PhilArchive
open access
Minimal Morality: A Practical Rational Framework for AI Alignment
Traditional deontology, utilitarianism and ethics ethics carry structural flaws in handling AI ethical issues. Minimal Morality distinguishes two senses of "immoral" and sets eleven practical rational principles based on eight intrinsic human values. It integrates merits of classic ethics and avoids relativism, supplying unified objective criteria for humans, digital algorithms and institutional governance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Turner Problem: Relationality and the Limits of Algorithmic Morality#732294
- Justice in the age of algorithms: can AI weigh morality?#79508
- Ethical AI as a Moral Agent is Impossible: Why Algorithmic Fairness is an Illusion and We Need Democratic AI Governance#106647
- Ethical Issues with Artificial Ethics Assistants#714866
- How AI can AID bioethics#768234
Record · ID 688941
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive