PhilArchive
open access
Change Axiology: From Good State to Dynamic Value Flow
This article proposes Change Axiology as a reconstruction of value theory grounded in Change Ontology and Change Epistemology. It argues that traditional axiology often begins from an implicit good-state assumption, treating value as if it were already oriented toward a desirable state, rule, outcome, or character. Change Axiology instead defines value as a neutral relation of matching between a change-event and a subject's orientation, intention, need, or sustainable continuation under specified conditions and scales. On this basis, good is not the definition of value but one possible classification: high positive matching. The paper develops the concepts of value-flow, subject-environment-scale specification, governing boundary, convergence-divergence, and the value-action matrix. It positions Change Axiology in dialogue with utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, pragmatism, value pluralism, and value-sensitive design, while arguing that dynamic, open, feedback-sensitive domains require an axiology capable of continuous monitoring and revision. The paper concludes by showing how Change Axiology bridges Change Epistemology and Change Praxeology and offers a philosophical foundation for adaptive AI value alignment and ChangeCision AI.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Architecture of meaning: A Natural-Law Framework#82277
- _Consciousness-Interface Ideology_: Process Welfare and Bilateral Verification in AI Ethics#90612
- How Final and Non-Final Valuing Differ#726403
- Putting “Epistemic Injustice” to Work in Bioethics: Beyond Nonmaleficence#729062
- The Philosophical Impossibility of Value Alignment: Temporal Fixation, Ontological Compression, and the Failure of RLHF (The AI-Induced Subjectivity Crisis Series, Paper 5)#710005
Record · ID 688251
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive