Kaur Khurana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1120, 2026 fc 1120 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1120, (canlii), imm-5918-25, 2026, citizenship and immigration, temporary resident visas, judicial review, refusal based on financial insufficiency and family ties outside canada, applicants challenge refusal of applications for temporary resident visas, officer’s findings assessed for reasonableness, decision unresponsive to evidence and submissions, application for judicial review granted, decision set aside, matter remitted, citizenship and immigration, temporary resident visas, financial resources, whether it was reasonable to refuse for insufficient assets and financial situation, bank statement showed lump sum deposits with identified origins, visitors not required by statute to demonstrate sufficient and available financial resources, malasi v canada (citizenship and immigration), akhoondian v canada (citizenship and immigration), refusal set aside, administrative law, reasonableness review, vavilov responsiveness, whether failure to mention detailed financial evidence and a key argument rendered reasons unreasonable, certified evidence from accountants and banking representatives not addressed, submission on family connections ignored, canada (minister of citizenship and immigration) v vavilov, paras 126, 127 applied, decision found unreasonable, matter remitted, citizenship and immigration, temporary resident visas, family ties outside canada, whether it was reasonable to find no significant family ties outside canada, officer ignored submission that mother, spouse’s mother, and other relatives live in india, connections described as integral to applicants, failure to mention key argument rendered refusal unreasonable, application for judicial review granted, redetermination ordered