Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (All)
arXiv (All) open access

Pre-Model Representation Failures in GNN-Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection

Hondi, Birindwa Prisca et al. · 2026 · arxiv_all
arXiv (All) · Papers · 2026
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
computational-complexitycryptography-and-security
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2608.15184] Pre-Model Representation Failures in GNN-Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2608.15184 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Aug 2026] Title: Pre-Model Representation Failures in GNN-Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Authors: Birindwa Prisca Hondi , Chinoso Philip Nwishienyi , Charity Wanja Mwaura , Alia Teto , Jema David Ndibwile View a PDF of the paper titled Pre-Model Representation Failures in GNN-Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection, by Birindwa Prisca Hondi and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: This paper is a failure analysis of the representation layer underlying GNN-based smart contract vulnerability detectors. These systems convert source code into graphs before any learning takes place; if the graph fails to capture the code's semantics, no model improvement can compensate. We investigate GNNSCVulDetector and identify four failures. First, structurally different contracts produce byte-for-byte identical graphs, constituting a concrete evasion attack. Second, graph construction is governed by a hardcoded 47-entry variable whitelist (including one duplicate entry), which constrains what the extractor can recognise. As a consequence, identical vulnerabilities with different variable names produce inconsistent graphs, graph quality degrades as naming diverges from the whitelist, and when no entry matches the pipeline produces structural output not grounded in source variables. Third, the C node (the graph element representing the external caller that triggers a reentrancy attack) is absent from even the most canonical vulnerable contract in the literature. Fourth, a controlled experiment confirms this as a direct misclassification: a fully exploitable contract is labelled safe because the C -> W edge is never constructed. All four failures are demonstrated experimentally. Current accuracy figures in the literature are measured under conditions that do not expose these failures. We demonstrate one confirmed case of misclassification caused directly by a representation-layer failure; the prevalence of such failures in real-world contract populations remains an open empirical question. Comments: 12 pages, 5 Tables, 4 Listings Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) ; Computational Complexity (cs.CC) Cite as: arXiv:2608.15184 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2608.15184v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15184 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jema David Ndibwile Prof [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 11:54:45 UTC (24 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Pre-Model Representation Failures in GNN-Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection, by Birindwa Prisca Hondi and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.CC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

Record · ID 612607 · SHA-256 8c712d3bb7cc2a46
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive