ABSTRACT
Abstract
A pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) for bioanalytical analysis of pain matrix activity and the autonomic nervous system to diagnose and validate patient treatments, health status and outcomes to diagnose and validate patient treatments and outcomes. The PMD is implemented using medical devices for measuring and reporting objective measurements of pain through patient monitoring and analyzing related biological, psychological, social, environmental, and demographic factors that may contribute to and effect physiological outcomes for patients and through the analysis, improve diagnosis of pain, the evaluation of related disease states, and treatment options.
Description
RELATED PATENT APPLICATION
This application is a divisional patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/992,016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,203) filed on Jan. 10, 2016 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND VALIDATION OF PATIENT TREATMENTS AND OUTCOMES that claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/101,992 filed Jan. 10, 2015 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entireties.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) for bioanalytical analysis of pain matrix activity and the autonomic nervous system to diagnose and validate patient treatments, health status and outcomes. The PMD is implemented using medical devices for measuring and reporting objective measurements of pain through patient monitoring and analyzing related biological, psychological, social, environmental, and demographic factors that may contribute to and effect physiological outcomes for patients and through the analysis improve diagnosis of pain, evaluation of related disease states, and treatment options.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Currently there exists no valid and reliable method of objectively quantifying an individual's experience of pain (Younger J et al, Pain Outcomes: A Brief Review of Instruments and Techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep., 2009 February; 13(1):39-43). In the United States, approximately 100 million adultsâmore than the number affected by heart disease, diabetes, and cancer combinedâsuffer from common chronic pain conditions (Tsang, A et al, Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: Gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. Journal of Pain. 2008; 9(10):883-891) with an annual national economic cost associated with chronic pain estimated to be $560-635 billion in 2011. The aging of the United States population means that a growing number of Americans will experience the diseases with which chronic pain is associated-diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, arthritis, and cancer, among others (Cherry et al, Population aging and the use of office-based physician services. NCHS Data Brief, No. 41. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics). Increases in obesity will result in more orthopedic problems related to the degradation of cartilage (Richettel et al., 2011). As a result, there will be a greater number of joint replacement surgeries, occurring in younger adult populations (Harms, S., R. Larson, A. E. Sahmoun, and J. R. Beal. 2007. Obesity increases the likelihood of total joint replacement surgery among younger adults. International Orthopaedics 31(1):23-26; Changulani et al., 2008); resulting in associated acute and also potentially chronic pain. Increases in disease states associated with pain will not only be experienced in the US. A UK Report from 2009, stated that, âchronic pain is two to three times more common now than it was 40 years agoâ (U.K. Department of Health. 2009. 150 years of the chief medical officer: On the state of public health. Annual Report. London: U.K. Department of Health; PAGE 34). There is no question that pain, and other complex chronic disease states, are a major public health challenge. According to the Institute of Medicine's 2011 studyâRelieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research., pain is a uniquely individual and subjective experience that depends on a variety of biological, psychological, and social factors, and different population groups experience pain differentially (IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press). Why one person suffers an injury and reports modest pain and another with a similar injury reports serious pain depends on many factors: genetic characteristics, general health status and comorbidities, pain experiences from childhood on, the brain's processing system, the emotional and cognitive context in which pain occurs, and cultural and social factors. Costly procedures often are performed when other actions should be considered, such as prevention, counseling, and facilitation of self-care, which are common features of successful treatment. In addition, adequate pain treatment and follow-up may be thwarted by a mix of uncertain diagnosis and societal stigma consciously or unconsciously applied to people reporting pain, particularly when they do not respond readily to treatment (IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press). For these reasons, it is important to develop an objective manner to measure pain, and general physical symptoms, but then to further combine and analyze sensor acquired data with additional factors that influence the individual experience of pain, and other related healthcare issues and disease states. Currently, physicians and caregivers rely upon a patient's own description of symptoms such as pain, which is an example of a physical outcome that has defied objective measurement. Today, uni-dimensional scales are used to evaluate pain. A commonly used scale is the numerical rating scale (NRS), which typically consists of scores 0-10, with the far left denoting âno painâ and the far right end of the scale as âworst pain imaginableâ. In general, it is difficult for a subject to accurately describe their pain, but especially while under duress, or for example patient populations that may struggle with communication, such as children, elderly patients suffering from dementia, and those who do not speak the same language as the treating medical professional. Clinical findings that can be seenâa broken bone on an x-ray, for exampleâdo not necessarily correlate well with the severity of pain the patient perceives. Elderly patients experience pain twice as often as those under the age of 60 which is thought to relate to their inability to accurately communicate pain and intensity or source of pain (Herr K et al, Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clin Geriatric Med, 2001 August; 17(3):457-vi) (Weiner D et al, 1999. Pain in nursing home residents: An exploration of prevalence, staff perceptions, and practical aspects of measurement. Clin of J Pain. 1999; 15:92 [PubMed: 10382922]). People afflicted by pain may find the rough tools of language inadequate to convey the character and intensity of their experience and its significance to them. This can be a substantial barrier to obtaining adequate treatment (Werner, A., and K. Malterud. 2003. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Social Science & Medicine 57(8):1409-1419). According to the Institute of Medicine, (IOM, 2011), pain and its severity, how it evolves, and the effectiveness of treatment depend on a constellation of biological, psychological, and social factors, such as the following:
Biologicalâthe extent of an illness or injury and whether the person has other illnesses, is under stress, or has specific genes or predisposing factors that affect pain tolerance or thresholds; Psychological-anxiety, fear, guilt, anger, depression, and thinking the pain represents something worse than it does and that the person is helpless to manage it (Ochsner, K., J. Zaki, J. Hanelin, D. Ludlow, K. Knierim, T. Ramachandran, G. Glover, and S. Mackey. 2008. Your pain or mine? Common and distinct neural systems supporting the perception of pain in self and other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 3(2): 144-160); Socialâthe response of significant others to the pain-whether support, criticism, enabling behavior, or withdrawalâthe demands of the work environment, access to medical care, culture, and family attitudes and beliefs.
Beyond the lack of a currently available objective measures for pain and more recent agreement that pain, and other complex chronic diseases, are a constellation of biological, psychological, and social factors there is still further need to address existing issues with under-treatment of patients suffering from chronic pain resulting from shortened hospital stays and lack of at-home monitoring and telemedicine. As outlined in IOM's Relieving Pain in America report: In 2007, almost half of Emergency Department patients presented with pain that was severe 22% or moderate 23%. (Niska et al, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. National Health Statistics Reports 26. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics) Chest or abdominal pain was the leading reason for the visit among those aged 15-64, while chest or abdominal pain plus shortness of breath was the leading reason for the visit among those 65 and older. There were 10 million inpatient surgeries and 17.4 million hospital outpatient surgeries in 2009 (AHA (American Hospital Association). 2011. Trendwatch chartbook 2011. Tables 3.1 and 3.4. http://www.aha.org/aha/research-and-trends/chartbook/index.html (accessed Mar. 3, 2011)). Between 10 and 50 percent of people having regularly performed surgical operationsâgroin hernia repair, breast and thoracic surgery, leg amputation, and coronary artery bypass surgeryâgo on to experience chronic pain, often due to damage to nerves in the surgical area during the procedure (Kehlet, et al, Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006; 367(9522):1618-1625). Today's shorter hospital staysâdown, on average, from 7.2 days in 1989 to 5.4 days in 2009 (AHA, 2011)âand the trend toward outpatient surgery may not permit sufficient opportunity to assess patients' postsurgical pain or establish an appropriate course of postoperative analgesia (perhaps one that can be administered at home), shown to be effective in hip and knee replacement, for example (Schug et al. Chronic pain after surgery or injury. 2011 Pain Clinical Updates 19. Seattle, Wash.: International Association for the Study of Pain). There is currently no way to monitor an out-patient's response to pharmaceutical treatment and the effectiveness of treatment related to pain and other related chronic disease states.
Recent improvements in sensor technology, powerful and miniaturized micro-controllers, systems on a chip (SOCs), low energy wireless communication, and power management add up to the opportunity for new wearable devices that allow for long-term, at-home, patient monitoring of physiologic measurements via patient worn sensors, cloud computing for data storage and analysis, and integration with networks and mobile devices provide communication with healthcare providers and healthcare systems. What is not measured in these devices of the prior art is a measurement of the severity of pain that a patient is experiencing either due to an immediate injury or as a chronic result of disease or other infirmary. Using the pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) of the present invention, pain is objectively measured to provide currently unavailable biophysical information that will assist in diagnosis, the selection and validation of treatments, and may provide patient incentives to continue in performing effective treatments. By tracking and evaluating biophysical measurements, âpain matrixâ activity in the form of a pain modulatory circuit with inputs that arise in multiple areas including cortical sites, the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), pregenual cingulate cortex, (pCC), somatosensory cortex 1 and 2, the thalamus and hypothalamus, insula, the amygdala, periaqueductal gray region (PAG), and additional descending pathway structures, and vagal tone may be correlated to determine stress, cognition, emotion, disease states, and evaluation of threat to determine pain state, modulation of pain, level of health and healing, and the vulnerability toward illness of a patient (Ossipov et al. Central Modulation of Pain. The Journal of Clinical Investigations: November 2010; 120(11): 3779-3787.)
Pain measurements may also assist physicians in prescribing proper dosage based on the patient's reaction to medication. Patients are receiving inadequate access to pain medications due to the well-publicized abuse of opioids and the subsequent reluctance of the many in the medical community to write prescriptions for non-institutionalized patients. According to researchers at the CDC, to reverse the epidemic of opioid drug overdose deaths and prevent opioid-related morbidity, efforts to improve safer prescribing of prescription opioids must be intensified (Paulozzi L J, Jones C, Mack K, Rudd R. Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relieversâUnited States, 1999-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60:1487-92). Between 2013 and 2014, the age-adjusted rate of death involving synthetic opioids, other than methadone (e.g., fentanyl) increased 80% (Rudd et al. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose DeathsâUnited States, 2000-2014. CDC: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Jan. 1, 2016/64(50); 1378-82). In 2014, there were approximately one and a half times more drug overdose deaths in the United States than deaths from motor vehicle crashes (CDC. Wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research (WONDER). Atlanta, Ga.: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov). Adequate pain treatment and follow-up may be thwarted by a mix of uncertain diagnosis and societal stigma consciously or unconsciously applied to people reporting pain, particularly when they do not respond readily to treatment (IOM, 2011).
There is currently no objective measure for pain and as a result physicians struggle to both diagnose and treat pain. A pain monitor would address this major health crisis by facilitating healthcare providers' prescribing of opioid pain relievers; in particular, prescribing the appropriate dose. American Geriatrics Society cites delays in access to prescribed opioids for nursing home patients, including those who are terminally ill, and the American Cancer Society has recognized the frequent inaccessibility of opioids necessary for treating some pain (IOM, 2011). According to the White House action plan, between 2000 and 2009, the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed by retail pharmacies grew by 48 percentâto 257 million. However, based on increased regulations to limit opioid abuse, twenty-nine percent of primary care physicians and 16 percent of pain specialists report they prescribe opioids less often than they think appropriate because of concerns about regulatory repercussions (Breuer et al, Pain management by primary care physicians, pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists: A national survey. Southern Medical Journal 2010 103(8):738-747).
Accurate medication dosage, early intervention, and physician education are necessary. The following is a list of potential savings from improvements in pain prevention, care, education, and research per IOM 2011 Relieving Pain in America report:
better treatment of acute pain, through education about self-management and better clinical treatment, in order to avoid the progression to chronic pain, which is more difficult and more expensive to treat and generates high health care utilization; reductions in health problems and complications of other physical and mental diseases and conditions associated with chronic pain that also are expensive to treat; more cost-effective care of people with chronic pain when self-management and multimodal approaches are used more often, primary care physicians are educated and empowered to treat most people with pain appropriately, and unnecessary diagnostic tests and procedures and referrals to specialists are avoided; better tailoring of treatment to individuals based on new research findings and integration of those findings into patterns of care. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) devices which enable the patient to self-administer pain medicine are used to administer medications in institutional settings. While there is currently no commercially available way to objectively measure pain, and rising concern over abuse of opioids and other prescriptions, PCA's are utilized and do have advantages. Research shows PCA is superior to intermittent injection of pain medication, even by the IV route (D'Arcy, Y. (2007). Pain pointers: Safe pain relief at the push of a button. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy, 5(5), 9-12). Patients use less narcotic, do not have to wait for the nurse to bring the medication, and have greater overall satisfaction with better analgesia and lower pain scores than patients who request analgesia from the nursing staff (Smeltzer, S., et al. (2008). Textbook of medical surgical nursing (11th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott). By controlling pain, patients can move more readily, take deep breaths and ambulate earlier, reducing the risk of post-operative complications (D'Arcy, Y. (2008). Keep your patient safe during PCA. Nursing, 38(1), 50-55).
Despite these advantages there are n
RELATED PATENT APPLICATION
This application is a divisional patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/992,016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,203) filed on Jan. 10, 2016 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND VALIDATION OF PATIENT TREATMENTS AND OUTCOMES that claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/101,992 filed Jan. 10, 2015 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entireties.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) for bioanalytical analysis of pain matrix activity and the autonomic nervous system to diagnose and validate patient treatments, health status and outcomes. The PMD is implemented using medical devices for measuring and reporting objective measurements of pain through patient monitoring and analyzing related biological, psychological, social, environmental, and demographic factors that may contribute to and effect physiological outcomes for patients and through the analysis improve diagnosis of pain, evaluation of related disease states, and treatment options.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Currently there exists no valid and reliable method of objectively quantifying an individual's experience of pain (Younger J et al, Pain Outcomes: A Brief Review of Instruments and Techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep., 2009 February; 13(1):39-43). In the United States, approximately 100 million adultsâmore than the number affected by heart disease, diabetes, and cancer combinedâsuffer from common chronic pain conditions (Tsang, A et al, Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: Gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. Journal of Pain. 2008; 9(10):883-891) with an annual national economic cost associated with chronic pain estimated to be $560-635 billion in 2011. The aging of the United States population means that a growing number of Americans will experience the diseases with which chronic pain is associated-diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, arthritis, and cancer, among others (Cherry et al, Population aging and the use of office-based physician services. NCHS Data Brief, No. 41. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics). Increases in obesity will result in more orthopedic problems related to the degradation of cartilage (Richettel et al., 2011). As a result, there will be a greater number of joint replacement surgeries, occurring in younger adult populations (Harms, S., R. Larson, A. E. Sahmoun, and J. R. Beal. 2007. Obesity increases the likelihood of total joint replacement surgery among younger adults. International Orthopaedics 31(1):23-26; Changulani et al., 2008); resulting in associated acute and also potentially chronic pain. Increases in disease states associated with pain will not only be experienced in the US. A UK Report from 2009, stated that, âchronic pain is two to three times more common now than it was 40 years agoâ (U.K. Department of Health. 2009. 150 years of the chief medical officer: On the state of public health. Annual Report. London: U.K. Department of Health; PAGE 34). There is no question that pain, and other complex chronic disease states, are a major public health challenge. According to the Institute of Medicine's 2011 studyâRelieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research., pain is a uniquely individual and subjective experience that depends on a variety of biological, psychological, and social factors, and different population groups experience pain differentially (IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press). Why one person suffers an injury and reports modest pain and another with a similar injury reports serious pain depends on many factors: genetic characteristics, general health status and comorbidities, pain experiences from childhood on, the brain's processing system, the emotional and cognitive context in which pain occurs, and cultural and social factors. Costly procedures often are performed when other actions should be considered, such as prevention, counseling, and facilitation of self-care, which are common features of successful treatment. In addition, adequate pain treatment and follow-up may be thwarted by a mix of uncertain diagnosis and societal stigma consciously or unconsciously applied to people reporting pain, particularly when they do not respond readily to treatment (IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press). For these reasons, it is important to develop an objective manner to measure pain, and general physical symptoms, but then to further combine and analyze sensor acquired data with additional factors that influence the individual experience of pain, and other related healthcare issues and disease states. Currently, physicians and caregivers rely upon a patient's own description of symptoms such as pain, which is an example of a physical outcome that has defied objective measurement. Today, uni-dimensional scales are used to evaluate pain. A commonly used scale is the numerical rating scale (NRS), which typically consists of scores 0-10, with the far left denoting âno painâ and the far right end of the scale as âworst pain imaginableâ. In general, it is difficult for a subject to accurately describe their pain, but especially while under duress, or for example patient populations that may struggle with communication, such as children, elderly patients suffering from dementia, and those who do not speak the same language as the treating medical professional. Clinical findings that can be seenâa broken bone on an x-ray, for exampleâdo not necessarily correlate well with the severity of pain the patient perceives. Elderly patients experience pain twice as often as those under the age of 60 which is thought to relate to their inability to accurately communicate pain and intensity or source of pain (Herr K et al, Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clin Geriatric Med, 2001 August; 17(3):457-vi) (Weiner D et al, 1999. Pain in nursing home residents: An exploration of prevalence, staff perceptions, and practical aspects of measurement. Clin of J Pain. 1999; 15:92 [PubMed: 10382922]). People afflicted by pain may find the rough tools of language inadequate to convey the character and intensity of their experience and its significance to them. This can be a substantial barrier to obtaining adequate treatment (Werner, A., and K. Malterud. 2003. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Social Science & Medicine 57(8):1409-1419). According to the Institute of Medicine, (IOM, 2011), pain and its severity, how it evolves, and the effectiveness of treatment depend on a constellation of biological, psychological, and social factors, such as the following:
Biologicalâthe extent of an illness or injury and whether the person has other illnesses, is under stress, or has specific genes or predisposing factors that affect pain tolerance or thresholds; Psychological-anxiety, fear, guilt, anger, depression, and thinking the pain represents something worse than it does and that the person is helpless to manage it (Ochsner, K., J. Zaki, J. Hanelin, D. Ludlow, K. Knierim, T. Ramachandran, G. Glover, and S. Mackey. 2008. Your pain or mine? Common and distinct neural systems supporting the perception of pain in self and other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 3(2): 144-160); Socialâthe response of significant others to the pain-whether support, criticism, enabling behavior, or withdrawalâthe demands of the work environment, access to medical care, culture, and family attitudes and beliefs.
Beyond the lack of a currently available objective measures for pain and more recent agreement that pain, and other complex chronic diseases, are a constellation of biological, psychological, and social factors there is still further need to address existing issues with under-treatment of patients suffering from chronic pain resulting from shortened hospital stays and lack of at-home monitoring and telemedicine. As outlined in IOM's Relieving Pain in America report: In 2007, almost half of Emergency Department patients presented with pain that was severe 22% or moderate 23%. (Niska et al, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. National Health Statistics Reports 26. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics) Chest or abdominal pain was the leading reason for the visit among those aged 15-64, while chest or abdominal pain plus shortness of breath was the leading reason for the visit among those 65 and older. There were 10 million inpatient surgeries and 17.4 million hospital outpatient surgeries in 2009 (AHA (American Hospital Association). 2011. Trendwatch chartbook 2011. Tables 3.1 and 3.4. http://www.aha.org/aha/research-and-trends/chartbook/index.html (accessed Mar. 3, 2011)). Between 10 and 50 percent of people having regularly performed surgical operationsâgroin hernia repair, breast and thoracic surgery, leg amputation, and coronary artery bypass surgeryâgo on to experience chronic pain, often due to damage to nerves in the surgical area during the procedure (Kehlet, et al, Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006; 367(9522):1618-1625). Today's shorter hospital staysâdown, on average, from 7.2 days in 1989 to 5.4 days in 2009 (AHA, 2011)âand the trend toward outpatient surgery may not permit sufficient opportunity to assess patients' postsurgical pain or establish an appropriate course of postoperative analgesia (perhaps one that can be administered at home), shown to be effective in hip and knee replacement, for example (Schug et al. Chronic pain after surgery or injury. 2011 Pain Clinical Updates 19. Seattle, Wash.: International Association for the Study of Pain). There is currently no way to monitor an out-patient's response to pharmaceutical treatment and the effectiveness of treatment related to pain and other related chronic disease states.
Recent improvements in sensor technology, powerful and miniaturized micro-controllers, systems on a chip (SOCs), low energy wireless communication, and power management add up to the opportunity for new wearable devices that allow for long-term, at-home, patient monitoring of physiologic measurements via patient worn sensors, cloud computing for data storage and analysis, and integration with networks and mobile devices provide communication with healthcare providers and healthcare systems. What is not measured in these devices of the prior art is a measurement of the severity of pain that a patient is experiencing either due to an immediate injury or as a chronic result of disease or other infirmary. Using the pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) of the present invention, pain is objectively measured to provide currently unavailable biophysical information that will assist in diagnosis, the selection and validation of treatments, and may provide patient incentives to continue in performing effective treatments. By tracking and evaluating biophysical measurements, âpain matrixâ activity in the form of a pain modulatory circuit with inputs that arise in multiple areas including cortical sites, the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), pregenual cingulate cortex, (pCC), somatosensory cortex 1 and 2, the thalamus and hypothalamus, insula, the amygdala, periaqueductal gray region (PAG), and additional descending pathway structures, and vagal tone may be correlated to determine stress, cognition, emotion, disease states, and evaluation of threat to determine pain state, modulation of pain, level of health and healing, and the vulnerability toward illness of a patient (Ossipov et al. Central Modulation of Pain. The Journal of Clinical Investigations: November 2010; 120(11): 3779-3787.)
Pain measurements may also assist physicians in prescribing proper dosage based on the patient's reaction to medication. Patients are receiving inadequate access to pain medications due to the well-publicized abuse of opioids and the subsequent reluctance of the many in the medical community to write prescriptions for non-institutionalized patients. According to researchers at the CDC, to reverse the epidemic of opioid drug overdose deaths and prevent opioid-related morbidity, efforts to improve safer prescribing of prescription opioids must be intensified (Paulozzi L J, Jones C, Mack K, Rudd R. Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relieversâUnited States, 1999-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60:1487-92). Between 2013 and 2014, the age-adjusted rate of death involving synthetic opioids, other than methadone (e.g., fentanyl) increased 80% (Rudd et al. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose DeathsâUnited States, 2000-2014. CDC: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Jan. 1, 2016/64(50); 1378-82). In 2014, there were approximately one and a half times more drug overdose deaths in the United States than deaths from motor vehicle crashes (CDC. Wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research (WONDER). Atlanta, Ga.: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov). Adequate pain treatment and follow-up may be thwarted by a mix of uncertain diagnosis and societal stigma consciously or unconsciously applied to people reporting pain, particularly when they do not respond readily to treatment (IOM, 2011).
There is currently no objective measure for pain and as a result physicians struggle to both diagnose and treat pain. A pain monitor would address this major health crisis by facilitating healthcare providers' prescribing of opioid pain relievers; in particular, prescribing the appropriate dose. American Geriatrics Society cites delays in access to prescribed opioids for nursing home patients, including those who are terminally ill, and the American Cancer Society has recognized the frequent inaccessibility of opioids necessary for treating some pain (IOM, 2011). According to the White House action plan, between 2000 and 2009, the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed by retail pharmacies grew by 48 percentâto 257 million. However, based on increased regulations to limit opioid abuse, twenty-nine percent of primary care physicians and 16 percent of pain specialists report they prescribe opioids less often than they think appropriate because of concerns about regulatory repercussions (Breuer et al, Pain management by primary care physicians, pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists: A national survey. Southern Medical Journal 2010 103(8):738-747).
Accurate medication dosage, early intervention, and physician education are necessary. The following is a list of potential savings from improvements in pain prevention, care, education, and research per IOM 2011 Relieving Pain in America report:
better treatment of acute pain, through education about self-management and better clinical treatment, in order to avoid the progression to chronic pain, which is more difficult and more expensive to treat and generates high health care utilization; reductions in health problems and complications of other physical and mental diseases and conditions associated with chronic pain that also are expensive to treat; more cost-effective care of people with chronic pain when self-management and multimodal approaches are used more often, primary care physicians are educated and empowered to treat most people with pain appropriately, and unnecessary diagnostic tests and procedures and referrals to specialists are avoided; better tailoring of treatment to individuals based on new research findings and integration of those findings into patterns of care. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) devices which enable the patient to self-administer pain medicine are used to administer medications in institutional settings. While there is currently no commercially available way to objectively measure pain, and rising concern over abuse of opioids and other prescriptions, PCA's are utilized and do have advantages. Research shows PCA is superior to intermittent injection of pain medication, even by the IV route (D'Arcy, Y. (2007). Pain pointers: Safe pain relief at the push of a button. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy, 5(5), 9-12). Patients use less narcotic, do not have to wait for the nurse to bring the medication, and have greater overall satisfaction with better analgesia and lower pain scores than patients who request analgesia from the nursing staff (Smeltzer, S., et al. (2008). Textbook of medical surgical nursing (11th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott). By controlling pain, patients can move more readily, take deep breaths and ambulate earlier, reducing the risk of post-operative complications (D'Arcy, Y. (2008). Keep your patient safe during PCA. Nursing, 38(1), 50-55).
Despite these advantages there are negatives. For example, they cannot be readily used, if at all, for infants, toddlers, and other who cannot operate the device due to either a physical disability such as a spinal cord injury or individuals unable or unwilling to understand instructions for use. Patients who are obese or asthmatic, or those taking drugs that potentiate opiates, such as sedatives or hypnotics, muscle relaxants and antiemetics, should not use PCA. Patients with sleep apnea should not use PCA (D'Arcy, Y. (2011). New thinking about postoperative pain management. OR Nurse, 51(11): 28-36). Also, current PCA devices continue to operate based upon the subjective measure of self-assessment. Without a means to normalize patient self-assessment inconsistent treatment remains an issue for patients. PCA combined with an objective measure for pain using the PainTrace medical devices and components and features of the pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) of the present invention may alleviate many existing issues.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) of the present invention uses medical devices to acquire data, and physiological measurements, related to pain and demographics, medical information, activities, and patient and healthcare provider information further acquired through PMD specific components and features to establish baselines for both healthy patients and for patients that may be suffering from various disease states. Using the PMD, collected data related to pain and associated physiological measurements, are transformed to diagnostic indicators, or healthcare provider tools, based on factors related to patient demographics, comorbidities, interventions, and other known contributors that affect the overall experience of pain, and additionally are indicators of health, including genetics, biomarkers, past experiences, pain matrix neurological modulation of pain, activities, and emotional and cultural influences. The PMD will acquire and store pain measurements, physiological measurement, and relevant data, correlating with surveys and the current âgold standardâ, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and similar scales for the self-report of pain to translate collected data to establish a more accurate and reliable scale of pain measurement, and related disease diagnosis and monitoring, based on physiological measurements and the biopsychosocial factors related to the experience of pain.
Recent findings through neurological research have determined the existence of a brain-based âpain matrixâ responsible for the processing and modulation of pain. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is central to this pain matrix with neurological connections linked to the periaqueductal gray region (PAG), responsible for descending pain pathways from the brain, and cortical sites that together with the amygdala provide emotional-affective modulation of cognitive functions in pain (Ossipov). et al. Central Modulation of Pain. The Journal of Clinical Investigations: November 2010; 120(11): 3779-3787, Neugebauer et al. Forebrain pain mechanisms. Brain Res Rev. 2009; 60 (1): 226-242). In particular, the amygdala produces the largest asymmetry, and research has shown that the amygdala is a critical component of the pain matrix. (Veinante P et al. The Amygdala between sensation and affect: a role in Pain. J Molec Psych 2013, 1:9 http://www.jmolecularpsychiatry.com/content/1/1/9). Studies have evidenced that only the right central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) has been related to both acute and chronic pain. (Ossimov, 33-40), (Ji, G. et al. Hemispheric lateralization of pain processing by amygdal neurons. JNeurophysiol. 2009; 102 (4): 253-2264, Carrsquillo, Y. et al. Hemispheric lateralization of a molecular signal for pain modulation in the amygdala. Mol Pain. 2008; 4:24). By measuring EDA using the contralateral placement of sensors, or electrodes, direct measurements of brain pain processing from the âpain matrixâ demonstrate the âcollection of brain regions that are involved in neurological functions, including cognition, emotion, motivation, and sensation as well as painâ (Ossipov), et al. Central Modulation of Pain. The Journal of Clinical Investigations: November 2010; 120(11): 3779-3787). Large asymmetric differences in EDA between the left and right side have been demonstrated upon direct stimulation of particular brain regions, some of which form the aforementioned âpain matrix.â Boucesin in, Electrodermal Activity page 41, summarizes three main pathways connecting the central nervous system (CNS) to EDA. In particular, the pathway termed âEDA1â arises from the limbic region which includes the amygdala as a brain region that elicits ipsilateral EDA (Mangina C A, et al. Direct Electrical Stimulation of Specific Human Brain Structures and Bilateral Electrodermal Activity. Int J Psychophysiol, 1996 22(1-2), 1-8; Mangina C A, et al. Even-related Brain Potentials, Bilateral Electrodermal Activity and Mangina-Test Performance in Learning Disabled/ADHD Pre-adolescents with Severe Behavioral Disorders as Compared to Age-matched Normal Controls. Int J Psychophysiol, 2000 37(1), 71-85; Boucsein W. Electrodermal Activity. (2nd Ed.); Page 41. Springer-Verlag (New York 2012).
The use of contralateral sensors for the measurement of EDA and a correlation of these measurements to pain is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,238 to Levengood and Gedye, and others. However, these findings were presented somewhat in isolated experiments and the devices used presented challenges in sensitivity and repeatability. In Burke, U.S. Pat. No. 8,560,046, a device that reliably measured pain was disclosed, however the integration of collected data with other biophysical measurements and particularly with ipsilateral measurements was not described.
This patent outlines an integrated pain measurement and diagnostic that builds and improves on previously granted claims for contralateral sensor placement in the measurement of autonomic nervous system function and pain matrix activity. The PMD combines a series of data management systems to acquire biosignals, integrate patient information, perform diagnosis, and treatment interventions and deliver pain measurement and diagnostic outcomes that provide useful and useable information for the HCP. In addition to the diagnosis of pain, the pain measurement devices of the PMD also provide early diagnosis of intestinal distress, allergies and respiratory infection, sports injury related to tendon and ligament damage, as well as diagnosis of chronic pain related to back injury, dental and migraine cases among others. Using the PMD it has demonstrated statistically significant correlation to patient self-report of pain and the evaluation of pre- and post-treatment pain states as well as the aforementioned disease states.
The PMD as described herein evaluates physiologic measurements, tracks patient activity, interacts with patient via questions pertinent to their diagnosis, and aids decisions around on-going treatment regimens and alterations to improve outcomes. The physiologic measurements evaluated by the PMD may include, but are not limited to, pain-related asymmetric biosignals specific to the present invention, heart rate, heart rate variability, photoplethysmogram (PPG), blood pressure, skin temperature, movement, GSR, and other vital signs. Through the analysis and continual integration of data, the PMD has an evolutionary nature, in that it will constantly be evaluating data input from a number of different sources, for example health care providers who are gathering biometrics data on patients that may be suffering from various disease states, new research and journal references related to specific disease states, and biophysical data through multiple biosensors used in monitoring the patient with the initial scope of analysis directed to include evaluations of acute and chronic pain as it relates to interventions. Through the gathering of data points that comprise biological, psychological, social measures, and other relevant data fields combined with the disease state diagnostic data points, the PMD will store, data mine, integrate, and transform the gathered data in a HIPAA compliant manner, or in an appropriate fashion to protect patient privacy rights, in order to parallel and integrate data on patients using a biopsychosocial platform, or one that comprises other appropriate factors for data points, to further increase the understanding of a disease state or evaluate an intervention. The PMD may further correlate device generated measurements of pain and the central nervous system activity as related to respiratory sinus arrhythmia, heart rate and heart variability, respiration, photoplethysmogram (PPG), movement, and skin temperature measurements from other sensors in order to determine pain matrix activity and vagal tone that may provide information on the vulnerability of the patient to stress and illness. (Loggia et al, Autonomic responses to heat pain: Heart rate, skin conductance, and their relation to verbal ratings and stimulus intensity. Pain. 2011; 152 (3): 592-598). By measuring the manifestation of pain in the nervous system combined with data regarding biological, behavioral, environmental, psychological, and social factors, the PMD may further derive statistical computations of patient and population factors and isolate factors to be used for diagnosis to increase the understanding of various disease states via the multi-dimensional transformation of data through the analysis using the pain and physiological measurements generated by the device, and components and features integrated within the PMD platform.
The individual nature of a patient's interpretation of pain and the current biospsychosocial approaches to treatment of complex disease states presents barriers to fully understand a patient's experience and how pain relates to treatment and successful outcomes. The PMD, as an integrated device, network, and software system, removes subjective analysis and resolves issues of patient inconsistencies and limitations by integrating objective sensor measurements of pain and âpain matrixâ central nervous system activity with health information, demographics, and physiological measurements through a unique graphical user interface (GUI) that makes data accessible and useful for health care providers (HCP) and patients. The PMD uses pain measurement acquisition software to normalize and correlate measurements from for example the pain matrix and associated signals, and integrates aspects of this measured pain data to other collected sensor data to more effectively present the biophysical state of a patient at specific time points. The PMD further integrates information from specific fields through specific questions related to patient activities and disease states. For example, a migraine patient may receive a series of questions as designated time points related to pain inflections that represent a change in pain state. The collected responses are correlated and may show an increase in pain that is related to activities such as eating, exercise, stress, and other daily interactions that may identify the source of pain or exasperation, or improvement, of the diseased or healthy state. The PMD further integrates patient health status, physical biosignal device measurements, diagnosis, research, and healthcare provider (HCP) intervention and management in order to reinforce positive patient emotions, to educate, to promote healthy activities, and to encourage compliance to improve outcomes through remote patient engagement. The PMD further provides a personal health record storage platform that will additionally function as universal health record allowing individual health and activity data and electronic health record data to be combined for analysis. The analysis of health information, demographics, and physiological measurements with pain matrix and nervous system measurements presented through the PMD System of the present invention will result in integration of data and ongoing monitoring that benefits the healthcare community and individuals with custom and global analysis of health factors, specific disease and health related data, and effective treatment options to ultimately improve understanding of a disease state, or general health, related influencing factors, and best practices for safe and effective treatment interventions and regimens. The integration and optimization of this data within contextual timeframes and associated patient knowledgebase presented by the BioTraceIT analysis application software of the PMD can dramatically aid an HCP in diagnosis, patient monitoring, patient engagement, treatment options, and acceptable dose limits.
It is an objective and advantage of the present invention to integrate device generated pain measurements and other biometric sensors and biopsychosocial data collected within a graphical user interface for tracking and evaluation of a patient's health status and response to treatment as the subjective nature of pain has many components that can be potentially objectified when combined with a physiological measurement of pain as acquired by the PainTrace device 14 and integrated within the PMD 10 ; pain measurement and diagnostic system (Chapman et al, Pain and Stress in a Systems Perspective: Reciprocal Neural, Endocrine, and Immune Interactions. J Pain. 2008 February; 9(2):122-145).
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD utilizes a computer processing system having memory and data storage to process the electrical activity of a pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD utilizes a computer processing system having memory and data storage to process the electrical activity of a pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device by measuring the differential of voltage or current between at least two matching electrodes and normalizing an electric signal to determine a value level representative of objective quantitative measure of pain matrix activity and displaying and storing data from the pain measurement device and using the collected data in the evaluation of health and wellness.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD utilizes a computer processing system having memory and data storage to process the electrical activity of a pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device by measuring the differential of voltage or current between at least two matching electrodes contralaterally placed and by measuring the voltage or current differential between and normalizing an electric signal to determine a value level representative of an objective measure of pain matrix activity and displaying and storing data from the pain measurement device and using the collected data in the evaluation of health and wellness.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD utilizes a computer processing system having memory and data storage to process the electrical activity of a pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device by measuring the differential of voltage or current between at least two matching electrodes ipsilaterally placed and by measuring the voltage or current differential between and normalizing an electric signal to determine a value level representative of an objective measure of pain measuring and displaying and storing data from the pain measurement device and using the collected data in the evaluation of health and wellness.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD utilizes a computer processing system having memory and data storage to process the electrical activity of a pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device by measuring the differential of voltage or current between at least two matching electrodes contralaterally placed with the voltage or current differential between at least two matching electrodes ipsilaterally placed to calibrate measurements of the pain matrix and central nervous system activity and displaying and storing data from the pain measurement device and using the collected data for the evaluation of health and wellness.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD utilizes a computer processing system having memory and data storage to process the electrical activity of a pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device by measuring the differential of voltage or current between at least two matching electrodes contralaterally placed with the voltage or current differential between at least two matching electrodes ipsilaterally placed to determine and validate a value level representative of an objective measure of pain matrix and central nervous system activity and displaying and storing data from the pain measurement device and using the collected data for the evaluation of health and wellness.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device of the PMD will be worn over longer periods of time as a âwearableâ at-home monitor for pain and health monitoring with data collected using components and features of the PMD.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD provide alerts based on data collected from the pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device that deviates from set levels be transmitted to associated healthcare providers.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD provides for the administration of medication through an automated pump dispenser based on data collected from the pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that the PMD provides for the activation through a security code of a dispenser for medication based on data collected from the pain matrix and central nervous system measurement device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention that data collected from one or more physiological monitors of the PMD for measuring multiple physiological signs of a subject such as pain, heart rate, heart rate variability, skin temperature, electrodermal activity (EDA), photoplethysmogram (PPG) readings, skin conductivity, motion, tension and compression is used for the evaluation of health and wellness of a patient.
It is a further object and advantage that the PMD of the present invention collect data from one or more physiological monitors for measuring multiple physiological signs.
It is a further objective and advantage that the PMD includes components and features to interact with the patient based on their diagnosis and monitored changes in pain levels.
The present invention is related to a bioanalytical analysis system using pain measurements to diagnosis and measure the effectiveness of treatment outcomes, the system comprising a device for measuring pain matrix activity; a plurality of BioTrace Factors related to biophysical, biological, psychological, social, environmental, and demographic information; and wherein deflections in measurements of pain matrix activity are combined with BioTrace Factors to determine the effectiveness of a patient's treatment. The combination of pain matrix activity and BioTrace Factors provides a quantitative measure of pain. The quantitative measure of pain matrix activity correlates with self-reporting of pain using a numerical rating scale. The bioanalytical analysis system comprises 10-60 messaging triggered by a combination of pain matrix activity, BioTrace Factors, and integrated journaling. The plurality of BioTrace Factors of the bioanalytical analysis system comprising contribution factors and factor impact levels. The combination of pain matrix activity measurements and BioTrace Factors provide a PainTrace Factor reflective of an individual patient's experience to pain. The combination of BioTrace Factors and a PainTrace Factor provide BioTrace Progress Score reflective of the effectiveness of a patient's treatment and measurement of a patient's compliance to that treatment.
In some embodiments measurements of pain matrix activity of the bioanalytical analysis system are made without applying a voltage, by applying a range of voltages or currents. The device for measuring pain matrix activity of the bioanalytical analysis system has sensors and in some embodiments a float current is applied to the sensors intermittently. The sensors of the device for measuring pain matrix activity may be placed contralaterally, ipsilaterally, in pairs placed contralaterally and in pairs placed ipsilaterally, and in some embodiments two pairs of ipsilateral sensors are placed contralaterally. The device for measuring pain matrix activity of the bioanalytical analysis system has a load resistor having resistance of between 0.5 k ohms and 900 k ohms. The load resistor may be a variable resistor and a calibration method may incrementally increase resistance by applying voltage to generate a linear resistance curve. The variable resistor may be adjusted using the linear resistance curve to produce maximum current flow.
The bioanalytical analysis system using pain measurements to diagnosis and measure the effectiveness of treatment outcomes may comprise a noxious stimulus caliper that applies a consistent and repeatable amount of pressure for a consistent period of time. By acquiring pain matrix activity measurements from the applied stimulus using the noxious stimulus caliper a baseline of pain tolerance may be generated. The bioanalytical analysis system may comprise one or all of the following components a motion detector, a heart rate monitor, a heart rate variability monitor, a blood pressure monitor, a galvanic skin response measurement device, and a skin temperature measurement device. In some embodiments, the device for measuring pain matrix activity of the bioanalytical analysis system comprising a pain matrix monitoring device, heart rate monitor, heart rate variability monitor, blood pressure monitor, galvanic skin response measurement device, temperature measurement device, and motion detector. The bioanalytical analysis system may comprise SaaS, PaaS and on demand computing services and a shared resource database through a web browser or other interface. The bioanalytical analysis system may comprise an electronic circuit for the initialization, identification, location, acquisition, control and communication to the device for measuring pain matrix activity.
The present invention is related to an autonomic function monitoring device, comprising: a pain matrix activity measurement device having sensors, a data acquisition system; and wherein deflections in measurements of pain matrix activity are used to determine the levels of a patient's pain and health. The pain matrix activity measurement of the autonomic function monitoring device provides a quantitative measure of pain. The quantitative measure of pain matrix activity correlates with self-reporting of pain using a numerical rating scale. The measurements of pain matrix activity may be made without applying a voltage or by applying a range of voltages and currents. In some embodiments, a float current is applied to the sensors intermittently. The sensors of the autonomic function monitoring device may be placed contralaterally, ipsilaterally, in pairs placed contralaterally and in pairs placed ipsilaterally, and in some embodiments two pairs of ipsilateral sensors may be placed contralaterally.
The autonomic function monitoring device wherein the device for measuring pain matrix activity having a load resistor having resistance of between 0.5 k ohms and 900 k ohms. In some embodiments, the load resistor is a variable resistor and resistance is incrementally increased and voltage is applied to generate a linear resistance curve. In applying calibration methods, the variable resistor may be adjusted using the linear resistance curve to produce maximum current flow. The autonomic function monitoring device may comprise a noxious stimulus caliper that applies a consistent and repeatable amount of pressure for a consistent period of time. The pain matrix activity measurements from the applied stimulus using the noxious stimulus caliper may be used to generate a baseline of pain tolerance. In some embodiments, the autonomic function monitoring device may comprise one or all of a motion detector, a heart rate monitor, a heart rate variability monitor, a blood pressure monitor, a galvanic skin response measurement device, and a skin temperature measurement device. The autonomic function monitoring device comprising SaaS, PaaS and on demand computing services and a shared resource database through a web browser or other interface. The autonomic function monitoring device comprising an electronic circuit for the initialization, identification, location, acquisition, control and communication to a plurality of sensors.
The present invention is related to an activity monitor to measure pain, that in some embodiments may comprise contralateral sensors measuring pain matrix activity without applying voltage. In other embodiments, activity monitor to measure pain may comprise ipsilateral sensors by applying voltage. The activity monitor to measure pain comprising one or all of a heart rate monitor, a heart rate variability monitor, a motion detector, a blood pressure monitor, a galvanic skin response measurement device, and a skin temperature measurement device. The activity monitor to measure pain may comprise a sensor track. The activity monitor to measure pain may comprise a sensor cluster. The activity monitor to measure pain may comprise an electronic circuit for the initialization, identification, location, acquisition, control and communication to a plurality of sensors.
