PhilArchive
open access
Thinking with Cases: An Introduction to Bioethics
Thinking with Cases is an open, case-based introduction to bioethics designed for undergraduate and pre-professional courses—particularly in nursing and the health sciences, though accessible to any reader coming to the field for the first time. An opening chapter develops the conceptual toolkit such courses require: the four principles of biomedical ethics (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice), the major moral theories that stand behind them, the history of informed consent and human-subjects protection from Nuremberg through the Belmont Report, and the practical skill of reconstructing an argument to locate the single premise in dispute. Twelve true case studies then put those tools to work, ranging across the field's classic and contemporary controversies: Dax Cowart's demand to refuse life-saving burn treatment; the Tuskegee and Guatemala syphilis studies; the He Jiankui CRISPR twins; conscientious refusal and provision in post-Dobbs medicine; racial bias in a widely used medical algorithm; the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Skrmetti; and the first transplant of a genetically modified pig heart into a living human. Each case presents opposing positions in their strongest form, reconstructs the central arguments in standard form, and closes on an open question rather than a verdict—inviting students to reach and defend their own judgments. The book is released as an open educational resource under a Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license, free to read, adapt, and teach from.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bioethics met its COVID‐19 Waterloo: The doctor knows best again#748270
- Can LLMs Reason in a Legally Meaningful Manner? A Small-scale Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases#1048777
- A comparative analysis of biomedical research ethics regulation systems in Europe and Latin America with regard to the protection of human subjects#747058
- Reply to Christopher Kaczor on Abortion#105019
- Beyond the central dogma: ecogenomics and the implication for bioethics#106731
Record · ID 688935
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive