Conceptio › Archive › USGS Publications

USGS Publicationspublic full text

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 Annual Report

Suellen Lynn, Michelle Treadwell, Barbara E. Kus, K.P. Burnham, D.R. Anderson, R.F. Daubenmire · U.S. Geological Survey

USGS Publications · Papers · License: Public Domain

Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓

abundance activities annual base bell breeding california camp

usgs, geological survey, united states, science, government publication, usgs open-file report, 2024, 1009, distribution, abundance, breeding, activities, least, bell, vireo, marine, corps, base, camp, pendleton, california, 2020, annual

Ecosystems Mission Area—Species Management Research Program Prepared in cooperation with Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 Annual Report

Open-File Report 2024–1009

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Cover. Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) adult incubating a nest on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Photograph by Michelle Treadwell, U.S. Geological Survey, 2020.

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 Annual Report By Suellen Lynn, Michelle Treadwell, and Barbara E. Kus

Ecosystems Mission Area—Species Management Research Program Prepared in cooperation with Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Open-File Report 2024–1009

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2024

For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–392–8545. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/ or contact the store at 1–888–275–8747. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Lynn, S., Treadwell, M., and Kus, B.E., 2024, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 annual report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2024–1009, 66 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241009. ISSN 2331-1258 (online)

iii

Acknowledgments This work was funded by Environmental Security Department, Resources Management Division, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California. Data for Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton either are not available or have limited availability owing to restrictions of the funding entity, U.S. Marine Corps: Contact Ryan Besser at [email protected] for more information. Data for the San Luis Rey River either are not available or have limited availability owing to restrictions of the funding entity (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Please contact Christopher Chabot, Planning Division, Los Angeles District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for more information. The authors thank the biologists who assisted in data collection for this project: Lisa Allen, Armand Amico, Alex Bartolo, Kim Geissler, Rachel Guinea, Scarlett Howell, Rachelle McLaughlin, Shannon Mendia, Molly Morrissey, Ryan Pottinger, Ben Stubbs, and Stéphane Vernhet. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Contents Acknowledgments��iii Executive Summary��1 Introduction��2 Study Areas and Methods��3 Population Size and Distribution��3 Core Areas��5 Rotating Non-Core Areas: Group A��5 Habitat Characteristics��6 Artificial Seep Study��6 Vegetation Structure and Plant Composition��6 Vireo Survival, Site Fidelity, and Movements��8 Site Fidelity and Movements��8 Nest Success and Breeding Productivity��8 Data Analyses��9 Population Size and Distribution��9 Vegetation Structure and Plant Composition��9 Nest Success and Breeding Productivity��10 Daily Nest Survival��10 Nest Characteristics��10 Results��11 Population Size and Distribution��11 Core Survey Areas��11 Non-Core Survey Areas��11 Habitat Characteristics��11 Core Survey Areas��11 Non-Core Survey Areas��16 Vegetation Sampling��16 Vireo Movements��17 Returning Banded Birds��17 New Banded Birds��20 Site Fidelity and Movement��20 Nest Success and Breeding Productivity��21 Nesting Attempts��21 Nest Success��21 Cowbird Parasitism��21 Productivity��27 Daily Nest Survival��27 Nest Characteristics��27 Discussion��31 Conclusions��32 Reference Cited��33

Appendix 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Survey Areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��37 Appendix 2. Vegetation Sampling Locations, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��43 Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��46 Appendix 4. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��58 Appendix 5. Between-Year Movement of Adult Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��62 Appendix 6. Status and Nesting Activities of Least Bell's Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��64

Figures 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

Map showing Least Bell's Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��4 Map showing Location of Least Bell's Vireo Seep and Reference sites at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��7 Diagram of vegetation sampling plot configuration��8 Graph showing number of Least Bell’s Vireo territories in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2005–20��12 Graph showing territory establishment of Least Bell’s Vireos in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2005–20��14 Graph showing average total percentage cover by height class and plant type at Seep and Reference sites, Santa Margarita River, 2020, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton��17 Map showing percentage soil moisture at vegetation sampling plots, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��18 Map showing locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Old Treatment Ponds Reference site, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��23 Map showing locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Pump Road Reference site, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��24 Map showing locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Old Treatment Pond Seep site, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��25 Map showing locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Pump Road Seep site, treated as a Reference site in 2020, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��26

Tables 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Number and distribution of Least Bell's Vireos in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��12 Number of territorial male Least Bell’s Vireos in core survey areas 2020 at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, by drainage, 2005–20��13 Number and distribution of Least Bell's Vireos in non-core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��14 Habitat types used by Least Bell's Vireos in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��14 Proportion of all Least Bell’s Vireo territories dominated or co-dominated by non-native vegetation, by drainage, 2005–12��15

vii

6. 7. 8. 9.

10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.

19. 20.

21.

Proportion of all Least Bell’s Vireo territories dominated or co-dominated by non-native vegetation, by drainage, 2013–20��15 Habitat types used by Least Bell's Vireos in non-core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��16 Results of Student’s t-tests for differences in vegetation cover between the Seep site and Reference sites at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��16 Results of Pearson’s correlation tests between percentage soil moisture and overall foliage cover and percentage herbaceous cover at each height category, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��19 Banding status of Least Bell’s Vireos detected on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCBCP) and those that emigrated off Base, 2020��19 Number of banded adult Least Bell’s Vireos by original year banded, age, original banding location, and sex at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��20 Summary of new Least Bell’s Vireos captured and banded on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��21 Between-year dispersal into, within, or out of Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton by Least Bell’s Vireos banded as juveniles in 2019 and detected in 2020��22 Number of Least Bell’s Vireo territories and nests monitored at Seep and Reference sites on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��22 Fate of completed Least Bell’s Vireo nests in fully monitored territories at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��27 Reproductive success and productivity of nesting Least Bell’s Vireos at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��28 Logistic regression models for the effect of treatment on nest survival of Least Bell’s Vireos on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��29 Parameter estimate, standard error, odds ratios and 95-percent confidence intervals for models explaining daily survival rate of Least Bell’s Vireos at Seep and Reference sites on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��29 Host plant species used by Least Bell’s Vireos at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��29 Least Bell’s Vireo nest characteristics and results of student’s t-tests of successful versus unsuccessful nesting attempts at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��30 Least Bell’s Vireo nest characteristics and results of Student’s t-tests of all nesting attempts at Seep versus Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020��30

viii

Conversion Factors International System of Units to U.S. customary units

Multiply

To obtain

Length meter (m)

3.281

foot (ft)

kilometer (km)

0.6214

mile (mi)

meter (m)

1.094

yard (yd)

Area square meter (m2)

0.0002471

acre

hectare (ha)

2.471

acre

hectare (ha)

0.003861

square mile (mi2)

Flow liters per minute (l/min)

0.2642

gallons per minute (g/min)

Datum Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS 84). Horizontal coordinate information in mapped figures is referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).

Abbreviations ±

plus or minus

AICc

Akaike’s Information Criterion for small sample sizes

DSR

Daily Survival Rate

GPS

Global Positioning System

MAPS

Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship

MCAS

Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton

MCBCP

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 Annual Report By Suellen Lynn, Michelle Treadwell, and Barbara E. Kus

Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide the Marine Corps with an annual summary of abundance, breeding activity, demography, and habitat use of endangered Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCBCP, or Base). Surveys for the Least Bell's Vireo were conducted at MCBCP, California, between April 1 and July 10, 2020. Core survey areas and a subset of non-core areas in drainages containing riparian habitat suitable for vireos were surveyed 3–4 times. We detected 669 territorial male vireos and 16 transient vireos in core survey areas. An additional 156 territorial male vireos were detected in non-core survey areas. Territorial vireos were detected on all 10 drainages/sites surveyed (core and non-core areas). Of the vireo territories in core areas, 88 percent were on the 4 most populated drainages, with the Santa Margarita River containing 69 percent of all territories. In core areas, 79 percent of male vireos were confirmed as paired; 83 percent of male vireos in non-core areas were confirmed as paired. The number of documented Least Bell’s Vireo territories in core survey areas on MCBCP (669) increased 39 percent from 2019 to 2020. The number of territories in all core survey area drainages increased by one or more between 2019 and 2020. The substantial increase in vireo numbers on MCBCP (39 percent) was consistent with population changes in surrounding areas, including the lower San Luis Rey River (26 percent), Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton (58 percent), and the middle San Luis Rey River (7 percent). Most core-area vireo territories (69 percent of males) occurred in willow (Salix spp.) riparian habitat. An additional 4 percent of birds occupied willow habitat co-dominated by Western sycamores (Platanus racemosa) or Fremont cottonwoods (Populus fremontii). Eighteen percent of territories were found in riparian scrub dominated by mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia) or sandbar willow (S. exigua). Upland scrub was used by 7 percent or fewer vireos; 1 percent of territories occurred in non-native vegetation, and less than 1 percent of vireo territories occurred in habitat co-dominated by coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) and sycamore.

In 2019, MCBCP began operating an artificial seep along the Santa Margarita River. The artificial seep pumped water to the surface from March through August each year during daylight hours and was designed to increase the amount of surface water present to enhance Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus; flycatcher) breeding habitat. Although this enhancement was designed to benefit flycatchers, few flycatchers have inhabited the seep and proposed seep areas within the past several years. Therefore, vireos were selected as a surrogate species to determine effects of the habitat enhancement. This report presents preliminary analyses of vireo and vegetation response to the existing artificial seep. We sampled vegetation in the Seep site and three Reference sites to determine the effects of a new water diversion dam that was completed in 2019 and a surface water enhancement seep pump installed along the Santa Margarita River. We found minor differences in non-native vegetation cover between Reference sites and the Seep site. However, soil moisture was higher at the Reference sites compared to the Seep site. The effect of the seep pump may have been masked by high precipitation in the bio-year (July 1‒June 30) before 2020, limited time for the water diversion to have an effect, well-draining soil, and the non-operation of two to three of the six seep outlets. We color banded and resighted color banded Least Bell’s Vireos to evaluate adult site fidelity, between-year movement, and the effect of surface water enhancement on vireo site fidelity and between-year movement. We banded 146 Least Bell's Vireos for the first time during the 2020 season. Birds banded included 27 adult vireos and 119 juvenile vireos. All adult vireos were banded with unique color combinations. The juvenile vireos (all nestlings) were banded with a single gold numbered federal band on the left leg. We resighted and identified 85 Least Bell's Vireos banded before the 2020 breeding season on Base in 2020. Of the 85, 13 vireos were originally banded on the San Luis Rey River, 2 were banded in Baja California Sur, 1 was banded at Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton, and the remaining birds were banded at MCBCP. Adult birds of known age ranged from 1 to 8 years old.

2 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Most returning adult vireos showed strong between-year site fidelity. Of the adults present in 2019 and 2020, 74 percent, (79 percent of males; 40 percent of females) returned to within 100 m of their previous territory. The average between-year movement for returning adult vireos was 0.3 plus or minus (±) 0.8 kilometer (km). The average movement of first-year vireos detected in 2020 that fledged from a known nest on MCBCP in 2019 was 4.7±7.0 km. One first-year vireo that originated at MCBCP moved off Base and was detected at Murrieta Creek, 23.0 km from his natal territory. We monitored Least Bell's Vireo pairs to evaluate the effects of surface water enhancement on nest success and breeding productivity. Vireos were monitored at one Seep site and three Reference sites. Base personnel plan to install a second seep pump at one of the Reference sites in the future, at which time the status of the monitoring site will change from Reference to Seep. Nesting activity was monitored between March 31 and July 28 in 52 territories within the Seep and Reference sites (12 at the Seep site and 40 at Reference sites). All territories were occupied by pairs, and all but one territory was fully monitored, meaning all nesting attempts were monitored at these territories. One vireo territory within a Reference site was partially monitored. During the monitoring period, 94 nests (25 in the Seep site and 69 in Reference sites) were monitored. Breeding productivity was similar at the Seep site and Reference sites (3.7 and 2.9 young per pair, respectively), with 75 percent of Seep pairs and 79 percent of Reference pairs successfully fledging at least 1 young in 2020. Compared to Reference sites, the Seep site had a higher proportion of all eggs that hatched and also a higher proportion of nests with eggs that hatched. Conversely, a lower proportion of hatchlings and nests that had hatchlings fledged at the Seep site than at Reference sites. According to the best model, nest survival in 2020 was not affected by treatment (Seep versus Reference), although the second best model that included treatment was also well supported. Completed nests at the Seep site were likely to be as successful as nests at Reference sites in 2020 (57 percent and 59 percent, respectively). Predation was believed to be the primary source of nest failure at both sites. Predation accounted for 90 percent and 73 percent of nest failures at Seep and Reference sites, respectively. Failure of the remaining eight nests was attributed to the collapse of the nesting substrate, exposure to rain and flooding, and other unknown reasons. Fourteen plant species were used as hosts for vireo nests in 2020. In 2020, we found that at the Seep site, successful nests were placed in taller host plants and further from the edge of host plants (closer to the center) than unsuccessful nests. We found no difference in nest placement between the Seep site and the Reference sites.

Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide the Marine Corps with an annual summary of abundance, breeding activity, demography, and habitat use of endangered Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCBCP, or Base). The results are intended to provide the Base with biological information during each year to assist with appropriate management of the federally listed Least Bell’s Vireo and maintain compliant actions supporting military training on MCBCP in accordance with the Base Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Programmatic Biological Opinion (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1995). The Least Bell's Vireo (vireo) is a small, migratory songbird that breeds in southern California and northwestern Baja California, Mexico, from April through July. Historically abundant within lowland riparian ecosystems, vireo populations began declining in the late 1900s as a result of habitat loss and alteration associated with urbanization and conversion of land adjacent to rivers to agriculture (Franzreb, 1989, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998, Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, 2004). Two additional factors that contributed to the vireo's decline are (1) the expansion in range of the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), a brood parasite, to include the Pacific coast (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986, Franzreb, 1989, Kus, 1998, 1999, Kus and others, 2020), and (2) the introduction of invasive non-native plant species, such as giant reed (Arundo donax), into riparian systems. By 1986, the vireo population in California was thought to number about 300 territorial males (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,1986). In response to the dramatic reduction in numbers of Least Bell's Vireos in California, the California Fish and Game Commission listed the species as endangered in 1980, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service followed suit in 1986. Since listing, the vireo population in southern California has rebounded, largely in response to cowbird control and habitat restoration and preservation (Kus and Whitfield, 2005). As of 2006, the statewide vireo population was estimated to be approximately 2,500 territories (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006), roughly a third of which occurred on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCBCP, or Base). Male Least Bell's Vireos arrive on breeding grounds in southern California in mid-March. Male vireos are conspicuous and frequently sing their diagnostic primary song from exposed perches throughout the breeding season (Kus and others, 2020). Females arrive approximately 1–2 weeks after males and are more secretive. Females often are seen early in the season traveling through the habitat with males. The female, with the male's help, builds an open cup nest in dense vegetation approximately 1 meter (m) above the ground. Clutch size for Least Bell's Vireos averages three to four eggs. Typically, the female and male incubate the eggs for 14 days, and young fledge from the nest at 11–12 days of age.

Study Areas and Methods 3 It is not unusual for vireos to re-nest after a failed attempt, provided ample time remains within the breeding season (Kus and others, 2020). Vireos rarely fledge more than one brood in a season, although double brooding can be more common during years when breeding conditions are favorable (for example, early nest initiation, high early fledging success; Lynn and Kus, 2009, 2010a). Nesting lasts from early April through July, but adults and juvenile birds remain on the breeding grounds into late September or early October before migrating to their wintering grounds in southern Baja California, Mexico. Vireo pairs hold territories of approximately 0.5–1.0 hectares (ha) and maintain territory boundaries through vocal interactions with neighboring pairs. Territories remain stable throughout the breeding season, although silent males occasionally will venture beyond their territory boundaries. Females will sometimes leave their original territory to begin a new breeding attempt with a different male after completing an earlier nesting attempt (either successful or failed). Territory boundaries relax near the end of the breeding season as fledglings explore surrounding habitat. Territory fidelity between years is high for males, with typically 70–90 percent of males returning to within 100 m of their previous breeding territory (Rourke and Kus, 2006, 2007, 2008; Lynn and Kus, 2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2011, 2012, 2013; Lynn and others, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020). In 2019, MCBCP began operating an artificial seep along the Santa Margarita River. The artificial seep pumped water to the surface from March through August each year during daylight hours and was designed to increase the amount of surface water present to enhance Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus; flycatcher) breeding habitat. Two additional seeps are planned within the Santa Margarita River drainage below a water diversion dam constructed in 2019 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2016). Although the enhancements were designed to benefit Southwestern Willow Flycatchers, few flycatchers have inhabited the seep and proposed seep areas within the past several years (Howell and Kus, 2015, 2016, 2017; Howell and others, 2018, 2020). However, Least Bell’s Vireos are abundant in the enhancement areas and were selected as a surrogate species to determine the effects of the habitat enhancement. Vireos frequently co-occur with flycatchers in riparian habitat and have similar habitat requirements, such as the presence of riparian obligate trees (typically willows and cottonwoods) with a brushy understory. Vireos and flycatchers have similar territory size, similar territorial behavior (singing from high perches to advertise territory boundaries), and share similarities in nest placement (nests are placed in the understory vegetation). Although there are some differences in habitat requirements between these two species (flycatchers prefer more mesic conditions that include surface water or elevated soil moisture during at least part of the breeding season; vireos are more tolerant of drier, brushier vegetation sometimes lacking an overstory), vireos were considered sufficiently similar to flycatchers to serve as a

surrogate species to evaluate the response of habitat to surface water enhancement and the effect of these habitat changes on vireo breeding productivity. This report presents preliminary analyses of vireo and vegetation response to the existing artificial seep. The purpose of this study was to document the status of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in San Diego County, California. Specifically, our goals were to (1) determine the size and composition of the vireo population at the Base; (2) characterize habitat used by vireos; (3) band a subset of vireos to facilitate the estimation of annual vireo survival and movements; (4) document the vegetation structure and plant composition within the areas influenced by artificial seeps (Seep sites) compared to similar areas without artificial seeps (Reference sites); and (5) assess the effects of the artificial seeps on vireos by measuring annual survival, inter-annual movement, nest success, and breeding productivity of vireos in sites surrounding artificial seeps compared to Reference sites. Data collected from this study are critical to inform natural resource managers about the status of this endangered species at MCBCP and guide modification of land use and management practices as appropriate to ensure the species’ continued existence. This work was funded by and performed in cooperation with the Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security Resources Management Division, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California. All activities were covered under 10(a)1(A) Recovery Permit #TE-829554-18.

Study Areas and Methods Population Size and Distribution Most of the MCBCP’s primary drainages, and several minor ones supporting riparian habitat, were surveyed for vireos between April 1 and July 10, 2020 (fig. 1). Field work was completed by U.S. Geological Survey biologists Lisa Allen, Armand Amico, Alex Bartolo, Kim Geissler, Rachel Guinea, Scarlett Howell, Suellen Lynn, Rachelle McLaughlin, Shannon Mendia, Molly Morrissey, Ryan Pottinger, Ben Stubbs, Michelle Treadwell, and Stéphane Vernhet. In 2020, we implemented a new, reduced vireo survey plan, which involved surveying a core area plus a subset of all riparian habitat on Camp Pendleton each year. Selection criteria for surveys within the core areas included (1) primary drainages (Santa Margarita River, Las Flores Creek, San Onofre Creek, and San Mateo Creek), (2) historic flycatcher territories, (3) vireo nest monitoring areas from a previous post-fire study (Lynn and others, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020), and (4) the survey units with the highest average count of flycatchers from 2005 to 2014 in drainages where no historic flycatcher breeding or nest monitoring

4 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

EXPLANATION Survey areas Core

Group C

Group A

Group D

Group B

Group E

Water diversion dam

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

Figure 1. Least Bell's Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

2 2

4 MILES 4 KILOMETERS

Study Areas and Methods 5 has occurred. Core survey areas were surveyed 4 times per year at least 10 days apart, every year. Non-core areas were divided into 5 groups (fig. 1, Groups A–E), each to be surveyed on a rotational schedule once every 5 years. Group A non-core areas were surveyed in 2020. All non-core areas were surveyed four times in 2020 except Pueblitos Canyon, which was surveyed three times. The specific areas surveyed are listed in the Core Areas and Rotating Non-Core Areas: Group A sections below.

Core Areas 1. De Luz Creek South, between the confluence of the Santa Margarita River and the confluence with Roblar Creek (appendix 1, fig. 1.1). 2. Santa Margarita River: (a) From Basilone Road to a point approximately 8.5 kilometers (km) downstream on the east side of the Santa Margarita River (appendix 1, figs. 1.1, 1.2). (b) From the Rifle Range along Stagecoach Road to a point approximately 2.5 km downstream (appendix 1, figs. 1.1, 1.2). (c) From the confluence with De Luz Creek to Basilone Road (appendix 1, fig. 1.1). 3. Lake O’Neill section of Fallbrook Creek, all riparian habitat surrounding Lake O’Neill (appendix 1, fig. 1.1). 4. Aliso Creek, between the Pacific Ocean and 0.5 km upstream from the electrical transmission lines (appendix 1; fig. 1.2). 5. Las Flores Creek (within Las Pulgas Canyon): (a) Between the Pacific Ocean and a point approximately 2 km upstream from Stuart Mesa Road (appendix 1; fig. 1.3). (b) Between a point 1.6 km downstream from Basilone Road and the Zulu Impact Area, approximately 0.75 km upstream from Basilone Road (appendix 1; fig. 1.3). 6. San Mateo Creek, from the Pacific Ocean to a point 3.7 km upstream, including habitat south and east of the abandoned agricultural fields (appendix 1; figs. 1.4, 1.5). 7. San Onofre Creek, from a point 1.5 km upstream from the Pacific Ocean to a point approximately 5 km upstream from the Pacific Ocean (appendix 1; figs. 1.3, 1.4). 8. Pilgrim Creek, between the southern Base boundary and Vandegrift Boulevard, including the two side drainages east of Pilgrim Creek (appendix 1; fig. 1.6).

Rotating Non-Core Areas: Group A 1. Cockleburr Canyon, between the Pacific Ocean and a point 0.25 km east of Interstate 5 (appendix 1; fig. 1.2). 2. Santa Margarita River: (a) From the Rifle Range along Stagecoach Road to a point approximately 1.9 km upstream on the west side of the Santa Margarita River (appendix 1; fig. 1.1). (b) From a point 1.4 km upstream from Stuart Mesa Road to a point 3.5 km upstream of Stuart Mesa Road on the west side of the Santa Margarita River (appendix 1; fig. 1.2). (c) All riparian habitat within Ysidora Basin east of Vandegrift Road (appendix 1; fig. 1.2). 3. Pueblitos Canyon, between Vandegrift Road and a point approximately 2.5 km upstream (appendix 1; fig. 1.2). Biologists followed standard survey techniques described in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Least Bell's Vireo survey guidelines (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001). Observers moved slowly (1–2 km per hour) through riparian habitat while searching and listening for vireos. Observers walked along the edge(s) of the riparian corridor on the upland and river side where habitat was narrow enough to detect a bird on the opposite edge. In wider stands, observers traversed the habitat to detect all birds throughout its extent. Surveys typically began at sunrise and were completed by early afternoon, avoiding conditions of high winds and extreme heat that can reduce bird activity and detectability. All male Least Bell’s Vireos were detected and confirmed audibly by hearing their diagnostic song. Attempts were made to observe males visually to note banding status, but visual observations were not required to confirm the identity of the species as the song was considered the most diagnostic field characteristic. The presence of a female vireo within a territory was confirmed audibly through the detection of the pair call, a unique call elicited between mated birds, or visually when observed traveling quietly with the male. Alternatively, female presence was inferred by observing a nest, breeding behavior such as a food carry, or the presence of dependent fledglings. For each bird detected, investigators recorded age (adult or juvenile), sex, breeding status (paired, unpaired, undetermined, or transient), and if the bird was banded. Birds were considered transients if they were not detected on two or more consecutive surveys after an initial detection. Vireo locations were mapped on 1:12,000 aerial photographs as well as 1:24,000 U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps, using Samsung Galaxy S7 and S8 and LG G5 mobile phones that use Android operating systems with a built-in Global Positioning System (GPS) to determine geographic coordinates (World Geodetic System of 1984).

6 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Habitat Characteristics Dominant native and non-native plants were recorded and the percentage cover of non-native vegetation was estimated using cover categories of less than 5, 5–50, 51–95, and greater than 95 percent within the area used by each vireo detected. The overall habitat type within each territory was specified according to the following categories: Mixed willow riparian: Habitat dominated by one or more willow species, including black willow (Salix gooddingii), arroyo willow (S. lasiolepis), and red willow (S. laevigata), with mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia) as a frequent co-dominant. Willow-cottonwood: Willow riparian habitat in which Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) is a co-dominant. Willow-sycamore: Willow riparian habitat in which Western sycamore (Platanus racemosa) is a co-dominant. Sycamore-oak: Woodlands in which sycamore and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) occur as co-dominants. Riparian scrub: Dry or sandy habitat dominated by sandbar willow (S. exigua) or mule fat, with few other woody species. Upland scrub: Coastal sage scrub adjacent to riparian habitat. Non-native: Sites vegetated exclusively with non-native species, such as giant reed and salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima).

Artificial Seep Study In April 2019, MCBCP completed construction of a weir system designed to divert water from the Santa Margarita River to Lake O’Neill and several recharging ponds for the Conjunctive Use Project (Vernadero Group Inc., unpub. data, 2018). The purpose of the Conjunctive Use Project is to provide additional water for MCBCP and the Fallbrook Public Utility District (Vernadero Group Inc., unpub. data, 2018). In January 2019, MCBCP began operating an artificial seep along the Santa Margarita River to compensate for groundwater withdrawal upstream (fig. 2; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2016). A low-volume (20‒40 liters per minute), shallow groundwater irrigation pumping well was installed to draw water to the surface. The pump was solar-powered and directed water to six outlet pipes arranged within an area approximately 1,500 square meters (m2). Water was pumped during daylight hours from March through August each year. Two other seeps were planned but had not been installed by 2020. Shallow pools created by the seep pumps were small (8–44 m2) and limited to the immediate vicinity of the outlet pipes. The purpose of our study was to measure the effects of the artificial seep on vegetation and vireo breeding,

movements, and survival compared to areas where seeps were not operating, beginning in 2020, the first breeding season after the Conjunctive Use Project was implemented. Although the intent was to enhance historic Willow Flycatcher breeding habitat, few Willow Flycatchers have occupied these areas over the past 5 years (Howell and Kus, 2015, 2016, 2017; Howell and others, 2018, 2020). Least Bell’s Vireos were selected as surrogates for Willow Flycatchers because they were well represented in the areas, and their habitat affinities are similar to those of Willow Flycatchers. We established two types of study plots, Seep and Reference sites (fig. 2). Two Seep sites were selected to surround and extend downstream from (1) an existing seep (in the Old Treatment Ponds area) and (2) a planned seep (in the Pump Road area). A Reference site was selected 0.5–0.8 km from each Seep site. Reference sites were on the same side of the Santa Margarita River as their corresponding Seep sites and encompassed similar vegetation as the corresponding Seep site in 2020. We anticipate the Reference sites will become drier relative to the Seep sites as the upstream water diversion effects are manifested. Only one of the two Seep sites had an operating seep pump in 2020. Therefore, we considered the Seep site without an operating pump to be a third Reference site in 2020.

Vegetation Structure and Plant Composition We sampled vegetation at three Reference sites and one Seep site (fig. 2) to examine the response of riparian habitat to locally augmented surface water. We collected vegetation data at 12 vireo territories per site (36 territories at Reference sites and 12 territories at the Seep site), centered on a single vireo nest per territory, for a total of 48 vegetation sampling locations (appendix 2). Vegetation data were collected using a protocol that combined aspects of flycatcher vegetation sampling in 2001 and 2002 (Rourke and others, 2004) and the “stacked cube” method developed to characterize canopy architecture in structurally diverse riparian habitat for vireos (Kus, 1998). Each sampling location consisted of a center plot (nest location) and 3 satellite plots (fig. 3), totaling 192 sampling plots. Satellite plots were located 15 m from the center plot at 0, 120, and 240 degrees. We collected a GPS point at the center of each plot. Vegetation cover was visually estimated within 5 m of the center of the plot at 7 height intervals: 0–1 m, 1–2 m, 2–3 m, 3–4 m, 4–5 m, 5–6 m, and greater than 6 m. Overall foliage cover was recorded as the percentage of volume (percentage cover) occupied by all foliage in the plot per height interval, lumping all species together. Overall non-native foliage cover was measured as the percentage cover of all non-native species (herbaceous and woody) within the plot per height interval. Estimates of both overall foliage and non-native cover were measured using a modified Daubenmire (1959) scale with cover classes less than 1 percent, 1–10 percent, 11–25 percent, 26–50 percent, 51–75 percent, 76–90 percent, and greater than 90 percent. Cover classes were further refined using + and − to indicate whether the estimate was in the upper or lower range of the cover class.

Study Areas and Methods 7 117°23'30"

117°23'00"

117°22'30"

117°22'00"

117°21'30"

± 33°17'30"

Pump Road north

# * 33°17'00"

# * # * # * Old treatment ponds north

Pump Road south

33°16'30"

33°16'00"

Old treatment ponds south

EXPLANATION Monitoring sites Reference site

33°15'30"

Seep site

# #

Old treatment pond seep outlet Proposed seep

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE

0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 2. Location of Least Bell's Vireo Seep and Reference sites at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

A 7.5-m-tall fiberglass telescoping pole, demarcated in 1-m intervals, was used to determine height class and canopy height. Overall foliage cover was further divided by identifying the three plant species with the highest foliage volume (Species 1, 2, and 3) at each plot and estimating their contribution and the contribution of all other species combined (All other) to overall foliage cover, adding up to a total of 100 percent of the overall foliage cover. We also measured

canopy height (estimated if above 7.5 m) and recorded soil moisture (percentage of relative saturation) at the center of each plot using a Kelway model HB-2 soil pH and moisture meter (kelinstruments.com/kelway-hb-2, Teaneck, New Jersey). Soil moisture was measured to assess the effect of surface water augmentation beyond the immediate vicinity of the seep pumps.

8 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Site Fidelity and Movements

0°

15 m

10 m CENTER

240°

120°

Figure 3. Diagram of vegetation sampling plot configuration. Abbreviation: m, meter.

Vireo Survival, Site Fidelity, and Movements The primary goals of banding Least Bell's Vireos on MCBCP were (1) to evaluate adult vireo site fidelity within a potential source population, (2) to investigate natal dispersal on Base and the role MCBCP young play in potentially supporting vireo populations off Base, and (3) to evaluate how artificial seeps affected vireo site fidelity, dispersal, and survival. The regional Least Bell’s Vireo color banding convention designates orange or gold as the color representing MCBCP. Therefore, nestlings from monitored nests were banded at 6–7 days of age with a single anodized gold numbered federal band on the left leg. Adult vireos within Seep and Reference sites were captured in mist nets and banded with a unique combination of colored plastic and anodized metal bands, including either an anodized gold or orange plastic band (or both, depending on the available color combinations) to designate MCBCP as the bird’s site of origin. Returning adults previously banded as nestlings with a single numbered federal band were target netted to determine their identity, and their original band was supplemented with other bands to generate unique color combinations to enable identification of individuals. In 2020, we noticed an unusually high number of banded vireos that appeared to have injured legs. The suspected predominant cause of leg injuries was accumulated vegetation forming a constricting “bracelet” underneath the leg band. After in-house consultation, we stopped banding nestlings and unbanded adult vireos as of June 19 to minimize the chance of causing more injuries. Although we intended to continue to target net returning adults with single numbered federal bands to determine their identity, no more adults were captured after June 19.

During surveys and nest monitoring activities, we attempted to resight all vireos to determine if they were banded, and if so, to confirm their identity by reading their unique color band combination or by recapturing birds with single federal bands. We used resighting and recapture data to determine the 2020 locations of known individuals. In future reports, we will also use these data to calculate annual survival, or the proportion of birds that survived from one year to the next. Site fidelity and movements of vireos were determined by measuring the distance between the center of a vireo’s breeding or natal territory in 2019 and the center of the same vireo’s breeding territory in 2020. Vireos demonstrated site fidelity if they returned to within 100 m of their 2019 territory (Kus and others, 2020). Site fidelity and movement were calculated for (1) adults Base-wide and (2) first-year vireos that were banded as nestlings or juveniles Base-wide (in other words, first-year adults). Only individuals with known territory locations during the last year detected before 2020 were included; for example, juveniles banded after fledging were excluded because their natal territories could not be confirmed in light of their capacity for substantial movement; vireos captured at one of the two Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) stations on Base were excluded unless their territory locations were known from surveys.