The present invention is further related to a sensor track, comprising a flexible sensor attachment device having a track and conductive strip; and wherein the flexible sensor attachment device provides for the attachment and electrical connection to a plurality of electrodes and sensors. The sensor track may comprise a Velcro strip for the attachment of the sensor track to clothing. The sensor track may comprise an adhesive strip for the attachment of the sensor track to skin, clothing or other surfaces. The sensor track may comprise an electronic circuit for the initialization, identification, location, acquisition, control and communication to a plurality of sensors. The sensor track may comprise wireless communication circuitry. The sensor track may comprise communication connectors to add separate sensor tracks and additional electrodes and sensors to the sensor track.
The present invention is related to a method of quantitatively measuring pain, comprising establishing a baseline by measuring the pain matrix activity during noxious stimulus; monitoring pain matrix activity and deflections from the established baseline; establishing BioTrace Factors based on patient biophysical data, patient and population demographics and self-reported measurements of pain; establishing a PainTrace Factor based on the integration of data from pain matrix activity measurements and BioTrace Factors; monitoring patient pain matrix activity through treatment; and identifying pre-treatment and post-treatment deltas indicative of the change in pain state; and correlating the measured deltas with associated pain scales.
The present invention is a method of measuring the effectiveness of treatment outcomes using measurements of pain matrix activity, comprising monitoring pain matrix activity and deflections to establish a quantitative measure of pain; monitoring and collecting LifeTraceIT data based on patient activity, engagement, compliance and integrated journaling; applying an iterative analysis to BioTrace Factors, PainTrace Factors, LifeTraceIT data, related to a patient and integrating this analysis to generate an individualized BioTrace Progress Score which will be determined on an ongoing basis that continues monitoring of patient actions, physiological data, treatment interventions, and pain matrix activity; which will further be combined with associated trends, population clusters, current research and historical medical records in assessing the effectiveness of treatment outcomes.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become obvious to the reader and it is intended that these objects and advantages are within the scope of the present invention. To the accomplishment of the above and related objects, this invention may be embodied in the form illustrated in the accompanying drawings, attention being called to the fact, however, that the drawings are illustrative only, and that changes may be made in the specific construction illustrated and described within the scope of this application.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Several embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of a pain measurement and diagnostic system (PMD) network that may be in a clinical or hospital setting in an implementation of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of a server system and integration of one or more server systems, computers, mobile devices, biophysical devices and sensors and pain measurement devices within the PMD network in an implementation of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of application components in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6A is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the pain measurement sensors (referred to herein as the PainTrace sensors or PainTrace device sensors) that provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6B is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of a PainTrace device that provides data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6C is a diagrammatic representation of another embodiment of the PainTrace sensors that provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6D is a diagrammatic representation of a further embodiment of the PainTrace sensors that provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6E is a diagrammatic representation of a still further embodiment of PainTrace sensors and PainTrace measurement devices with sensors that provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6F is an exploded view of a diagrammatic representation of the embodiment of the PainTrace sensor and holder of FIG. 6C that provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6G is a diagrammatic representation of a still further embodiment of a PainTrace measurement device with sensors that provides data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6H is a diagrammatic representation of the still further embodiment of a PainTrace measurement device with sensors of FIG. 6G that provides data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6I is a diagrammatic representation of a still further embodiment of a PainTrace measurement device with sensor integrated with a blood pressure monitor to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 6J is a diagrammatic representation of a still further embodiment of a PainTrace sensor device that may be used with the PainTrace measurement device and blood pressure monitor of FIG. 6I to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 7A is a front view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device with sensor installed on a wristband to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 7B is a rear view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device with sensor installed on a wristband to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 7C is a front view of a diagrammatic representation of another embodiment of only the PainTrace sensor installed on a wristband to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 8A is a side view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device with sensors to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 8B is a rear view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device with sensor installed on a wristband to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 9A is an internal side view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device with sensor to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 9B is a rear view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device of FIG. 9A to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 9C is a rear view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace sensor of FIG. 9A to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 10A is a perspective view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace sensor to provide data to an embodiment of the PainTrace application component in an embodiment of the PMD of the present invention;
FIG. 10B is a perspective view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace sensor connector;
FIG. 10C is a perspective view of a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the PainTrace device connector;
CLAIMS
Claims ( 20 )
What is claimed is:
1. An autonomic function monitoring device, comprising:
a pain matrix activity measurement device having a plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body, the sensors comprising a pressure measurement device configured to measure the pressure of a sensor against the skin;
the pain matrix activity measurement device configured to acquire data from the contralateral sensors, the contralateral sensors configured to measure pain matrix activity;
a data acquisition system configured to acquire pain matrix activity data from the pain matrix activity measurement device, the data acquisition system comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium within a network of central processing units having memory and data storage and having embodied thereon one or more computer programs causing one or more of the central processing units to execute certain steps of;
accessing pressure data from a pressure measurement device and displaying an indicator or marker of the pressure measurement to allow for adjustment to have the sensors configured to be placed contralaterally have equal pressure against the skin;
accessing data from the plurality of sensors; and
identifying deflections from the data accessed from the plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body as measurements of pain matrix activity providing a quantitative measure of pain that is used to determine the levels of a patient's pain and health.
2. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein the one or more central processing units is further configured to determine a delta from the point in time of a deflection to the maximum amount of deflection, the delta providing the quantitative measure of pain from the measurements of pain matrix activity from the plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body, the delta configured to a numerical rating scale correlated to a numerical rating scale used for the self-reporting of pain.
3. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein the pain matrix activity measurement device is configured to acquire data from the plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body for measurements of pain matrix activity without applying a voltage to the sensors.
4. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein the pain matrix activity measurement device configured to acquire data from the plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body for measurements of pain matrix activity with applying a voltage to the sensors.
5. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein the pain matrix activity measurement device is configured to acquire data from the plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body by applying a float current to the sensors intermittently.
6. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein the pressure measurement device of the sensors is configured to be placed contralaterally on the skin having a strain gauge configured to measure the pressure of a sensor against the skin.
7. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein sensors of the plurality of sensors are two pairs configured to be placed ipsilaterally, the first pair of ipsilateral sensors configured to be placed contralaterally from the second pair of ipsilateral sensors; and
the autonomic function monitoring device configured to measure skin conductivity between the first pair of ipsilateral sensors;
the autonomic function monitoring device configured to measure skin conductivity between the second pair of ipsilateral sensors;
the autonomic function monitoring device configured to determine differences in skin conductivity between the first pair of ipsilateral sensors and the second pair of ipsilateral sensors;
the autonomic function monitoring device configured to apply a voltage offset for differences within a tolerance level; and
provide an indicator of a faulty sensor or limited contact for difference outside of the tolerance level.
8. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 wherein the pain matrix activity measurement device having a load resistor having resistance of between 0.5k ohms and 900k ohms.
9. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 8 wherein the load resistor is a variable resistor configured to incrementally increase resistance and the pain matrix activity measurement device configured to apply voltage to generate a linear resistance curve and using the linear resistance curve, the adjustment of the variable resistor is configured to produce maximum current flow.
10. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a noxious stimulus caliper configured to apply a consistent and repeatable amount of pressure for a consistent period of time; and
the pain matrix activity measurement device configured to measure the applied stimulus using the noxious stimulus caliper to generate a baseline of pain tolerance.
11. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a motion detector.
12. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a heart rate monitor.
13. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a heart rate variability monitor.
14. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a blood pressure monitor.
15. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a galvanic skin response measurement device.
16. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising a skin temperature measurement device.
17. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising heart rate monitor, heart rate variability monitor, blood pressure monitor, galvanic skin response measurement device, temperature measurement device, and motion detector.
18. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising SaaS, PaaS and on demand computing services and a shared resource database through a web browser or other interface.
19. The autonomic function monitoring device of claim 1 comprising an electronic circuit for the initialization, identification, location, acquisition, control and communication to a plurality of sensors.
20. An autonomic function monitoring device comprising:
a pain matrix activity measurement device having a plurality of sensors and wherein at least one pair of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body;
at least one of the plurality of sensors configured to be placed ipsilaterally on the skin, the plurality of sensors comprising a pressure measurement device having a strain gauge configured to measure the pressure of a sensor against the skin, the pain matrix activity measurement device configured to provide an indicator or marker of the pressure measurement to allow for adjustment to have the at least one ipsilaterally sensor have a pressure measurement equal to at least one other sensor within the plurality of sensors;
the pain matrix activity measurement device configured to acquire data from the contralateral sensors, the contralateral sensors configured to measure pain matrix activity;
a data acquisition system configured to acquire pain matrix activity data from the pain matrix activity measurement device, the data acquisition system comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium within a network of central processing units having memory and data storage and having embodied thereon one or more computer programs causing one or more of the central processing units to execute certain steps of;
accessing pressure data from a pressure measurement device and displaying an indicator or marker of the pressure measurement to allow for adjustment to have the sensors configured to be placed contralaterally have equal pressure against the skin;
accessing data from the plurality of sensors; and
identifying deflections from the data accessed from the plurality of sensors configured to be positioned contralaterally at similar locations on the left and right side of the body as measurements of pain matrix activity providing a quantitative measure of pain that is used to determine the levels of a patient's pain and health.
US16/458,129
2015-01-10
2019-06-30
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Active
US11497438B2
( en )
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title
US16/458,129
US11497438B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2019-06-30
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title
US201562101992P
2015-01-10
2015-01-10
US14/992,016
US10376203B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2016-01-10
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
US16/458,129
US11497438B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2019-06-30
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date
US14/992,016
Division
US10376203B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2016-01-10
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Publications (2)
Publication Number
Publication Date
US20200000401A1
US20200000401A1 ( en )
2020-01-02
US11497438B2
true
US11497438B2 ( en )
2022-11-15
Family
ID=56356526
Family Applications (4)
Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date
US14/992,016
Active - Reinstated
2037-02-22
US10376203B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2016-01-10
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
US16/458,130
Active
2036-05-03
US11653877B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2019-06-30
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
US16/458,129
Active
US11497438B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2019-06-30
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
US18/114,375
Active
2036-03-06
US12390157B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2023-02-27
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date
US14/992,016
Active - Reinstated
2037-02-22
US10376203B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2016-01-10
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
US16/458,130
Active
2036-05-03
US11653877B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2019-06-30
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date
US18/114,375
Active
2036-03-06
US12390157B2
( en )
2015-01-10
2023-02-27
Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
Country Status (16)
Country
Link
US
( 4 )
US10376203B2
( en )
EP
( 4 )
EP3242589A4
( en )
JP
( 1 )
JP6721607B2
( en )
KR
( 1 )
KR102394073B1
( en )
CN
( 1 )
CN107106053B
( en )
AU
( 1 )
AU2016205022B2
( en )
BR
( 1 )
BR112017014694B1
( en )
CA
( 1 )
CA2972290A1
( en )
CL
( 1 )
CL2017001797A1
( en )
HK
( 1 )
HK1245051A1
( en )
IL
( 1 )
IL252975B
( en )
MX
( 1 )
MX381449B
( en )
PH
( 1 )
PH12017501253B1
( en )
RU
( 1 )
RU2722748C2
( en )
SG
( 1 )
SG11201705499VA
( en )
WO
( 1 )
WO2016112373A1
( en )
Families Citing this family (113)
* Cited by examiner, â Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
US10796801B2
( en )
*
2006-02-13
2020-10-06
David G. Silverman
Method and system for assessing, quantifying, coding and communiicating patient's health and perioperative risk
US10685743B2
( en )
2014-03-21
2020-06-16
Ehr Command Center, Llc
Data command center visual display system
KR20220119761A
( en )
2014-03-21
2022-08-30
ë ì¤ë르ë ì§ì¤ë²ê·¸
Medical services tracking system and method
US10573407B2
( en )
2014-03-21
2020-02-25
Leonard Ginsburg
Medical services tracking server system and method
US20160363449A1
( en )
*
2015-06-09
2016-12-15
Ohio State Innovation Foundation
Apparatus and method for logging propulsion data associated with a manual mobility assistance device
US11330984B2
( en )
*
2015-06-19
2022-05-17
The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology
Wearable graphene sensors
US11270384B1
( en )
2015-09-30
2022-03-08
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Computer-based management methods and systems
US10395217B1
( en )
*
2015-09-30
2019-08-27
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Computer-based management methods and systems
US20170242965A1
( en )
*
2016-02-24
2017-08-24
Rewire Ltd.
Dynamic interactive pain management system and methods
AU2017225905A1
( en )
*
2016-02-29
2018-10-25
Recovery App Pty Ltd
Psycho-social methods and apparatus for: rehabilitation, pre-operatively and post-operatively to orthopaedic surgery
US11200298B2
( en )
*
2016-03-15
2021-12-14
Amgen Inc.
Reducing probability of glass breakage in drug delivery devices
TWI589274B
( en )
*
2016-07-05
2017-07-01
da-quan Ye
Virtual reality system for psychological clinical application
US11419509B1
( en )
2016-08-18
2022-08-23
Verily Life Sciences Llc
Portable monitor for heart rate detection
KR102604233B1
( en )
*
2016-08-31
2023-11-20
ì¼ì±ì ì주ìíì¬
wearable measuring apparatus
AU2017330353A1
( en )
*
2016-09-21
2019-05-02
Trayt Inc.
Platform for assessing and treating individuals by sourcing information from groups of resources
CA3076349A1
( en )
*
2016-09-23
2018-03-29
Ehr Command Center, Llc
Data command center visual display system
AU2017335497B2
( en )
2016-09-27
2020-01-16
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
System for pain management using objective pain measure
EP3519037B1
( en )
2016-09-27
2020-07-29
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Systems for closed-loop pain management
US10667747B2
( en )
2016-10-25
2020-06-02
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Method and apparatus for pain control using baroreflex sensitivity during posture change
EP3568861B1
( en )
2017-01-11
2024-12-11
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Pain management based on emotional expression measurements
US10675469B2
( en )
2017-01-11
2020-06-09
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Pain management based on brain activity monitoring
US10631777B2
( en )
2017-01-11
2020-04-28
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Pain management based on functional measurements
US10960210B2
( en )
2017-02-10
2021-03-30
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Method and apparatus for pain management with sleep detection
US10156029B1
( en )
2017-06-14
2018-12-18
Apple Inc.
Fabric control device
WO2019018206A1
( en )
2017-07-18
2019-01-24
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Sensor-based pain management systems and methods
US11690547B2
( en )
*
2017-07-28
2023-07-04
Osaka University
Discernment of comfort/discomfort
US11676733B2
( en )
2017-12-19
2023-06-13
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Learning and applying contextual similarities between entities
EP4180010A1
( en )
2017-12-22
2023-05-17
Coloplast A/S
Sensor assembly part of an ostomy system having a moisture sensor
EP4032510B1
( en )
2017-12-22
2025-07-09
Coloplast A/S
Base plate with selective sensor points and a method of its manufacture
AU2018386861B2
( en )
2017-12-22
2024-03-14
Coloplast A/S
Ostomy appliance with angular leakage detection
JP7472022B2
( en )
2017-12-22
2024-04-22
ã³ããã©ã¹ã ã¢ã¯ãã£ã¼ã¼ã«ã¹ã«ã
Base plate for ostomy appliance, monitor device and system for ostomy appliance
WO2019120452A1
( en )
2017-12-22
2019-06-27
Coloplast A/S
Coupling part with a hinge for an ostomy base plate and sensor assembly part
US11865029B2
( en )
2017-12-22
2024-01-09
Coloplast A/S
Monitor device of a medical system having a connector for coupling to both a base plate and an accessory device
WO2019120445A1
( en )
2017-12-22
2019-06-27
Coloplast A/S
Base plate and sensor assembly of an ostomy system having a leakage sensor
CN108427917A
( en )
*
2018-02-12
2018-08-21
åäº¬é¼æ¥¼å»é¢
A kind of smart electronics pain scores system and methods of marking
CN111885984B
( en )
2018-03-15
2023-08-04
ç§æ´æ®ææ¯ç¹å ¬å¸
Apparatus and method for determining when to wear an ostomy appliance based on sensor data
KR101938250B1
( en )
*
2018-04-04
2019-01-14
주ìíì¬ íì ìì´í°
System, apparatus and method for preventing injury based on status information before and after training
JP6570691B1
( en )
*
2018-04-13
2019-09-04
æ ªå¼ä¼ç¤¾ãã¸ã¡ãã
Personal medical information collection system
EP3563759A1
( en )
*
2018-05-01
2019-11-06
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Apparatus for determining a stress and/or pain level
WO2019226564A1
( en )
2018-05-22
2019-11-28
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Adaptive electrical neurostimulation treatment to reduce pain perception
AU2019274427B2
( en )
2018-05-22
2022-04-14
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Adaptive chronic pain relief via implanted electrical neurostimulation
US11557398B2
( en )
2018-05-22
2023-01-17
International Business Machines Corporation
Delivering a chemical compound based on a measure of trust dynamics
US11177039B2
( en )
2018-05-22
2021-11-16
International Business Machines Corporation
Assessing a treatment service based on a measure of trust dynamics
US10957434B2
( en )
2018-05-22
2021-03-23
International Business Machines Corporation
Updating a prescription status based on a measure of trust dynamics
US11004563B2
( en )
*
2018-05-22
2021-05-11
International Business Machines Corporation
Adaptive pain management and reduction based on monitoring user conditions
US10964433B2
( en )
2018-05-22
2021-03-30
International Business Machines Corporation
Assessing a medical procedure based on a measure of trust dynamics
US10943674B2
( en )
2018-05-22
2021-03-09
International Business Machines Corporation
Updating a clinical trial participation status based on a measure of trust dynamics
JP6989457B2
( en )
*
2018-07-24
2022-01-05
å¯å£«éããã³ããã¯æ ªå¼ä¼ç¤¾
External information receiving / distributing device, data transmission method, and program
US11253181B2
( en )
*
2018-08-03
2022-02-22
From Zero, LLC
Method for objectively tracking and analyzing the social and emotional activity of a patient
US12014824B1
( en )
*
2018-09-05
2024-06-18
PEER Technologies PLLC
Interactive health care system for managing back or neck pain
CN109171706B
( en )
*
2018-09-30
2020-12-29
å京信æ¯å·¥ç¨å¤§å¦
ECG Signal Denoising Method and System Based on Class Matching and Fractional Diffusion
US10964427B2
( en )
*
2018-09-30
2021-03-30
General Electric Company
Integrated systems and methods for evolving state protocols and decision support
CN109871860B
( en )
*
2018-11-02
2022-12-13
æ¹å大å¦
A Dimensionality Reduction Clustering Method for Daily Load Curves Based on Kernel Principal Component Analysis
US12350495B2
( en )
2018-11-08
2025-07-08
Baropace, Inc.
Method of treatment of drug resistant hypertension
WO2020123338A1
( en )
*
2018-12-12
2020-06-18
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Cardiac implant devices with integrated pressure sensing
US12465215B2
( en )
*
2018-12-14
2025-11-11
Pd Neurotechnology Ltd
Monitor system of multiple Parkinson's disease symptoms and their intensity
WO2020144575A1
( en )
*
2019-01-08
2020-07-16
Iluria Ltd.
Diagnosis and effectiveness of monitoring attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
KR102716356B1
( en )
*
2019-01-25
2024-10-10
ì¼ì±ì ì주ìíì¬
Texture interface for measuring biological signal and biological signal measurement apparatus comprising the same
AU2020214965B2
( en )
2019-01-31
2025-09-18
Coloplast A/S
A sensor patch for an ostomy appliance
US12232998B2
( en )
*
2019-01-31
2025-02-25
Coloplast A/S
Application of a stomal sensor patch
KR102807748B1
( en )
2019-01-31
2025-05-14
컬ë¬íë¼ì¤í¸ ìì´/ìì¤
Sensor patch for stomas
US11488361B1
( en )
*
2019-02-15
2022-11-01
Meta Platforms Technologies, Llc
Systems and methods for calibrating wearables based on impedance levels of users' skin surfaces
KR102871649B1
( en )
*
2019-02-19
2025-10-16
íëìë차주ìíì¬
Electronic device and control method for the same
EP3930642B1
( en )
2019-02-28
2023-10-25
Coloplast A/S
A sensor patch for attachment to a base plate
EP3958801B1
( en )
2019-04-26
2024-08-21
Coloplast A/S
A sensor patch for attachment to a base plate
DE102019112126A1
( en )
*
2019-05-09
2020-11-12
Moio Gmbh
Sensor module, care set and use therefor
KR102261453B1
( en )
*
2019-05-13
2021-06-07
(주)ìì´ì¿±
Device and method that pain monitoring
CN113811276B
( en )
*
2019-07-02
2022-09-02
乿²»Â·å¡æå°¼è«æ¯å¡è¨å°
Device for inducing aesthetic tremor or chills to alleviate chronic pain through multisensory and multimodal stimulation
US12475984B2
( en )
*
2019-08-05
2025-11-18
Rxassurance Corporation
Techniques for providing interactive clinical decision support for drug dosage reduction
US20220336109A1
( en )
*
2019-08-16
2022-10-20
OptimDosing, LLC
Application for tracking progression and isolating causes of adverse medical conditions
IL291096B1
( en )
2019-08-29
2026-02-01
Ehr Command Center Llc
Data command center visual display system
US11903679B2
( en )
2019-08-30
2024-02-20
AR & NS Investment, LLC
Artificial intelligence-based robotic system for physical therapy
CA3155643A1
( en )
*
2019-09-25
2021-04-01
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Remote aggregation of data for drug administration devices
EP4047609A4
( en )
*
2019-10-15
2022-12-07
Sony Group Corporation
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND PROGRAM
US11850068B2
( en )
*
2019-11-27
2023-12-26
International Business Machines Corporation
Modular sensing unit
CN110934568A
( en )
*
2019-11-29
2020-03-31
䏿µ·å¸ä¸å»æç®é¦
Muscle tenderness quantitative test system and method based on data fusion technology
US11672473B2
( en )
*
2019-12-31
2023-06-13
Khamra Echols
Pain level indicator assembly
WO2021151191A1
( en )
*
2020-01-31
2021-08-05
Apt International Business Sciences Inc.
System and method for consistent user data acquisition and monitoring
US12573481B2
( en )
2020-02-26
2026-03-10
Dhrpro, Llc
Dynamic health records
US12011286B2
( en )
*
2020-03-16
2024-06-18
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Detecting undiagnosed sleep disordered breathing using daytime sleepiness and nighttime obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity
US20210322828A1
( en )
*
2020-04-20
2021-10-21
Spine Principles Llc
Methods and Systems for Targeted Exercise Programs and Content
US20210345896A1
( en )
*
2020-05-06
2021-11-11
Elite HRV, Inc.
Heart Rate Variability Monitoring and Analysis
CN111710392A
( en )
*
2020-06-03
2020-09-25
é»é¾æ±ä¸å»è¯å¤§å¦
Therapeutic effect and quantitative system of three-stage syndrome differentiation traction in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of radiculopathy
GB202011500D0
( en )
*
2020-07-24
2020-09-09
Paindrainer Ab
A pain management system
US11903686B1
( en )
*
2020-08-14
2024-02-20
Tula Health Inc
Systems, apparatuses, and methods for optimizing a physiological measurement taken from a subject
US12458289B1
( en )
2020-08-14
2025-11-04
Tula Health, Inc.
Systems, apparatuses, and methods for determining an optimal position of a physiological sensor against a subject
US20220208375A1
( en )
*
2020-12-29
2022-06-30
Kpn Innovations, Llc.
System and method for generating a digestive disease functional program
US11158417B1
( en )
*
2020-12-29
2021-10-26
Kpn Innovations, Llc.
System and method for generating a digestive disease nourishment program
WO2022154847A1
( en )
2021-01-12
2022-07-21
Emed Labs, Llc
Health testing and diagnostics platform
EP4278362A4
( en )
*
2021-01-12
2024-12-04
S-Alpha Therapeutics, Inc.
DIGITAL APPARATUS AND APPLICATION FOR ARTHRITIS THERAPY AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
US12414709B2
( en )
*
2021-02-11
2025-09-16
Zoll Respicardia, Inc.
Monitoring system and user interface for monitoring implantable disordered breathing treatment systems
EP4052641A1
( en )
*
2021-03-02
2022-09-07
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Vital-sign detection device
US11615888B2
( en )
2021-03-23
2023-03-28
Emed Labs, Llc
Remote diagnostic testing and treatment
US11929168B2
( en )
2021-05-24
2024-03-12
Emed Labs, Llc
Systems, devices, and methods for diagnostic aid kit apparatus
CA3113414A1
( en )
*
2021-03-29
2022-09-29
Mind Cure Health Inc.
Psychedelics protocol computer systems and methods
US11369454B1
( en )
2021-05-24
2022-06-28
Emed Labs, Llc
Systems, devices, and methods for diagnostic aid kit apparatus
GB2623461A
( en )
2021-06-22
2024-04-17
Emed Labs Llc
Systems, methods, and devices for non-human readable diagnostic tests
CN113555128A
( en )
*
2021-06-25
2021-10-26
åé大å¦éå±å»é¢
Chronic pain Internet+ management platform and its construction method
US12014829B2
( en )
2021-09-01
2024-06-18
Emed Labs, Llc
Image processing and presentation techniques for enhanced proctoring sessions
ES2905474B2
( en )
*
2021-10-19
2023-04-18
Univ Madrid Politecnica
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR THE EARLY DETECTION OF EPISODES OF ONCOLOGICAL PAIN
TWI784774B
( en )
*
2021-10-28
2022-11-21
ä¸åé«è¥å¤§å¸
Smart feedback device and systematic method for physiological image and signal
KR102776085B1
( en )
*
2021-12-06
2025-03-06
(주)ì°ì¤ì¼ì´
Wearable pain management system based on bio-signal collection and analysis
CN114287885B