Europe PMC
open access
CC BY 4.0
Why collective AI assurance cannot target agents or networks in isolation
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assurance-Scoped Reliability for Agentic Networks: Capturing the State That Matters#410976
- The Ontology of Collective Machine Intelligence Toward a Philosophy of AI Communities#724685
- AI YOU CAN TRUST: UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF STRUCTURAL ASSURANCE AND SITUATIONAL NORMALITY IN THE USE OF GENERATIVE AI#414638
- Reply to Van der Stigchel et al.: Empirical evidence that AI survey contamination is real and substantial#1053057
- Debiased Inference for AI-Generated Data without Gold-Standard Labels: Identification via Multiple Imperfect Measurements#819451
Record · ID 669758
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive