The Fake Friend Dilemma: Relational Trust and the Political Economy of Conversational AI
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2601.03222] The Fake Friend Dilemma: Relational Trust and the Political Economy of Conversational AI Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Computers and Society arXiv:2601.03222 (cs) [Submitted on 6 Jan 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 4 Sep 2026 (this version, v3)] Title: The Fake Friend Dilemma: Relational Trust and the Political Economy of Conversational AI Authors: Jacob Erickson View a PDF of the paper titled The Fake Friend Dilemma: Relational Trust and the Political Economy of Conversational AI, by Jacob Erickson View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: As conversational AI systems become a larger part of the media landscape, they raise questions about whose interests they serve and the risks they may pose to users. These systems do more than provide information: they increasingly offer advice and companionship through interfaces that can appear supportive and socially responsive. A pressing concern is that users may form perceived social relationships with these systems and place relational trust in them, even when the interests shaping interactions do not fully align with their own. The Fake Friend Dilemma (FFD) describes the problem that follows: the same relational trust that makes conversational AI useful can also leave users open to manipulation and exploitation when institutional interests conflict with their own. Drawing on work on relational trust, AI alignment, extractive design, and the political economy of communication, the paper considers how the FFD can manifest through product sales, propaganda and biased information, surveillance, and behavioral nudging. It also considers possible structural and technical mitigation strategies. The FFD is not simply about AI misleading users. The problem it surfaces is that the trust people place in these systems can itself become a resource for institutional actors seeking to influence behavior or extract information. The FFD is therefore as much a problem of media governance and political economy as it is a technological one. Comments: Manuscript under review Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2601.03222 [cs.CY] (or arXiv:2601.03222v3 [cs.CY] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03222 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jacob Erickson [ view email ] [v1] Tue, 6 Jan 2026 18:07:52 UTC (209 KB) [v2] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:39:36 UTC (64 KB) [v3] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:26:21 UTC (55 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The Fake Friend Dilemma: Relational Trust and the Political Economy of Conversational AI, by Jacob Erickson View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CY < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-01 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- A mechanistic model of trust based on neural information processing#609738
- Reframing the Performance and Ethics of Empathic AI: Wisdom of the Crowd and Placebos.#338301
- AI Should Develop Human Empathy, Not Replace It#86605
- Роль штучного інтелекту в розвитку електронних міжнародних маркетингових комунікацій#692964
- Cryptographic certificates of validity for trustworthy AI#303167
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive