Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.15147] Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.15147 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Aug 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 30 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World Authors: Jiang Jiang (1), Yifu Sun (1), Qi Shen (1) ((1) Persagy Science and Technology Co., Beijing, China) View a PDF of the paper titled Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World, by Jiang Jiang (1) and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Machine intelligence's push into the physical world is stuck on a gap: deployment demands auditable judgments from day one, fault samples are scarce or absent, and the norms defining "what counts as a fault" live in design documents, not in operational data. We argue this gap is structural, and locate where it can be legitimately closed. We divide the worlds machine intelligence faces into four (phenomenal, basic physical, artificial physical, artificial symbolic) along one axis of constraint strength, and give the Promulgation Criterion: extracting a prior framework from a world is legitimate if and only if the world is intentionally constituted (C1) and has left a readable generative archive (C2). On the criterion's two gradient axes, exactly one world is high on both: the artificial physical world (buildings, factories, infrastructure), whose norms precede their instances; the legitimate path is to extract the framework from the archive, not to induce it from data. We then show what shape such a framework must take: four construction goals force four incompatible carriers, hence at least four layers (syntax, concepts, knowledge, instances); on a closed concept layer fault localization is decidable in polynomial time, and every judgment is interrogable, traceable to a promulgated clause. The same criterion fixes the runtime division of labor with LLMs: promulgatable duties go to rule engines, on-site judgments beyond promulgation go to LLMs, and every generation sandwiched by promulgated clauses is auditable. The theory is falsifiable: four bets (P1-P4) with explicit falsification conditions -- among them that the next large-scale AI breakthrough occurs in the artificial physical world. Evidence: formal proofs (Appendix A); two cases (Appendix B: a cooling plant; the Curiosity rover Sol 1536 anomaly); eight reverse-read lineages, from BACnet to RDF/OWL (Appendix C). Comments: Major revision. Main paper (51 pp.) plus supplementary material (60 pp.): formal machinery, demonstrations, and witness dossiers moved to the supplement. New: LLM division-of-labor (Ch. 6); four predictions plus two structural corollaries (Ch. 7); I/O-logic semantics (A.1); non-identifiability boundary (A.2); sample-complexity separation (A.6); Curiosity Sol 1536 replay (B.2). Thesis unchanged Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) ACM classes: I.2.4; I.2.0 Cite as: arXiv:2608.15147 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.15147v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15147 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jiang Jiang [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:50:19 UTC (74 KB) [v2] Sun, 30 Aug 2026 02:03:13 UTC (124 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World, by Jiang Jiang (1) and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World#611096
- Artificial intelligence and China's authoritarian governance#338877
- Constitutional Framework for Artificial Intelligence#687624
- Handbook on the Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence#81408
- Why Machines Won't Rule the World#115138
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive