R. v. Amin

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, ykca, 2026ykca11, 2026 ykca 11 (canlii), 2026, ykca, 11, (canlii), 23-yu910, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, ranges, whether the judge erred in applying the white range to an assault where the victim was awake and protesting, continuum approach to yukon sexual assault range affirmed, proportionality and parity correctly applied, 20 months for count 2, persistence in face of communicated non‑consent and penetration considered, appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, conditional sentence orders, is a conditional sentence appropriate given denunciation and deterrence in sexual assault cases?, stigma of house arrest in calgary compared to a small community addressed, support letters and first‑offender status weighed, proulx and maslehati principles considered, conditional sentence refused, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, mitigating and aggravating factors, did the judge treat the not guilty plea and lack of remorse or insight as aggravating?, comparator cases involved guilty pleas and remorse distinguished, absence of plea not adding to sentence acknowledged, rehabilitation prospects and counselling recognised, no error in principle, evidence, appeal, fresh evidence, should post‑sentence family and immigration consequences be admitted on appeal?, palmer and sipos criteria applied, collateral immigration consequences considered at sentencing, pham distinguished, evidence would not have affected the result on fitness of sentence, fresh evidence not admitted