CanLIImetadata only
Zhuromsky v Calgary (City)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, abca, 2026abca271, 2026 abca 271 (canlii), 2026, abca, 271, (canlii), 2601-0150ac, 2026, municipalities, land use planning, development permits and zoning bylaw definitions, interpretation of “rowhouse building” and “secondary suite”, did the board err in interpreting the bylaw, permitted or discretionary use in the r, cg district, maximum density alleged to be exceeded, municipal government act, s. 688(3) applied, permission to appeal granted, procedure, appeals, permission to appeal test, municipal government act, s. 688(3), whether proposed ground involves a question of law or jurisdiction, extricable question of law versus mixed fact and law, cumulative requirements of importance and reasonable chance of success, scope of limited appellate review in planning matters, permission to appeal granted on one issue, administrative law, procedural fairness, tribunal hearing management, acceptance of multiple revised plans during appeal process, denial of adjournment application, whether exercise of discretion gave rise to a question of law or jurisdiction, procedural unfairness alleged but not of sufficient importance, adjournment between hearing dates considered, permission to appeal denied on this issue
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 638441
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.