ConceptioArchiveCanLII
CanLIImetadata only

R. v. MacKinnon

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal · License: Open Access
Open Source ↗
appealapplicationcanadacanadiancaselawcourtopinionevidencehearing
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nsca, 2026nsca54, 2026 nsca 54 (canlii), 2026, nsca, 54, (canlii), cac 551486, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, ancillary orders, criminal code, s. 161, whether sentencing judge had jurisdiction to amend s. 161 order of prohibition post, sentencing, variation requirements under s. 161(3), application, notice, hearing, functus officio and no legal authority to revisit order, amended order set aside, original order restored, procedure, appeal, jurisdiction and notice, whether unilateral amendment of ancillary order without notice constituted reversible error, no notice to parties and no request by crown or offender, miscarriage of justice found from unlawful amendment of s. 161 order, leave to appeal sentence granted, appeal allowed, evidence, appeal, fresh evidence, whether affidavits should be admitted in the interests of justice, r. v. wolkins, credible and sufficient evidence establishing procedural and jurisdictional errors, uncontradicted affidavits explaining provenance of amended s. 161 order, fresh evidence admitted, appeal allowed, original order restored
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 638493
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.