NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Accuracy of angioboost software versus routine angiography for assessing the degree of coronary artery lesion occlusion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Non-invasive and Invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease#828645
- Chronic Total Occlusive Lesions CMR Study#863464
- Combined Non-invasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320 Detector Computed Tomography#871027
- Evaluating AI-Gatekeeper Software in Coronary Artery Stenosis Screening: A Multicenter RCT#910082
- Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: clinical validation and intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT#284518
Record · ID 621029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive