Bordignon v Bordignon

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca373, 2026 bcca 373 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 373, (canlii), ca50079, 2026, procedure, chambers applications, inactive list and appeal management, whether the main appeal should not be placed on the inactive list, whether leave should be granted to proceed with the support appeal, delay attributed to mediated settlement negotiations and manoeuvring, interests of justice and fairness between appeal and cross appeal, main appeal remains active, leave granted, procedure, stay or dismissal, non, compliance with orders below, whether an appellant should be refused a hearing for failure to comply with payments and support orders, due administration of justice discretion, larkin v glase, garousi v garousi, application bound up with merits, single justice in chambers versus division, application referred to division assigned to hear appeals, procedure, court of appeal rules, inactive list, court of appeal rules, r 50(a), whether the main appeal qualifies as inactive and should be placed on the inactive list, administrative oversight identified, interests of justice assessed, appeal should remain active, main appeal should not be placed on the inactive list, procedure, abandonment and reactivation, leave to proceed, court of appeal rules, r 50(3) and r 51, whether it is in the interests of justice to reactivate an appeal on the inactive list, factors from kar recovery, ltd. v kda and deline v kidd, delay explained and prejudice addressed, leave to proceed granted, procedure, disbursements, transcripts, whether the cost of transcript preparation should be funded from money held in trust from sale proceeds and shared, appellant says he lacks means, respondent disputes and alleges hiding assets, cross appeal expanded issues and extent of transcription required, funding ordered from trust subject to final costs determination by division