Gurnsey v. Canada (Attorney General)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1104, 2026 fc 1104 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1104, (canlii), t-1754-25, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, canada recovery benefits act, whether officer reasonably found applicant did not earn at least $5,000, self, employment income calculated as revenue less expenses, s. 3(2), reliance on t2125 and cra system entries for net income, decision justified, intelligible, transparent, application for judicial review dismissed, evidence, judicial review record, admissibility, access copyright, whether documents not before decision, maker are admissible on judicial review, exceptions for background, procedural defects, or complete absence of evidence, documents attached to affidavit outside respondent’s record not within exceptions, exclusion does not affect result, documents not admissible, procedure, federal courts rules, style of cause, rule 303(2), whether canada revenue agency was correctly named as respondent, proper respondent on judicial review under federal courts rules, rule 303(2), consent of parties to amendment, style of cause amended, respondent name replaced, procedure, costs, rule 400, whether nominal costs should be awarded to successful party, discretion over costs under federal courts rules, rule 400, nominal costs requested without explanation, self, represented applicant and good faith application considered, no order for costs