NCBI PubMed Central
open access
The critical-thinking paradox in generative AI-integrated learning: distinguishing efficiency from cognitive depth-a differentiated framework and testable propositions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Extended to Amplified: The Generative Mind in the Age of LLMs#103817
- Redefining the Cognitive Process through Differentiation of Perceptual Structure: Resolving Hard Problems in Cognitive Science via a Nine-Stage Cognitive Operation Model#699036
- Thinking Without Knowing: On Large Language Models and the Simulation of Mind#107567
- Cognitive capability and behavioral exposure in generative AI use: a dual-pathway model of perceived facilitation and integrity-related risk.#396149
- Executive Judgement in AI-Mediated Decision-Making Environments: A Process Theory of Formation, Qualification Attrition and Authorisation#1144409
Record · ID 613338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive