include the power provided to the vacuum pump (steam ejector) that is needed to remove non-condensable gases. This power is normally provided by steam, but the pressure available from low enthalpy geothermal fluids is not sufficient to drive an eductor. In addition, MED has limited pretreatment requirements. The feed is often not de-aerated, which can be challenging for materials of construction at high salinity feeds. Turbidity and suspended solids are not a concern as long as there is no risk of clogging of the spray nozzles.
As discussed earlier, MED has a limited TBT to minimize adverse scaling on the heat transfer tubing. Since heat removal from geothermal requires a reduction in temperature, the geothermal fluid cannot be used directly in the first effect, as the high temperature would cause scaling. This results in the need for a secondary circuit and direct use of the heat is not possible. Additionally, the first effect is designed to utilize steam. The use of a liquid phase heat source would require a significant redesign of existing technology with an adverse capital impact due to much higher heat transfer areas required due to lower heat transfer coefficients from a liquid as opposed to condensing steam. The use of a secondary circuit and the need for steam in the first effect will have a significant impact on MED performance ratio.
The forgoing issues are some of the reasons why integrated forward osmosis systems (FO) are so preferable. Given current membrane performance and without the use of multiple effects, the system will obtain a performance ratio of 3-5. This compares favorably with MED technology since the FO can use the geothermal fluid directly, without a secondary circuit or need to generate steam. See, for example, Table 1.
TABLE 1
FO Plant Capacity for a 100 kg/s Low Enthalpy Geothermal Well
Geothermal Well Head Temperature
100° C.
115° C.
130° C.
Geothermal
10,650
KW(t)
15,975
KW(t)
21,300
KW(t)
Energy Flow
FO Plant
1300
m3/day
2000
m3/day
2500
m3/day
Capacity
Since the sea water is desalinated via forward osmosis across a membrane, as opposed to thermally, retrograde solubility of calcium sulfate is not a concern and scaling can be controlled with the use of scale inhibitors. Thus, FO plant recoveries can exceed both MED and SWRO recoveries significantly. Additionally, because both temperatures and pressures are moderate, with the exception of the few heat exchangers, inexpensive and robust non-metallic (PVC, CPVC, FRP) materials are used. Furthermore, the FO platform can use a spiral wound membrane element that allows a very high packing factor and vertical orientation for the draw recovery column allowing a much smaller footprint. Generally, current capital cost analysis reveals that at even modest capacities FO plants compare favorably with large scale thermal plants. Auxiliary electrical energy requirements will vary depending on the particular application, but the much higher recoveries compared to an MED process result in the need to pump much lower volumes of feed water and, therefore, the electrical requirement is expected to be lower. Pre-treatment requirements for the FO platform may be more significant than for an MED plant. For open intakes a media filter would be required. However, the optional high pH operation of the FO process diminishes the potential for fouling biofilm formation or organic fouling. Thus, the rigorous pretreatment to reduce organics in SWRO plants is not required. Given the high recovery of the FO platform much less water needs pretreatment compared to lower recovery systems. Heat input into the FO desalination occurs into the product water stream. This stream is non-scaling and so the allowable TBT is much higher than in the MED process, this allows direct use of the geothermal heat. Various hybrid approaches are possible to integrate MED and FO desalination. In particular the FO plant may be fed with the cooling water return or concentrate from the MED plant, as this would require no increase in intake capacity (and capex) and no increase in pumping feed water pumping energy, while reducing discharge pumping needs.
FIG. 1 presents a schematic of a forward osmosis system/process for osmotic extraction of a solvent. A solution to be treated may contain one or more species such as salts, proteins, catalysts, microorganisms, organic or inorganic chemicals, chemical precursors or products, colloids, or other constituents. In some non-limiting embodiments, nutrient discharge by wastewater plants may be reduced with a forward osmosis system and process as illustrated.
