Bielefeld Pub
metadata only
Assessing the Quality of Evidence Regarding Permanently Listed Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) in Germany: A Scoping Review
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Navigating the DiGA jungle: A taxonomy and archetypal framework of the German digital therapeutics landscape.#455414
- Digital Evidence: Facilitating what and for whom?#168669
- Ethical and legal reconfiguration of clinical practice in the European Union (1997–2020): a hermeneutic analysis from a principle-based perspective. From the Oviedo Convention to the General Data Protection Regulation: informed consent, regulatory harmonization, and data governance#241352
- UC Comments NIH's RFI on Developing Consent Language for Research Using Digital Health Technologies (NOT-OD-24-002)#624289
- Institutional Operationalisation of the Converging EU Digital Rulebook for Trustworthy AI-in-Health Research#328838
Record · ID 622751
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive