Rahman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1106, 2026 fc 1106 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1106, (canlii), imm-24028-24, 2026, citizenship and immigration, permanent residence, quebec investor class, immigration and refugee protection act, subs. 11(1), 12(2), immigration and refugee protection regulations, s. 90(2), judicial review of refusal for failure to demonstrate intent to reside in quebec, assessment based on settlement and business plans, travel, french studies, and supporting documents, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, quebec selection, intention to reside in quebec, whether the officer reasonably found the applicant did not intend to reside in quebec, onus on applicant to provide sufficient evidence, lack of detail on housing, schools, french learning, and business location considered, limited time in quebec and timing of efforts weighed, application for judicial review dismissed, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, canada (minister of citizenship and immigration) v vavilov, 2019 scc 65, whether reasons were justified, intelligible and responsive to the stakes, officer’s chain of analysis on intention to reside in quebec assessed against record constraints, no fatal flaws or serious shortcomings found, application for judicial review dismissed, evidence, administrative decision, making, sufficiency of evidence, whether the officer ignored or unreasonably discounted evidence of divesting assets, business location inquiries, and supporting letter, bare statement of “ca $ 3275300” and lack of supporting documents considered, email and interview answers found not to support asserted facts, application for judicial review dismissed