42nd Dental Inc (Amara Dental) v Mouhamad

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, abca, 2026abca266, 2026 abca 266 (canlii), 2026, abca, 266, (canlii), 2601-0167ac, 2026, procedure, appeals, extension of time, alberta rules of court, rule 14.8(2)(a)(iii), time to file notice of appeal runs from order pronounced, order settlement or entry does not change deadline, dispute about form of order not a sufficient excuse, notice of appeal filed late, application dismissed, procedure, appeals, settling the order, alberta rules of court, rules 9.2 and 9.3, rule 14.8(2)(a)(iii), whether delay to settle a disputed order justifies extending time, “genuine intention to appeal” and filing within designated appeal period, dispute about form of order does not change running of time, application dismissed, procedure, appeals, mootness, whether proposed appeal has no practical effect due to change in circumstances, no live controversy where notification process and record transfers will be completed before appeal heard, appeal would be essentially advisory on residual records, appeal without arguable merit, application dismissed, health, health information, custody of patient records, health information act, whether appeal is an advisory question to ensure compliance with college bylaws, assurance of compliance with professional obligations to forward records per patient wishes, court of appeal not a substitute for seeking direction from the college, insufficient merit to extend time, application dismissed