As shown in FIG. 1 , the system/ process 10 includes a forward osmosis module 12 . Various forward osmosis systems and processes can be used, such as those described herein and further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,391,205 and 8,002,989; and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2011/0203994, and 2012/0267306; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. The module 12 is in fluid communication with a feed stream 20 (i.e., the first solution) and a draw solution source or stream 24 . The feed water source 20 can include, for example, municipal (e.g., sewage) and/or industrial (e.g., hydraulic fracturing flow-back) wastewater, including radioactive water. The draw solution source 24 can include, for example, a saline stream, such as sea water, or another solution as described herein that can act as an osmotic agent to dewater the feed source 20 by osmosis through a forward osmosis membrane within the module 12 . The module 12 outputs a stream 26 of concentrated solution from the feed source 20 that can be further processed or discarded. The module 12 also outputs a dilute draw solution 28 that can be further processed as described herein, for example, the dilute draw solution 28 can be directed to a separation unit 30 where draw solutes and a target solvent can be recovered. Generally, the <figure-
CLAIMS
Claims ( 20 )
What is claimed is:
1 . A system for osmotic extraction of a solvent from a first solution, comprising:
a forward osmosis unit comprising:
a first chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of the first solution;
a second chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of a concentrated draw solution; and
a semi-permeable membrane system separating the first chamber from the second chamber and configured for osmotically separating the solvent from the first solution, thereby forming a second solution in the first chamber and a dilute draw solution in the second chamber;
a source of thermal energy from a renewable energy source; and a separation system in fluid communication with the forward osmosis unit and the source of thermal energy and configured to separate the dilute draw solution into the concentrated draw solution and a solvent stream, the separation system comprising:
a first inlet fluidly coupled to an outlet of the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for receiving the dilute draw solution therefrom;
a second inlet for receiving the source of thermal energy;
a first outlet fluidly coupled to the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for introducing the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis unit; and
a second outlet for outputting the solvent.
2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the forward osmosis unit comprises a plurality of semi-permeable membrane systems.
3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the renewable energy source comprises a concentrated solar energy plant.
4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the source of thermal energy comprises at least one of waste heat, stored heat, or a steam source.
5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the waste heat comprises heat rejected by a concentrated solar power plant.
6 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the stored heat comprises at least one of a hot heat transfer fluid, a cold heat transfer fluid, and/or a source of hot water from a concentrated solar power plant.
7 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the steam source comprises at least one of a portion of steam output from a steam generator, a solar super heater, and/or a steam condenser of a concentrated solar power plant.
8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the separation system comprises a distillation module.
9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the distillation module comprises at least one of a distillation column and/or a membrane distillation module.
10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the steam source is directly coupled to the distillation module.
11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the source of thermal energy is used to produce steam or a mechanical energy source for use in the separation system.
12 . The system of claim 1 further comprising a pretreatment system in fluid communication with the thermal energy source for conditioning the first solution.
13 . The system of claim 1 further comprising a post-treatment system in fluid communication with the thermal energy source for conditioning at least one of the second solution, the concentrated draw solution, and/or the solvent.
14 . The system of claim 1 further comprising an osmotic storage system for storing the concentrated draw solution and the solvent exiting the separation system in fluidic isolation for later reintroduction to the forward osmosis unit as the first solution and the concentrated raw solution.
15 . A method of osmotically extracting a solvent from a first solution, the method comprising the steps of:
providing a forward osmosis unit, where the forward osmosis unit comprises:
a first chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of the first solution;
a second chamber having an inlet fluidly coupled to a source of a concentrated draw solution; and
a semi-permeable membrane system separating the first chamber from the second chamber and configured for osmotically separating the solvent from the first solution, thereby forming a second solution in the first chamber and a dilute draw solution in the second chamber;
fluidly coupling a separation system with the forward osmosis unit, wherein the separation system is configured to separate the dilute draw solution into the concentrated draw solution and a solvent stream and comprises:
an inlet fluidly coupled to an outlet of the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for receiving the dilute draw solution therefrom;
a first outlet fluidly coupled to the second chamber of the forward osmosis unit for introducing the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis unit; and
a second outlet for outputting the solvent; and
introducing a source of thermal energy from a renewable energy source to the separation system.
16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the step of introducing a source of thermal energy comprises directing at least one of waste heat, stored heat, or a steam source from a concentrated solar power plant to the separation system.
17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the separation system comprises at least one distillation module and the step of introducing a source of thermal energy comprises directing a source of steam comprising at least one of a portion of a steam output from a steam generator, a solar super heater, and/or a steam condenser.
18 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the step of introducing a source of thermal energy comprises directing the source of thermal energy to a steam generator to provide steam to the separation system.
19 . The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of introducing a portion of the source of thermal energy to at least one of a pretreatment and/or post-treatment process for conditioning at least one of the first solution, the second solution, and/or the solvent.
20 . The method of claim 15 further comprising the steps of storing the solvent and the concentrated draw solution generated by the separation system in fluidic isolation for later reintroduction as the first solution and the concentrated draw solution to the forward osmosis module.
US14/767,230
2013-02-13
2014-02-11
Renewable desalination of brines
Abandoned
US20160002073A1
( en )
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title
US14/767,230
US20160002073A1
( en )
2013-02-13
2014-02-11
Renewable desalination of brines
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title
US201361764339P
2013-02-13
2013-02-13
US201361785116P
2013-03-14
2013-03-14
US14/767,230
US20160002073A1
( en )
2013-02-13
2014-02-11
Renewable desalination of brines
PCT/US2014/015822
WO2014126925A1
( en )
2013-02-13
2014-02-11
Renewable desalination of brines
Publications (1)
Publication Number
Publication Date
US20160002073A1
true
US20160002073A1 ( en )
2016-01-07
Family
ID=51354499
Family Applications (1)
Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date
US14/767,230
Abandoned
US20160002073A1
( en )
2013-02-13
2014-02-11
Renewable desalination of brines
Country Status (7)
Country
Link
US
( 1 )
US20160002073A1
( en )
AU
( 1 )
AU2014216457A1
( en )
CA
( 1 )
CA2900944A1
( en )
CL
( 1 )
CL2015002258A1
( en )
ES
( 1 )
ES2547472B2
( en )
IL
( 1 )
IL240400A0
( en )
WO
( 1 )
WO2014126925A1
( en )
Cited By (18)
* Cited by examiner, â Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
WO2017152226A1
( en )
*
2016-03-09
2017-09-14
Enrgistream Pty Ltd
Process and system for treating waste water and generating power
WO2018022349A1
( en )
*
2016-07-25
2018-02-01
Qatar Foundation For Education, Science And Community Development
Hybrid desalination system
CN109071274A
( en )
*
2016-03-04
2018-12-21
åºç¨ä»¿ç妿éå ¬å¸
Use the electricity-generating method of infiltration and waste water fermentation processing
US10207935B2
( en )
*
2016-01-31
2019-02-19
Qatar Foundation For Education, Science And Community Development
Hybrid desalination system
US10308524B1
( en )
2019-01-15
2019-06-04
Kuwait Institute For Scientific Research
Pressure-reduced saline water treatment system
US10532936B2
( en )
2017-11-29
2020-01-14
King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals
Integrated system with an absorption refrigeration subsystem and a desalination subsystem
US10940439B1
( en )
2019-12-10
2021-03-09
Kuwait Institute For Scientific Research
High water recovery hybrid membrane system for desalination and brine concentration
US11198095B2
( en )
*
2014-05-23
2021-12-14
Geo40 Limited
Silica products from geothermal fluids by reverse osmosis
US20220119278A1
( en )
*
2015-06-22
2022-04-21
Eureka Resources, Llc
Method and System for Treating Wastewater
CN114562433A
( en )
*
2021-12-07
2022-05-31
西å®äº¤é大å¦
Salt difference cycle power generation system and method based on phase change material and solar photo-thermal
US11465924B2
( en )
*
2020-07-14
2022-10-11
Sunvapor, Inc.
Hybrid process and system for recovering water
CN115276471A
( en )
*
2021-04-29
2022-11-01
ä¸å½ç§å¦é¢çåææ¯ç ç©¶æ
A mixed working fluid reverse electrodialysis low-grade thermal power generation system with a single feed port
US11718547B2
( en )
*
2018-03-16
2023-08-08
XDI Holdings, LLC
Dirty water treatment optimization
US11925901B2
( en )
2022-03-30
2024-03-12
Donaldson Company, Inc.
System and method for reclaiming solvent
US11958749B2
( en )
2015-06-19
2024-04-16
Geo40 Limited
Method of production of a silica concentrate
US12448304B2
( en )
2023-08-28
2025-10-21
Bob I. Cantrell
Thermal driven water desalination system using forward osmosis
US20260015275A1
( en )
*
2023-08-28
2026-01-15
Bob Cantrell
Thermal driven water desalination system using forward osmosis
US12576362B2
( en )
2019-09-17
2026-03-17
Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha
Method for concentrating raw material solution, and system for concentrating raw material solution
Families Citing this family (5)
* Cited by examiner, â Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
SG11201705597XA
( en )
*
2015-01-08
2017-08-30
Vito Nv (Vlaamse Instelling Voor Tech Onderzoek Nv)
Method and system for solar driven osmotic water purification
GB201711238D0
( en )
2017-07-12
2017-08-23
Saltkraft Aps
Power generation process
GB201711240D0
( en )
2017-07-12
2017-08-23
Saltkraft Aps
Power generation process
TR201909200A2
( en )
*
2019-06-20
2019-07-22
Repg Enerji Sistemleri San Ve Tic A S
ELECTRICITY GENERATION SYSTEM WITH OZMOZ
US11951443B2
( en )
2022-04-04
2024-04-09
Saudi Arabian Oil Company
System and method for separating and recovering gas field chemicals from wastewater
Family Cites Families (5)
* Cited by examiner, â Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
US4862708A
( en )
*
1988-05-10
1989-09-05
Hughes Aircraft Company
Osmotic thermal engine
MX2011005893A
( en )
*
2008-12-03
2011-09-21
Oasys Water Inc
STORAGE OF OSMOTIC GRID OF PUBLIC SERVICE SCALE.
US8246787B2
( en )
*
2009-09-03
2012-08-21
Pratt & Whitney Rockedyne, Inc.
Solar desalinization plant
AU2010319846B2
( en )
*
2009-10-28
2015-05-28
Oasys Water LLC
Forward osmosis separation processes
CN103619452B
( en )
*
2011-04-25
2015-12-23
Oasysæ°´æéå ¬å¸
Osmotic separation systems and methods
2014
2014-02-11
AU
AU2014216457A
patent/AU2014216457A1/en
not_active
Abandoned
2014-02-11
ES
ES201590089A
patent/ES2547472B2/en
not_active
Expired - Fee Related
2014-02-11
CA
CA2900944A
patent/CA2900944A1/en
not_active
Abandoned
2014-02-11
WO
PCT/US2014/015822
patent/WO2014126925A1/en
not_active
Ceased
2014-02-11
US
US14/767,230
patent/US20160002073A1/en
not_active
Abandoned
2015
2015-08-06
IL
IL240400A
patent/IL240400A0/en
unknown
2015-08-13
CL
CL2015002258A
patent/CL2015002258A1/en
unknown
Cited By (24)
* Cited by examiner, â Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
US11198095B2
( en )
*
2014-05-23
2021-12-14
Geo40 Limited
Silica products from geothermal fluids by reverse osmosis
US11958749B2
( en )
2015-06-19
2024-04-16
Geo40 Limited
Method of production of a silica concentrate
US20220119278A1
( en )
*
2015-06-22
2022-04-21
Eureka Resources, Llc
Method and System for Treating Wastewater
US10207935B2
( en )
*
2016-01-31
2019-02-19
Qatar Foundation For Education, Science And Community Development
Hybrid desalination system
CN109071274A
( en )
*
2016-03-04
2018-12-21
åºç¨ä»¿ç妿éå ¬å¸
Use the electricity-generating method of infiltration and waste water fermentation processing
KR20190005830A
( en )
*
2016-03-04
2019-01-16
ì´íë¼ì´ë ë°ì´ì¤ë¯¸ë©í± ìì´/ìì¤
Power generation method using osmosis and anaerobic wastewater treatment
US10968128B2
( en )
*
2016-03-04
2021-04-06
Applied Biomimetic A/S
Power generation process
KR102315309B1
( en )
*
2016-03-04
2021-10-20
ì´íë¼ì´ë ë°ì´ì¤ë¯¸ë©í± ìì´/ìì¤
Method of generating electricity using osmosis and anaerobic wastewater treatment
WO2017152226A1
( en )
*
2016-03-09
2017-09-14
Enrgistream Pty Ltd
Process and system for treating waste water and generating power
US10981116B2
( en )
2016-03-09
2021-04-20
EnrgiStream Pty Etd
Process and system for treating waste water and generating power
WO2018022349A1
( en )
*
2016-07-25
2018-02-01
Qatar Foundation For Education, Science And Community Development
Hybrid desalination system
US10532936B2
( en )
2017-11-29
2020-01-14
King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals
Integrated system with an absorption refrigeration subsystem and a desalination subsystem
US11718547B2
( en )
*
2018-03-16
2023-08-08
XDI Holdings, LLC
Dirty water treatment optimization
US10308524B1
( en )
2019-01-15
2019-06-04
Kuwait Institute For Scientific Research
Pressure-reduced saline water treatment system
US12576362B2
( en )
2019-09-17
2026-03-17
Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha
Method for concentrating raw material solution, and system for concentrating raw material solution
US10940439B1
( en )
2019-12-10
2021-03-09
Kuwait Institute For Scientific Research
High water recovery hybrid membrane system for desalination and brine concentration
US11628403B2
( en )
2019-12-10
2023-04-18
Kuwait Institute For Scientific Research
High water recovery hybrid membrane system for desalination and brine concentration
US11465924B2
( en )
*
2020-07-14
2022-10-11
Sunvapor, Inc.
Hybrid process and system for recovering water
US12565436B2
( en )
2020-07-14
2026-03-03
Sunvapor, Inc.
Hybrid process and system for recovering water
CN115276471A
( en )
*
2021-04-29
2022-11-01
ä¸å½ç§å¦é¢çåææ¯ç ç©¶æ
A mixed working fluid reverse electrodialysis low-grade thermal power generation system with a single feed port
CN114562433A
( en )
*
2021-12-07
2022-05-31
西å®äº¤é大å¦
Salt difference cycle power generation system and method based on phase change material and solar photo-thermal
US11925901B2
( en )
2022-03-30
2024-03-12
Donaldson Company, Inc.
System and method for reclaiming solvent
US12448304B2
( en )
2023-08-28
2025-10-21
Bob I. Cantrell
Thermal driven water desalination system using forward osmosis
US20260015275A1
( en )
*
2023-08-28
2026-01-15
Bob Cantrell
Thermal driven water desalination system using forward osmosis
Also Published As
Publication number
Publication date
ES2547472A2
( en )
2015-10-06
IL240400A0
( en )
2015-09-24
ES2547472R1
( en )
2015-11-12
WO2014126925A1
( en )
2014-08-21
CL2015002258A1
( en )
2015-12-18
CA2900944A1
( en )
2014-08-21
AU2014216457A1
( en )
2015-08-20
ES2547472B2
( en )
2016-09-15
Similar Documents
Publication
Publication Date
Title
WO2014126925A1
( en )
2014-08-21
Renewable desalination of brines
Esmaeilion
2020
Hybrid renewable energy systems for desalination
Islam et al.
2018
Desalination technologies for developing countries: a review
Macedonio et al.
2012
Efficient technologies for worldwide clean water supply
Olwig et al.
2012
Techno-economic analysis of combined concentrating solar power and desalination plant configurations in Israel and Jordan
Saffarini et al.
2012
Technical evaluation of stand-alone solar powered membrane distillation systems
Garg
2019
Renewable energy-powered membrane technology: cost analysis and energy consumption
Singh et al.
2023
Sustainability issues of solar desalination hybrid systems integrated with heat exchangers for the production of drinking water: a review
US20130168224A1
( en )
2013-07-04
Leverage of waste product to provide clean water
Azevedo
2014
Renewable energy powered desalination systems: technologies and market analysis
Fthenakis et al.
2024
Review of solar-enabled desalination and implications for zero-liquid-discharge applications
Shafieian et al.
2020
A solar membrane-based wastewater treatment system for high-quality water production
Belessiotis
2016
Delyannis
Warkad et al.
2024
Different desalination techniques and itâs economic analysis: a review
Muthuvairavan et al.
2023
Large-scale solar desalination system
Tyagi et al.
2024
Model-based zero liquid discharge desalination for land-locked arid/semi-arid regions in India
US20240043302A1
( en )
2024-02-08
A hybrid process and system for recovering water
Nair et al.
2022
Desalination and sustainability
Almajali et al.
2025
Solar-Powered Advances in Water Desalination: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Research
Xevgenos et al.
2018
Integrated brine management: A circular economy approach
Energy
2012
Water desalination using renewable energy
ErbaÅ
2019
Performance analysis of combined cycle power plant with multi-effect distillation (MED) desalination process
Olufisayo et al.
2021
A Review of Renewable Energy Powered Reverse Osmosis System for Seawater Desalination
Cancilla et al.
2024
Technologies for Desalination of Brackish and Sea Water
Abdelkereem et al.
2020
Desalination Using Renewable Energy
Legal Events
Date
Code
Title
Description
2015-10-06
AS
Assignment
Owner name : OASYS WATER, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text : ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NOWOSIELSKI-SLEPOWRON, MAREK S.;REEL/FRAME:036736/0996
Effective date : 20150908
2016-10-11
AS
Assignment
Owner name : SILICON VALLEY BANK, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:OASYS WATER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:040315/0862
Effective date : 20161006
Owner name : TRINITY CAPITAL FUND II, L.P., ARIZONA
Free format text : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:OASYS WATER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:040317/0483
Effective date : 20161006
2018-04-29
STCB
Information on status: application discontinuation
Free format text : ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION
2018-06-10
AS
Assignment
Owner name : OASYS WATER, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text : RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 40317/0483;ASSIGNOR:TRINITY CAPITAL FUND II, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:046330/0019
Effective date : 20180604