Mosca v Landmark West Capital Management Inc

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, abca, 2026abca281, 2026 abca 281 (canlii), 2026, abca, 281, (canlii), 2501-0261ac, 2026, procedure, appeals, application to reopen and reargue, costs, whether the costs decision should be varied so parties bear their own costs, no formal judgment entered, reconsideration of appeal considered, panel aware of procedural history, no exceptional circumstances warranting reargument, application denied, procedure, appeals, reargument, exceptional circumstances, whether court was misled, overlooked or misapprehended evidence, or made a patent error, tailleur v mckiernan test applied, reargument not to remake arguments made or that might have been made, exceptional circumstances not established, application denied, procedure, alberta rules of court, variation of judgment, rule 9.13, rule 14.38(2)(c), whether there is a good reason to vary the costs award, or to reopen and reargue, guided by same considerations, no basis shown to reconsider costs decision, costs award not varied, application denied, procedure, costs, costs of application, written submissions, whether costs should be awarded for the application where respondents made no submissions, deadline set for responding materials, no further submissions received, no costs awarded for the application, no costs awarded for the application