Guevara Robles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1134, 2026 fc 1134 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1134, (canlii), imm-8873-25, 2026, citizenship and immigration, inadmissibility, human or international rights violations, irpa, para. 35(1)(a), irpr, s. 15(b), judicial review of immigration appeal division decision on complicity in crimes against humanity, whether de novo admissibility hearing may depart from refugee appeal division findings, decision set aside and remitted to immigration appeal division, statutory interpretation, regulations, irpr, para. 15(b), modern approach, rizzo & rizzo shoes ltd (re), vavilov, whether decision, maker relied on plain language without text, context and purpose, interpretation of “has committed” and silence on negative findings, incomplete interpretive analysis found unreasonable, application for judicial review granted, procedure, res judicata, issue estoppel, danyluk v ainsworth technologies inc, whether issue estoppel applied to refugee appeal division findings of fact in subsequent inadmissibility appeal, failure to identify and analyse angle preconditions and discretionary step, reasons silent on central argument, decision found not transparent or intelligible, matter remitted, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, vavilov, mason, whether reasons provided responsive justification to key submissions and legal constraints, failure to grapple with res judicata and issue estoppel arguments and statutory context, tribunal reasons could not be supplemented on review, decision unreasonable, judicial review allowed, deportation order set aside and reconsideration ordered