Time discounting defended

This paper tentatively defends the claim that temporal proximity always and without exception strengthens certain moral reasons, including one’s reasons to save others – call this view temporalism. Although almost all other philosophers have dismissed temporalism out of hand, I argue that it has some prima facie intuitive plausibility, and is at least somewhat similar to views about partiality that many philosophers already accept. I also defend temporalism against the common objection that it is analogous to claiming that mere spatial proximity can strengthen certain moral reasons. The upshot of this paper is that temporalism is a theoretical live option, which deserves to be taken more seriously in the future.