S.B. v K.B.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, skca, 2026skca88, 2026 skca 88 (canlii), 2026, skca, 88, (canlii), cacv4336, 2026, family, appeal, standard of review in parenting determinations, whether the trial judge’s best interests order on parenting time and primary residence after school entry should be disturbed, deference absent legal error or palpable and overriding error, s.a.r. v a.k.l., hickey v hickey applied, shared parenting until school age, primary care with respondent if no relocation, appeal dismissed, family, parenting, status quo weight, did the trial judge err by mischaracterizing and giving weight to a unilateral status quo, child‑centred inquiry considers lived reality, connections, and interim orders, impact on non‑moving parent’s relationship and ability to promote contact assessed, no reweighing of factors on appeal, appeal dismissed, statutory interpretation, children’s law act, 2020, relocation definition, whether this was a relocation engaging s. 15 where the appellant had a “pending application”, term interpreted textually, contextually and purposively, focus on significant impact on relationship, trial judge erred in characterization but conducted relocation analysis in substance, error not material to outcome, appeal dismissed, family, parenting, stability and primary residence, did the trial judge err in concluding the child’s stability and life were in saskatoon, near shared parenting acknowledged, but supports, activities, and circle of family in saskatoon emphasized, findings open to trier of fact, no palpable and overriding error, appeal dismissed, family, family violence, best interests, whether findings and weight given to family violence under cla s. 10 were erroneous, single incident established, other allegations not proven, credibility assessed, factor weighed alongside willingness to promote relationship and child’s needs and stability, no overemphasis shown, appeal dismissed