Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (All)
arXiv (All) open access

Anatomy of a Quantized Agent: VRAM Stability and Forecasting in Code-Synthesis Agentic Workloads

Banerjee, Anubhab · 2026 · arxiv_all
arXiv (All) · Papers · 2026
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
and-cluster-computingartificial-intelligencedistributedmachine-learningparallel
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2608.15117] Anatomy of a Quantized Agent: VRAM Stability and Forecasting in Code-Synthesis Agentic Workloads Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.15117 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Aug 2026] Title: Anatomy of a Quantized Agent: VRAM Stability and Forecasting in Code-Synthesis Agentic Workloads Authors: Anubhab Banerjee View a PDF of the paper titled Anatomy of a Quantized Agent: VRAM Stability and Forecasting in Code-Synthesis Agentic Workloads, by Anubhab Banerjee View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Analytical models of peak VRAM consumption for LLM inference decompose memory into weight-storage, KV-cache, and activation terms parameterized by step count, tool invocations, and context expansion. We evaluate this decomposition empirically within a strictly scoped measurement study: a LangGraph-based CUDA-kernel-synthesis agent (AgentK), a 4-bit quantization family (Q4 K M), a single NVIDIA H100 GPU, and four LLM backbones across 1,920 trajectories. Focusing on peak-memory forecasting behavior, we report two primary observations. First, closed-form analytical models achieve competitive accuracy when provided with two empirical constants: loaded-weight VRAM and a fixed activation-memory overhead. Supplied with live GPU readings and ground-truth trajectory parameters, the closed-form model matches or outperforms the best learned baseline on three of the four backbones (test MAPE 2.2-4.4% vs. 3.4-6.5%, p = 0.76). The exception is the smallest backbone (Phi-4-mini), where minimal VRAM variance (CV 0.3%) causes dynamic modeling to underperform simple regression. Second, compile success strictly bifurcates by backbone capacity (from 5.7% for Phi-4-mini to 62.0% for Qwen2.5-Coder-14B), demonstrating that functional code synthesis remains constrained by intrinsic LLM capabilities rather than available memory. Furthermore, because overall peak-memory variance is remarkably low across all backbones (CV 0.3-9.4%), learned prompt-feature regression offers statistically insignificant improvements over a constant-mean baseline. Consequently, we find no justification for deploying complex predictive VRAM models in highly quantized, weight-dominated regimes. We release the evaluated corpus and anonymized framework to support replication. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.15117 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.15117v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15117 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Anubhab Banerjee [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:39:43 UTC (168 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Anatomy of a Quantized Agent: VRAM Stability and Forecasting in Code-Synthesis Agentic Workloads, by Anubhab Banerjee View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.DC cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

Record · ID 612544 · SHA-256 87d943231ee50332
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive