AFFORDANCE20Q: Evaluating Affordance Reasoning from Physical Properties

[2606.14240] AFFORDANCE20Q: Evaluating Affordance Reasoning from Physical Properties Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2606.14240 (cs) [Submitted on 12 Jun 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 28 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: AFFORDANCE20Q: Evaluating Affordance Reasoning from Physical Properties Authors: Yifan Jiang , Meige Yang , Zitong Li , Jay Pujara View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Affordance reasoning, the inference of an object's action possibilities from its physical properties (e.g., shape and material), is fundamental to human physical understanding and increasingly critical for Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing affordance benchmarks largely expose explicit object identities in the evaluation setup, allowing models to rely on memorized object-affordance mappings rather than reasoning over physical properties. To address this gap, we introduce Affordance20Q, a novel affordance reasoning benchmark formulated as a 20-Questions game without exposing the object's identity. In each game, the model identifies a hidden object's affordance from a candidate set by asking yes/no questions about its physical properties. Affordance20Q comprises 1,009 games over 454 objects and 59 affordances, all manually filtered, refined, and annotated. We conduct comprehensive experiments with 15 state-of-the-art LLMs and find a substantial gap (~20 points) compared to human performance. A KL-based information-gain (IG) analysis further shows that models fail to ask discriminating questions as the game progresses. To close the gap, we develop KB-Anchored Rule Induction (KARI), a pipeline based on LLMs that generates affordance rules grounded in evidence from knowledge bases (KBs). KARI improves open-source LLMs by up to 15.2 points, while the limited coverage of KBs hinders further gains. We release all our code and data at this https URL . Comments: EMNLP Findings 2026 Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.14240 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2606.14240v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14240 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yifan Jiang [ view email ] [v1] Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:20:19 UTC (1,850 KB) [v2] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:25:44 UTC (1,808 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)

Related documents

• AFFORDANCE20Q: Evaluating Affordance Reasoning from Physical Properties#682720
• Reflectance Physicalism About Color: The Story Continues#742252
• Synergy Makes Direct Perception Inefficient#728184
• Artifacts and affordances: from designed properties to possibilities for action#773219
• Perceiving properties versus perceiving objects#728919