R v Ikkidluak

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nuca, 2025nuca4, 2025 nuca 4 (canlii), 2025, nuca, 4, (canlii), 08-24-012-cap, 2025, criminal procedure, sentencing, joint sentencing recommendations, rejection of joint recommendations after trial, sentencing judge rejecting a four, year joint recommendation and imposing a nine, year sentence, did the sentencing judge err in rejecting the joint recommendation without sufficient notice or reasons?, framework for assessing joint sentencing recommendations post, trial, r v anthony, cook, 2016 scc 43, applied, evidence, sentencing, gravity of offences, mischaracterization of facts, improper reliance on more egregious precedents, sentencing judge misdescribing the facts of the third assault and comparing the case to more severe sexual assault cases, did the sentencing judge err in assessing the gravity of the offences?, requirement to situate offences on a spectrum of seriousness, indigenous peoples, sentencing, rehabilitation and collateral consequences, offender’s prospects for rehabilitation and impact of incarceration on indigenous offenders, sentencing judge failing to consider the appellant’s loss of employment, family separation, and rehabilitation prospects, did the sentencing judge err in failing to account for collateral consequences and rehabilitation?, gladue principles and collateral consequences in sentencing, criminal procedure, sentencing, totality principle, application of totality principle to consecutive sentences, sentencing judge imposing a nine, year sentence without adequately considering proportionality or rehabilitation, did the sentencing judge err in applying the totality principle?, requirement to ensure combined sentence is not unduly harsh or crushing, r v hutchings, 2012 nlca 2, applied