Forcades v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1117, 2026 fc 1117 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1117, (canlii), imm-23532-24, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, canada (minister of citizenship and immigration) v vavilov, whether the officer’s h&c decision was unreasonable, review confined to the reasons and decision, maker’s reasoning process, findings coherent, rational, and responsive to submissions, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, humanitarian and compassionate grounds, irpa, s. 25, kanthasamy v canada (citizenship and immigration), whether the officer unreasonably refused h&c relief, equitable relief requires weighing all relevant facts and factors, establishment and family financial support weighed against negative factors, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, temporary residence and status, immigration and refugee protection regulations, s. 202, whether issuance of work permits meant the applicant had status, work permit does not, by reason only, confer temporary resident status, officer’s conclusion consistent with the regulations, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, establishment in canada, non, compliance with immigration laws, whether the officer unreasonably weighed failure to regularize status, disregard for immigration laws given significant negative weight, failure to regularize status can mitigate establishment (giles mendoza), establishment alone insufficient, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, hardship on return, country conditions and risk, whether the officer unreasonably assessed treatment of deserters and personal risk, generalized risk and personal situation considered, prior rpd denial and prra refusal treated as relevant, insufficient evidence of claimed treatment found, application dismissed