Sorensen v. Ong

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nsca, 2026nsca66, 2026 nsca 66 (canlii), 2026, nsca, 66, (canlii), ca 546115, 2026, family, corollary relief, appeal, spousal support and division of property challenged, appellant sought redetermination alleging errors in entitlement, valuation, and reasons, appellate deference to fact finding, mixed fact and law, and discretion affirmed, no error in law or fact found, appeal dismissed, family, spousal support, divorce act, s. 15.2, entitlement and quantum, whether trial judge erred in awarding retroactive and prospective spousal support, compensatory and non, compensatory considerations, condition, means, needs, and circumstances addressed, reasons read contextually and functionally, no material error, serious misapprehension, or error of law, appeal dismissed, property, matrimonial property, matrimonial property act, classification and valuation, whether trial judge erred regarding debts on a real property, exclusion of a condominium, and reimbursement of a transfer of funds, credibility findings and adverse inference for non, disclosure of banking records, no palpable and overriding error, division upheld, appeal dismissed, procedure, reasons, sufficiency of reasons on appeal, r. v. g.f., r. v. sheppard, r. v. r.e.m., whether reasons precluded meaningful appellate review, functional and contextual reading in light of record, issues, and submissions, sufficiency not a free, standing ground of appeal, reasons provided intelligible basis for review, appeal dismissed