Evaluating Multimodal LLMs across Text and Audio Modalities for Accessible Disaster Assistance
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.14651] Evaluating Multimodal LLMs across Text and Audio Modalities for Accessible Disaster Assistance Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.14651 (cs) [Submitted on 30 Jul 2026] Title: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs across Text and Audio Modalities for Accessible Disaster Assistance Authors: Anuridhi Gupta , Samara Mansoor , Hemant Purohit View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Multimodal LLMs across Text and Audio Modalities for Accessible Disaster Assistance, by Anuridhi Gupta and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Effective disaster risk communication is a foundational humanitarian challenge, yet current emergency infrastructure fails to meet the needs of individuals with access and functional needs, including hard-of-hearing individuals, pregnant women, mothers with toddlers, and elderly individuals with dementia. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MM-LLMs), demonstrate powerful capabilities to serve diverse users across text, audio, image, and video modalities within a single unified system, such as a chatbot. However, their suitability for deployment rests on a property that receives limited scrutiny, i.e., whether these systems produce consistent, actionable outputs regardless of the modality through which a user communicates. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis to understand the status of open-weight MM-LLMs using real emergency alert scenarios across four different vulnerable personas. These state-of-the-art (SOTA) models are evaluated on consistency of responses across text and audio modalities when the same task scenario is given. Findings indicate that no model achieves reliable consistency across modalities, and that performance gaps are heightened for personas with access needs, introducing modality-dependent inequity that undermines the humanitarian value of these systems. These results inform concrete design recommendations for building equitable, trustworthy, and inclusive AI tools for disaster risk communication. Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) ACM classes: H.5.2; I.2.7; K.4.2 Cite as: arXiv:2608.14651 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.14651v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14651 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Anuridhi Gupta [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:09:09 UTC (1,196 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Multimodal LLMs across Text and Audio Modalities for Accessible Disaster Assistance, by Anuridhi Gupta and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Deeply Interleaved Text-Image Contexts for Multimodal LLMs Assessment#973401
- ENWAR: A RAG-Empowered Multi-Modal LLM Framework for Wireless Environment Perception#334296
- SceneJail: Exploiting Video Scenario Context to Jailbreak Multimodal LLMs#1143500
- SceneJail: Exploiting Video Scenario Context to Jailbreak Multimodal LLMs#1136789
- Beyond Appearance: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Exploit Vertical Structure for Remote Sensing Natural Scene Understanding?#821879
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive