Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.15131] Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.15131 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Aug 2026] Title: Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark Authors: Wesley Shu , Peng Wei View a PDF of the paper titled Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark, by Wesley Shu and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Digital platforms govern by changing rules: rankings, monetization thresholds, moderation standards, verification systems, disclosure requirements, appeal processes, and access policies. These interventions are rarely absorbed passively. Creators, sellers, advertisers, moderators, users, developers, and strategic operators adapt to the new reward surface. This paper develops a platform-adaptation model for evaluating governance interventions as transitions in adaptive multi-actor information systems. The model represents actor best response, strategic gaming opportunity, moderation burden, user-incentive movement, enforcement response, externality formation, and downstream platform stability. We evaluate the model on 72 external public platform-governance cases covering media monetization, ranking systems, verification, delivery platforms, marketplaces, app stores, community platforms, and creator ecosystems. Across 9 methods and 648 method-case evaluations, the full platform-adaptation simulator achieves mean adaptation quality of 0.836338, compared with 0.669731 for a risk-register baseline, 0.589457 for causal-loop analysis, 0.492750 for generic governance critique, 0.369492 for engagement-only optimization, and 0.331965 for baseline policy review. Paired comparisons show a win rate of 1.00 against all tested baselines and channel ablations. The contribution is an information-systems theory and measurement framework showing why platform governance evaluation fails when it treats policy rules as static controls rather than interventions into adaptive actor-response fields. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2608.15131 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.15131v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15131 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Peng Wei [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:09:32 UTC (20 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark, by Wesley Shu and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark#611081
- On the Interface Between Foundation Models and Programs#929111
- Public involvement across the UK’s research ecosystem at systems-level – results from the INTEGRATE study, a freedom of information-based survey#629551
- Competitiveness, Theoretical and Policy Approaches. Towards a More Competitive EU#11116
- Platform governance of online news in India : a political economy approach#1146439
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive