R v Pilosio Canada Inc.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, skca, 2026skca97, 2026 skca 97 (canlii), 2026, skca, 97, (canlii), cacr3938, 2026, workplace health and safety, occupational health and safety offence, supplier duties, the saskatchewan employment act, s. 3, 15(a), strict liability offence framework for supplier responsibility, whether supplier ensured equipment was safe when used with instructions, training, modification, and “chain of training” considered, appeal allowed, acquittal restored, statutory interpretation, definition, “supplier”, the saskatchewan employment act, s. 3, 1(1)(ee), whether leasing equipment for use at a place of employment makes the appellant a supplier, modern approach, rizzo & rizzo shoes ltd. (re) applied, remedial public welfare legislation interpreted broadly, r v greater sudbury (city) referenced, supplier finding upheld, appeal allowed, statutory interpretation, standard, “reasonably practicable”, the saskatchewan employment act, s. 3, 1(1)(z), whether “reasonably practicable” means “possible” or “possible given current knowledge, technology and invention”, gross disproportion definition applied, trial judge’s approach upheld, supplier’s measures found sufficient on trial findings, appeal allowed, acquittal restored, procedure, appellate review, unreasonable verdict, new trial, whether the summary conviction appeal judge erred in treating a misapprehension about knowledge of shipment and site use as essential to the verdict, whether the acquittal was unreasonable, misapprehension found not material to conclusion on safety with instructions, new trial order set aside, appeal allowed, acquittal restored