Nest Success and Breeding Productivity Our purpose for monitoring Least Bell’s Vireo nests was to evaluate how vireo nest success and breeding productivity were affected by alteration of vireo habitat by the artificial seep compared to Reference sites with no augmented surface water. We monitored vireo nests at the Seep site and three Reference sites to compare differences between the two groups. We monitored vireo nesting activity at 12 territories in the active Seep site and 40 territories in Reference sites between March 31 and July 28, 2020. Territories were chosen in order of the vireos’ arrival. Vireos were observed for evidence of nesting, and their nests were located. Nests were visited as infrequently as possible to minimize the chances of leading predators or Brown-headed Cowbirds to nest sites; typically, there were three to five visits per nest. The first visit was timed to determine the number of eggs laid, the next few visits to determine hatching and age of young, and the last to band nestlings. Fledging was confirmed through detection of young outside the nest, or, rarely, the presence of feather dust in the nest. Unsuccessful nests were placed into one of four nest fate categories: (1) Depredated, nests found empty or destroyed before the estimated fledge date and where the adult vireos were not found tending fledgling(s);

Study Areas and Methods 9 (2) Parasitized, previously active nests that were subsequently abandoned by adult vireos after one or more Brown-headed Cowbird eggs were laid in the nest or any nests that fledged cowbird young without fledging vireo young; (3) Other, nests failing for reasons, such as poor nest construction, the collapse of a host plant that caused a nest’s contents to be dumped onto the ground, the presence of a clutch of infertile eggs, or other causes that were known; and (4) Unknown, nests that appeared intact and undisturbed, but were abandoned with vireo eggs or nestlings. Characteristics of nests were recorded following abandonment or fledging of young from nests. These characteristics included nest height, host species, host height, and the distance nests were placed from the edge of the host plant and to the edge of the vegetation clump in which they were placed. To determine if the artificial seeps affected vireo productivity, we compared vireo nest success (the percentage of vireo nests that successfully fledged at least one young) and breeding productivity (the number of eggs, nestlings, and fledglings produced) between Seep and Reference sites in 2020. We examined nest success and the proportion of nests that were depredated or parasitized by cowbirds, and the likelihood of re-nesting after a first nesting attempt (successful or failed), to associate the effects altered habitat may have on the vulnerability of vireo nests to predators and brood parasites. We also examined clutch size (the maximum number of vireo eggs known to be laid in the nest), the proportion of eggs that hatched, the proportion of nestlings that fledged, the proportion of eggs that produced fledglings, the proportion of nests that successfully fledged young, the total number of fledglings per pair, and the proportion of pairs that had at least one successful nest. We examined vireo nest placement characteristics to explore vireo response to potential differences in vegetation structure between Seep and Reference sites. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton implements an intensive annual cowbird control program on Base, and parasitism of Least Bell’s Vireo nests is extremely rare. Nevertheless, when necessary, we followed our standard protocol for manipulating nest contents in the event cowbird eggs or nestlings were detected in vireo nests. In nests with fewer than three vireo eggs, cowbird eggs were removed no sooner than the seventh day of incubation to minimize the possibility of nest abandonment in response to the removal. Cowbird eggs were removed from nests containing three or more vireo eggs as they were found. Cowbird nestlings were removed immediately from nests.

Data Analyses Population Size and Distribution Because we began a new core plus rotating non-core survey procedure in 2020, we limited our examination of annual differences to vireo territories that were located within the core survey areas. We also present summaries of vireo territories in non-core survey areas without annual comparisons. Non-core survey results will be summarized every fifth year (for example, in 2024, 2029, and so on) when a round of non-core surveys has been completed. We examined annual differences in the dates vireos arrived and established breeding territories by compiling the total number of vireo territories established by the end of each month (April, May, June, and July) within core survey areas, all of which were surveyed at least 4 times annually for the past 16 years. We also calculated the projected Base-wide vireo population size in 2020 based on the proportion of all vireo territories that were counted within core survey areas from 2005 to 2019. First, for each year from 2005 to 2019, we calculated the proportion of all vireo territories on Base that were counted within the core survey areas (core/total); then, we multiplied these proportions by the number of vireo territories that were counted within core survey areas in 2020 to arrive at a range of projected number of vireo territories Base-wide in 2020.

Vegetation Structure and Plant Composition At each height category, the estimates of Species 1, 2, and 3 and All Other were converted to the percentage cover values of the sampling plot area. We averaged the percentage cover of each plant species, total plant species, non-native plant species, canopy height, and soil moisture across each sampling location (center and three satellite plots) to obtain means for each territory. We also identified the maximum canopy height at each sampling location. We used Student’s t-tests to determine if there were differences between Seep and Reference sites in (1) average canopy height, (2) maximum canopy height, (3) soil moisture, (4) vegetation volume (percent cover) of all plant species (overall foliage cover), (5) cover of non-native species (including herbaceous and woody vegetation), (6) cover of native herbaceous species, and (7) cover of woody species at each height category by sampling location. We used Pearson’s correlation to examine the relationship between soil moisture at Seep site plots and the distance of the plot from the seep outlets at the sampling plot scale, and also between soil moisture at all locations and (1) canopy height, (2) percentage overall foliage cover at each height category, and (3) percentage of herbaceous cover (including non-native herbaceous species) at all height categories at the sampling location scale.

10 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Nest Success and Breeding Productivity We used chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests to determine if there were differences between Seep and Reference sites in (1) the likelihood of vireos re-nesting after a first nesting attempt, (2) the likelihood of re-nesting if the first nesting attempt failed or was successful, (3) the proportion of nests that successfully fledged young, (4) the proportion of nests that were depredated, (5) whether or not the first nest attempt was successful, (6) the proportion of eggs that hatched, (7) the proportion of nestlings that fledged, (8) the proportion of eggs that produced fledglings, (9) the proportion of nests that produced fledglings, and (10) the number of pairs that had at least one successful nest. Chi-square tests were used when sample sizes were sufficient; Fisher’s Exact tests were used when one or more category contained fewer than five samples. We used t-tests to determine if there were differences between Seep and References sites in the (1) number of nesting attempts, (2) clutch size, and (3) number of fledglings per pair. If nests were parasitized by Brown-headed Cowbirds, rescued by removing the cowbird egg(s) or nestling(s), and subsequently fledged vireo young, all success and productivity calculations were rerun treating successful rescued nests as failed nests to estimate the potential effect(s) of cowbird parasitism on the Pendleton vireo population. Data were analyzed using Program R (R Core Team, 2020). Two-tailed tests were considered significant if P≤0.10. Means are presented with standard deviations. All data from the MCBCP from 2005 to 2020 used in comparisons with 2020 data can be found in Rourke and Kus (2006, 2007, 2008); Lynn and Kus (2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2011, 2012, 2013); and Lynn and others (2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020). Data from before 2005 was extracted from unpublished reports by Griffith Wildlife Biology (unpub. data, 2004).

Daily Nest Survival We used RMark (White and Burnham, 1999; Laake, 2013) in program MARK to calculate daily survival rate (DSR) of vireo nests, which accounts for the variability in exposure days across nests found at different stages of the nesting cycle and allows for the analysis of the effects of covariates on DSR (Dinsmore and others, 2002). Using RMark, we modelled the effects of the seeps on DSR. Nest survival was calculated across a 32-day cycle length: 2-days for the last day of nest construction and a day of rest before the first egg is laid, 4-days for egg-laying, 14-days for incubation, and 12-days for the nestling period. Age of nests at the time they were discovered was calculated in days by

forward- or backward-dating of nests in relation to known dates of nest-building, egg-laying, or hatching. Data compiled for each nest included (1) the Julian dates for when the nest was first found, last active, and last checked; (2) the nest fate (successful or unsuccessful); (3) the age of the nest (in days) when it was initiated, relative to the first nest found that year; (4) if the nest was in the Seep site or a Reference site; and (5) the year. RMark uses program MARK to create models with or without covariates (user-designated) and produces metrics for evaluating the validity of each model or how well the model fits the data relative to the other models. We used an information-theoretic approach (Akaike’s Information Criteria for small sample sizes; AICc; Burnham and Anderson, 2002) to evaluate support for nest survival models reflecting a priori hypotheses regarding the effect of seeps on DSR. We hypothesized that DSR would be higher in the Seep site than in Reference sites, and that DSR would decrease annually in Reference sites as the habitat became drier relative to the Seep sites. We used logistic regression with a logit link to build models. First, we generated a constant survival model to serve as a reference for the effect of treatment (Seep versus Reference) on DSR. We then created models with treatment, year, the combined effect of treatment and year (treatment+year), and the interaction of treatment and year (treatment*year) and evaluated support for the models in relation to the constant survival model. Models were ranked from lowest to highest AICc. Models were considered well supported if they were within 2 AICc of the highest-ranked (top, lowest AICc) model (difference in AICc [Δ AICc] less than 2). We further examined the well-supported models by calculating the odds ratio for each covariate in the model (the odds that the covariate had an effect on survival such that no effect equaled 1, negative effect was less than 1, positive effect was greater than 1) and then examining the 95-percent confidence interval of the odds ratio. For example, if the 95-percent confidence interval of the odds ratio was greater than 1 (and did not include 1), we had 95-percent confidence that the covariate had a positive effect on survival relative to the reference.

Nest Characteristics We used t-tests to determine if there were differences in (1) nest height, (2) host plant height, (3) distance to the edge of the host plant, and (4) distance to the edge of the vegetation clump in which the nest was located between Seep and Reference sites and between successful and failed nests within Seep and Reference sites.

Results 11

Results Population Size and Distribution Core Survey Areas A total of 685 male Least Bell's Vireos were detected in core survey areas during Base-wide surveys (table 1; fig. 4; appendix 3, figs. 3.1‒3.12). Of these, 669 were territorial males, 79 percent of which were confirmed as paired, and 16 were transients. One banded male was detected at two different territories, paired at one territory and transient at the second. This vireo was only included once in the total count of territorial vireos. The 2020 total represents a 39 percent increase in territorial males from the same areas surveyed in 2019 (480). Transient vireos were observed on 4 of the 10 (40 percent) drainages or sites surveyed. Eighty-eight percent of vireo territories occurred on the 4 most populated drainages/sites (Santa Margarita River, Las Flores Creek, San Mateo Creek, and Pilgrim Creek), and most vireo territories (69 percent, 460 territories) occurred along the Santa Margarita River, the largest expanse of riparian vegetation on Base (tables 1, 2). The remaining 4 drainages/sites each contained fewer than 25 territories. From 2005 to 2019, 54–65 percent of resident males detected on MCBCP were within the core areas surveyed in 2020 (average 57±3 percent). Assuming the vireo population on the rest of MCBCP in 2020 did not vary from the 2005 to 2019 distribution, we estimated between 1,029 and 1,239 resident vireos on MCBCP in 2020. The distribution of Least Bell's Vireo territories documented on Base in 2020 remained very similar to 2019 (table 2). From 2019 to 2020, the proportion of vireo territories in each drainage (the number of vireo territories detected in the drainage divided by the total number of vireo territories in core survey areas) changed by less than 0.01 in every drainage except at San Onofre Creek (proportion increased by 0.012) and San Mateo Creek (proportion of territories dropped by 0.019). The absolute number of vireo territories increased in every drainage. The Santa Margarita River continued to support the most vireo territories, increasing by 38 percent (127 territories). Las Flores Creek, the second most populated drainage, increased 31 percent (15 territories). San Onofre Creek increased 120 percent (12 territories), Pilgrim Creek increased 50 percent (11 territories), De Luz Creek increased 53 percent (8 territories), Aliso Creek increased 89 percent (8 territories), Fallbrook Creek (Lake O’Neill section) increased 88 percent (7 territories), and San Mateo Creek increased 3 percent (1 territory). Least Bell’s Vireos began arriving on Base during the last week of March 2020, with 68 percent of territories established by the end of April (fig. 5). This number represented the

fourth lowest proportion of territories established by the end of April since 2005. By the end of May, 87 percent of territories had been established. The first vireo detected on MCBCP in 2020 was found on March 24, 3 days later than the earliest documented arrival date for vireos in 2013 and 2019. The earliest arrival dates for other years were April 4, 2005; March 31, 2006; April 2, 2007; March 31, 2008; March 23, 2009; March 29, 2010; April 4, 2011; March 22, 2012; March 27, 2014, March 23, 2015, March 23, 2016, March 24, 2017, March 23, 2018. Note that these dates represent anecdotal observations; standardized vireo surveys began April 1 in 2020, but vireo presence before surveys was noted when observed.

Non-Core Survey Areas A total of 156 male vireos were detected in non-core survey areas in 2020 (table 3). Eighty-three percent of territorial males were confirmed as paired, and no transients were detected.

Habitat Characteristics Core Survey Areas Vireos used several different habitat types ranging from willow-dominated thickets along stream courses to non-native vegetation and upland scrub (table 4). Most vireo locations in core survey areas occurred in habitat characterized as mixed willow riparian, with 69 percent of males in the study area found in this habitat. An additional 4 percent of birds occupied willow habitat co-dominated by cottonwoods or sycamores. Eighteen percent of territories were found in riparian scrub, dominated by mule fat or sandbar willow. Seven percent of vireos occupied upland scrub, 1 percent occupied non-native habitat, and less than 1 percent occupied drier habitats characterized by a mix of sycamore and oak. The proportion of vireo territories documented in non-native vegetation in core survey areas increased from 2019 to 2020, the highest level recorded since 2005 (tables 5, 6). Seventeen percent (118/685) of vireo territories in 2020 were in areas where non-native species comprised at least 50 percent of the habitat. Eighty-one percent of territories dominated by non-native vegetation contained predominantly poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), and 12 percent contained predominantly black mustard (Brassica nigra). All eight drainages in 2020 contained territories dominated by non-native vegetation. Two of these drainages (the Santa Margarita River and Las Flores Creek) also contained territories dominated by non-native vegetation every year since 2015. Overall, 2005 remained the year with the highest number of territories dominated or co-dominated by non-native vegetation.

12 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 800 700

Number of vireo territories

600 500 400 300 200

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

100

Year

Figure 4. Number of Least Bell’s Vireo territories in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2005–20. Table 1. Number and distribution of Least Bell's Vireos in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [ha, hectare; rd, road] Territories

Total Transients territories

Total area surveyed (ha)

Known pairs

Single/status undetermined

Santa Margarita River, I-5 to De Luz Creek1

357

103

460

964

De Luz Creek South

Lake O'Neill section of Fallbrook Creek

Aliso Creek

Las Flores Creek—Pacific Ocean to Stuart Mesa Rd

124

Drainage/survey site

Las Flores Creek—Stuart Mesa Rd to eastern edge of lower core area

138

Las Flores Creek—Western edge of upper core area to Zulu Impact Area

San Onofre Creek, lower east core area

191

San Mateo Creek, lower bottom core area

492

Pilgrim Creek, Base boundary upstream to Vandegrift Boulevard

Total

526

143

669

2,359

1Core areas in the Santa Margarita River are the east section of Air Station, Effluent Seep, Bell, Rifle Range, Pump Road excluding Pump Road monitoring area, Above Hospital, and Below Hospital.

Table 2. Number of territorial male Least Bell’s Vireos in core survey areas 2020 at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, by drainage, 2005–20. [The number includes only singing males determined to hold territories. Numeric change is the positive or negative change in the number of vireo territories between 2019 and 2020]

Number of territorial males 2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Numeric change

314

277

281

327

402

435

293

252

291

294

259

283

253

365

333

460

127

De Luz Creek

Fallbrook Creek

Aliso Creek

Las Flores Creek

San Onofre Creek

San Mateo Creek

Pilgrim Creek

Total

476

404

407

461

594

623

435

360

418

411

363

391

349

505

480

669

189

Drainage Santa Margarita River

Results 13

14 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 800

Number of vireo territories

700 600 500 400 300 200 100

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

0 30-Apr

31-May

30-Jun

31-Jul

Date

Figure 5. Territory establishment of Least Bell’s Vireos in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2005–20. Dates represent survey period end points. Surveys began late in 2011 and 2012; therefore, arrival dates for these years are not included. Table 3. Number and distribution of Least Bell's Vireos in non-core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [ha, hectare]

Territories Drainage/survey site

Known pairs

Single/status undetermined

Total territories

Transients

Total area surveyed (ha)

Non-core survey areas group A Santa Margarita River, I-5 to De Luz Creek

124

149

402

Pueblitos Canyon

Cockleburr Canyon

129

156

458

Total

Table 4. Habitat types used by Least Bell's Vireos in core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Habitat types are included for resident and transient Least Bell’s Vireo locations. Abbreviations: >, greater than; <, less than]

Number of locations >50 percent native

>50 percent non-native

Total

Percentage of total

Mixed willow

400

473

Riparian scrub

101

125

Upland scrub

Willow-sycamore

Non-native

Willow-cottonwood

Habitat type

Oak-sycamore Total

567

118

685

100

Table 5. Proportion of all Least Bell’s Vireo territories dominated or co-dominated by non-native vegetation, by drainage, 2005–12. Proportion of all territories (number of territories within the drainage)

Drainage

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Aliso Creek

0.09

(23)

0.00

(14)

0.09

(11)

0.00

(12)

0.00

(23)

0.11

(18)

0.00

(9)

0.18

(11)

De Luz Creek

0.08

(12)

0.05

(20)

0.00

(17)

0.00

(21)

0.00

(22)

0.00

(23)

0.00

(17)

0.00

(20)

Fallbrook Creek

0.16

(19)

0.00

(6)

0.14

(7)

0.00

(10)

0.00

(8)

0.00

(10)

0.00

(5)

0.17

(6)

Las Flores Creek

0.00

(49)

0.07

(45)

0.00

(47)

0.24

(45)

0.09

(65)

0.12

(67)

0.04

(48)

0.00

(28)

Pilgrim Creek

0.00

(28)

0.00

(16)

0.00

(18)

0.00

(17)

0.30

(20)

0.05

(20)

0.05

(22)

0.00

(12)

San Mateo Creek

0.62

(26)

0.16

(25)

0.00

(19)

0.11

(27)

0.10

(52)

0.27

(49)

0.03

(30)

0.00

(21)

San Onofre Creek

0.45

(11)

0.00

(12)

0.00

(12)

0.43

(7)

0.30

(20)

0.13

(16)

0.25

(16)

0.00

(16)

Santa Margarita River

0.19

(319)

0.07

(291)

0.03

(290)

0.03

(328)

0.07

(422)

0.05

(439)

0.11

(298)

0.07

(258)

Total

0.18

(487)

0.06

(429)

0.03

(421)

0.06

(467)

0.08

(632)

0.07

(642)

0.09

(445)

0.06

(372)

Table 6. Proportion of all Least Bell’s Vireo territories dominated or co-dominated by non-native vegetation, by drainage, 2013–20. Proportion of all territories (number of territories within the drainage)

Drainage

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Aliso Creek

0.00

(12)

0.00

(6)

0.00

(5)

0.00

(6)

0.20

(5)

0.00

(9)

0.08

(12)

0.11

(18)

De Luz Creek

0.00

(21)

0.25

(16)

0.19

(16)

0.19

(16)

0.71

(7)

0.00

(10)

0.13

(16)

0.43

(23)

Fallbrook Creek

0.00

(6)

0.00

(7)

0.00

(5)

0.00

(4)

0.00

(6)

0.13

(15)

0.13

(8)

0.27

(15)

Las Flores Creek

0.00

(34)

0.00

(39)

0.03

(33)

0.10

(30)

0.04

(23)

0.15

(55)

0.24

(49)

0.07

(67)

Pilgrim Creek

0.00

(19)

0.00

(18)

0.00

(17)

0.00

(13)

0.06

(16)

0.05

(21)

0.00

(22)

0.09

(33)

San Mateo Creek

0.00

(28)

0.00

(28)

0.17

(30)

0.00

(39)

0.40

(25)

0.00

(33)

0.29

(35)

0.23

(35)

San Onofre Creek

0.00

(16)

0.06

(16)

0.44

(9)

0.00

(11)

0.19

(16)

0.00

(11)

0.20

(10)

0.13

(24)

Santa Margarita River

0.05

(300)

0.04

(308)

0.08

(280)

0.03

(292)

0.04

(268)

0.06

(375)

0.13

(342)

0.18

(470)

Total

0.04

(436)

0.04

(438)

0.09

(395)

0.04

(411)

0.09

(366)

0.06

(529)

0.15

(494)

0.17

(685)

Results 15

16 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Non-Core Survey Areas Most vireo locations in non-core survey areas occurred in habitat characterized as mixed willow riparian, with 54 percent of males in the study area found in this habitat (table 7). An additional 1 percent of birds occupied willow habitat co-dominated by sycamores. Seventeen percent of territories were found in riparian scrub, dominated by mule fat or sandbar willow. Seventeen percent of vireos occupied upland scrub and 11 percent occupied non-native habitat.

Vegetation Sampling There were no significant differences in overall foliage cover or percent cover of native herbaceous vegetation at any height category between the Seep site and the Reference sites (table 8; fig. 6). Non-native vegetation cover was significantly higher at Reference sites than at the Seep site below 1 m and above 4 m, although there was very little non-native cover above 4 m. There was no non-native cover above 5 m at the Seep site. Woody vegetation cover was significantly greater at the Seep site than at Reference sites below 1 m, but there were no other differences in woody vegetation cover between the Seep and Reference sites. We also did not find differences in maximum canopy height (20 m at the Seep site and 17 m at Reference sites) or average canopy height (7.5±1.6 m at the Seep site and 7.4±2.0 m at Reference sites; t=0.8, P=0.40 and t=0.3, P=0.80, respectively). Table 7. Habitat types used by Least Bell's Vireos in non-core survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Habitat types are included for resident and transient Least Bell’s Vireo locations. Abbreviation: >, greater than]

Number of locations Habitat type

>50 percent >50 percent Total native non-native

Percentage of total

Non-core survey areas Group A Mixed willow

Riparian scrub

Upland scrub

Non-native

Willow-sycamore

112

156

100

Total

Soil moisture was significantly lower at the Seep site (36±29 percent) than at Reference sites (57±32 percent; t=−2.1, P=0.04; fig. 7). Soil moisture was not correlated with the distance from the nearest seep outlet (r=−0.03, P=0.85) or with canopy height (r=0.06, P=0.68). There was also no correlation between soil moisture and overall foliage cover at any height category (table 9). However, soil moisture was negatively correlated with percent herbaceous cover (higher soil moisture=lower percent herbaceous cover) between 2 and 3 m, and between 4 and 6 m (table 9), although there was very little herbaceous cover above 4 m. Soil moisture varied geographically across all four monitoring sites. The western edge of the Seep site was dry, despite being close to the main river channel (fig. 7). The highest soil moisture in the Seep site was in the southeastern area, just west of an ephemeral drainage. Soil moisture was high on the eastern edge of the Old Treatment Ponds Reference site and the western side of the southern Pump Road Reference site. A dirt road defined the western border of both Pump Road Reference sites; the southern section of this road was flooded for the entire breeding season. All but one sampling location at the northern Pump Road Reference site had high soil moisture (above 65 percent), and 4 of the 12 sampling locations were 100 percent saturated. High soil moisture in the Reference sites was indicated by the rapid growth of annual vegetation until late June/early July. Except for a small portion of the northwest edge of the southern Pump Road Reference site, the soil type across all monitoring sites was uniformly high-draining river wash or Greenfield sandy loam (U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Science, 2020).

Table 8. Results of Student’s t-tests for differences in vegetation cover between the Seep site and Reference sites at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [m, meter; t, Student’s t statistic; P, probability; >, greater than]

Height interval (m)

Overall foliage cover t

Native herbaceous cover

Non-native vegetation cover

Woody vegetation cover

0–1

−0.4 0.69

0.5

0.63

−1.8

10.08

1.7

10.10

>1–2

0.5 0.62 −0.2

0.83

−1.1

0.29

1.5

0.14

>2–3

0.8 0.41

0.3

0.74

−0.2

0.82

1.2

0.24

>3–4

0.5 0.59

0.2

0.81

−0.7

0.51

0.8

0.44

>4–5

0.6 0.56

0.4

0.67

−1.8

10.09

0.7

0.49

>5–6

0.4 0.70 −0.7

0.49

−1.7

10.10

0.6

0.58

−2.0

10.06

0.7

0.50

0.6 0.53 −0.7

1Significant difference.

0.52

Results 17

* >6 m

EXPLANATION

5–6 m

Height category, in meters

Reference non-native cover Seep non-native cover

4–5 m

Reference woody cover Seep woody cover Reference native herbaceous cover Seep native herbaceous cover Reference overall foliage cover

3–4 m

Seep overall foliage cover

2–3 m

1–2 m

0–1 m

10%

20%

30%

* 40%

50%

Percent cover

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Figure 6. Average total percentage cover by height class and plant type at Seep and Reference sites, Santa Margarita River, 2020, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Error bars represent 1 standard deviation. Asterisk indicates a significant difference. Abbreviations: >, greater than; m, meter; %, percent.

Vireo Movements Returning Banded Birds We were able to observe 1,526 adult Least Bell’s Vireos (848 males, 99 percent of all males, and 413 females, 62 percent of all females) on Base well enough to determine banding status in 2020, although not all banded vireos were observed well enough to conclusively identify the individual. Ninety-nine vireos had been banded before the 2020 breeding season, 14 of which we could not identify because the vireos were banded with only a single numbered metal federal band as nestlings and not recaptured (12 natals) or had incomplete resights and were therefore not identified (2 incomplete resights; table 10). Therefore, we were able to identify 85 vireos on Base that had unique color band combinations in 2020 (table 10; appendix 4, table 4.1). Of the 85 identified banded vireos, 69 vireos had been banded on Base, and 16 vireos were originally banded off Base (13 on

the San Luis Rey River, 1 at Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton, [MCAS] and 2 in Baja California Sur; B. Kus, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019; table 11). Adult birds of known age ranged from 1 to 8 years old. Twenty-one percent of adult banded birds were 1 year old in 2020. Twelve natal vireos (6 males and 6 females) were resighted on MCBCP in 2020 (table 10). Based on the color of the metal leg bands, six were banded as nestlings on Base before 2020 or at MCAS before 2016, three were banded as nestlings at MCAS in 2018 or 2019, two were banded as nestlings on the San Luis Rey River, and one may have been banded off Base or at MCAS in 2018. Efforts to recapture and identify these vireos were unsuccessful. One male and one female vireo that were last detected on MCBCP were detected off Base in 2020 (table 10). The male was observed on Murrieta Creek and had been banded as a nestling on MCBCP in 2019. The female was observed on the San Luis Rey River and was originally banded on MCBCP before 2020.

18 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 117°23'

117°22'

( ! (! !! ( ( ( ! ( !! ( ( !

( ! !! (( ! ( ( ! ( !! ( ( ! ! ( (! ( (! !

33°17'

( ! (! ( !! (

( ! ( !! ( ( !

Pump Road north Reference site

( ! (! ( !! ( ( ! ( ( ! !! (

( ! (! ( !! (

( ! (! !! ( ( ( ! ( ! ( (! !

( ! (! ( (! ! ( ! (! ! (! ( ! ((! ! (( !

( ! (! ( !! (

## # #

( (! ! !! ( ( ( ! (! ( (! ! ( ! (! ( (! !

( ! (! ( !! (

Old treatment ponds north Seep site

! ! ( ( (! (! (! (! ! ( (! ( ! (! ( !! (

Pump Road south Reference site ( ! (! ( !! ( ( ! (! ( (! ! ( ! (! !! ( ( ( ! (! !! ( (

( ! ( (! ! ( ! ( ! (! !! ( (

Old treatment ponds south Reference site

( ! ( ( ! !! (

( ! ! ( ! (( ! ( ! (! ( !! ( ! (! ! (( ! (

! ( (! (! ! (

( ! (! !! ( (

( ! ( ! (! (! ( (! (! !! ( (! ! ( ! ( ( !

! ( ( (! ! ( !

( ! ( !! ( ( ! ( ! ( ( ! (( ! ( !! ( ( !! ! ( ! ( !! ( ( !

33°16'

! ( (! (! ! (

EXPLANATION

( ! (! ! ( ! ( ! ( (! ! (( !

Reference site Seep site

! ( (! (! ! (

# Proposed seep # Seep outlet

Vegetation plot soil moisture (percent) ( 0–10 ! ( 51–60 ! ( 11–20 ! ( 61–70 ! ( 21–30 ! ( 71–80 ! ( 31–40 ! ( 81–90 ! ( 41–50 ! ( 91–100 ! Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 7. Percentage soil moisture at vegetation sampling plots, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

Results 19 Table 9. Results of Pearson’s correlation tests between percentage soil moisture and overall foliage cover and percentage herbaceous cover at each height category, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [m, meter; r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; P, probability, >, greater than]

Overall foliage cover

Percentage herbaceous cover

Height interval (m)

0–1

0.10

0.50

−0.09

0.56

>1–2

0.02

0.90

−0.16

0.29 10.06

>2–3

0.05

0.76

−0.28

>3–4

0.07

0.63

−0.23

0.11

>4–5

−0.03

0.85

−0.25

10.09

>5–6

−0.02

0.91

−0.25

10.09

0.00

0.99

−0.19

0.19

1Significant relationship.

Table 10. Banding status of Least Bell’s Vireos detected on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCBCP) and those that emigrated off Base, 2020. [Birds detected on MCBCP include immigrants. Natal vireos were originally banded as nestlings with a single numbered federal band. Abbreviation: —, no data]

Detected on MCBCP

Banding status

Male

Total on Female MCBCP

Emigrants Male

Female

Total

Uniquely banded before 2020

—

Natal recaptured in 2020

—

Subtotal of known identity vireos

—

Natal, not recaptured

—

Incomplete resight

—

Grand total

101

1Found on Murrieta Creek in 2020. 2Found on the San Luis Rey River in 2020.

20 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Table 11. Number of banded adult Least Bell’s Vireos by original year banded, age, original banding location, and sex at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Vireos originally banded in Baja California Sur were captured on the wintering grounds so the natal site was unknown. Abbreviations: —, no data; ≥, greater than or equal to]

Number of vireos observed by origin Year originally banded

Age, in years, 2020

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Male

Female

San Luis Rey River

Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton

Baja California Sur

Unknown

Male

Female

Male

Female

Total

2012

—

2013

—

≥5

—

2017

≥4

—

2018

≥3

—

2015 2016

2019

Subtotal Unknown

Total

1Vireos were seen with a metal gold numbered banding, indicating that they were originally banded at Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, before 2016. 2Vireos were seen with a metal dark blue numbered band, indicating that they were originally banded on the San Luis Rey River. 3Vireos were seen with a metal silver numbered band on the left leg and assumed to be 1- or 2-year-old vireos banded by the San Diego Natural History Museum at Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton in 2018 or 2019 (Ferree and Clark, 2018, 2019). 4Vireo seen with a single metal silver numbered band on the right leg, could have been banded off Base or at Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton. 5Vireo with incomplete resight of the bands, but metal silver seen in combination with plastic bands. Identity and origin not determinable.

New Banded Birds A total of 146 Least Bell's Vireos were captured and banded for the first time in 2020 (table 12). Newly banded birds included 27 adult vireos caught for the first time and banded with a unique color combination and 119 juvenile birds which were banded as nestlings with a single gold numbered federal band. These newly banded vireos are not included in site fidelity or movement analyses.

Site Fidelity and Movement Resighting banded birds allowed us to identify individuals that either returned to the same site they used in a previous year (within 100 m) or moved to a different location (appendix 5, table 5.1). Fifty-two adult vireos

(45 males and 7 females) that were identified at MCBCP in 2019 were resighted in 2020, 47 of which occupied known territories both years (2 females and 3 males were banded or recaptured at a MAPS station in 2019 or 2020 and did not have known territories that year). Most returning adult vireos showed strong between-year site fidelity. Of the 47 returning territorial adults, 35 (74 percent of territorial adults; 33 males, 79 percent of males; 2 females, 40 percent of females) occupied a breeding site in 2020 that they had defended in 2019 (within 100 m). Seven additional vireos (15 percent of all vireos; 7 males, 17 percent of males; no females) returned to sites adjacent to their previous territories (within 300 m). The average distance moved by returning adult vireos was 0.3±0.8 km (range 0.0–4.7 km; 0.3±0.8 km, range 0.0–4.7 km for males; 0.4±0.4 km, range 0.0–0.9 km for females).

Results 21 Table 12. Summary of new Least Bell’s Vireos captured and banded on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [—, no data]

Age banded

Males

Females

Unknown sex

Total

—

Nestling

—

119

Total

119

146

Adult

Nine first-year vireos that were banded as nestlings in 2019 on MCBCP were resighted in 2020 and occupied known territories (seven males and two females; table 13). Five additional first-year vireos that were detected in 2020 were originally captured at a MAPS station in 2019 and therefore did not have a known natal territory. The average distance that first-year vireos moved from their natal territories to their breeding territories was 4.7±7.0 km (range 0.6–23.0 km; males moved 5.4±7.9 km, range 0.6–23.0 km; females moved 2.4±1.2 km, range 1.5–3.3 km). One first-year male vireo that was banded as a nestling on MCBCP in 2019 was detected off Base in 2020 at Murrieta Creek, 23.0 km from his natal territory. Five other first-year vireos that were originally banded as nestlings along the San Luis Rey River (three males and two females) in 2019 dispersed 7.2±4.1 km to MCBCP.

Nest Success and Breeding Productivity Nesting activity was monitored at 12 territories in the Seep site and 40 territories in Reference sites (table 14; figs. 8–11; appendix 6, table 6.1). All of the territories in the Seep site and all but one of the territories in the Reference sites were considered fully monitored, meaning that all nests within the territory were found and documented during the breeding season. One territory in a Reference site was partially monitored and was not included in all analyses. Fifty-two pairs built 94 nests; 7 of these were not completed (INC or FAL in appendix 6, table 6.1) and have been excluded from calculations of nest success and productivity.

Nesting Attempts Pairs at the Seep site and Reference sites had a similar number of nesting attempts (including incomplete nests) over the course of the 2020 breeding season (table 14; t=1.5, P=0.15). Seep pairs (11/12; 92 percent) were more likely to re-nest after an initial attempt than Reference pairs (22/39; 56 percent; Fisher’s Exact P=0.04). The number of re-nests after a failed first nesting attempt did not differ between Seep

pairs (7/8; 88 percent) and Reference pairs (15/18; 83 percent; Fisher’s Exact P>0.99). However, pairs at the Seep site (4/4; 100 percent) were more likely to re-nest after a successful first nesting attempt than were pairs at Reference sites (7/21; 33 percent; Fisher’s Exact P=0.03). Pairs at Reference sites were more likely to re-nest after a failed first nesting attempt than after a successful first nesting attempt in 2020 (Fisher’s Exact P=0.003), although pairs at the Seep site were equally likely to re-nest after a failed or successful first nesting attempt (Fisher’s Exact P>0.99). When both monitoring site types were combined, pairs were more likely to re-nest after a failed nesting attempt than they were after a successful nesting attempt in 2020 (Fisher’s Exact P=0.007). Overall, 85 percent (22/26) of vireo pairs attempted to re-nest after a failed first nesting attempt and 44 percent (11/25) of pairs attempted to re-nest after a successful first nesting attempt in 2020. Two pairs at the Seep site and seven pairs at Reference sites attempted three nests in 2020.

Nest Success Completed nests in the Seep site were as likely to be successful as completed nests in Reference sites (chi-square=0.06, P=0.81); 57 percent (13/23) of nests in the Seep site successfully fledged young and 59 percent (38/64) of those in Reference sites successfully fledged young (table 15). First nesting attempts also were as likely to be successful at the Seep site (67 percent) as at Reference sites (46 percent; Fisher’s Exact P=0.32) in 2020 (appendix 6, table 6.1). Overall, 59 percent of all nesting attempts were successful and 51 percent of first nesting attempts were successful in 2020. Causes of failure were similar at Seep and Reference sites. Most nest failures at both Seep and Reference sites were caused by predation, although no confirmed predation events were witnessed (table 15). Predation accounted for 90 percent (9/10) of nest failures at the Seep site and 73 percent (19/26) of nest failures at Reference sites. We documented eight nests that failed for other reasons, known and unknown, at our monitoring sites (appendix 6, table 6.1). Two nests were abandoned with no eggs ever confirmed. Two nests were abandoned with eggs for unknown reasons. Rain and flooding caused three nests to fail. One nest failed when the supporting branch broke. Overall, 43 percent and 41 percent of completed vireo nests at Seep and Reference sites were lost to predation or other causes, respectively.

Cowbird Parasitism No Least Bell’s Vireo nests within monitoring sites were parasitized by Brown-headed Cowbirds in 2020.

22 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Table 13. Between-year dispersal into, within, or out of Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton by Least Bell’s Vireos banded as juveniles in 2019 and detected in 2020. [Drainage codes: SMR, Santa Margarita River; FC, Fallbrook Creek; MU, Murrieta Creek; SLR, San Luis Rey River; PU, Pueblitos Creek; PL, Pilgrim Creek; LF, Las Flores Creek. Band colors: ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; pupu, metal purple; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; YEYE, plastic yellow; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; BKBK, plastic black; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; BWST, plastic blue-white striped; PUPU, plastic purple; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; DBWH, plastic dark blue-white split. Sex: M, male; F, female. Abbreviation: km, kilometer]

Drainage/territory 2020

Dispersal distance (km)

Left leg

Right leg

SMR/MER

SMR/HE51

0.6

ORPU pupu

Mgo

SMR/DRO

SMR/HW63

1.2

ORPU

Mgo

SMR/FUR

SMR/HW23

1.5

YEYE pupu

Mgo

SMR/HTI

SMR/HW23

1.8

ORDG

DGOR Mgo

SMR/HDX

FC/OL10

2.0

DPDP

BPST Mgo

SMR/GEN

SMR/HW62

3.3

WHDP

BPST Mgo

SMR/TEN

SMR/HW66

4.3

DPWH

ORDG Mgo

SMR/LEM

SMR/HE40

4.7

PUYE

BKBK Mgo

SMR/WOM

MU/MSC01

23.0

WHPU

DPDP Mgo

SLR/FAQU1

SMR/YB63

3.4

PUWH

YEBK Mdb

SLR/DDOL1

BPST

BWST Mdb

2019

Band combination Sex

PU/PU03

4.8

SLR/CMET1

PL/PS05

5.1

BPST

PUPU Mdb

SLR/CFOR1

SMR/HE38

9.2

DPWH

BKYE Mdb

SLR/WMON1

LF/UL18

13.5

BPST

DBWH Mdb

1Immigrant to Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton from the San Luis Rey River.

Table 14. Number of Least Bell’s Vireo territories and nests monitored at Seep and Reference sites on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [±, plus or minus]

Nests/territories Territories

Nest monitoring area type Seep

Reference

Nests (number complete)

25 (23)

69 (64)

Completed nests per pair1

1.9±0.7

1.6±0.6

Total number of nests per pair1 (includes incomplete nests)

2.1±0.5

1.7±0.8

1Does not include one territory at a Reference site that was partially monitored (one nest monitored).

Results 23 117°22'40"

117°22'30"

117°22'20"

117°22'10"

± !

ROK

BAX ACA

CRA

KTM

! 33°16'10"

ISO

! !

" "

TET !

SAG

! !

PNA

33°16'00"

CAP SMO

BOR

" "

ANZ !

EXPLANATION !

Reference site 2020 Least Bell's Vireo territories

33°15'50"

Monitored Least Bell's Vireo territory

Least Bell's Vireo territory

! Meters

! !

130

195

260

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.05 0.05

0.1 MILE

0.1 KILOMETER

Figure 8. Locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Old Treatment Ponds Reference site, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

24 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 117°23'0"

117°22'50"

117°22'40"

EXPLANATION Reference site 2020 Least Bell's Vireo territories

33°16'30"

Monitored Least Bell's Vireo territory

Least Bell's Vireo territory

Meters 0

130

195

260

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

RHI

MAL

" " " 33°16'20"

SLX

ENC

" "

RUB

OPT ARM

FRX

BGT

33°16'10"

CSAL

AMO

CRX

VIT

ROK

ISO !

SAG

0 0

0.05 0.05

0.1 MILE

0.1 KILOMETER

Figure 9. Locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Pump Road Reference site, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

Results 25 117°22'40"

117°22'30"

" ARW

117°22'20"

GAL

33°17'00"

BRM

KYL

FRO

MRY

" "

REY

PAL

JAB

33°16'50"

## # # # " # WIC SKY "

PIP ! !

" "

VAD

SMW

CHW

SLO

YOD

KNO !

! GRD

! ! ! ! !

EXPLANATION

Seep site

33°16'40"

Reference site

Seep outlet

2020 Least Bell's Vireo territories

Monitored Least Bell's Vireo territory

Least Bell's Vireo territory Meters

110

165

220

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.05 0.05

0.1 MILE 0.1 KILOMETER

Figure 10. Locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Old Treatment Pond Seep site, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

26 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 117°22'50"

33°17'10"

117°22'40"

ELR

GIM !

# "

NAZ

" "

LEG

GAN

" "

! SAU

ARA

ARW

GAL

33°17'00"

FRO

BRM

REY

MRY

" "

JAB

PIP ! !

SLO

EXPLANATION

33°16'50"

SMW

Seep site

Reference site

Proposed seep

2020 Least Bell's Vireo territories

Monitored Least Bell's Vireo territory

Least Bell's Vireo territory

! !

Meters 0

110

165

220

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.05 0.05

0.1 MILE 0.1 KILOMETER

Figure 11. Locations of monitored Least Bell’s Vireo territories at the Pump Road Seep site, treated as a Reference site in 2020, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

Results 27 Table 15. Fate of completed Least Bell’s Vireo nests in fully monitored territories at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Numbers in parentheses are proportions of total nests found]

Nest fate Successful

Number of nests Seep

Reference

Total

51 (0.59)

Failed Predation

28 (0.32)

Parasitism

0 (0.00)

Other/unknown

8 (0.09)

Total completed nests

87 (1.00)

Productivity Clutch size did not differ between the Seep site and Reference sites (table 16). However, the Seep site had a higher percentage of eggs that hatched and a higher percentage of nests with hatchlings than Reference sites. The percentage of hatchlings that fledged and the percentage of nests with hatchlings that ultimately fledged young was significantly higher at Reference sites than at the Seep site. However, pairs at Seep and Reference sites were equally likely to fledge young. Four vireo pairs at the Seep site (25 percent) and six pairs at Reference sites (15 percent) successfully double-brooded during the 2020 breeding season (appendix 6, table 6.1). Vireo pairs at Seep and Reference sites combined fledged 3.1 vireo young per pair, and 78 percent of monitored pairs were successful in fledging at least 1 young in 2020.

Daily Nest Survival Analysis of DSR showed that the model that included treatment did not improve the estimate obtained from the constant model for predicting vireo nest survival (table 17). In other words, nests at the Seep site and Reference sites in 2020 had similar daily survival rates (table 18). The second-ranked model, which included treatment (Seep) was within 2 AICc of the constant model and carried an AICc weight of 0.28, which indicated some support; however, treatment (Seep) was not considered a significant contributor to the model when examining odds ratios (95-percent confidence interval of the odds ratio included 1).

Nest Characteristics Least Bell’s Vireos used 14 plant species for nesting at Seep and Reference sites in 2020, although not all were used within each treatment (table 19). Vireos used 7 species at the Seep site and 13 species at Reference sites. Seventy-six percent of all nests (80 percent at the Seep site and 75 percent at Reference sites) were placed in arroyo willow, mule fat, or sandbar willow. At the Seep site, no vireo nests were placed in herbaceous vegetation, and 25 nests (100 percent) were placed in woody vegetation or perennial vines. At Reference sites, 5 vireo nests (7 percent) were placed in herbaceous vegetation, and 63 nests (93 percent) were placed in woody vegetation or perennial vines. Three vireo nests were built in non-native plant species (one in black mustard and two in poison hemlock) at Reference sites. In 2020, we found that successful vireo nests were in taller host plants and further from the edge (closer to the center) of host plants than unsuccessful nests at the Seep site. We found no other differences in nest placement between successful and unsuccessful nests at either the Seep site or at Reference sites (table 20). We found no difference between vireo nest placement at the Seep site versus Reference sites (table 21).

28 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Table 16. Reproductive success and productivity of nesting Least Bell’s Vireos at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [±, plus or minus; %, percent; ≥, greater than or equal to; t, t-statistic; P, probability; <, less than]

Seep site

Parameter

Reference sites

Total

Nests with eggs

Eggs laid

199

279

Average clutch size1

3.6±0.6

3.5±0.6

3.6±0.6

Hatchlings

129

202

Nests with hatchlings

Eggs2

91%

65%

72%

Nests3

96%

70%

77%

Fledglings

115

159

Hatchlings4

60%

89%

79%

Nests5

59%

90%

80%

Fledglings per egg

0.6

Hatching success

Nests with fledglings Fledging success

Average number of young fledged per pair6

3.7±2.7

2.9±2.0

3.1±2.1

Pairs fledging ≥1 young7

9, 75%

31, 79%

40, 78%

1Based on 21 Seep and 51 Reference non-parasitized nests with a full clutch

(t=0.02; P=0.89). 2Percentage of all eggs that hatched (Chi-squared=18.6, P<0.001). 3Percentage of all nests with eggs in which at least one egg hatched

(Fisher’s Exact P=0.02). 4Percentage of all hatchlings that fledged (Chi-squared=9.8, P=0.002). 5Percentage of all nests with hatchlings in which at least one young fledged

(Fisher’s Exact P=0.01). 6Based on 12 Seep and 39 Reference pairs (t=1.1, P=.30). 7Based on 12 Seep and 39 Reference pairs (Fisher’s Exact P=0.71).

Results 29 Table 17. Logistic regression models for the effect of treatment (whether a nest was in a Seep or Reference site) on nest survival of Least Bell’s Vireos on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Models are ranked from best to worst based on Akaike’s Information Criteria for small samples (AICc), change in AICc (ΔAICc), and Akaike weights. AICc is based on −2×loge likelihood and the number of parameters in the model. The constant model is the null model, which does not include covariates. Abbreviation: no., number]

Model

AICc

ΔAICc

AICc weight

No. parameters

Deviance

Constant

183.7

0.0

0.72

181.7

Treatment

185.6

1.9

0.28

181.6

Table 18. Parameter estimate (β), standard error (SE), odds ratios and 95-percent confidence intervals for models explaining daily survival rate of Least Bell’s Vireos at Seep and Reference sites on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Models are in order of best-supported to least-supported]

Effect

Odds ratio

95-percent confidence interval

Constant

3.92

0.18

50.56

32.22–72.59

Treatment

Constant

3.97

0.23

52.95

34.01–82.44

Treatment

−0.15

0.39

0.86

0.40–1.86

Model

Table 19. Host plant species used by Least Bell’s Vireos at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Numbers in parentheses are proportions of total nests within treatment types. Abbreviation: —, no data]

Host species

Number of nests Seep

Reference

Total

Arroyo or red willow

8 (0.32)

32 (0.47)

40 (0.43)

Mule fat

2 (0.08)

14 (0.21)

16 (0.17)

Sandbar willow

10 (0.40)

5 (0.07)

15 (0.16)

Blue elderberry (Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea)

2 (0.08)

7 (0.10)

9 (0.10)

Poison hemlock

—

2 (0.03)

2 (0.02)

Poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum)

1 (0.04)

1 (0.01)

2 (0.02)

Black willow

1 (0.04)

1 (0.01)

2 (0.02)

Dead herb

—

1 (0.01)

1 (0.04)

—

1 (0.01)

Wild grape (Vitus sp.)

—

1 (0.01)

Mugwort (Artemisia douglasiana)

—

1 (0.01)

Black mustard

—

1 (0.01)

Wild rose (Rosa californica)

—

1 (0.01)

Black walnut (Juglans californica)

—

1 (0.01)

California blackberry (Rubus ursinus)

30 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Table 20. Least Bell’s Vireo nest characteristics and results of student’s t-tests of successful versus unsuccessful nesting attempts at Seep and Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [n, number of nests in sample (successful, unsuccessful); t, Student’s t statistic; P, P-value; m, meter]

Nest characteristic

Nest fate Successful Unsuccessful

Seep site Average nest height (m)

1.0

0.9

13, 12

1.2

0.29

Average host height (m)

4.5

3.0

13, 12

4.4

0.05

Average distance to edge of host (m)

0.9

0.6

13, 12

3.2

0.09

Average distance to edge of clump (m)

1.7

1.3

13, 12

1.7

0.21

Reference site Average nest height (m)

1.1

1.0

37, 28

2.1

0.16

Average host height (m)

4.8

4.2

38, 30

0.8

0.38

Average distance to edge of host (m)

0.6

38, 29

0.3

0.58

Average distance to edge of clump (m)

1.8

1.5

38, 29

1.1

0.30

Table 21. Least Bell’s Vireo nest characteristics and results of Student’s t-tests of all nesting attempts at Seep versus Reference sites, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [n, number of nests in sample (Seep site, Reference site); t, Student’s t statistic; P, P-value; m, meter]

Seep

Reference

Average nest height (m)

Seep and Reference sites

1.0

25, 65

0.7

0.42

Average host height (m)

3.8

4.6

25, 68

1.6

0.21

Average distance to edge of host (m)

0.7

0.6

25, 67

1.2

0.28

Average distance to edge of clump (m)

1.5

1.7

25, 67

0.7

0.39

Discussion 31

Discussion Least Bell’s Vireo numbers have fluctuated over the past several years, manifested relatively consistently across several study areas in San Diego County, including MCBCP; the San Luis Rey River; the San Diego River; MCAS; and the Sweetwater Reservoir. The range-wide vireo population gradually increased through the 1980s and 1990s, reaching a peak in 2009–10 before declining through 2012. The population then fluctuated between 60 percent and 70 percent of peak numbers through 2017 before increasing in 2018, remaining high in 2019, and increasing again in 2020 (B. Jones, Sweetwater Environmental Biologists, Inc., unpub. data, 1985; Kus 1989a, 1989b, 1991a, 1991b, 1993, 1995; Kus and Beck, 1998; B. Kus, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2007–19; Allen and others, 2017, 2018; Ferree and Clark, 2018, 2019, 2020; Allen and Kus, 2019, 2020, 2021; Houston and others, 2021). Between 2016 and 2018, the population trends at different study areas within the vireo’s range diverged, with vireos increasing on MCBCP from 2015 to 2016, but decreasing on MCAS and on the lower San Luis Rey River and remaining stable on the middle San Luis Rey River (B. Kus, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2016). In 2017, there also was a discrepancy between sites, although in the opposite direction. By 2018, trends in vireo populations on MCBCP, the lower San Luis Rey River, the middle San Luis Rey (in areas not burned during a December 2017 fire), and at MCAS re-converged (Ferree and Clark, 2018; B. Kus, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2018). From 2019 to 2020, these sites increased by 39 percent (MCBCP), 26 percent (lower San Luis Rey River; Houston and others, 2021), 7 percent (middle San Luis Rey River; B. Kus, Allen and Kus, 2021), and 58 percent (MCAS; Ferree and Clark, 2020). There was a general decrease in vireo numbers region-wide from 2010 to 2017 that can largely be attributed to drought conditions on the breeding grounds before and during that timeframe. Low precipitation compromises primary productivity, resulting in decreased annual plant and foliage growth. Consequently, foraging substrate and nesting cover for vireos was likely compromised, as was arthropod abundance, and ultimately, the wildlife (including vireos) that depend on these resources. Rainfall during 3 of the 4 bio-years between 2016 and 2020 was 12–51 percent above the 2002–11 average (Office of Water Resources, 2020), likely positively affecting breeding productivity in 2017, 2019, and 2020 and driving an increase in the vireo populations in 2018 and 2020, and possibly in 2021. One year after the installation of the artificial seep, few differences in vegetation cover were found between the Seep site and the Reference sites; only the non-native species cover

differed between sites. Non-native cover under 1 m and above 4 m was higher at the Reference sites where it was composed mostly of herbaceous annuals, giant reed, and woody species, such as salt cedar and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp). In contrast, non-native species cover at the Seep site was lower and composed only of herbaceous species. We expected that soil moisture at the Seep site would be higher than at the Reference sites, which have not received surface water augmentation. However, average soil moisture at the Seep site was lower than at the Reference sites, and soil moisture at vegetation sampling locations near the seep outlets was similar to the average soil moisture for the entire Seep site, rather than being wetter as expected. Similarly, soil moisture did not extend far from the surface water pools created by the seep pumps within the Seep site. Whereas soil moisture 1 m from the seep pools ranged from 15 to 55 percent, at 3 m from the pools, soil moisture dropped to 0 percent at over half of the measurement locations. This steep drop in soil moisture can be attributed to the soil type, which was a high-draining sandy loam, unlikely to retain moisture at the surface without a water source. Two of the six seep pump outlets did not produce water all season (blocked or turned off), and one other outlet only began operating after June 15. Surface water was present for most of the season at three of the seep outlets and for the last part of the season at one other seep outlet. Soil moisture in the Seep site was highest in the southeastern section where flycatchers nested in 2020 (Howell and Kus, 2024). Soil moisture was also particularly high in the northern Pump Road Reference site where a potential new seep pump will be installed and where flycatchers have nested in past years. Precipitation in the 2019–20 bio-year was higher than average, and over half of this precipitation accumulated in April. The timing and amount of precipitation likely kept soil naturally wet throughout the season so that any effects from the diversion dam were not obvious. Additionally, the Conjuctive Use Project dam is designed to divert water under high-flow conditions and was only recently implemented; therefore, there likely has not been significant water diversion from the Santa Margarita River yet, adding to the persistence of natural surface water downstream. Surface water in the Santa Margarita River did not recede until early July. As a result, the increased water provided by the seep pump did not noticeably improve the availability of surface water over naturally available water. Similarly, the relative uniformity of vegetation structure, soil moisture, and vireo breeding success and productivity across monitoring sites suggests that comparisons between Seep and Reference sites were less meaningful than comparisons of these parameters from year to year, or of future potential divergence in these parameters among sites with changing weather conditions.

32 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report In 2020, we continued to see vireos that originated outside of MCBCP moving on to Base and holding territories. Five first-year vireos moved to MCBCP from the San Luis Rey River, where they hatched in 2019. Two 3-year old vireos and one 4-year-old vireo were detected on MCBCP in 2020 for the first time after they were banded on the San Luis Rey River in 2018 and 2016. Conversely, one vireo that hatched on MCBCP in 2019 was detected off Base. In 2020, we resighted two vireos on MCBCP that were originally banded in Baja California Sur, on the wintering grounds; one of these Baja vireos was also detected on Base in 2019. These movements demonstrate the ability of vireos to disperse well beyond their natal drainages. Incidental observations of vireos in areas that typically have not been thoroughly surveyed help to enhance our understanding of movements of both adult and dispersing juvenile vireos. Further banding and resighting of vireos within southern California and Baja California Sur continues to increase our understanding of the extent of movement between populations and during migration and the role such movements play in maintaining genetic diversity and persistence in these populations. Continued monitoring of cohorts banded as nestlings provides the opportunity to collect lifetime reproductive data for a segment of the population, facilitating identification of age- and possibly sex-related patterns in life history characteristics that affect population size, productivity, and genetic structure.

Conclusions Until 2011, the vireo population on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCBCP) tracked the overall increase in Least Bell’s Vireos in southern California since the late 1970s (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006). Since its peak in 2010, the vireo population on Camp Pendleton reached a 21-year low in 2015 and then rebounded in 2018 to the fifth highest count recorded. Extrapolating the number of vireos counted in core areas on MCBCP in 2020 to the entire Base, the Base-wide vireo population in 2020 was likely the highest on record. High productivity in 2017 and 2019 had a strong effect on the number of vireos that returned in 2018 and 2020. The increasing trend in the vireo population in the 1980s and 1990s can largely be attributed to management actions, including control of Brown-headed Cowbirds and protection and restoration of riparian habitat. On MCBCP, annual Brown-headed Cowbird control has reduced cowbird parasitism to a negligible level since the mid-1990s, releasing a major limit on vireo breeding productivity. Although two vireo nests were parasitized by cowbirds in 2018, no cowbird parasitism was recorded on MCBCP in 2019 or 2020. Cowbird control has a demonstrably positive effect on vireo productivity (Kus, 1999, Kus and Whitfield, 2005), but must be consistently practiced to maintain the desired reduction in parasitism.

The recent fluctuations in the vireo population may be a consequence of a variety of interacting factors including wildfire (affecting apparent population size, distribution, and habitat-related nesting productivity and predation), drought (affecting breeding productivity and survival), high floodwaters, and the inherent carrying capacity of the current habitat (whether breeding, migratory, or wintering). These factors are difficult to parse and are subject to change as a result of natural (for example, weather) and anthropogenic (for example, habitat alteration or restoration) processes, making future population trends difficult to predict. The seep pump at the Old Treatment Ponds did not have a noticeable effect on vegetation or vireo breeding and productivity in 2020, likely at least partially as a result of high precipitation in the preceding bio-year, soil type in the vicinity of the seep outlets, non-operation of two or three of the six seep outlets, and the short time since completion of the water diversion dam. Non-operation of the seep outlets will need to be corrected to provide full utility to the currently installed pump. Other factors, such as precipitation and operation of the water diversion dam, were temporal and will likely change in the future, allowing determination of whether or not the seep pumps can compensate for a lowered water table and less precipitation. It is also possible that the seep pumps were not installed in an ideal location, and it is worth considering moving the pump to a more water-receptive location (topographic depression or dry drainage, less well-draining soil type) that might maintain surface water and soil moisture in a larger area. Alternatively, if the seep pumps only affect a small area, more seep pumps or more outlets would allow surface water augmentation over a larger area. Whereas we did not document catastrophic wildfires on Base in 2020, it is worth continued vigilance surrounding military and civilian activities on Base to avoid causing wildfires during the frequent high-wildfire-risk weather conditions in southern California. The wildfires that occurred in October 2013 and May 2014 were sparked by a combination of circumstances, including the on-going drought, strong east winds that carried dry, hot air from the deserts, human activity (for example, vehicles with hot engines parked on dry grass), and electrical infrastructure failure as a result of strong winds (S. Sullivan, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, written commun., 2014). Other smaller fires on Base also have been ignited by military training involving the use of equipment that can ignite fires (for example, gunfire, vehicles with hot engines parked on dry grass; S. Sullivan, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, written commun., 2014). Although most of these circumstances were beyond immediate human control, catastrophic events like wildfires highlight the delicate tipping point that can easily be upset by normally innocuous human activities. These events can adversely affect vireo populations in the short-term and potentially long-term, causing direct mortality during the breeding season, destroying habitat during any time of the year, and possibly causing long-term changes in vegetation structure and composition and consequently a reduction in high quality breeding habitat for vireos.

33 Direct human impacts on vireo habitat were not documented in 2020, although continued attention to other potential activities (for example, weed control, off-road vehicle traffic) would provide documentation to assist in developing management actions to preserve and enhance vireo habitat. Closing high-speed roads in vireo habitat during vireo breeding season and prohibiting the use of firearms during dry, windy weather could minimize the chances of human-caused wildfires that damage and destroy vireo breeding habitat. Communication among personnel may reduce the instances of human-related impacts to vireos and occupied vireo habitat by allowing all participants to understand needs and flexibilities and adjust their activities accordingly. For instance, impacts to vireos and vireo habitat can be minimized when military training exercises and maintenance activities, such as clearing vegetation, are limited to outside the vireo breeding season or to areas not occupied by vireos. Improved understanding of factors influencing vireos and vireo habitat will provide managers with the improved scientific knowledge necessary to maintain a balance between the sometimes competing land uses on Base, including military activities, recreation, habitat protection, and endangered species management.

References Cited Allen, L.D., Howell, S.L., and Kus, B.E., 2017, Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Middle San Luis Rey River, San Diego, southern California—2016 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1065, 11 p., accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1065. Allen, L.D., Howell, S.L., and Kus, B.E., 2018, Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Middle San Luis Rey River, San Diego, southern California—2017 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1082, 12 p., accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1082.

Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2021, Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Middle San Luis Rey River, San Diego, southern California—2020 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1134, 11 p., accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1134. Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R., 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference—A practical information-theoretic approach (2d ed.): New York, N.Y., Springer-Verlag. Daubenmire, R.F., 1959, Canopy coverage method of vegetation analysis: Northwest Science, v. 33, p. 43–64. [Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/b97636.] Dinsmore, S.J., White, G.C., and Knopf, F.L., 2002, Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival: Ecology, v. 83, no. 12, p. 3476–3488. [Available at https://doi.org/10.1890/ 0012-9658(2002)083[3476:ATFMAN]2.0.CO;2.] Ferree, K., and Clark, K.B., 2018, Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher surveys and nest monitoring at Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, California, 2018—Final report: Prepared for Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, Calif., October 16, 2018. Ferree, K., and Clark, K.B., 2019, Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher surveys and nest monitoring at Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, California, 2019—Final report: Prepared for Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, Calif., October 31, 2019. Ferree, K., and Clark, K.B., 2020, Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher surveys and nest monitoring at Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, California, 2020—Final report: Prepared for Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, Calif., September 3, 2020. Franzreb, K.E., 1989, Ecology and conservation of the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, v. 89, no. 1, 17 p. [Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA322886.pdf.]

Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2019, Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Middle San Luis Rey River, San Diego, southern California—2018 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1109, 12 p., accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1109.

Houston, A., Allen, L.D., Pottinger, R.E., and Kus, B.E., 2021, Least Bell's Vireos and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers at the San Luis Rey flood risk management project area in San Diego County, California—Breeding activities and habitat use—2020 annual report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2021–1053, 67 p., accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211053.

Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2020, Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Middle San Luis Rey River, San Diego, southern California—2019 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1122, 11 p., accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1122.

Howell, S., and Kus, B.E., 2015, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2015 data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 89 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_ 187_659c377866e97.]

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Howell, S., and Kus, B.E., 2016, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2016 data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 87 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_ 187_659c42972d23a.] Howell, S., and Kus, B.E., 2017, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2017 data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 73 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_ 187_659c77c0ba635.] Howell, S., Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2018, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2018 data summary: Restricted-File Federal Interagency Report, Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 106 p. Howell, S., Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2020, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2019 data summary: Restricted-File Federal Interagency Report, Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Howell, S.L., and Kus, B.E., 2024, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 annual report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2024–1005, 35 p., available at https://doi.org/10.3133.ofr20241005. Kus, B.E., 1989a, Status and management of the Least Bell’s Vireo at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California, 1988: San Diego, Calif., Report for the State of California Department of Transportation, District 11, U.S. Geological Survey report, 32 p. [Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/96319.] Kus, B.E., 1989b, Status of the Least Bell’s Vireo at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California 1989: San Diego, Calif., Report for the State of California Department of Transportation, District 11, U.S. Geological Survey report, 15 p. [Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/96327.]

Kus, B.E., 1991a, Status of the Least Bell’s Vireo at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California 1990: San Diego, Calif., Report for the State of California Department of Transportation, District 11, U.S. Geological Survey report, 10 p. [Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/96803.] Kus, B.E., 1991b, Distribution and breeding status of the Least Bell’s Vireo at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California 1991: San Diego, Calif., Report for the State of California Department of Transportation, District 11, U.S. Geological Survey report, 15 p. [Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/96802.] Kus, B.E., 1993, Distribution and breeding status of the Least Bell’s Vireo at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California 1992–1993: San Diego, Calif., Report for the State of California Department of Transportation, District 11, U.S. Geological Survey report, 29 p. [Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/96644.] Kus, B.E., 1995, Distribution and breeding status of the Least Bell’s Vireo at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California 1994: San Diego, Calif., Report for the State of California Department of Transportation, District 11, U.S. Geological Survey report, 25 p. [Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/96591.] Kus, B.E., 1998, Use of restored riparian habitat by the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus): Restoration Ecology, v. 6, no. 1, p. 75–82. [Available at https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1998.06110.x.] Kus, B.E., 1999, Impacts of Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism on the productivity of the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo: Studies in Avian Biology, v. 18, p. 160–166. [Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 260363840_Impacts_of_Brown-headed_Cowbird_ parasitism_on_productivity_of_the_endangered_Least_ Bell's_Vireo.] Kus, B.E., and Beck, P.P., 1998, Distribution and abundance of the Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and the Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) at selected Southern California sites in 1997: Sacramento, Calif., California Department of Fish and Game, 76 p. [Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260364086.] Kus, B.E., and Whitfield, M.J., 2005, Parasitism, productivity, and population growth—Response of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) to cowbird (Molothrus spp.) control: Ornithological Monographs, v. 57, p. 16–27. [Available at https://doi.org/10.2307/40166811.]

35 Kus, B.E., Hopp, S.L., Johnson, R.R., and Brown, B.T., 2020, Bell's Vireo (Vireo bellii), version 1.0. in Poole, A.F., ed., Birds of the world: Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell Lab of Ornithology, accessed July 17, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.belvir.01.

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2009, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2008 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.

Laake, J.L., 2013, RMark—An R interface for analysis of capture-recapture data with MARK: Seattle, Wash., Alaska Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 2013-01, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, 25 p.

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2010a, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2009 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.

Lynn, S., Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2014, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2014 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 118 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c77c0ba635.]

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2010b, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2010 annual data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 100 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c64ceb460c.]

Lynn, S., Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2015, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2015 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 105 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c7a6f10976.]

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2011, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2011 annual data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 78 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c66c5958a6.]

Lynn, S., Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2016, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2016 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 107 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c7c771dd08.]

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2012, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2012 annual data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 84 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c693778eeb.]

Lynn, S., Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2017, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2017 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 110 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_ article.php?cid=SDMMP_CID_187_659c7fc35fb5d.]

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2013, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2013 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 88 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_article.php?cid= SDMMP_CID_187_659c6d80ea94f.]

Lynn, S., Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2018, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2018 annual report: Restricted-File Federal Interagency Report, Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.

Office of Water Resources, 2020, Lake O’Neill Station precipitation summary: Camp Pendleton, Calif., Prepared for the Assistant Chief of Staff, Facilities, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.

Lynn, S., Allen, L.D., and Kus, B.E., 2020, Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2019 annual report: Restricted-File Federal Interagency Report, Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.

R Core Team, 2020, R—A language and environment for statistical computing: Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, accessed July 17, 2023, at http://www.R-project.org.

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, 2004, The riparian bird conservation plan—A strategy for reversing the decline of riparian associated birds in California, version 2.0: California Partners in Flight, Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, accessed July 7, 2023, at http://www.elkhornsloughctp.org/ uploads/files/1381276129Riparain%20Joint%20Ventur e%202004%20Riparian_Bird_Conservation_Plan.pdf. Rourke, J.W., and Kus, B.E., 2006, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2005 annual report: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Rourke, J.W., and Kus, B.E., 2007, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2006 annual data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, U.S. Geological Survey 2005 Annual Report, 50 p. Rourke, J.W., and Kus, B.E., 2008, Distribution, abundance, and breeding activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2007 annual data summary: Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, U.S. Geological Survey Annual Data Summary, 68 p. [Available at https://sdmmp.com/view_article.php? cid=CID_ctamanah%40usgs.gov_5751c384040a9.] Rourke, J.W., Kus, B.E., and Whitfield, M.J., 2004, Distribution and abundance of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at selected southern California sites in 2001: Sacramento, Calif., Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, Species Conservation and Recovery Program Report 2004–05, U.S. Geological Survey Final Report, 60 p. [Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311067108.]

U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Science, 2020, Gridded soil survey geographic (gSSURGO) by State—California: Geospatial data gateway, accessed July 17, 2023, at https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/GDGHome.aspx. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants—Determination of endangered status for the Least Bell’s Vireo: Federal Register, v. 51, no. 85, p. 16474–16482. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1995, Biological opinion (1-6-95-F-02)—Programmatic activities and conservation plans in riparian and estuarine/beach ecosystems on Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton: Carlsbad, Calif., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office, 270 p. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998, Draft recovery plan for the Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus): Portland, Oreg., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001, Least Bell’s Vireo survey guidelines: Carlsbad, Calif., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Internal memorandum, 3 p., accessed November 8, 2022, at https://www.fws.gov/media/survey-guidelines- least-bells-vireo. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006, Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) 5-year review summary and evaluation: Carlsbad, Calif., Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 26 p. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2016, Formal section 7 consultation on the Conjunctive Use Project, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. White, G.C., and Burnham, K.P., 1999, Program MARK—Survival estimation from populations of marked animals: Bird Study, v. 46, no. S1, p. S120–S139, accessed August 31, 2023, at https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477239.

Appendix 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Survey Areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020

Appendix 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Survey Areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 117°22'00" 33°26'00"

117°20'00"

117°18'00"

117°16'00"

± De Luz Creek

33°24'00"

Roblar Creek

33°22'00"

Basilone and Roblar Roads Santa Santa Margarita Margarita River River

Fallbrook Creek

33°20'00"

Lake O'Neill

33°18'00"

EXPLANATION Survey areas Core

Group C

Group A

Group D

Group B

Group E

Water diversion dam

33°16'00"

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

1 1

2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.1. Least Bell’s Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Upper Santa Margarita River, Fallbrook Creek, Lake O’Neill, De Luz Creek, Roblar Creek, and Basilone and Roblar Roads. Core areas and Group A areas were surveyed in 2020.

38 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 117°26'00"

117°24'00"

117°22'00"

± 33°18'00"

22 Area Aliso Creek Pueblitos Canyon 33°16'00"

French Creek

Newton Canyon Santa Margarita River

Cockleburr Canyon

33°14'00"

Tuley Canyon

EXPLANATION Survey areas

33°12'00"

Core

Group C

Group A

Group D

Group B

Group E

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

1 1

2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.2. Least Bell’s Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Lower Santa Margarita River, 22 Area, Pueblitos Canyon, Tuley Canyon, Newton Canyon, Cockleburr Canyon, French Creek, and Aliso Creek.

Appendix 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Survey Areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 39 117°28'00"

117°26'00"

117°24'00"

San Onofre Creek 33°22'00"

Horno Canyon

33°20'00"

Piedra de Lumbre Creek

Las Flores Creek

33°18'00"

Hidden Canyon

EXPLANATION Survey areas

33°16'00"

Core

Group D

Group B

Group E

Group C Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

1 1

2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.3. Least Bell’s Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: San Onofre Creek South Fork, Ammunition Supply Point, Horno Canyon, Piedra de Lumbre Canyon, Las Flores Creek, and Hidden Canyon.

40 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 117°36'00"

117°34'00"

117°32'00"

117°30'00"

117°28'00"

Talega Canyon 33°28'00"

Cristianitos Creek

33°26'00"

San Mateo Creek 33°24'00"

San Onofre Creek 33°22'00"

EXPLANATION Survey areas

33°20'00"

Core

Group D

Group B

Group E

Group C Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

1 1

2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.4. Least Bell’s Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Talega Canyon, Cristianitos Creek, San Mateo Creek, and San Onofre Creek.

Appendix 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Survey Areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 41 117°32'00"

117°30'00"

117°28'00"

33°30'00"

33°28'00"

San Mateo Creek

33°26'00"

EXPLANATION

33°24'00"

Survey areas

Core

Group C

Group B

Group D

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

1 1

2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.5. Least Bell’s Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Upper San Mateo Creek.

42 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report 117°22'00"

117°20'00"

117°18'00"

± 33°20'00"

De Luz Homes

33°18'00"

Pilgrim Creek

Ysidora Basin to Windmill Canyon 33°16'00"

Windmill Canyon

EXPLANATION Water diversion dam Survey areas 33°14'00"

Core

Group C

Group A

Group E

Group B Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

1 1

2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.6. Least Bell’s Vireo survey areas at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Windmill Canyon, Ysidora Basin to Windmill Canyon, Pilgrim Creek, and De Luz Homes Habitat.

Appendix 2. Vegetation Sampling Locations, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 43

Appendix 2. Vegetation Sampling Locations, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 Table 2.1. Vegetation sampling locations, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.

Table 2.1. Vegetation sampling locations, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued

[WGS 84, World Geodic System of 1984]

Site

Longitude

Latitude

Datum

Territory

Site

Longitude

Latitude

Datum

ACA

Reference

−117.37270

33.27076

WGS 84

KYL

Seep

−117.37491

33.28338

WGS 84

AMO

Reference

−117.38093

33.27226

WGS 84

LEG

Reference

−117.38041

33.28372

WGS 84

ANZ

Reference

−117.37439

33.26583

WGS 84

MAL

Reference

−117.37954

33.27425

WGS 84

ARM

Reference

−117.37962

33.26943

WGS 84

MRY

Reference

−117.37736

33.28217

WGS 84

ARW

Reference

−117.37748

33.28417

WGS 84

NAZ

Reference

−117.38062

33.28485

WGS 84

BGT

Reference

−117.37900

33.27067

WGS 84

OPT

Reference

−117.38113

33.27002

WGS 84

BAX

Reference

−117.37310

33.27069

WGS 84

PAL

Seep

−117.37490

33.28229

WGS 84

BRM

Reference

−117.37743

33.28330

WGS 84

PNA

Reference

−117.37343

33.26779

WGS 84

BOR

Reference

−117.37515

33.26664

WGS 84

PIP

Reference

−117.37748

33.28150

WGS 84

CAP

Reference

−117.37401

33.26671

WGS 84

Rey

Seep

−117.37532

33.28202

WGS 84

CRX

Reference

−117.37779

33.27363

WGS 84

RHI

Reference

−117.37928

33.27482

WGS 84

CHW

Seep

−117.37450

33.28148

WGS 84

ROK

Reference

−117.37613

33.27038

WGS 84

CRA

Reference

−117.37489

33.27019

WGS 84

SAG

Reference

−117.37586

33.26837

WGS 84

ELR

Reference

−117.38063

33.28614

WGS 84

SLX

Reference

−117.38044

33.27277

WGS 84

ENC

Reference

−117.38119

33.27141

WGS 84

CSAL

Reference

−117.37839

33.27313

WGS 84

Reference

−117.37750

33.28504

WGS 84

Territory

FRX

Reference

−117.37845

33.27105

WGS 84

FRO

Reference

−117.37900

33.28217

WGS 84

SKY

Seep

−117.37400

33.28227

WGS 84

GAL

Reference

−117.37887

33.28350

WGS 84

SMO

Reference

−117.37364

33.26673

WGS 84

GAN

Reference

−117.37868

33.28435

WGS 84

SLO

Seep

−117.37587

33.28104

WGS 84

GIM

Reference

−117.37950

33.28569

WGS 84

TET

Reference

−117.37494

33.26848

WGS 84

GRD

Seep

−117.37526

33.27944

WGS 84

VAD

Seep

−117.37380

33.28310

WGS 84

JAB

Seep

−117.37580

33.28194

WGS 84

VIT

Reference

−117.37852

33.27013

WGS 84

KTM

Reference

−117.37252

33.27024

WGS 84

WIC

Seep

−117.37356

33.28191

WGS 84

KNO

Seep

−117.37427

33.28058

WGS 84

YOD

Seep

−117.37467

33.28060

WGS 84

44 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Pendleton Seep Vegetation Data Form — 2020 Observer(s): _____________ Date: % Cover CODE

1-10% 1

2020 Drainage: ______________ 11-25% 2

26-50% 3

Plot ID: _______________

51-75% 4

76-90% 5

>90% 6

Center Plot Height

Overall Foliage Cover

Exotics Cover

Species 1

Sp. 1 % Cover

Species 2

Sp. 2 % Cover

Species 3

Sp. 3 % Cover

All Other

0-1 m 1-2 m 2-3 m 3-4 m 4-5 m 5-6 m >6 m GPS Coordinates

Canopy Height:

Soil Moisture: Comments:

Satellite Plots (15m from Center Plot) 0 Degrees Plot Height

Overall Foliage Cover

Exotics Cover

Species 1

Sp. 1 % Cover

Species 2

Sp. 2 % Cover

Species 3

Sp. 3 % Cover

All Other

0-1 m 1-2 m 2-3 m 3-4 m 4-5 m 5-6 m >6 m GPS Coordinates

Soil Moisture: Comments:

Figure 2.1. Pendleton Seep Vegetation Data Form—2020.

Canopy Height:

Appendix 2. Vegetation Sampling Locations, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 45 Pendleton Seep Vegetation Data Form — 2020 Observer(s): _____________ Date: % Cover CODE

1-10% 1

2020 Drainage: ______________ 11-25% 2

26-50% 3

Plot ID: _____________

51-75% 4

76-90% 5

>90% 6

120 Degrees Plot Height

Overall Foliage Cover

Exotics Cover

Species 1

Sp. 1 % Cover

Species 2

Sp. 2 % Cover

Species 3

Sp. 3 % Cover

All Other

0-1 m 1-2 m 2-3 m 3-4 m 4-5 m 5-6 m >6 m GPS Coordinates

Canopy Height:

Soil Moisture: Comments:

240 Degrees Plot Height

Overall Foliage Cover

Exotics

Species 1

Sp. 1 % Cover

Species 2

Sp. 2 % Cover

Species 3

Sp. 3 % Cover

All Other

0-1 m 1-2 m 2-3 m 3-4 m 4-5 m 5-6 m >6 m GPS Coordinates Soil Moisture: Comments:

Figure 2.1.—Continued

Canopy Height:

46 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE

0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.1. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: De Luz Creek.

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 47

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo # Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.2. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Santa Margarita River and Lake O’Neill.

48 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo # Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Santa Margarita River.

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 49

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo #

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.4. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Santa Margarita River and Pueblitos Canyon.

50 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo # Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.5. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Santa Margarita River and Ysidora Basin.

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 51

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.6. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Cockleburr Canyon.

52 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.7. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Lower Pilgrim Creek.

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 53

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo #

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.8. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Aliso Creek.

54 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo #

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.9. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Lower Las Flores Creek.

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 55

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo # Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE 0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.10. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Upper Las Flores Creek.

56 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo #

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE

0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.11. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: Lower San Onofre Creek and Lower San Mateo Creek.

Appendix 3. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 57

EXPLANATION 2020 Detections

Least Bell's Vireo territory

# Transient Least Bell's Vireo #

Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station

0 0

0.25 0.25

0.5 MILE

0.5 KILOMETER

Figure 3.12. Locations of Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020: San Onofre Creek (West).

58 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Appendix 4. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 Table 4.1. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Band colors: OROR, plastic orange; PUOR, plastic purple-orange split; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; BKBK, plastic black; PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; DBWH, plastic dark blue-white split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; DBDP, plastic dark blue-dark pink split; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; PUPU, plastic purple; BWST, plastic dark blue-white striped; YEYE, plastic yellow; YEPU, plastic yellow-purple split; ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; BYST, plastic black-yellow striped; gogo, metal gold; Mye, yellow numbered metal band; WHDB, plastic white-dark blue split; pupu, metal purple; WHWH, plastic white; Msi, silver numbered federal band. Sex: M, male; F, female. Location codes in comments: DL MAPS, De Luz MAPS; SMR, Santa Margarita River; SM MAPS, Santa Margarita MAPS Station; SLR, San Luis Rey River; MCAS, Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton. All other 3-letter codes are territory designations. Abbreviations: ≥, greater than or equal to; —, no bands observed; ?, band status unknown]

Sex

Band combination Left leg

Right leg

Age, in years

Comments De Luz Creek

OROR

PUOR Mgo

≥4

Banded as an adult at LEM in 2017.

DPWH Mgo

BPST

≥3

Banded as an adult at DL MAPS in 2018.

ORDG

BKYE Mgo

≥3

Banded as an adult at WOM in 2018.

PUWH Mgo

BKBK

Banded as an adult at AH01 in 2018.

PUWH Mgo

BPST

≥2

Banded as an adult at ERM in 2019.

PUYE

WHDP Mgo

≥2

Banded as an adult at IMP in 2019.

—

Mgo

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SMR before 2020.

—

Mgo

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SMR before 2020. Fallbrook Creek

DGOR

BPST Mgo

Banded as a nestling at KHA in 2017.

DPDP

BPST Mgo

Banded as a nestling at HDX in 2019. Las Flores Creek

BPST

DBWH Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2019.

YEBK

BKBK Mgo

Banded as a juvenile at SM MAPS in 2019.

BKBK

DBDP Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2017.

WHPU Mdb

DPWH

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2018.

—

Mdb

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SLR before 2020.

BPST

PUPU Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2019.

BPST

BWST Mdb

ORDG Mgo

YEYE

Banded as a nestling at ONX in 2012.

YEPU Mdb

YEYE

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2012.

WHDP

WHDP Mgo

Banded as a nestling at CKI in 2013.

ORDG

PUOR Mgo

≥6

Banded as an adult at UNI in 2015.

ORPU Mgo

ORPU

≥6

Banded as an adult at DRO in 2015.

WHDP

ORDG Mgo

≥6

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2015.

WHPU Mgo

—

≥6

Banded as an adult at HOL in 2015.

YEPU

ORDG Mgo

≥5

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2016.

ORDG Mgo

WHPU

≥5

Banded as an adult at LNS in 2016.

Pilgrim Creek

Pueblitos Creek Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2019. Santa Margarita River

Appendix 4. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 59 Table 4.1. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued [Band colors: OROR, plastic orange; PUOR, plastic purple-orange split; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; BKBK, plastic black; PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; DBWH, plastic dark blue-white split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; DBDP, plastic dark blue-dark pink split; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; PUPU, plastic purple; BWST, plastic dark blue-white striped; YEYE, plastic yellow; YEPU, plastic yellow-purple split; ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; BYST, plastic black-yellow striped; gogo, metal gold; Mye, yellow numbered metal band; WHDB, plastic white-dark blue split; pupu, metal purple; WHWH, plastic white; Msi, silver numbered federal band. Sex: M, male; F, female. Location codes in comments: DL MAPS, De Luz MAPS; SMR, Santa Margarita River; SM MAPS, Santa Margarita MAPS Station; SLR, San Luis Rey River; MCAS, Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton. All other 3-letter codes are territory designations. Abbreviations: ≥, greater than or equal to; —, no bands observed; ?, band status unknown]

Sex

Band combination Left leg

Right leg

Age, in years

Comments

Santa Margarita River—Continued F

BPST

DPDP Mgo

Banded as a nestling at ARI in 2015.

ORDG

BKBK Mgo

Banded as a nestling at KNG in 2015.

ORDG

YEYE Mgo

Banded as a nestling at KOA in 2015.

WHDP

ORPU Mgo

Banded as a nestling at HDX in 2015.

YEPU

DPWH Mgo

Banded as a nestling at MCAS in 2015.

OROR

DPDP Mgo

≥4

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2017.

BYST

PUOR Mgo

≥4

Banded as an adult at ARY in 2017.

OROR

ORPU Mgo

≥4

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2017.

PUWH gogo

Mye

≥4

Banded as an adult in Miraflores, Baja California Sur in 2017.

WHDP

—

≥4

Banded as an adult at MOR in 2017.

WHPU Mgo

ORDG

≥4

Banded as an adult at PEP in 2017.

YEYE

Mgo

≥4

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2017.

WHDB Mdb

WHDB

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2016.

DPWH Mgo

DGOR

Banded as a nestling at UNI in 2016.

YEYE Mdb

pupu

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2016.

YEYE

YEPU Mgo

≥3

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2018.

—

BPST

≥3

Banded as an adult at CED in 2018.

PUWH Mgo

BYST

≥3

Banded as an adult at FAU in 2018.

BKBK

WHPU Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2017.

BKYE

YEYE Mgo

Banded as a nestling at MOR in 2017.

—

WHPU

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2018.

BPST

ORDG Mgo

Banded as a nestling at BAD in 2017.

BPST

OROR Mgo

Banded as a nestling at ZYL in 2017.

BPST

WHWH Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2017.

BYST

PUWH Mgo

Banded as a nestling at ZAM in 2017.

ORDG

BPST Mgo

Banded as a nestling at MOU in 2017.

ORDG

ORPU Mgo

Banded as a nestling at KOA in 2017.

ORDG

YEBK Mgo

Banded as a nestling at KNG in 2017.

OROR

YEPU Mgo

Banded as a nestling at DAQ in 2017.

YEYE

PUOR Mgo

Banded as a nestling at BRU in 2017.

BKBK

ORPU Msi

≥2

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2019.

BKYE Mgo

DPDP

≥2

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2019.

BKBK

ORDG Msi

≥2

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2019.

BKYE

WHWH Mgo

≥2

Banded as an adult at BAE in 2019.

BPST

BKYE Mye

≥2

Banded as an adult in Miraflores, Baja California Sur in 2019.

60 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Table 4.1. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued [Band colors: OROR, plastic orange; PUOR, plastic purple-orange split; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; BKBK, plastic black; PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; DBWH, plastic dark blue-white split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; DBDP, plastic dark blue-dark pink split; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; PUPU, plastic purple; BWST, plastic dark blue-white striped; YEYE, plastic yellow; YEPU, plastic yellow-purple split; ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; BYST, plastic black-yellow striped; gogo, metal gold; Mye, yellow numbered metal band; WHDB, plastic white-dark blue split; pupu, metal purple; WHWH, plastic white; Msi, silver numbered federal band. Sex: M, male; F, female. Location codes in comments: DL MAPS, De Luz MAPS; SMR, Santa Margarita River; SM MAPS, Santa Margarita MAPS Station; SLR, San Luis Rey River; MCAS, Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton. All other 3-letter codes are territory designations. Abbreviations: ≥, greater than or equal to; —, no bands observed; ?, band status unknown]

Sex

Band combination Left leg

Right leg

Age, in years

Comments

Santa Margarita River—Continued M

BPST

PUOR Mgo

≥2

Banded as an adult at MER in 2019.

DPWH Mgo

PUOR

≥2

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2019.

pupu

BKYE Mgo

≥2

Banded as an adult at RNR in 2019.

WHPU

WHPU Mgo

≥2

Banded as an adult at HLD in 2019.

WHPU

WHWH Mgo

≥2

Banded as an adult at ZUS in 2019.

BKBK Mgo

BPST

Banded as a nestling at DRO in 2018.

DPDP Mdb

BPST

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2018.

—

BPST

Banded as a nestling at LEM in 2018.

DPWH

BPST Mgo

Banded as an adult at MOU in 2019.

PUOR

BKYE Mgo

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2019.

WHPU

YEBK Mgo

Banded as an adult at ARL in 2019.

WHPU Mgo

WHPU

Banded as a nestling at DAQ in 2018.

WHPU Mgo

YEPU

Banded as a nestling at ARY in 2018.

YEPU Mgo

DPWH

Banded as a nestling at BIL in 2018.

—

Mdb

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SLR before 2020.

—

Mgo

≥1

Banded as a nestling at MCBCP before 2020.

BPST

Mgo

≥1

Banded as an adult at ARW in 2020.

BPST Mgo

WHPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at RHI in 2020.

BPST Mgo

YEYE

≥1

Banded as an adult at BRM in 2020.

Mgo

—

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SMR before 2020.

Mgo

—

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SMR before 2020.

Mgo

YEYE pupu

≥1

Banded as an adult at FRO in 2020.

pupu

BKYE Mgo

≥1

Banded as an adult at MRY in 2020.

PUWH Msi

—

≥1

Banded at age unknown at an unknown location before 2020.

—

Mgo

≥1

Banded as a nestling on the SMR before 2020.

—

Msi

≥1

Banded as a juvenile at an unknown location before 2020.

ORDG Mgo

≥1

Banded at age unknown on the SMR before 2020.

BKBK

Mgo

≥1

Banded as an adult at FRO in 2020.

DGOR

Mgo

≥1

Banded as an adult at SMW in 2020.

DGOR Mgo

YEYE

≥1

Banded as an adult at SAU in 2020.

DPWH Mgo

BYST

≥1

Banded as an adult at SHD in 2020.

Mgo

DPWH

≥1

Banded as an adult at CAP in 2020.

Mgo

ORPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at CRA in 2020.

Appendix 4. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 61 Table 4.1. Banded Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued [Band colors: OROR, plastic orange; PUOR, plastic purple-orange split; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; BKBK, plastic black; PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; DBWH, plastic dark blue-white split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; DBDP, plastic dark blue-dark pink split; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; PUPU, plastic purple; BWST, plastic dark blue-white striped; YEYE, plastic yellow; YEPU, plastic yellow-purple split; ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; BYST, plastic black-yellow striped; gogo, metal gold; Mye, yellow numbered metal band; WHDB, plastic white-dark blue split; pupu, metal purple; WHWH, plastic white; Msi, silver numbered federal band. Sex: M, male; F, female. Location codes in comments: DL MAPS, De Luz MAPS; SMR, Santa Margarita River; SM MAPS, Santa Margarita MAPS Station; SLR, San Luis Rey River; MCAS, Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton. All other 3-letter codes are territory designations. Abbreviations: ≥, greater than or equal to; —, no bands observed; ?, band status unknown]

Sex

Band combination Left leg

Right leg

Age, in years

Comments

Santa Margarita River—Continued M

Mgo

PUPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at GAN in 2020.

Mgo

PUWH

≥1

Banded as an adult at SKY in 2020.

Msi

—

≥1

Banded as a nestling at MCAS before 2020.

Msi

—

≥1

Banded as a nestling at MCAS before 2020.

ORDG Mgo

ORDG

≥1

Banded as an adult at KTM in 2020.

ORDG Mgo

YEPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at MAL in 2020.

OROR Mgo

BPST

≥1

Banded as an adult at KNO in 2020.

PUOR Mgo

YEPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at GAL in 2020.

PUOR Mgo

YEYE

≥1

Banded as an adult at RHI in 2020.

pupu

PUOR Mgo

≥1

Banded as an adult at AMO in 2020.

PUWH Mgo

BKYE

≥1

Banded as an adult at SLO in 2020.

PUYE

OROR Mgo

≥1

Banded as an adult at TET in 2020.

PUYE Mgo

WHPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at SLX in 2020.

WHDP Mgo

WHPU

≥1

Banded as an adult at PIP in 2020.

WHWH Mgo

pupu

≥1

Banded as an adult at ACA in 2020.

WHWH Mgo

WHDP

≥1

Banded as an adult at CHW in 2020.

YEBK Mgo

ORDG

≥1

Banded as an adult at VAD in 2020.

YEYE Mgo

pupu

≥1

Banded as an adult at KYL in 2020.

DPWH

BKYE Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2019.

WHDP

BPST Mgo

Banded as a nestling at GEN in 2019.

YEYE pupu

Mgo

Banded as a nestling at FUR in 2019.

—

Msi

Banded as an adult at SM MAPS in 2020.

BPST

WHPU Mgo

Banded as a juvenile at SM MAPS in 2019.

DPWH

ORDG Mgo

Banded as a nestling at TEN in 2019.

ORDG

DGOR Mgo

Banded as a nestling at HTI in 2019.

ORPU

Mgo

Banded as a nestling at DRO in 2019.

ORPU pupu

Mgo

Banded as a nestling at MER in 2019.

PUWH

YEBK Mdb

Banded as a nestling on the SLR in 2019.

PUYE

BKBK Mgo

Banded as a nestling at LEM in 2019.

PUYE

DPWH Mgo

Banded as a juvenile at SM MAPS in 2019.

PUYE

WHPU Mgo

Banded as a juvenile at SM MAPS in 2019.

WHPU Mgo

YEBK

Banded as a juvenile at SM MAPS in 2019.

62 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Appendix 5. Between-Year Movement of Adult Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 Table 5.1. Between-year movement of adult Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Drainage codes: SMR, Santa Margarita River; DL, De Luz Creek; SM MAPS, Santa Margarita MAPS Station; FC, Fallbrook Creek; SLR, San Luis Rey River; PL, Pilgrim Creek. Band colors: PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; PUOR, plastic purple-orange split; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; pupu, metal purple; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; gogo, metal gold; Mye, yellow numbered metal band; BKBK, plastic black; Msi, silver numbered federal band; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; BYST, plastic black-yellow striped; OROR, plastic orange; YEPU, plastic yellow-purple split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; YEYE, plastic yellow; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; WHWH, plastic white; DBDP, plastic dark blue-dark pink split; WHDB, plastic white-dark blue split;. Sex: M, male; F, female. Abbreviations: km, kilometer, ≥, greater than or equal to; —, no bands observed]

Drainage/territory Last seen

2020

Distance moved (km)

Band combination Right leg

Age, in years, 2020

Sex

PUYE

WHDP Mgo

≥2

Left leg

Last seen in 2019 SMR/IMP

DL/DS13

SMR/DRO

SMR/HW14

ORPU Mgo

ORPU

≥6

SMR/SM MAPS

SMR/ES28

DPWH Mgo

PUOR

≥2

SMR/VLE

SMR/AH27

—

BPST

≥3

SMR/PEP

SMR/AH09

WHPU Mgo

ORDG

≥4

SMR/RNR

SMR/AH10

pupu

BKYE Mgo

≥2

SMR/DAQ

SMR/HE41

WHPU Mgo

—

≥6

SMR/ES16

SMR/ES32

WHDP

ORDG Mgo

≥6

SMR/RR06

SMR/RR37

PUWH gogo

Mye

≥4

SMR/ES13

SMR/REY

ORDG

BKBK Mgo

SMR/ES19

SMR/ES05

WHDP

WHDP Mgo

SMR/BOW

SMR/HE05

OROR

YEPU Mgo

SMR/HE21

SMR/HE08

—

BPST

SMR/ARL

SMR/AH08

WHPU

YEBK Mgo

SMR/BN11

SMR/BN20

OROR

ORPU Mgo

≥4

SMR/ES30

SMR/ES28

OROR

DPDP Mgo

≥4

SMR/HE18

SMR/HE19

BPST

OROR Mgo

SMR/ATL

SMR/AH19

ORDG

PUOR Mgo

≥6

SMR/MER

SMR/HE06

BPST

PUOR Mgo

≥2

SMR/BN10

SMR/BN18

YEYE

Mgo

≥4

SMR/ES28

SMR/ES30

BPST

WHWH Mdb

SMR/HW13

SMR/HW20

ORDG

BPST Mgo

SMR/RR24

SMR/RR30

ORDG

YEBK Mgo

SMR/ERM

DL/DS14

0.1

PUWH Mgo

BPST

≥2

SMR/BN10

SMR/SM MAPS

0.1

BKBK

ORPU Msi

≥2

FC/OL04

FC/OL13

0.1

DGOR

BPST Mgo

SMR/FAU

SMR/AH07

0.1

PUWH Mgo

BYST

≥3

SMR/ZUS

SMR/AH04

0.1

WHPU

WHWH Mgo

≥2

SMR/BN21

SMR/BN19

0.1

—

WHPU

SMR/HDS

SMR/AH38

0.1

DPWH Mgo

DGOR

SMR/MOU

SMR/AH18

0.1

DPWH

BPST Mgo

SMR/WOM

DL/DS16

0.1

ORDG

BKYE Mgo

≥3

SMR/MOR

SMR/HE13

0.1

WHDP

—

≥4

SMR/SM MAPS

SMR/PNA

0.1

PUOR

BKYE Mgo

Appendix 5. Between-Year Movement of Adult Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 63 Table 5.1. Between-year movement of adult Least Bell’s Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued [Drainage codes: SMR, Santa Margarita River; DL, De Luz Creek; SM MAPS, Santa Margarita MAPS Station; FC, Fallbrook Creek; SLR, San Luis Rey River; PL, Pilgrim Creek. Band colors: PUYE, plastic purple-yellow split; WHDP, plastic white-dark pink split; Mgo, gold numbered federal band; ORPU, plastic orange-purple split; DPWH, plastic dark pink-white split; PUOR, plastic purple-orange split; BPST, plastic black-pink striped; WHPU, plastic white-purple split; ORDG, plastic orange-dark green split; pupu, metal purple; BKYE, plastic black-yellow split; PUWH, plastic purple-white split; gogo, metal gold; Mye, yellow numbered metal band; BKBK, plastic black; Msi, silver numbered federal band; DGOR, plastic dark green-orange split; BYST, plastic black-yellow striped; OROR, plastic orange; YEPU, plastic yellow-purple split; YEBK, plastic yellow-black split; DPDP, plastic dark pink; YEYE, plastic yellow; Mdb, dark blue numbered federal band; WHWH, plastic white; DBDP, plastic dark blue-dark pink split; WHDB, plastic white-dark blue split;. Sex: M, male; F, female. Abbreviations: km, kilometer, ≥, greater than or equal to; —, no bands observed]

Drainage/territory Last seen

2020

Distance moved (km)

Band combination Left leg

Right leg

Age, in years, 2020

Sex

DPWH

Last seen in 2019—Continued SMR/RR27

SMR/RR18

0.1

YEPU Mgo

SMR/BRA

SMR/HW08

0.1

WHPU Mgo

WHPU

SMR/JAG

SMR/AH14

0.1

BKBK

WHPU Mdb

SMR/HLD

SMR/HE03

0.1

WHPU

WHPU Mgo

≥2

SMR/ARY

SMR/HW58

0.1

BYST

PUOR Mgo

≥4

SMR/HW07

SMR/HW45

0.1

ORDG

YEYE Mgo

SMR/ZAM

SMR/HW27

0.1

WHDP

ORPU Mgo

DL/MRT

DL/DS15

0.1

OROR

PUOR Mgo

≥4

SMR/ES07

SMR/PAL

0.1

YEPU

ORDG Mgo

≥5

SMR/BAE

SMR/HW04

0.1

BKYE

WHWH Mgo

≥2

SMR/FRAS

SMR/ES25

0.2

BKBK

ORDG Msi

≥2

SMR/FKI

SMR/HE59

0.2

BPST

ORDG Mgo

SMR/SM MAPS

SMR/CON

0.3

BKYE Mgo

DPDP

≥2

SMR/HE35

SMR/HE57

0.3

BYST

PUWH Mgo

DL/DS02

DL/DS20

0.6

DPWH Mgo

BPST

≥3

SMR/GEN

SMR/AE54

0.9

BKBK Mgo

BPST

SMR/APO

DL/DS09

2.7

PUWH Mgo

BKBK

SMR/IBX

SMR/HE39

4.7

ORDG

ORPU Mgo

SLR/FRAS

PL/PS15

8.1

BKBK

DBDP Mdb

SMR/ZAM

SMR/HW38

YEYE

PUOR Mgo

SMR/HE47

SMR/HE17

0.1

ORDG Mgo

YEYE

SMR/RR11

SMR/RR15

0.1

YEPU

DPWH Mgo

SMR/HE07

SMR/HE72

0.1

BPST

DPDP Mgo

SMR/BN48

SMR/BOR

0.2

YEYE

YEPU Mgo

≥3

SMR/BN34

SMR/CAN

0.4

YEYE Mdb

pupu

SMR/ARY

SMR/HE23

1.8

WHPU Mgo

YEPU

SLR/WMON

SMR/BN18

4.2

DPDP Mdb

BPST

SLR/WFIR

PL/PS30

6.9

WHPU Mdb

DPWH

YEPU Mdb

YEYE

BKYE

YEYE Mgo

Last seen in 2018

Last seen in 2017 SMR/ES25

SMR/PAL

SMR/MOR

SMR/CHW

4.3

Last seen in 2016 SMR/LNS

SMR/HW03

0.8

ORDG Mgo

WHPU

≥5

SLR/BRAT

SMR/JAB

7.5

WHDB Mdb

WHDB

64 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report

Appendix 6. Status and Nesting Activities of Least Bell's Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 Table 6.1. Status and nesting activities of Least Bell's Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020. [Monitoring: F, fully monitored territory, P, partially monitored territory. Nest fate: SUC, fledged at least one Least Bell’s Vireo young; INC, nest not completed; PRE, nest failure caused by predation; UNK, reason for nest failure/abandonment unknown; FAL, false nest, built by male; OTH, nest failed with known cause other than predation or parasitism. Abbreviation: No., number; —, no data]

Territory

Nest

Monitoring

Nest fate

No. fledged

Comments Seep site

CHW

SUC

—

CHW

SUC

—

GRD

SUC

—

GRD

SUC

—

JAB

INC

—

JAB

SUC

—

KNO

INC

—

KNO

SUC

—

KYL

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings, one egg or nestling disappeared after hatching and before nest was depredated.

KYL

SUC

—

PAL

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

PAL

SUC

—

REY

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

REY

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings, two eggs or nestlings disappeared after hatching and before nest was depredated.

REY

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

SKY

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

SLO

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

SLO

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

VAD

SUC

—

VAD

SUC

—

WIC

SUC

—

WIC

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

YOD

UNK

—

Abandoned with eggs after rain.

YOD

SUC

—

YOD

SUC

— Reference sites

ACA

SUC

—

ACA

INC

—

ACA

UNK

—

Abandoned with fully developed eggs.

AMO

SUC

—

ANZ

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

ANZ

INC

—

ANZ

SUC

—

ARA

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

Appendix 6. Status and Nesting Activities of Least Bell's Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020 65 Table 6.1. Status and nesting activities of Least Bell's Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued [Monitoring: F, fully monitored territory, P, partially monitored territory. Nest fate: SUC, fledged at least one Least Bell’s Vireo young; INC, nest not completed; PRE, nest failure caused by predation; UNK, reason for nest failure/abandonment unknown; FAL, false nest, built by male; OTH, nest failed with known cause other than predation or parasitism. Abbreviation: No., number; —, no data]

Territory

Nest

Monitoring

Nest fate

No. fledged

Comments

Reference sites—Continued ARA

SUC

—

ARM

SUC

—

ARW

INC

—

ARW

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

ARW

SUC

—

BAX

SUC

—

BGT

SUC

—

BOR

PRE

—

Failed before hatching confirmed.

BOR

SUC

—

BRM

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

BRM

UNK

—

Abandoned, no eggs observed.

CAP

SUC

—

CRA

INC

—

CRA

SUC

—

CRX

FAL

—

CRX

PRE

—

Eggs not observed.

CRX

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

CSAL

OTH

—

Rain destroyed nest.

CSAL

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

CSAL

SUC

—

ELR

SUC

—

ELR

SUC

—

ENC

SUC

—

FRO

SUC

—

FRO

SUC

—

FRX

SUC

—

GAL

PRE

—

Failed before hatching confirmed.

GAN

SUC

—

GIM

PRE

—

Failed before hatching confirmed.

ISO

SUC

—

KTM

SUC

—

KTM

SUC

—

LEG

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

LEG

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

LEG

SUC

—

MAL

SUC

—

MRY

SUC

—

MRY

SUC

—

NAZ

SUC

—

OPT

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

66 Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell’s Vireo—2020 Annual Report Table 6.1. Status and nesting activities of Least Bell's Vireos at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, 2020.—Continued [Monitoring: F, fully monitored territory, P, partially monitored territory. Nest fate: SUC, fledged at least one Least Bell’s Vireo young; INC, nest not completed; PRE, nest failure caused by predation; UNK, reason for nest failure/abandonment unknown; FAL, false nest, built by male; OTH, nest failed with known cause other than predation or parasitism. Abbreviation: No., number; —, no data]

Territory

Nest

Monitoring

Nest fate

No. fledged

Comments

Reference sites—Continued OPT

SUC

—

PIP

SUC

—

PNA

SUC

—

PNA

SUC

—

RHI

UNK

—

Supporting branch broke.

RHI

SUC

—

ROK

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

ROK

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

RUB

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

RUB

PRE

—

Failed with nestlings.

SAG

UNK

—

Abandoned with eggs.

SAG

SUC

—

SAG

PRE

—

Failed before hatching confirmed.

OTH

—

Abandoned with eggs after rain.

UNK

—

Abandoned, no eggs observed.

SLX

SUC

—

SMO

PRE

—

Failed with eggs.

SMW

SUC

—

TET

SUC

—

TET

SUC

—

VIT

SUC

—

For more information concerning the research in this report, contact the Director, California Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 6000 J Street, Placer Hall Sacramento, California 95819 https://www.usgs.gov/centers/california-water-science-center Publishing support provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Science Publishing Network, Sacramento Publishing Service Center

Lynn and others—Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo—2020 Annual Report—OFR 2024–1009

ISSN 2331-1258 (online) https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241009

Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020 Annual Report

Related documents