A Scoping Review of the Negative Effects of Digital Technology on Cognition

[2603.10025] A Scoping Review of the Negative Effects of Digital Technology on Cognition Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Computers and Society arXiv:2603.10025 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Feb 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 15 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: A Scoping Review of the Negative Effects of Digital Technology on Cognition Authors: Urška Žnidarič , Erik Štrumbelj , Octavian Machidon View a PDF of the paper titled A Scoping Review of the Negative Effects of Digital Technology on Cognition, by Ur\v{s}ka \v{Z}nidari\v{c} and Erik \v{S}trumbelj and Octavian Machidon View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: The rapid integration of digital technology into daily life has prompted sustained concern regarding its impact on human cognition. To characterize documented negative effects and the conditions under which they arise, we conducted a scoping review isolating the documented negative effects of digital technology use on cognition. Using a hybrid automated and manual search strategy, we identified foundational seed papers via Scopus and executed an algorithmic citation snowballing process via the OpenAlex API to capture relevant empirical and non-empirical literature. The resulting synthesis of 937 papers (584 empirical, 353 non-empirical) spans legacy screens, multitasking, smartphones, and the nascent work on generative artificial intelligence (AI). Evidence suggests an evolution in the nature of cognitive risk: while research on earlier technologies predominantly describes disruptions to resource allocation, early findings on AI point toward a hypothesized erosion of higher-order cognition. We analyze these risks across cognitive domains through four mechanisms: functional interference, neurochemical dysregulation, structural neuroplasticity, and psychosocial displacement. Effects are frequently moderated by socioeconomic status and environmental factors, suggesting that cognitive decline is often mediated by the displacement of activities rather than direct technological toxicity. Finally, the paper examines how habitual digital offloading could theoretically deplete cognitive reserve, creating downstream risks for long-term health. The collective evidence suggests an efficiency-atrophy paradox, where digital tools optimize short-term performance at the potential expense of long-term unassisted cognition. Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2603.10025 [cs.CY] (or arXiv:2603.10025v2 [cs.CY] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.10025 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Erik Štrumbelj [ view email ] [v1] Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:53:28 UTC (3,072 KB) [v2] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:16:42 UTC (3,071 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A Scoping Review of the Negative Effects of Digital Technology on Cognition, by Ur\v{s}ka \v{Z}nidari\v{c} and Erik \v{S}trumbelj and Octavian Machidon View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CY < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

• Intervenciones digitales en salud mental: revisión de su impacto, beneficios y limitaciones#273730
• The missing quadrant: perceived voluntariness, option sets and the acceptance of green digital tools#423346
• El debate de los derechos digitales de las personas trabajadoras en la Europa digital y su desarrollo en España#234669
• Cognitive Functioning is Better on Computers than on Smartphones: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis#423369
• The Impact of Digital Technology on Children and the Family: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities#464371