Evertz Technologies Limited v. Providius Corp.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, onca, 2026onca628, 2026 onca 628 (canlii), 2026, onca, 628, (canlii), coa-24-cv-1252, 2026, procedure, costs, appeal, whether substantial indemnity costs are warranted, substantial indemnity requires “reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct”, litigation conduct described as misleading the court and abuse of process, stay of action defended on appeal, substantial indemnity refused, procedure, costs, fixing costs, what all, inclusive appeal costs should be fixed, stakes of appeal and extra work in defending decision considered, appellant expenditure on appeal noted, lack of analysis of bill of costs addressed, costs fixed at partial indemnity, all, inclusive, procedure, costs, apportionment, whether time spent on shared issues should reduce costs, argument that respondent was unsuccessful on “central common issue” rejected, explanation for lead role on shared issues accepted, success in responding to appeal of stay recognised, reduction refused