R. v. P.S. Sidhu Trucking Ltd.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, ykca, 2026ykca7, 2026 ykca 7 (canlii), 2026, ykca, 7, (canlii), 26-yu940, 2026, procedure, appeals, interlocutory orders, whether territorial court order was interlocutory and not appealable under s. 813 until completion of the prosecution, characterisation of order removing non‑lawyer representative, application of r. v. druken to summary conviction context, no appellate jurisdiction mid‑trial, interlocutory ruling to be reviewed after trial, applications dismissed, statutory interpretation, criminal code, summary conviction appeals, does s. 839(1)(a) require leave to appeal from a s. 813 decision via s. 822(1)?, interpretation of s. 839(1)(a) and linkage to s. 822 processes, misapprehension that s. 813 appeals avoid leave rejected, questions of law alone and reasonable possibility of success not met, leave to appeal refused, procedure, extensions, time to appeal, should an extension of time be granted where the proposed appeal has no reasonable possibility of success?, extension analysis considers merits per r. v. carlick and buencamino, interests of justice do not support extension for unmeritorious appeal, notice late and appeal doomed to fail, extension of time refused, criminal and statutory offences, appeals, interlocutory appeals in regulatory prosecutions, are there recognised exceptions or alternative pathways permitting mid‑trial appellate review?, rule against interlocutory appeals affirmed per r. v. holland and rodrigue, extraordinary remedies or distinct charter proceedings distinguished from s. 813 and s. 830 appeals, no applicable exception established, appeal dismissed