arXiv (All)
open access
Opacity as a Feature, Not a Flaw: The LoBOX Governance Ethic for Role-Sensitive Explainability and Institutional Trust in AI
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Opacity as a Feature, Not a Flaw: The LoBOX Governance Ethic for Role-Sensitive Explainability and Institutional Trust in AI#611306
- Validation is not enough: Longitudinal evidence of post-deployment fragility in clinical AI systems.#409408
- Validation is not enough: Longitudinal evidence of post-deployment fragility in clinical AI systems#406562
- From AI dependence to reflective collaboration: psychological ownership, competency anxiety, and perceived support in AI-assisted learning.#415288
- Governing What You Cannot Observe: Adaptive Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Agents#138960
Record · ID 612783
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive