Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.15225] Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2608.15225 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Aug 2026] Title: Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability Authors: Tongjie Wei , Peng Zhang , Zhiwen Hu , Xupu Hu , Chen Lyu , Gangyan Zeng View a PDF of the paper titled Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability, by Tongjie Wei and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Vendors assessing Linux kernel CVEs need to know whether a bug is triggerable under production-tailored configurations, not merely whether a version is affected, yet upstream reproducers and vulnerability databases rarely provide configuration-level context. We study minimal trigger-configuration inference: given a CVE entry and a target kernel version (optionally a baseline .config), we synthesize a Kconfig-satisfiable option set that remains effective after make olddefconfig and, when a reproducer is available, still triggers under a specified evaluation protocol; we then prune it to a 1-minimal (subset-minimal) boundary for evaluation. Our framework FCC links vulnerability cues to build-system symbols, completes implicit prerequisites under olddefconfig feedback to avoid silent rollback, and performs runtime-validated minimization guided by dependency topology. We evaluate on KernJC and KernelCTF, totaling 88 CVEs across multiple kernel versions. On the 88-CVE set, FCC improves the post-make olddefconfig configuration success rate from 62.5% (55/88) to 96.6% (85/88) over an olddef-only injection baseline; on the KernJC set, FCC reduces the average candidate set size by 78.7% compared to KernJC (Avg. 14.72 vs. 69.00 options per CVE). A stage-wise analysis of time and token costs shows that Stage I dominates overhead, while CVE-focused evidence selection substantially reduces this cost. By returning an effective and auditable 1-minimal configuration boundary, FCC helps vendors scope triggerability against their deployment configurations with a clear, tool-supported decision line. Comments: 22 pages, 7 figures. Accepted to ISSTA 2026 Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2608.15225 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2608.15225v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15225 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Tongjie Wei [ view email ] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 13:28:21 UTC (2,987 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability, by Tongjie Wei and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability#611169
- Inferring 1-Minimal Trigger Configurations for Assessing Linux Kernel CVE Triggerability#459584
- CVE-2026-83196 — CRITICAL 9.1#923742
- CVE-2026-97935#1098377
- CVE-2026-83229 — CRITICAL 9.1#923744
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive