Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (All)
arXiv (All) open access

Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Making

Pillai, Abhirami · arxiv_all
arXiv (All) · Papers
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
econometricsg-3i-2-6machine-learning
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2604.26169] Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Making Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2604.26169 (cs) [Submitted on 28 Apr 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 28 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Making Authors: Abhirami Pillai View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Treatment allocation under budget constraints is a central challenge in digital advertising. The standard approach trains an offline uplift model on historical data, then solves a constrained optimization to allocate budget. This fails in cold-start settings where little historical data exists. We propose Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits (BCCB), an online framework that learns which users respond to ads while simultaneously spending the budget. BCCB unifies three components: learning individual-level treatment effects, exploring users whose response is uncertain, and pacing the budget over time. We derive the per-arrival decision rule as the KKT condition of a Lagrangian relaxation of the budgeted causal-allocation objective, providing a principled foundation for the algorithm. We evaluate on the Criteo Uplift dataset using 20 random seeds with paired statistical tests. Our central finding is a data-efficiency crossover at n = 7,500 historical observations (paired one-sided t-test, p = 0.043): below this threshold, offline pipelines either fail or produce unreliable allocations, while BCCB operates from the first user. BCCB exhibits 2-4x lower run-to-run variance than offline methods and outperforms all four online baselines (Thompson Sampling, budgeted Thompson Sampling, HTE Greedy, and Uplifting Bandits) at every budget level tested (p < 0.001). These results give practitioners a concrete decision rule for choosing between offline and online paradigms. Comments: 17 pages, 5 tables. v2: Expanded to 20 random seeds with paired statistical tests; formal crossover test at n=7,500 (p=0.043); added Uplifting Bandits (Hsieh et al., NeurIPS 2022) as fifth baseline; Lagrangian derivation of decision rule with Proposition 1; hyperparameter sensitivity analysis; corrected mathematical claims Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) ; Econometrics (econ.EM); Machine Learning (stat.ML) ACM classes: I.2.6; G.3 Cite as: arXiv:2604.26169 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2604.26169v2 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.26169 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Abhirami Pillai [ view email ] [v1] Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:24:26 UTC (487 KB) [v2] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 02:56:12 UTC (28 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs econ econ.EM stat stat.ML References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender ( What is IArxiv? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

Record · ID 684438 · SHA-256 5e0507e4aedb7610
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive