PubMed
open access
Unpacking the black box - a questionnaire study of how medical journals identify and manage conflicts of interest of editors and peer reviewers.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Unpacking the black box - a questionnaire study of how medical journals identify and manage conflicts of interest of editors and peer reviewers#120287
- From policing authors to stewarding science: Governing artificial intelligence across the scientific publishing pipeline in medical journals#436211
- Author Gender Inequality in Medical Imaging Journals and the COVID-19 Pandemic#669970
- Changes In Scientific Publishing: A Heuristic For Analysis#657602
- The Tip of the Iceberg? Insights into the Prevalence of Publication Bias in Two Probability-Based Academic Panels#162890
Record · ID 626387
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive