R v Ulayuruluk

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nuca, 2025nuca7, 2025 nuca 7 (canlii), 2025, nuca, 7, (canlii), 01-23-012-cap, 2025, criminal infractions, second, degree murder, intoxication, specific intent, appellant convicted of second, degree murder after stabbing victim with significant force, did the trial judge err in finding the appellant had the specific intent for murder despite intoxication?, application of "common, sense inference" to determine intent, r v walle framework applied to assess foreseeability of consequences and intent, evidence, intoxication, circumstantial evidence, trial judge relied on circumstantial evidence, including severity of the stab wound, appellant's actions, and statements, did the trial judge err in applying the "common, sense inference" without first finding the appellant knew the degree of force used?, governing principles from r v villaroman and r v walle applied, evidence, cumulative assessment, piecemeal analysis, appellant argued trial judge failed to consider evidence cumulatively in determining intent, did the trial judge err in assessing evidence piecemeal?, trial judge's reasons demonstrated consideration of all evidence, including intoxication, remorse, and lack of motive, criminal procedure, appeals, sufficiency of reasons, appellant challenged trial judge's reliance on circumstantial evidence and reasoning process, was the trial judge's reliance on circumstantial evidence sufficient to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt?, trial judge's findings upheld on appeal, with no error in reasoning or application of legal principles