The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.14611] The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Computers and Society arXiv:2608.14611 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Jul 2026] Title: The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities Authors: Stephen Casper , Oskar Galeev , Yoshua Bengio , Mohan Kankanhalli , Lee Wan Sie , Tegan Maharaj , Chris Meserole , Luke Ong , Stuart Russell , Dawn Song , Max Tegmark , Brian Tse , Xue Lan , Andrew Yao , Zhang Ya-Qin , Zhou Bowen , Imane Bello , Kwan Yee Ng , Vanessa Wilfred , Erica Liaw , Lee Chein Inn , Lin Wanxuan , Ng En Qi , Jonathan Lee , José Villalobos , Abhishek Aggarwal , Adam Gleave , Alan Chan , Alex Leung , Alvin Kwock , Anthony Tung , Arisa Siong , Arthur Tea , Ben Bucknall , Benjamin Weinstein-Raun , He Bing Sheng , Liu Bo , Bryan Kian Hsiang Low , Chris Ngo , Clement Neo , Cyrus Hodes , Dan Hendrycks , Daniel Ross , Liu Dapeng , Denise Wong , Djordje Zikelic , Elham Tabassi , Fabien Le Voyer , Fazl Barez , Gabriel Nicholas , Henry Papadatos , Jaan Tallinn , James Petrie , Xu Jia , Shao Jing , Jonathan Barry , Julia Chen , Sun Jun , Karson Elmgren , Kat Lyness , Katherine Lee , Kristy Loke , Lee Kwee Geak , Leslie Teo , Meng Ling Yu , Lisa Soder , Madhulika Srikumar , Malcolm Murray , Mark Brakel , Mark Nitzberg , Mary Phuong , Matthew Jagielski , Max Fenkell , Miro Plueckebaum , Kim Myuhng Joo , Hu Naying , Neil Davison , Nicolas Miailhe , Niki Iliadis , Nur Syahidah Sahrom , Ong Chen Hui , Pradeep Varakantham , Rebecca Finlay , Renata Dwan , Robert Opp , Rumman Chowdhury , Saad Siddiqui , Sabina Nong , Sam Ramadori , Sami Jawhar , Samuel Boger , Sara Hooker , Ying Shao Wei , Sebastian Hallensleben , Shinyuk Kang , Sophie Toura , Sreejith Balakrishnan , Stephanie Kasaon , Stephen Clare , Summer Yue , Sunny Yuqing Sun , Supheakmungkol Sarin , Tian Tian , Tim Schreier , Tori Westerhoff , Urvashi Aneja , Wayne Tee , Lu Wei , Xu Wei , Zhang Wenxuan , Hu Xia , Yang Xiaofang , Pan Xudong , Xiao Yajun , Yifan Jia , Tan Yong Khiam , Yuejin Du , Yuma Kurihara , Tan Zhi Xuan , Sören Mindermann et al. (20 additional authors not shown) View a PDF of the paper titled The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities, by Stephen Casper and 119 other authors View PDF Abstract: Frontier AI capabilities and autonomy are advancing rapidly. A growing number of real-world incidents make a trusted AI ecosystem essential to embracing AI with confidence. The 2026 Singapore Consensus is an outcome of the second International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety, bringing together over 100 contributors spanning 13 countries from frontier developers, government safety institutes, academia, and civil society. Building on the 2025 report, it presents a global understanding of technical AI safety research problems of top priority, now with a dedicated focus on societal resilience and on managing the risks of increasingly autonomous AI agents. Comments: Available at this https URL Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2608.14611 [cs.CY] (or arXiv:2608.14611v1 [cs.CY] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14611 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Stephen Casper [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 03:00:37 UTC (8,472 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities, by Stephen Casper and 119 other authors View PDF view license Current browse context: cs.CY < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Applications of Risk Science to AI Fairness Evaluation: Principles, Challenges, and Best Practices#794260
- Applications of Risk Science to AI Fairness Evaluation: Principles, Challenges, and Best Practices#790241
- The Category Error in Contemporary AI Safety Discourse and Why Non-Sentient Systems Cannot Be Moral Machines#719047
- Artificial Intelligence for Safety-Critical Systems in Industrial and Transportation Domains: A Survey#260306
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Global Justice#85528
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive